First report of oral cryptococcal osteomyelitis in a cat.

Cryptococcosis is a worldwide-distributed fungal disease affecting humans and animals and is considered the most common systemic mycosis in cats. Classically, the clinical presentation of cryptococcal infection in cats consists of solitary or multiple nodules located on the planum nasale or the bridge of the nose. Bone involvement as cryptococcal osteomyelitis is a rare clinical entity of cryptococcosis. Herein, this case report describes a domestic shorthair cat with osteomyelitis of the mandibular bone resulting from Cryptococcus spp. infection. During the physical examination, a subcutaneous mass measuring approximately 6 cm in diameter was identified at the mandibular region. Cytological evaluation revealed numerous encapsulated yeasts resembling Cryptococcus spp. Histopathological examination revealed multifocal to coalescent subcutaneous granulomatous inflammation with a large number of spherical yeasts surrounded by a clear capsule. These yeasts were positive for periodic acid-Schiff (PAS) staining. The cat was successfully treated with a combination of itraconazole therapy and surgical management. To the author's knowledge, this is the first clinical report of oral cryptococcal osteomyelitis in a cat.

Comparison of 2 sampling methods for molecular detection of bacteria or fungi from feline hair and scale specimens.

Skin diseases of cats are among the most frequent client motivations for a veterinary consultation. Both carpet and toothbrush sampling are commonly used to obtain hair and scale samples for microbiologic testing. Although molecular tests have become more accessible and more widely used by clinicians, the ideal collection method for clinical specimens is unclear. To assess their performance in retrieving microbial DNA from clinical samples, we compared the bacterial and fungal DNA load in hair and skin scale samples collected using carpet or toothbrush methods. We evaluated sample DNA yield using fluorometry, spectrophotometry, and quantitative PCR. Despite no measurable differences in sample weight, toothbrush samples yielded significantly higher bacterial (p = 0.028) and fungal (p = 0.005) DNA loads compared to carpet samples, regardless of disease status. The toothbrush method was more effective in harvesting microbial DNA from hair and skin scale samples.

The influence of sample processing time on the performance of Microsporum canis cultures in cats.

BACKGROUND: Fungal culture is widely used as a diagnostic tool for detecting dermatophytosis. However, the presence of fungal contaminants can influence the culture's performance and compromise the diagnosis. OBJECTIVE: To verify whether the sample processing time can affect the performance of fungal culture for the diagnosis of Microsporum canis infection in cats. ANIMALS: Forty Persian cats. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Hair and scale samples were collected by combing the coat using a 5 × 5 cm sterile polyester carpet. The carpets were assigned randomly to four groups based on time point of processing samples after collection (i.e. used for culture on a selective agar medium for dermatophytes): Group 1: 8 h (n = 10); Group 2: 24 h (n = 10); Group 3: 48 h (n = 10); and Group 4: 72 h (n = 10). Cultures were compared regarding the degree of fungal invasion by either M. canis or nondermatophytic contaminant moulds (NDM). RESULTS: Processing samples after 24 h of storage resulted in increased isolation rates of NDM and decreased isolation rates of M. canis. Samples processed after 48 h and 72 h presented more than half of the plates with a high degree of fungal contamination (i.e. NDM occupying ≥50% of the total fungal mass). However, samples processed after 8 h and 24 h presented a lower degree (P < 0.05) of NDM plate invasion and higher recovery rates of M. canis when compared to samples processed after 48 h and 72 h. CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL IMPORTANCE: Delayed processing time is closely associated with the overgrowth of contaminants and with lower recovery rates of M. canis.

Comparison of carpet and toothbrush techniques for the detection of Microsporum canis in cats.

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to evaluate the diagnostic concordance between the toothbrush and carpet techniques for the detection of Microsporum canis in cats in a field study. METHODS: Thirty-nine Persian cats from a cattery were used. Fungal culture samples from the haircoat of each cat were collected by stroking the coat with a sterile toothbrush and a 5 × 5 cm-sized sterile carpet square (n = 78 total samples). Specimens were inoculated onto Mycosel Agar and incubated at 25°C for 21 days. Both techniques were compared using the following parameters: number of plates without fungal growth, number of plates with contaminant growth and number of plates positive for dermatophytes. RESULTS: The feline population in the study cattery was 39. Thirty (77%) were symptomatic and nine (23%) asymptomatic. The diagnosis was made via carpet and toothbrush methods and 78 cultures were performed. On day 21, M canis was detected in all culture plates. No contaminant molds were observed. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: The concordance rate between the carpet and toothbrush techniques among the 78 evaluable culture plates was 100%. Both methods are equally effective for collecting material for Mcanis culture. Additionally, both techniques are inexpensive and easy to perform in feline clinical practice.