Soluble urokinase plasminogen activator receptor and decline in kidney function among patients without kidney disease.

Background: Hospitalized patients are at an increased risk of developing kidney disease after discharge, often despite the absence of any clinical indicators during hospitalization. Soluble urokinase plasminogen activator receptor (suPAR) is a marker of systemic chronic inflammation that can be measured from routine blood samples. We determined whether elevated suPAR during hospitalization is associated with a decline in estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) after discharge. Methods: This was a retrospective longitudinal cohort study of patients without detectable kidney disease presenting to the emergency department on two separate occasions during a 3-year period. The association between suPAR and a decline in eGFR was assessed by linear mixed models for repeated measures adjusting for age, sex, C-reactive protein, sodium, diabetes, hypertension and cardiovascular disease. Results: In total, 5124 patients (median age 65.9 years, 51.0% female) were included. The median suPAR was 2.9 ng/mL, the median time to readmission was 144 days and the expected rate of eGFR decline over this period was 5.1 mL/min/1.73 m2/year. Adjusting for other risk factors, patients with suPAR <3, 3-6 or ≥6 ng/mL had an expected eGFR decline of 4.3, 5.2 or 9.0 mL/min/1.73 m2/year, respectively. Similarly, patients with suPAR in the lowest (<2.4 ng/mL), middle (2.4-3.6 ng/mL) or highest (≥3.6 ng/mL) tertile had an expected eGFR decline of 4.2, 4.6 or 6.5 mL/min/1.73 m2/year, respectively. In both cases, a higher suPAR level was significantly and independently associated with a higher rate of eGFR decline (P < .001). Conclusions: A higher suPAR level was associated with accelerated eGFR decline among patients presenting to the emergency department, suggesting that routine suPAR measurements may have utility for the early detection of kidney disease.

Improved Survival Among Hospitalized Patients With Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) Treated With Remdesivir and Dexamethasone. A Nationwide Population-Based Cohort Study.

BACKGROUND: There are limited data on outcomes of moderate to severe coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) among patients treated with remdesivir and dexamethasone in a real-world setting. We sought to compare the effectiveness of standard of care (SOC) alone versus SOC plus remdesivir and dexamethasone. METHODS: Two population-based nationwide cohorts of individuals hospitalized with COVID-19 during February through December 2020 were studied. Death within 30 days and need of mechanical ventilation (MV) were compared by inverse probability of treatment weighted (ITPW) logistic regression analysis and shown as odds ratio (OR) with 95% confidence interval (CI). RESULTS: The 30-days mortality rate of 1694 individuals treated with remdesivir and dexamethasone in addition to SOC was 12.6% compared to 19.7% for 1053 individuals receiving SOC alone. This corresponded to a weighted OR of 30-day mortality of 0.47 (95% CI: .38-.57) for patients treated with remdesivir and dexamethasone compared to patients receiving SOC alone. Similarly, progression to MV was reduced (OR 0.36; 95% CI: .29-.46). CONCLUSIONS: Treatment of moderate to severe COVID-19 during June through December that included remdesivir and dexamethasone was associated with reduced 30-day mortality and need of MV compared to treatment in February through May.

Increased risk of diabetes mellitus five years after an episode of Staphylococcus aureus bacteraemia.

Background: Diabetes mellitus is a risk factor for infection with Staphylococcus aureus, but it is unclear whether S. aureus infection is a prediabetic condition. Methods: Nationwide population-based matched cohort study. Incidence rate and ratio with 95% confidence interval of diabetes were estimated by negative binomial regression. Results: Of 19,988 individuals with S. aureus bacteraemia and 185,579 population comparators, 667 and 4974 had a primary diagnose of diabetes within five years after discharge of S. aureus bacteraemia corresponding to a more than double risk of diabetes (adjusted incidence rate ratio 2.28 (95% confidence interval: 2.10-2.46)). Other factors associated with an increased risk of diabetes during follow-up were male sex, increasing age and level of comorbidity. Of the S. aureus bacteraemia and population cohort, 422 (2.11%) and 4048 (2.18%), respectively, developed diabetes without complications, while 245 (1.23%) and 926 (0.50%), respectively, developed diabetes with complications. Rates of diabetes without complication were increased for individuals in the S. aureus bacteraemia cohort compared to the population cohort within the first two years after which rates were comparable while rates of diabetes with complications remained higher throughout the five year follow-up period compared to the population cohort. Conclusions: The risk of diabetes was markedly increased up to five years after S. aureus bacteraemia compared to a population cohort. In addition to screening for diabetes during hospital admittance, screening cases of S. aureus bacteraemia for diabetes in the years following S. aureus bacteraemia may allow for earlier detection of diabetes.

Age-Dependent Increase in Incidence of Staphylococcus aureus Bacteremia, Denmark, 2008-2015.

Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia (SAB) is a major cause of illness and death worldwide. We analyzed temporal trends of SAB incidence and death in Denmark during 2008-2015. SAB incidence increased 48%, from 20.76 to 30.37 per 100,000 person-years, during this period (p<0.001). The largest change in incidence was observed for persons >80 years of age: a 90% increase in the SAB rate (p<0.001). After adjusting for demographic changes, annual rates increased 4.0% (95% CI 3.0-5.0) for persons <80 years of age, 8.4% (95% CI 7.0-11.0) for persons 80-89 years of age, and 13.0% (95% CI 9.0-17.5) for persons >90 years of age. The 30-day case-fatality rate remained stable at 24%; crude population death rates increased by 53% during 2008-2015 (p<0.001). Specific causes and mechanisms for this rapid increase in SAB incidence among the elderly population remain to be clarified.