Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 1 de 1
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Leuk Lymphoma ; 64(4): 776-787, 2023 04.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36781296

ABSTRACT

The addition of asparaginase to acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) and lymphoblastic lymphoma (LBL) treatment regimens provides significant patient benefits. Asparaginase therapies vary in origin (Escherichia coli- or Erwinia-derived) and preparation (native or pegylated), conferring distinct pharmacokinetic and immunogenic profiles. Clinical hypersensitivity reactions (HSRs) are commonly reported in patients and range from localized erythema to systemic anaphylaxis. Due to its favorable pharmacokinetic profile and reduced immunogenicity compared to native E. coli preparations, pegaspargase is the first-line asparaginase therapeutic option. Switching to an Erwinia-derived asparaginase is recommended for patients who experience HSRs or antibody-mediated inactivation to achieve the significant clinical benefit observed in patients who complete asparaginase treatment. Previous global shortages of asparaginase Erwinia chrysanthemi necessitated conversion mitigation strategies such as premedication protocols, desensitization, and asparaginase activity level monitoring. Here, we discuss the efficacy, safety, pharmacokinetics, current use, and administration of asparaginase therapies for pediatric and adolescent patients with ALL/LBL.


Subject(s)
Antineoplastic Agents , Dickeya chrysanthemi , Drug Hypersensitivity , Hypersensitivity , Precursor Cell Lymphoblastic Leukemia-Lymphoma , Adolescent , Humans , Child , Asparaginase/adverse effects , Asparaginase/pharmacokinetics , Escherichia coli , Expert Testimony , Drug Hypersensitivity/diagnosis , Drug Hypersensitivity/etiology , Precursor Cell Lymphoblastic Leukemia-Lymphoma/drug therapy , Antineoplastic Agents/adverse effects
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...