Challenges in Brugada Syndrome Stratification: Investigating SCN5A Mutation Localization and Clinical Phenotypes.

Brugada Syndrome (BrS) is a genetic heart condition linked to sudden cardiac death. Though the SCN5A gene is primarily associated with BrS, there is a lack of comprehensive studies exploring the connection between SCN5A mutation locations and the clinical presentations of the syndrome. This study aimed to address this gap and gain further understanding of the syndrome. The investigation classified 36 high-risk BrS patients based on SCN5A mutations within the transmembrane/structured (TD) and intra-domain loops (IDLs) lacking a 3D structure. We characterized the intrinsically disordered regions (IDRs) abundant in IDLs, using bioinformatics tools to predict IDRs and post-translational modifications (PTMs) in NaV1.5. Interestingly, it was found that current predictive tools often underestimate the impacts of mutations in IDLs and disordered regions. Moreover, patients with SCN5A mutations confined to IDL regions-previously deemed 'benign'-displayed clinical symptoms similar to those carrying 'damaging' variants. Our research illuminates the difficulty in stratifying patients based on SCN5A mutation locations, emphasizing the vital role of IDLs in the NaV1.5 channel's functioning and protein interactions. We advocate for caution when using predictive tools for mutation evaluation in these regions and call for the development of improved strategies in accurately assessing BrS risk.

Electrocardiographic temporo-spatial assessment of depolarization and repolarization changes after epicardial arrhythmogenic substrate ablation in Brugada syndrome.

Aims: In Brugada syndrome (BrS), with spontaneous or ajmaline-induced coved ST elevation, epicardial electro-anatomic potential duration maps (epi-PDMs) were detected on a right ventricle (RV) outflow tract (RVOT), an arrhythmogenic substrate area (AS area), abolished by epicardial-radiofrequency ablation (EPI-AS-RFA). Novel CineECG, projecting 12-lead electrocardiogram (ECG) waveforms on a 3D heart model, previously localized depolarization forces in RV/RVOT in BrS patients. We evaluate 12-lead ECG and CineECG depolarization/repolarization changes in spontaneous type-1 BrS patients before/after EPI-AS-RFA, compared with normal controls. Methods and results: In 30 high-risk BrS patients (93% males, age 37 + 9 years), 12-lead ECGs and epi-PDMs were obtained at baseline, early after EPI-AS-RFA, and late follow-up (FU) (2.7-16.1 months). CineECG estimates temporo-spatial localization during depolarization (Early-QRS and Terminal-QRS) and repolarization (ST-Tpeak, Tpeak-Tend). Differences within BrS patients (baseline vs. early after EPI-AS-RFA vs. late FU) were analysed by Wilcoxon signed-rank test, while differences between BrS patients and 60 age-sex-matched normal controls were analysed by the Mann-Whitney test. In BrS patients, baseline QRS and QTc durations were longer and normalized after EPI-AS-ATC (151 ± 15 vs. 102 ± 13 ms, P < 0.001; 454 ± 40 vs. 421 ± 27 ms, P < 0.000). Baseline QRS amplitude was lower and increased at late FU (0.63 ± 0.26 vs. 0.84 ± 13 ms, P < 0.000), while Terminal-QRS amplitude decreased (0.24 ± 0.07 vs. 0.08 ± 0.03 ms, P < 0.000). At baseline, CineECG depolarization/repolarization wavefront prevalently localized in RV/RVOT (Terminal-QRS, 57%; ST-Tpeak, 100%; and Tpeak-Tend, 61%), congruent with the AS area on epi-PDM. Early after EPI-AS-RFA, RV/RVOT localization during depolarization disappeared, as Terminal-QRS prevalently localized in the left ventricle (LV, 76%), while repolarization still localized on RV/RVOT [ST-Tpeak (44%) and Tpeak-Tend (98%)]. At late FU, depolarization/repolarization forces prevalently localized in the LV (Terminal-QRS, 94%; ST-Tpeak, 63%; Tpeak-Tend, 86%), like normal controls. Conclusion: CineECG and 12-lead ECG showed a complex temporo-spatial perturbation of both depolarization and repolarization in BrS patients, prevalently localized in RV/RVOT, progressively normalizing after epicardial ablation.

Right ventricular epicardial arrhythmogenic substrate in long-QT syndrome patients at risk of sudden death.

AIMS: The long-QT syndrome (LQTS) represents a leading cause of sudden cardiac death (SCD). The aim of this study was to assess the presence of an underlying electroanatomical arrhythmogenic substrate in high-risk LQTS patients. METHODS AND RESULTS: The present study enrolled 11 consecutive LQTS patients who had experienced frequent implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD discharges triggered by ventricular fibrillation (VF). We acquired electroanatomical biventricular maps of both endo and epicardial regions for all patients and analyzed electrograms sampled from several myocardial regions. Abnormal electrical activities were targeted and eliminated by the means of radiofrequency catheter ablation. VF episodes caused a median of four ICD discharges in eleven patients (6 male, 54.5%; mean age 44.0 ± 7.8 years, range 22-53) prior to our mapping and ablation procedures. The average QTc interval was 500.0 ± 30.2 ms. Endo-epicardial biventricular maps displayed abnormally fragmented, low-voltage (0.9 ± 0.2 mV) and prolonged electrograms (89.9 ± 24.1 ms) exclusively localized in the right ventricular epicardium. We found electrical abnormalities extending over a mean epicardial area of 15.7 ± 3.1 cm2. Catheter ablation of the abnormal epicardial area completely suppressed malignant arrhythmias over a mean 12 months of follow-up (median VF episodes before vs. after ablation, 4 vs. 0; P = 0.003). After the procedure, the QTc interval measured in a 12-lead ECG analysis shortened to a mean of 461.8 ± 23.6 ms (P = 0.004). CONCLUSION: This study reveals that, among high-risk LQTS patients, regions localized in the epicardium of the right ventricle harbour structural electrophysiological abnormalities. Elimination of these abnormal electrical activities successfully prevented malignant ventricular arrhythmia recurrences.

High-risk Brugada syndrome: factors associated with arrhythmia recurrence and benefits of epicardial ablation in addition to implantable cardioverter defibrillator implantation.

AIMS: This study aims to evaluate the prognostic impact of the arrhythmogenic substrate size in symptomatic Brugada syndrome (BrS) as well as to validate the long-term safety and effectiveness of epicardial radiofrequency ablation (RFA) compared with no-RFA group. METHODS AND RESULTS: In this prospective investigational long-term registry study, 257 selected symptomatic BrS patients with implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) implantation were included. Among them, 206 patients underwent epicardial RFA and were monitored for over 5 years post-ablation (RFA group), while 51 patients received only ICD implantation declining RFA. Primary endpoints included risk factors for ventricular fibrillation (VF) events pre-ablation and freedom from VF events post-ablation. In the RFA group, BrS substrates were identified in the epicardial surface of the right ventricle. During the pre-RFA follow-up period (median 27 months), VF episodes and VF storms were experienced by 53 patients. Independent risk factors included substrate size [hazard ratio (HR), 1.13; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.08-1.18; P < 0.001], aborted cardiac arrest (HR, 2.98; 95% CI, 1.68-5.28; P < 0.001), and SCN5A variants (HR, 2.22; 95% CI, 1.15-4.27; P = 0.017). In the post-RFA follow-up (median 40 months), the RFA group demonstrated superior outcomes compared with no-RFA (P < 0.001) without major procedure-related complications. CONCLUSION: Our study underscores the role of BrS substrate extent as a crucial prognostic factor for recurrent VF and validates the safety and efficacy of RFA when compared with a no-RFA group. Our findings highlight the importance of ajmaline in guiding epicardial mapping/ablation in symptomatic BrS patients, laying the groundwork for further exploration of non-invasive methods to guide informed clinical decision-making.

Brugada Syndrome: New Insights From Cardiac Magnetic Resonance and Electroanatomical Imaging.

BACKGROUND: Brugada syndrome (BrS) is considered a purely electrical disease with variable electrical substrates. Variable rates of mechanical abnormalities have been also reported. Whether exists a link between electrical and mechanical abnormalities has never been previously explored. This investigational physiopathological study aimed to determine the relationship between the substrate size/location, as exposed by ajmaline provocation, and the severity of mechanical abnormalities, as assessed by cardiac magnetic resonance in patients with BrS. METHODS: Twenty-four consecutive high-risk patients with BrS (mean age, 38±11 years, 17 males), presenting with malignant syncope and documented polymorphic ventricular tachycardia/ventricular fibrillation, and candidate to implantable cardioverter defibrillator implantation, underwent cardiac magnetic resonance and electroanatomic maps. During each examination, ajmaline test (1 mg/kg over 5 minutes) was performed. Cardiac magnetic resonance findings were compared with 24 age, sex, and body surface area-matched controls. In patients with BrS, the correlation between the electrical substrate extent and right ventricular regional mechanical abnormalities before/after ajmaline challenge was analyzed. RESULTS: After ajmaline, patients with BrS showed a reduction of right ventricular (RV) ejection fraction (P<0.001), associated with decreased transversal displacement (U, P<0.001) and longitudinal strain (ε, P<0.001) localized at RV outflow tract. In patients with BrS significant preajmaline/postajmaline changes of transversal displacement (ΔU, P<0.001) and longitudinal strain (Δε, P<0.001) were found. In the control group, no mechanical changes were observed after ajmaline. The electrical substrate consistently increased after ajmaline from 1.7±2.8 cm2 to 14.2±7.3 cm2 (P<0.001), extending from the RV outflow tract to the neighboring segments of the RV anterior wall. Postajmaline RV ejection fraction inversely correlated with postajmaline substrate extent (r=-0.830, P<0.001). In patients with BrS and normal controls, cardiac magnetic resonance detected neither myocardial fibrosis nor RV outflow tract morphological abnormalities. CONCLUSIONS: BrS is a dynamic RV electromechanical disease, where functional abnormalities correlate with the maximal extent of the substrate size. These findings open new lights on the physiopathology of the disease. Registration: URL: https://clinicaltrial.gov; Unique identifier: NCT03524079.

Brugada syndrome genetics is associated with phenotype severity.

AIMS: Brugada syndrome (BrS) is associated with an increased risk of sudden cardiac death due to ventricular tachycardia/fibrillation (VT/VF) in young, otherwise healthy individuals. Despite SCN5A being the most commonly known mutated gene to date, the genotype-phenotype relationship is poorly understood and remains uncertain. This study aimed to elucidate the genotype-phenotype correlation in BrS. METHODS AND RESULTS: Brugada syndrome probands deemed at high risk of future arrhythmic events underwent genetic testing and phenotype characterization by the means of epicardial arrhythmogenic substrate (AS) mapping, and were divided into two groups according to the presence or absence of SCN5A mutation. Two-hundred probands (160 males, 80%; mean age 42.6 ± 12.2 years) were included in this study. Patients harbouring SCN5A mutations exhibited a spontaneous type 1 pattern and experienced aborted cardiac arrest or spontaneous VT/VF more frequently than the other subjects. SCN5A-positive patients exhibited a larger epicardial AS area, more prolonged electrograms and more frequently observed non-invasive late potentials. The presence of an SCN5A mutation explained >26% of the variation in the epicardial AS area and was the strongest predictor of a large epicardial area. CONCLUSION: In BrS, the genetic background is the main determinant for the extent of the electrophysiological abnormalities. SCN5A mutation carriers exhibit more pronounced epicardial electrical abnormalities and a more aggressive clinical presentation. These results contribute to the understanding of the genetic determinants of the BrS phenotypic expression and provide possible explanations for the varying degrees of disease expression.

Novel CineECG Derived From Standard 12-Lead ECG Enables Right Ventricle Outflow Tract Localization of Electrical Substrate in Patients With Brugada Syndrome.

BACKGROUND: In Brugada syndrome (BrS), diagnosed in presence of a spontaneous or ajmaline-induced type-1 pattern, ventricular arrhythmias originate from the right ventricle outflow tract (RVOT). We developed a novel CineECG method, obtained by inverse electrocardiogram (ECG) from standard 12-lead ECG, to localize the electrical activity pathway in patients with BrS. METHODS: The CineECG enabled the temporospatial localization of the ECG waveforms, deriving the mean temporospatial isochrone from standard 12-lead ECG. The study sample included (1) 15 patients with spontaneous type-1 Brugada pattern, and (2) 18 patients with ajmaline-induced BrS (at baseline and after ajmaline), in whom epicardial potential duration maps were available; (3) 17 type-3 BrS pattern patients not showing type-1 BrS pattern after ajmaline (ajmaline-negative); (4) 47 normal subjects; (5) 18 patients with right bundle branch block (RBBB). According to CineECG algorithm, each ECG was classified as Normal, Brugada, RBBB, or Undetermined. RESULTS: In patients with spontaneous or ajmaline-induced BrS, CineECG localized the terminal mean temporospatial isochrone forces in the RVOT, congruent with the arrhythmogenic substrate location detected by epicardial potential duration maps. The RVOT location was never observed in normal, RBBB, or ajmaline-negative patients. In most patients with ajmaline-induced BrS (78%), the RVOT location was already evident at baseline. The CineECG classified all normal subjects and ajmaline-negative patients at baseline as Normal or Undetermined, all patients with RBBB as RBBB, whereas all patients with spontaneous and ajmaline-induced BrS as Brugada. Compared with standard 12-lead ECG, CineECG at baseline had a 100% positive predictive value and 81% negative predictive value in predicting ajmaline test results. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with spontaneous and ajmaline-induced BrS, the CineECG localized the late QRS activity in the RVOT, a phenomenon never observed in normal, RBBB, or ajmaline-negative patients. The possibility to identify the RVOT as the location of the arrhythmogenic substrate by the noninvasive CineECG, based on the standard 12-lead ECG, opens new prospective for diagnosing patients with BrS.

New electromechanical substrate abnormalities in high-risk patients with Brugada syndrome.

BACKGROUND: The relationship between the typical electrocardiographic pattern and electromechanical abnormalities has never been systematically explored in Brugada syndrome (BrS). OBJECTIVES: The aims of this study were to characterize the electromechanical substrate in patients with BrS and to evaluate the relationship between electrical and mechanical abnormalities. METHODS: We enrolled 50 consecutive high-risk patients with BrS (mean age 42 ± 7.2 years), with implantable cardioverter-defibrillator implantation for primary or secondary prevention of ventricular tachyarrhythmias (ventricular tachycardia/ventricular fibrillation [VT/VF]), undergoing substrate mapping and ablation. Patients underwent 3-dimensional (3D) echocardiography with 3D wall motion/deformation quantification and electroanatomic mapping before and after ajmaline administration (1 mg/kg in 5 minutes); 3D mechanical changes were compared with 50 age- and sex-matched controls. The effect of substrate ablation on electromechanical abnormalities was also assessed. RESULTS: In all patients, ajmaline administration induced Brugada type 1 pattern, with a significant increase in the electrical substrate (P < .001), particularly in patients with previous spontaneous VT/VF (P = .007). Induction of Brugada pattern was associated with lowering of right ventricular (RV) ejection fraction (P < .001) and worsening of 3D RV mechanical function (P < .001), particularly in the anterior free wall of the RV outflow tract, without changes in controls. RV electrical and mechanical abnormalities were highly correlated (r = 0.728, P < .001). By multivariate analysis, only the area of RV dysfunction was an independent predictor of spontaneous VT/VF (odds ratio 1.480; 95% confidence interval 1.159-1.889; P = .002). Substrate ablation abolished both BrS-electrocardiographic pattern and mechanical abnormalities, despite ajmaline rechallenge. CONCLUSION: BrS is an electromechanical disease affecting the RV. The typical BrS pattern reflects an extensive RV arrhythmic substrate, driving consistent RV mechanical abnormalities. Substrate ablation abolished both Brugada pattern and mechanical abnormalities.

Non-invasive assessment of the arrhythmogenic substrate in Brugada syndrome using signal-averaged electrocardiogram: clinical implications from a prospective clinical trial.

AIMS: Brugada syndrome (BrS) represents a major cause of sudden cardiac death in young individuals. The risk stratification to forecast future life-threatening events is still controversial. Non-invasive assessment of late potentials (LPs) has been proposed as a risk stratification tool. However, their nature in BrS is still undetermined. The purpose of this study is to assess the electrophysiological determinants of non-invasive LPs. METHODS AND RESULTS: Two hundred and fifty consecutive patients with (Group 1, n = 96) and without (Group 2, n = 154) BrS-related symptoms were prospectively enrolled in the registry. Signal-averaged electrocardiogram (SAECG) was performed in all subjects before undergoing epicardial mapping. Group 1 patients exhibited larger arrhythmogenic substrates (AS; 5.8 ± 2.8 vs. 2.6 ± 2.1 cm2, P < 0.001) with more delayed potentials (220.4 ± 46.0 vs. 186.7 ± 42.3 ms, P < 0.001). Late potentials were present in 82/96 (85.4%) Group 1 and in 31/154 (20.1%) Group 2 individuals (P < 0.001). Patients exhibiting LPs had more frequently a spontaneous Type 1 pattern (30.1% vs. 10.9%, P < 0.001), SCN5A mutation (34.5% vs. 21.2%, P = 0.02), and exhibited a larger AS with longer potentials (5.8 ± 2.7 vs. 2.2 ± 1.7 cm2; 231.2 ± 37.3 vs. 213.8 ± 39.0 ms; P < 0.001, respectively). Arrhythmogenic substrate dimension was the strongest predictor of the presence of LPs (odds ratio 1.9; P < 0.001). An AS area of at least 3.5 cm2 identified patients with LPs (area under the curve 0.88, 95% confidence interval 0.843-0.931; P < 0.001) with a sensitivity of 86%, specificity 88%, positive predictive value 85%, and negative predictive value 89%. CONCLUSION: The results of this study support the role of the epicardial AS as an electrophysiological determinant of non-invasive LPs, which may serve as a tool in the non-invasive assessment of the BrS substrate, as SAECG-LPs could be considered an expression of the abnormal epicardial electrical activity.ClinicalTrials.gov number (NCT02641431; NCT03106701).

Comparable clinical characteristics in Brugada syndrome patients harboring SCN5A or novel SCN10A variants.

AIMS: The Brugada syndrome (BrS) is an inherited disease associated with an increased risk of sudden cardiac death. Often, the genetic cause remains undetected. Perhaps due at least in part because the NaV1.8 protein is expressed more in both the central and peripheral nervous systems than in the heart, the SCN10A gene is not included in diagnostic arrhythmia/sudden death panels in the vast majority of cardiogenetics centres. METHODS AND RESULTS: Clinical characteristics were assessed in patients harboring either SCN5A or novel SCN10A variants. Genetic testing was performed using Next Generation Sequencing on genomic DNA. Clinical characteristics, including the arrhythmogenic substrate, in BrS patients harboring novel SCN10A variants and SCN5A variants are comparable. Clinical characteristics, including gender, age, personal history of cardiac arrest/syncope, spontaneous BrS electrocardiogram pattern, family history of sudden death, and arrhythmic substrate are not significantly different between probands harboring SCN10A or SCN5A variants. CONCLUSION: Future studies are warranted to further characterize the role of these specific SCN10A variants.

Genotype/Phenotype Relationship in a Consanguineal Family With Brugada Syndrome Harboring the R1632C Missense Variant in the SCN5A Gene.

Brugada syndrome (BrS) is a known cause of sudden cardiac death. The genetic basis of BrS is not well understood, and no one single gene is linked to even a majority of BrS cases. However, mutations in the gene SCN5A are the most common, although the high amount of phenotypic variability prevents a clear correlation between genotype and phenotype. Research techniques are limited, as most BrS cases still remain without a genetic diagnosis, thus impairing the implementation of experimental models representative of a general pathogenetic mechanism. In the present study, we report the largest family to-date with the segregation of the heterozygous variant NM_198056:c.4894C>T (p.Arg1632Cys) in the SCN5A gene. The genotype-phenotype relationship observed suggests a likely pathogenic effect of this variant. Functional studies to better understand the molecular effects of this variant are warranted.

Novel SCN5A Frameshift Mutation in Brugada Syndrome Associated With Complex Arrhythmic Phenotype.

In this case report, we characterize a novel inherited frameshift mutation c.4700_4701del (p.Phe1567Cysfs*221) in a single copy of the SCN5A gene and its association with Brugada syndrome (BrS). The proband experienced a life-threatening ventricular arrhythmia successfully treated with DC-shock and he also suffered from supraventricular tachycardia. Ajmaline test confirmed the BrS diagnosis. No other mutation nor low frequency variants in the other 23 analyzed genes were detected. The same mutation was found in the father and sister, who were both diagnosed with BrS. We hypothesize that this mutation could be responsible for BrS and potentially linked to supraventricular tachycardias. Further studies are needed to confirm this observation and to assess the clinical relevance of this mutation, in terms of risk-stratification.

Non-paroxysmal atrial fibrillation mapping: characterization of the electrophysiological substrate using a novel integrated mapping technique.

AIMS: Clinical outcomes after radiofrequency catheter ablation (RFCA) remain suboptimal in the treatment of non-paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (AF). Electrophysiological mapping may improve understanding of the underlying mechanisms. To describe the arrhythmia substrate in patients with persistent (Pers) and long-standing persistent (LSPers) AF, undergoing RFCA, using an integrated mechanism mapping technique. METHODS AND RESULTS: Patients underwent high-density electroanatomical mapping before and after catheter ablation. Integrated maps characterized electrogram (EGM) cycle length (CL) in regions with repetitive-regular (RR) activations, stable wavefront propagation, fragmentation, and peak-to-peak bipolar voltage. Among 83 patients (72% male, 60 ± 11 years old), RR activations were identified in 376 regions (mean CL 180 ± 31 ms). PersAF patients (n = 43) showed more RR sites per patient (5.3 ± 2.4 vs. 3.7 ± 2.1, P = 0.002) with faster CL (166 ± 29 vs. 190 ± 29 ms; P < 0.001) and smaller surface area of fragmented EGMs (15 ± 14% vs. 27 ± 17%, P < 0.001) compared with LSPersAF. The post-ablation map in 50 patients remaining in AF, documented reduction of the RR activities per patient (1.5 ± 0.7 vs. 3.7 ± 1.4, P < 0.001) and area of fragmentation (22 ± 17% vs. 8 ± 9%, P < 0.001). Atrial fibrillation termination during ablation occurred at RR sites (0.48 ± 0.24 mV; 170.5 ± 20.2 ms CL) in 31/33 patients (94%). At the latest follow-up, arrhythmia freedom was higher among patients receiving ablation >75% of RR sites (Q4 82.6%, Q3 63.1%, Q2 35.1%, and Q1 0%; P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: The integrated mapping technique allowed characterization of multiple arrhythmic substrates in non-paroxysmal AF patients. This technique might serve as tool for a substrate-targeted ablation approach.

Brugada Syndrome: Progress in Diagnosis and Management.

Brugada syndrome (BrS) represents an inherited disorder associated with risk of sudden cardiac death due to VF in patients without structural heart disease. Currently, BrS is diagnosed by typical cove-shaped ST-segment elevation >2 mm in >1 RV precordial lead V1, V2 occurring spontaneously or after a sodium-channel blocker provocation test without any further evidence of malignant arrhythmias. An ICD should always be implanted in symptomatic BrS patients to prevent sudden death, despite high rates of complications with these devices. In asymptomatic people, an electrophysiological study should be performed to evaluate the need for an ICD. The recent discovery of a functional substrate has revolutionised our approach to the pathophysiology and management of BrS. Promising new therapeutic options have emerged in the last 3 years. Ajmaline is able to determine the extension of the substrate by prolonging the duration and fragmentation of abnormal epicardial electrograms. Substrate ablation results in the disappearance of both coved-type ECG and ventricular tachycardia/VF inducibility. These findings are clinically relevant, suggesting that epicardial ablation guided by ajmaline infusion may be an effective therapeutic option in BrS, potentially removing the need for ICD implantation.

SCN5A Nonsense Mutation and NF1 Frameshift Mutation in a Family With Brugada Syndrome and Neurofibromatosis.

In this case series, we report for the first time a family in which the inherited nonsense mutation [c. 3946C > T (p.Arg1316*)] in the SCN5A gene segregates in association with Brugada syndrome (BrS). Moreover, we also report, for the first time, the frameshift mutation [c.7686delG (p.Ile2563fsX40)] in the NF1 gene, as well as its association with type 1 neurofibromatosis (NF1), characterized by pigmentary lesions (café au lait spots, Lisch nodules, freckling) and cutaneous neurofibromas. Both of these mutations and associated phenotypes were discovered in the same family. This genetic association may identify a subset of patients at higher risk of sudden cardiac death who require the appropriate electrophysiological evaluation. This case series highlights the importance of genetic testing not only to molecularly confirm the pathology but also to identify asymptomatic family members who need clinical examinations and preventive interventions, as well as to advise about the possibility of avoiding recurrence risk with medically assisted reproduction.

Multipoint left ventricular pacing improves response to cardiac resynchronization therapy with and without pressure-volume loop optimization: comparison of the long-term efficacy of two different programming strategies.

PURPOSE: Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) with multipoint left ventricular (LV) pacing (MultiPoint™ Pacing [MPP]) improves long-term LV reverse remodeling, though questions persist about how to program LV pacing vectors and delays. We evaluated if an empirical method of programming MPP vectors and delays between pacing pulses improved CRT response similar to pressure-volume loop (PVL) optimized MPP programming. METHODS: Patients undergoing CRT implant (Quadra Assura MP™ CRT-D and Quartet™ LV lead) received MPP with programmed settings optimized either by PVL measurements at implant (PVL-OPT group) or empirically determined by maximizing the spatial separation between the two cathodes and minimal delays between the three ventricular pacing pulses (MAX-SEP group). CRT response was prospectively defined as a reduction in end-systolic volume (ESV) of ≥ 15% relative to baseline at 6 months as determined by a blinded observer. RESULTS: Patient characteristics at baseline (NYHA II-III, ejection fraction [EF] 27 ± 6%, QRS 151 ± 17 ms) were not significantly different between the PVL-OPT (n = 27) and MAX-SEP (n = 26) groups. During the follow-up period, there were no differences in the number of patients requiring reprogramming due to phrenic nerve stimulation or a high threshold for PVL-OPT vs. MAX-SEP (5/27 [19%] vs. 7/26 [27%], p = 0.53). After 6 months, ESV reduction, EF increase, and CRT response rate (RR) were similar for PVL-OPT vs. MAX-SEP (ESV - 20 ± 11 vs. - 22 ± 11%, p = 0.59; EF + 10 ± 4 vs. + 9 ± 7%, p = 0.53; RR 20/27 [74%] vs. 21/26 [81%], p = 0.74), while fewer patients in the PVL-OPT group experienced NYHA class reduction ≥ 2 (4/27 [15%] vs.15/26 [58%], p = 0.002). CONCLUSIONS: Both evaluated methods of MPP programming resulted in similar CRT outcomes. Empirical MPP programming by maximum spatial separation of LV cathodes may be an effective, simple, and non-invasive alternative to pressure-volume optimization.

General Anesthesia Attenuates Brugada Syndrome Phenotype Expression: Clinical Implications From a Prospective Clinical Trial.

OBJECTIVES: This study investigates the electrocardiographic-electrophysiological effects of administration of anesthetic drugs for general anesthesia (GA) in patients with BrS at high risk of sudden cardiac death (SCD). BACKGROUND: The safety of anesthetic agents in Brugada syndrome (BrS) is under debate. METHODS: All consecutive patients with spontaneous type 1 BrS electrocardiographic (ECG) patterns undergoing epicardial ablation of the arrhythmogenic substrate (AS) under GA were enrolled. Anesthesia was induced with single bolus of propofol and maintained with sevofluorane. ECG measurements were collected before, immediately after, and 20 min after induction of GA. Three-dimensional maps during GA and after ajmaline indicated the epicardial AS before ablation. RESULTS: Thirty-six patients with BrS (32 male, 88.9%; mean age 38.8 ± 12.0 years) with a spontaneous type 1 ECG pattern underwent GA. Induction was performed using propofol at mean dose of 1.6 to 2.6 mg/kg (2.1 ± 0.3 mg/kg). Twenty-eight (28 of 36, 77.8%) patients showed a reversion to a nondiagnostic pattern. ST-segment elevation (0.32 ± 0.01 mV vs. 0.19 ± 0.02 mV; p < 0.001) and J-wave amplitude (0.47 ± 0.02 mV vs. 0.31 ± 0.03 mV; p < 0.001) decreased after propofol. The AS area during GA, in the absence of BrS pattern, significantly enlarged after administration of ajmaline (3.6 ± 0.5 cm2 vs. 20.3 ± 0.8 cm2). No patient developed malignant arrhythmias during GA induction and maintenance. CONCLUSIONS: This study shows that GA using single-bolus propofol and volatile anesthetics is safe in high-risk patients with BrS, and it may exert a modulating effect by reducing the manifestation of type 1 BrS pattern and AS in the form of epicardial abnormal ECGs. (Epicardial Ablation in Brugada Syndrome: An Extension Study of 200 BrS Patients; NCT03106701).

Assessing the Malignant Ventricular Arrhythmic Substrate in Patients With Brugada Syndrome.

BACKGROUND: Guidelines recommend the use of implanted cardioverter-defibrillators in patients with Brugada syndrome and induced ventricular tachyarrhythmias, but there is no evidence supporting it. OBJECTIVES: This prospective registry study was designed to explore clinical and electrophysiological predictors of malignant ventricular tachyarrhythmia inducibility in Brugada syndrome. METHODS: A total of 191 consecutive selected patients with (group 1; n = 88) and without (group 2; n = 103) Brugada syndrome-related symptoms were prospectively enrolled in the registry. Patients underwent electrophysiological study and substrate mapping or ablation before and after ajmaline testing (1 mg/kg/5 min). RESULTS: Overall, before ajmaline testing, 53.4% of patients had ventricular tachyarrhythmia inducibility, which was more frequent in group 1 (65.9%) than in group 2 (42.7%; p < 0.001). Regardless of clinical presentation, larger substrates with more fragmented long-duration ventricular potentials were found in patients with inducible arrhythmias than in patients without inducible arrhythmias (p < 0.001). One extrastimulus was used in more extensive substrates (median 13 cm2; p < 0.001), and ventricular fibrillation was the more frequently induced rhythm (p < 0.001). After ajmaline, patients without arrhythmia inducibility had arrhythmia inducibility without a difference in substrate characteristics between the 2 groups. The substrate size was the only independent predictor of inducibility (odds ratio: 4.51; 95% confidence interval: 2.51 to 8.09; p < 0.001). A substrate size of 4 cm2 best identified patients with inducible arrhythmias (area under the curve: 0.98; p < 0.001). Substrate ablation prevented ventricular tachyarrhythmia reinducibility. CONCLUSIONS: In Brugada syndrome dynamic substrate variability represents the pathophysiological basis of lethal ventricular tachyarrhythmias. Substrate size is independently associated with arrhythmia inducibility, and its determination after ajmaline identifies high-risk patients missed by clinical criteria. Substrate ablation is associated with electrocardiogram normalization and not arrhythmia reinducibility. (Epicardial Ablation in Brugada Syndrome [BRUGADA_I]; NCT02641431; Epicardial Ablation in Brugada Syndrome: An Extension Study of 200 BrS Patients; NCT03106701).