ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: The study aimed to assess outcomes in patients undergoing liver biopsy for metastatic cancer, focusing on mortality rates and chemotherapy following their biopsy. METHODS: Hospital Episode Statistics data from 2010 to 2019 identified 30 992 patients with metastatic cancer who underwent percutaneous liver biopsy. Primary outcomes included 14-day and 30-day mortality rates, as well as the proportion receiving chemotherapy within 6 months. RESULTS: 30 992 patients were studied (median age of 69 (IQR 59-74) years, 52% female). 28% underwent inpatient biopsy with 8% dying within 14 days and 26% within 30 days. Outpatient biopsies had lower mortality rates: 2.2% at 14 days and 8.6% at 30 days.30-day mortality was associated with: inpatient biopsy (OR 3.5 (95% CI 3.26 to 3.76)) and increasing comorbidity (Charlson score 1-4: 1.21 (95% CI 1.11 to 1.32)); but negatively with all ages under 70 (eg, for 18-29 years 0.35 (95% CI 0.20 to 0.63)) and biopsy at a radiotherapy centre (0.88 (95% CI 0.82 to 0.95)).46% of patients received chemotherapy within 6 months of biopsy (53% with outpatient biopsies but only 33% with inpatient biopsies). Receiving chemotherapy was associated with: all ages under 70 (eg, 18-29 years 3.3 (95% CI 2.62 to 5.30)), female sex (1.06 (95% CI 1.01 to 1.11)) and medium (1.13 (95% CI 1.04 to 1.22) and high (1.49 (95% CI 1.38 to 1.62)) volume liver biopsy providers; but negatively with inpatient biopsy (0.45 (95% CI 0.43 to 0.48)) and increasing comorbidity (Charlson score 1-4: 0.85 (95% CI 0.79 to 0.91)). CONCLUSIONS: Mortality rates following liver biopsy for metastatic cancer are notably higher among patients undergoing emergency inpatient procedures. Clinicians should carefully weigh the risks and benefits of biopsy in elderly, comorbid or poor performance status patients. Multidisciplinary approaches involving palliative care may aid in decision-making for these patients.
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: The provision of palliative care is increasing, with many people dying in community-based settings. It is essential that communication is effective if and when patients transition from hospice to community palliative care. Past research has indicated that communication issues are prevalent during hospital discharges, but little is known about hospice discharges. METHODS: An explanatory sequential mixed methods study consisting of a retrospective review of hospice discharge letters, followed by hospice focus groups, to explore patterns in communication of palliative care needs of discharged patients and describe why these patients were being discharged. Discharge letters were extracted for key content information using a standardised form. Letters were then examined for language patterns using a linguistic methodology termed corpus linguistics. Thematic analysis was used to analyse the focus group transcripts. Findings were triangulated to develop an explanatory understanding of discharge communication from hospice care. RESULTS: We sampled 250 discharge letters from five UK hospices whereby patients had been discharged to primary care. Twenty-five staff took part in focus groups. The main reasons for discharge extracted from the letters were symptoms "managed/resolved" (75.2%), and/or the "patient wishes to die/for care at home" (37.2%). Most patients had some form of physical needs documented on the letters (98.4%) but spiritual needs were rarely documented (2.4%). Psychological/emotional needs and social needs were documented in 46.4 and 35.6% of letters respectively. There was sometimes ambiguity in "who" will be following up "what" in the discharge letters, and whether described patients' needs were resolved or ongoing for managing in the community setting. The extent to which patients received a copy of their discharge letter varied. Focus groups conveyed a lack of consensus on what constitutes "complexity" and "complex pain". CONCLUSIONS: The content and structure of discharge letters varied between hospices, although generally focused on physical needs. Our study provides insights into patterns associated with those discharged from hospice, and how policy and guidance in this area may be improved, such as greater consistency of sharing letters with patients. A patient-centred set of hospice-specific discharge letter principles could help improve future practice.