ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is a chronic disease that affects different areas of the patient's body. Patient education and health literacy is essential for them to participate actively in follow-up. OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to assess differences between clinimetric measurements done by a medical team and patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) in RA and understand the impact of patient education strategies in order to identify differences between RA assessment methods. METHODS: This is a longitudinal cohort study. It included adult patients with RA and access to digital tools. These were divided into 3 groups by type of education. Group 1 included patients who participated in a multicomponent RA educational program. Group 2 did not have this multicomponent RA education. Group 3 did not receive any education. The 3 groups performed PROMs. Disease activity scales, functional class, and quality of life were measured. Univariate and bivariate analysis (χ 2 and Wilcoxon for paired data) were done. RESULTS: Twenty-eight patients were included in group 1, 26 in group 2, and 37 in group 3. All were women. In group 1, there were no significant differences in clinimetrics between the medical team and patient's PROMs except for fatigue. In group 2 and group 3, significant differences were found. The RAPID3 and PAS variables did not show significant differences when analyzed by intervention subgroups. CONCLUSIONS: This study shows no differences between clinimetrics/PROMs for patients with a high-level education on RA and physicians. On the other hand, when patient did not have any RA education, the clinimetric results differed from physician measurement.
Subject(s)
Arthritis, Rheumatoid , Patient Education as Topic , Patient Reported Outcome Measures , Quality of Life , Humans , Arthritis, Rheumatoid/therapy , Arthritis, Rheumatoid/diagnosis , Female , Middle Aged , Patient Education as Topic/methods , Longitudinal Studies , Male , Adult , Health Literacy/methods , Health Literacy/statistics & numerical data , Aged , Severity of Illness IndexABSTRACT
Purpose: To determine the value of lung ultrasound (LUS) compared to high-resolution computed tomography (HRCT) in the early diagnosis of interstitial lung disease (ILD) in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Patients and Methods: An observational prospective study was performed. Were included patients with respiratory symptoms or/and, patients with crackles in auscultation during medical consultation. All patients underwent to chest X-rays, LUS, HRCT,and respiratory function tests. Results: A total of 192 patients with RA were included. Mean disease duration was 16.8 ± 11.1 years. 72% were positive for rheumatoid factor or anti-citrullinated antibodies. Of the total number of subjects, 54.7% had respiratory symptoms. The other patients did not have respiratory symptoms, but they did have had crackles on pulmonary auscultation. B lines > 11.5 on the ROC curve predicted ILD (AUC 0.63; CI 95%: 0.55-0.71; p < 0.003). A DLCO value of <7.13 significantly predicted the presence of ILD (AUC 0.61; 95% CI: 0.52-0.70; p < 0.028). Conclusion: The findings of this study suggest that LUS is a valuable tool for the early diagnosis of ILD in patients with RA, and together with DLCO, can adequately predict the presence of ILD in this population. LUS also helps to determine which patients with respiratory symptoms and signs suggestive for ILD are undergo to HRCT.
ABSTRACT
Antecedentes: El dolor lumbar es uno de los principales motivos de consulta en el primer nivel de atención, requiere múltiples intervenciones diagnósticas, así como la adopción de conductas terapéuticas, e incluso, conlleva discapacidad en los pacientes adultos. Objetivo: Brindar una aproximación clínica con orientación diagnóstica para el abordaje de los pacientes con un motivo de consulta frecuente en el primer nivel de atención. Resultados: Los autores proponen un algoritmo para el abordaje clínico del paciente con dolor lumbar crónico, orientando, además, hacia generalidades de los exámenes complementarios (química sanguínea, imágenes diagnósticas, entre otros), para evaluar en un primer nivel al paciente que acude por esta patología. Conclusiones: La propuesta presentada en este artículo permite guiar al personal médico de primer nivel de atención a través de una aproximación enfocada en las características semiológicas del dolor, así como poder correlacionar con los diagnósticos más frecuentes, a fin de remitir o dirigir al paciente de acuerdo con las necesidades particulares correspondientes.
Keywords: Background: Low back pain is one of the main complaints in primary care reported by-patients, requiring several diagnostic interventions, therapeutic approaches and even entailing disability in young adults. Objective: To provide a clinical approach, diagnostically oriented, for patients frequently consulting primary care. Results: Of the authors propose a clinical algorithm for the clinical assessment of the patient with chronic low back pain, also considering complementary tests (imaging, blood chemistry, etc.) for the evaluation in primary care of the patient with this pathology. Conclusions: The proposal provided in this article helps guide the primary care physician through an approach focusing on the semiological characteristics of pain, so that they can correlate with the most frequent diagnoses, in order to refer or direct the patient according to their particular needs.
Subject(s)
Humans , Signs and Symptoms , Pathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms , Low Back Pain , Neurologic ManifestationsABSTRACT
Introduction: Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is an autoimmune disease characterized by chronic inflammation, causing pain and stiffness in the joints. SARS-CoV-2 increases the clinical vulnerability of the population with RA and has led to the implementation and/or development of telemedicine. Objective: To describe changes in level of therapeutic adherence, quality of life and capacity for self-care agency, during the follow-up period of a group of patients linked to a non-face-to-face multidisciplinary consultation model during the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic. Methodology: Descriptive cohort study (July to October 2020). Description of the level of therapeutic adherence (Morisky Green Test), quality of life (EuroQOL-5-Dimensions-3-Level-version) and self-care capacity (ASA-R Scale) in the context of a telehealth model. A univariate and bivariate analysis was performed (Stata Software, Considered p-value <0.05). Results: Of 71 patients treated under the telehealth model, 85.9% were women, the age range was between 33 and 86 years with a median of 63. The most prevalent comorbidity was arterial hypertension (35.2%). Quality of life did not change during follow-up nor did adherence to treatment, apart from in one item [the patients did not stop taking the medication when they were well (p = 0.029)]. In self-care capacity, there were significant improvements in five dimensions (p < 0.05), without significant differences in the global score. Conclusion: Patients with RA evaluated in the context of telehealth in a period of pandemic did not present significant changes in quality of life, adherence to treatment, or capacity for self-care, and remained close to baseline values when they attended a traditional face-to-face assessment.
INTRODUCCIÓN: La artritis reumatoide (AR) es una enfermedad autoinmune caracterizada por una inflamación crónica que produce dolor y rigidez articular. El SARS-CoV-2 aumenta la vulnerabilidad clínica en pacientes con AR, lo que ha conllevado la implementación o el desarrollo de la telesalud. OBJETIVO: Describir los cambios en el nivel de adherencia terapéutica, la calidad de vida y la capacidad de autocuidado durante el periodo de seguimiento, en un grupo de pacientes con AR vinculados con un modelo de consulta multidisciplinar no presencial, en el curso de la pandemia por SARS-CoV-2. METODOLOGÍA: Estudio de cohorte descriptiva (julio a octubre del 2020). Descripción del nivel de adherencia terapéutica (TEST MORISKY GREEN), calidad de vida (EUROQOL-5-DIMENSIONS-3-LEVEL-VERSION) y capacidad de autocuidado (Escala ASA-R) en el contexto de un modelo de telesalud. Se realizó análisis univariado y bivariado (SOFTWARE Stata®, valor de p considerado <0,05). RESULTADOS: De 71 pacientes atendidos en modalidad de telesalud, el 85,9% fueron mujeres, la mediana de la edad fue de 63 (33-86) anos. La comorbilidad más prevalente fue la hipertensión (35,2%). La calidad de vida no tuvo cambios durante el seguimiento, al igual que la adherencia al tratamiento, excepto en uno de los ítems (los pacientes no dejaron de tomar la medicación cuando se encontraban bien; p = 0,029). En la capacidad de autocuidado hubo mejoras significativas en 5 dimensiones (p < 0,05), sin diferencias significativas en el puntaje global. CONCLUSIÓN: Los pacientes con AR evaluados en el contexto de la telesalud, en un periodo de pandemia, no presentaron cambios significativos en la calidad de vida, la adherencia al tratamiento y la capacidad de autocuidado; se mantuvieron en niveles similares a los valores basales cuando asistían a valoración tradicional presencial.
Subject(s)
Humans , Female , Adult , Middle Aged , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Arthritis, Rheumatoid , Musculoskeletal Diseases , Telemedicine , Health Occupations , Joint Diseases , MedicineABSTRACT
No disponible
Subject(s)
Humans , Arthritis, Rheumatoid/drug therapy , Autoimmune Diseases/drug therapy , Biological Therapy/methods , Medication Adherence/statistics & numerical data , Hospital Units/organization & administration , Drug-Related Side Effects and Adverse Reactions/epidemiology , Etanercept/therapeutic use , Infliximab/therapeutic use , Rituximab/therapeutic useABSTRACT
Describimos el caso de un paciente de 36 años con artritis reumatoide y miastenia gravis sin respuesta al tratamiento inmunosupresor convencional, quien recibió tratamiento con terapia anti CD-20 (rituximab), con adecuada respuesta clínica de sus dos patologías autoinmunes de base.
The following case presents a 36 year-old patient with rheumatoid arthritis and myasthenia gravis without response with the conventional immunosuppressive treatment, who was managed with anti CD-20 therapy (rituximab), with good clinical evolution of both autoinmune diseases.
Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Adult , Arthritis, Rheumatoid , Rituximab , Myasthenia Gravis , Therapeutics , Clinical EvolutionABSTRACT
La osteoporosis es una enfermedad silenciosa hasta que se presenta su principal complicación: las fracturas; con un importante costo económico y social para el paciente y el sistema de salud, constituyéndose en un verdadero problema de salud pública. Las mujeres en la etapa postmenopáusica tienen un mayor riesgo de osteoporosis y por ende de fractura. Actualmente disponemos de un variado grupo de medicamentos que, a través de diferentes mecanismos de acción, mejoran la densidad mineral ósea y disminuyen el riesgo de fractura. En el presente artículo se presenta al lector información relevante de cada uno de los medicamentos empleados en el tratamiento de esta entidad desde el punto de vista farmacológico y de efectividad clínica.
Osteoporosis is a silent illness until fractures appears, with a very high economic and social cost for the patient and the health system, representing a true problem of public health. Postmenopausal women have a higher risk of osteoporosis and fracture. Actually are available different drugs that through a varied mechanism of action, increase bone mineral density and reduce fracture risk. In this article we present relevant information about the pharmacology and clinical effectiveness of each one of drugs used in the treatment of osteoporosis.
Subject(s)
Humans , Therapeutics , Osteoporosis, Postmenopausal , Drug Therapy , Social Security , Technology, High-Cost , Public Health , Fractures, BoneABSTRACT
La artritis psoriática es una enfermedad de relativamente reciente descripción en el campo de la reumatología, pues previamente se consideraba que este tipo de pacientes cursaban con dos entidades nosológicas distintas que convergían en el tiempo: psoriasis y artritis reumatoide. Han sido múltiples los intentos por clasificar adecuadamente a estos pacientes y esto ha llevado a la aparición de 7 criterios de clasificación en los últimos 36 años. En el presente artículo haremos un recuento de las principales características clínicas, de laboratorio e imagenológicas de la artritis psoriática. Además, cada uno de los criterios de clasificación se describirá en orden cronológico de aparición.
Psoriatic arthritis is a relatively recent description disease in the rheumatology field. Previously physicians considered that the patient with psoriasis and any type of arthropathy had two diseases that coincided at the time: psoriasis and rheumatoid arthritis. There have been many attempts to classify these patients adequately. In the last 36 years seven criteria for the classification of this entity have appeared. In this article we made a summary of the clinical characteristics, laboratories and imaging in psoriatic arthritis. Furthermore, we intend to describe the classification criteria in chronological order.