Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 6 de 6
Filter
Add more filters











Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
mBio ; : e0024024, 2024 Sep 13.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39269169

ABSTRACT

Lentiviruses encode a number of multi-functional accessory proteins, however, the primary role of the accessory protein Vpr remains unclear. As Vpr engages the host DNA damage response (DDR) at multiple steps, modulation of the DDR is considered central to the function(s) of Vpr. Vpr activates ataxia telangiectasia and Rad3 (ATR)-mediated DDR signaling, resulting in cell cycle arrest. However, the cellular consequences of Vpr-induced DNA damage, and the connection of Vpr-induced DNA damage to other Vpr functions, are unknown. Here, we determined that HIV-1 Vpr-induced DNA damage activates the ATM-NF-κB essential modulator (NEMO) pathway and alters cellular transcription via NF-κB/RelA. Through RNA-sequencing (RNA-seq) of cells expressing Vpr or mutants that separate the ability of Vpr to induce DNA damage from other DDR phenotypes, we identified that Vpr alters the transcriptome independent of cell cycle arrest. In tissue-cultured U2OS cells and primary human monocyte-derived macrophages (MDMs), we showed Vpr activates both ataxia telangiectasia mutated (ATM) and NF-κB/RelA signaling cascades. While inhibition of NEMO did not affect Vpr-induced DNA damage, it prevented NF-κB activation by Vpr, highlighting the importance of NEMO in Vpr-mediated transcriptional reprogramming. Virion-delivered Vpr was sufficient to induce DNA damage and activate ATM-NEMO dependent NF-κB transcription, suggesting that engagement of the DDR and transcriptional changes can occur early during viral replication. Together, our data uncover cellular consequences of Vpr-induced DNA damage and provide a mechanism for how Vpr activates NF-κB through DNA damage and ATM-NEMO signaling, which occur independent of cell cycle arrest. We propose this is essential to overcoming restrictive environments, such as in macrophages, to enhance viral replication.IMPORTANCEThe HIV accessory protein Vpr is multi-functional and required for viral replication in vivo, yet how Vpr enhances viral replication is unknown. Emerging literature suggests that a conserved function of Vpr is the engagement of the host DNA damage response (DDR). For example, Vpr activates DDR signaling, causes DDR-dependent cell cycle arrest, promotes degradation of various DDR proteins, and alters cellular consequences of DDR activation. However, a central understanding of how these phenotypes connect and how they affect HIV-infected cells remains unknown. Here, we found that Vpr-induced DNA damage alters the host transcriptome by activating an essential transcription pathway, NF-κB. This occurs early during the infection of primary human immune cells, suggesting NF-κB activation and transcriptome remodeling are important for establishing productive HIV-1 infection. Together, our study provides novel insights into how Vpr alters the host environment through the DDR, and what roles Vpr and the DDR play to enhance HIV replication.

2.
PLoS Pathog ; 20(8): e1011836, 2024 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39207950

ABSTRACT

The host interferon pathway upregulates intrinsic restriction factors in response to viral infection. Many of them block a diverse range of viruses, suggesting that their antiviral functions might have been shaped by multiple viral families during evolution. Host-virus conflicts have led to the rapid adaptation of host and viral proteins at their interaction hotspots. Hence, we can use evolutionary genetic analyses to elucidate antiviral mechanisms and domain functions of restriction factors. Zinc finger antiviral protein (ZAP) is a restriction factor against RNA viruses such as alphaviruses, in addition to other RNA, retro-, and DNA viruses, yet its precise antiviral mechanism is not fully characterized. Previously, an analysis of 13 primate ZAP orthologs identified three positively selected residues in the poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase-like domain. However, selective pressure from ancient alphaviruses and others likely drove ZAP adaptation in a wider representation of mammals. We performed positive selection analyses in 261 mammalian ZAP using more robust methods with complementary strengths and identified seven positively selected sites in all domains of the protein. We generated ZAP inducible cell lines in which the positively selected residues of ZAP are mutated and tested their effects on alphavirus replication and known ZAP activities. Interestingly, the mutant in the second WWE domain of ZAP (N658A) is dramatically better than wild-type ZAP at blocking replication of Sindbis virus and other ZAP-sensitive alphaviruses due to enhanced viral translation inhibition. The N658A mutant is adjacent to the previously reported poly(ADP-ribose) (PAR) binding pocket, but surprisingly has reduced binding to PAR. In summary, the second WWE domain is critical for engineering a more potent ZAP and fluctuations in PAR binding modulate ZAP antiviral activity. Our study has the potential to unravel the role of ADP-ribosylation in the host innate immune defense and viral evolutionary strategies that antagonize this post-translational modification.


Subject(s)
Alphavirus Infections , Alphavirus , Humans , Animals , Alphavirus/genetics , Alphavirus Infections/virology , Alphavirus Infections/genetics , Protein Domains , RNA-Binding Proteins/genetics , RNA-Binding Proteins/metabolism , Selection, Genetic , Evolution, Molecular , Repressor Proteins
3.
J Am Chem Soc ; 146(22): 14972-14988, 2024 Jun 05.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38787738

ABSTRACT

Caspases are a highly conserved family of cysteine-aspartyl proteases known for their essential roles in regulating apoptosis, inflammation, cell differentiation, and proliferation. Complementary to genetic approaches, small-molecule probes have emerged as useful tools for modulating caspase activity. However, due to the high sequence and structure homology of all 12 human caspases, achieving selectivity remains a central challenge for caspase-directed small-molecule inhibitor development efforts. Here, using mass spectrometry-based chemoproteomics, we first identify a highly reactive noncatalytic cysteine that is unique to caspase-2. By combining both gel-based activity-based protein profiling (ABPP) and a tobacco etch virus (TEV) protease activation assay, we then identify covalent lead compounds that react preferentially with this cysteine and afford a complete blockade of caspase-2 activity. Inhibitory activity is restricted to the zymogen or precursor form of monomeric caspase-2. Focused analogue synthesis combined with chemoproteomic target engagement analysis in cellular lysates and in cells yielded both pan-caspase-reactive molecules and caspase-2 selective lead compounds together with a structurally matched inactive control. Application of this focused set of tool compounds to stratify the functions of the zymogen and partially processed (p32) forms of caspase-2 provide evidence to support that caspase-2-mediated response to DNA damage is largely driven by the partially processed p32 form of the enzyme. More broadly, our study highlights future opportunities for the development of proteoform-selective caspase inhibitors that target nonconserved and noncatalytic cysteine residues.


Subject(s)
Caspase 2 , Caspase Inhibitors , Proteomics , Humans , Caspase 2/metabolism , Caspase 2/chemistry , Proteomics/methods , Caspase Inhibitors/pharmacology , Caspase Inhibitors/chemistry , Caspase Inhibitors/metabolism , Molecular Structure , Cysteine Endopeptidases
4.
bioRxiv ; 2024 Jan 25.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37292767

ABSTRACT

Lentiviral accessory genes enhance replication through diverse mechanisms. HIV-1 accessory protein Vpr modulates the host DNA damage response (DDR) at multiple steps through DNA damage, cell cycle arrest, the degradation of host proteins, and both the activation and repression of DDR signaling. Vpr also alters host and viral transcription; however, the connection between Vpr-mediated DDR modulation and transcriptional activation remains unclear. Here, we determined the cellular consequences of Vpr-induced DNA damage using Vpr mutants that allow us to separate the ability of Vpr to induce DNA damage from cell cycle arrest and other DDR phenotypes including host protein degradation and repression of DDR. RNA-sequencing of cells expressing Vpr or Vpr mutants identified that Vpr alters cellular transcription through mechanisms both dependent and independent of cell cycle arrest. In tissue-cultured U2OS cells and primary human monocyte-derived macrophages (MDMs), Vpr-induced DNA damage activates the ATM-NEMO pathway and alters cellular transcription via NF-κB/RelA signaling. HIV-1 infection of primary MDMs validated Vpr-dependent NF-κB transcriptional activation during infection. Both virion delivered and de novo expressed Vpr induced DNA damage and activated ATM-NEMO dependent NF-κB transcription, suggesting that engagement of the DDR and transcriptional reprogramming can occur during early and late stages of viral replication. Together, our data identifies a mechanism by which Vpr activates NF-κB through DNA damage and the ATM-NEMO pathway, which occur independent of cell cycle arrest. We propose this is essential to overcoming restrictive environments, such as in macrophages, to enhance viral transcription and replication.

5.
J Mol Biol ; 434(6): 167327, 2022 03 30.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34695379

ABSTRACT

The DDR consists of multiple pathways that sense, signal, and respond to anomalous DNA. To promote efficient replication, viruses have evolved to engage and even modulate the DDR. In this review, we will discuss a select set of diverse viruses and the range of mechanisms they evolved to interact with the DDR and some of the subsequent cellular consequences. There is a dichotomy in that the DDR can be both beneficial for viruses yet antiviral. We will also review the connection between the DDR and innate immunity. Previously believed to be disparate cellular functions, more recent research is emerging that links these processes. Furthermore, we will discuss some discrepancies in the literature that we propose can be remedied by utilizing more consistent DDR-focused assays. By doing so, we hope to obtain a much clearer understanding of how broadly these mechanisms and phenotypes are conserved among all viruses. This is crucial for human health since understanding how viruses manipulate the DDR presents an important and tractable target for antiviral therapies.


Subject(s)
DNA Damage , DNA Repair , Immunity, Innate , Viruses , Antiviral Agents/pharmacology , Humans , Immunity, Innate/genetics , Virus Replication , Viruses/drug effects , Viruses/immunology
6.
mBio ; 11(4)2020 08 04.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32753492

ABSTRACT

The DNA damage response (DDR) is a signaling cascade that is vital to ensuring the fidelity of the host genome in the presence of genotoxic stress. Growing evidence has emphasized the importance of both activation and repression of the host DDR by diverse DNA and RNA viruses. Previous work has shown that HIV-1 is also capable of engaging the host DDR, primarily through the conserved accessory protein Vpr. However, the extent of this engagement has remained unclear. Here, we show that HIV-1 and HIV-2 Vpr directly induce DNA damage and stall DNA replication, leading to the activation of several markers of double- and single-strand DNA breaks. Despite causing damage and activating the DDR, we found that Vpr represses the repair of double-strand breaks (DSB) by inhibiting homologous recombination (HR) and nonhomologous end joining (NHEJ). Mutational analyses of Vpr revealed that DNA damage and DDR activation are independent from repression of HR and Vpr-mediated cell cycle arrest. Moreover, we show that repression of HR does not require cell cycle arrest but instead may precede this long-standing enigmatic Vpr phenotype. Together, our data uncover that Vpr globally modulates the host DDR at at least two independent steps, offering novel insight into the primary functions of lentiviral Vpr and the roles of the DNA damage response in lentiviral replication.IMPORTANCE The DNA damage response (DDR) is a signaling cascade that safeguards the genome from genotoxic agents, including human pathogens. However, the DDR has also been utilized by many pathogens, such as human immunodeficiency virus (HIV), to enhance infection. To properly treat HIV-positive individuals, we must understand how the virus usurps our own cellular processes. Here, we have found that an important yet poorly understood gene in HIV, Vpr, targets the DDR at two unique steps: it causes damage and activates DDR signaling, and it represses the ability of cells to repair this damage, which we hypothesize is central to the primary function of Vpr. In clarifying these important functions of Vpr, our work highlights the multiple ways human pathogens engage the DDR and further suggests that modulation of the DDR is a novel way to help in the fight against HIV.


Subject(s)
DNA Breaks, Double-Stranded , DNA Repair , DNA , vpr Gene Products, Human Immunodeficiency Virus/genetics , Cell Line, Tumor , HEK293 Cells , HIV Infections/virology , HIV-1/genetics , HIV-1/pathogenicity , HIV-2/genetics , HIV-2/pathogenicity , Host-Pathogen Interactions/genetics , Humans , Osteosarcoma , Virus Replication
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL