Prediction of recurrent heart failure hospitalizations and mortality using the echocardiographic Killip score.

AIM: Examine the performance of a simple echocardiographic "Killip score" (eKillip) in predicting heart failure (HF) hospitalizations and mortality after index event of decompensated HF hospitalization. METHODS: HF patients hospitalized at our facility between 03/2019-03/2021 who underwent an echocardiography during their index admission were included in this retrospective analysis. The cohort was divided into 4 classes of eKillip according to: stroke volume index (SVI) < 35ml/m2 > and E/E' ratio < 15 > . An eKillip Class I was defined as SVI ≥ 35ml/m2 and E/E' ≤ 15 and was used as reference. RESULTS: Included 751 patients, median age 78.1 (IQR 69.3-86) years, 59% men, left ventricular ejection fraction 45 (IQR 30-60)%, brain natriuretic peptide levels 634 (IQR 331-1222)pg/ml. Compared with eKillip Class I, a graded increase in the combined endpoint of 30-day mortality and rehospitalizations rates was noted: (Class II: HR 1.77, CI 0.95-3.33, p = 0.07; Class III: HR 1.94, CI 1.05-3.6, p = 0.034; Class IV: HR 2.9, CI 1.64-5.13, p < 0.001 respectively), which overall persisted after correction for clinical (Class II: HR 1.682, CI 0.9-3.15, p = 0.105; Class III: HR 2.104, CI 1.13-3.9, p = 0.019; Class IV: HR 2.74, CI 1.54-4.85, p = 0.001 respectively) or echocardiographic parameters (Class II: HR 1.92, CI 1.02-3.63, p = 0.045; Class III: HR 1.54, CI 0.81-2.95, p = 0.189; Class IV: HR 2.04, CI 1.1-3.76, p = 0.023 respectively). Specifically, the eKillip Class IV group comprised one-third of the patient population and persistently showed increased risk of 30-day HF hospitalizations or mortality following multivariate analysis. CONCLUSION: A simple echocardiographic score can assist identifying high-risk decompensated HF patients for recurrent hospitalizations and mortality.

Exercise limitation in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy: combined stress echocardiography and cardiopulmonary exercise test.

AIMS: The study aims to investigate exercise-limiting factors in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) using combined stress echocardiography and cardiopulmonary exercise test. METHODS AND RESULTS: A symptom-limited ramp bicycle exercise test was performed in the semi-supine position on a tilting dedicated ergometer. Echocardiographic images were obtained concurrently with gas exchange measurements along predefined stages of exercise. Oxygen extraction was calculated using the Fick equation at each activity level. Thirty-six HCM patients (mean age 67 ± 6 years, 72% men, 18 obstructive HCM) were compared with age and sex-matched 29 controls. At rest, compared with controls, E/E' ratio (6.26 ± 2.3 vs. 14 ± 2.5, P < 0.001) and systolic pulmonary artery pressures (SPAP) (22.6 ± 3.4 vs. 34 ± 6.2 mmHg, P = 0.023) were increased. Along with the stages of exercise (unloaded; anaerobic threshold; peak), diastolic function worsened (E/e' 8.9 ± 2.6 vs. 13.8 ± 3.6 P = 0.011; 9.4 ± 2.3 vs. 18.6 ± 3.3 P = 0.001; 8.7 ± 1.9 vs. 21.5 ± 4, P < 0.001), SPAP increased (23 ± 2.7 vs. 33 ± 4.4, P = 0.013; 26 ± 3.2 vs. 40 ± 2.9, P < 0.001; 26 ± 3.5 vs. 45 ± 7 mmHg, P < 0.001), and oxygen consumption (6.6 ± 1.7 vs. 6.8 ± 1.6, P = 0.86; 18.1 ± 2.2 vs. 14.6 ± 1.5, P = 0.008; 20.3 ± 3 vs. 15.1 ± 2.1 mL/kg/min, P = 0.01) was reduced. Oxygen pulse was blunted (6.3 ± 1.8 vs. 6.2 ± 1.9, P = 0.79; 10 ± 2.1 vs. 8.8 ± 1.6, P = 0.063; 12.2 ± 2 vs. 8.2 ± 2.3 mL/beat, P = 0.002) due to an insufficient increase in both stroke volume (92.3 ± 17 vs. 77.3 ± 14.5 P = 0.021; 101 ± 19.1 vs. 87.3 ± 15.7 P = 0.06; 96.5 ± 12.2 vs. 83.6 ± 16.1 mL, P = 0.034) and oxygen extraction (0.07 ± 0.03 vs. 0.07 ± 0.02, P = 0.47; 0.13 ± 0.02 vs. 0.10 ± 0.03, P = 0.013; 0.13 ± 0.03 vs. 0.11 ± 0.03, P = 0.03). Diastolic dysfunction, elevated SPAP, and the presence of atrial fibrillation were associated with reduced exercise capacity. CONCLUSIONS: Both central and peripheral cardiovascular limitations are involved in exercise intolerance in HCM. Diastolic dysfunction seems to be the main driver for this limitation.

Prognostic impact of combined non-severe aortic stenosis and mitral regurgitation on clinical outcomes: a single-centre retrospective study.

OBJECTIVES: Though the concomitant occurrence of non-severe aortic stenosis (AS) and mitral regurgitation (MR) is highly prevalent, there are limited data to guide clinical decision-making in this condition. Here, we attempt to determine an aortic valve area (AVA) cut-off value associated with worse clinical outcomes in patients with combined non-severe AS and MR. METHODS: Single-centre, retrospective analysis of consecutive patients who underwent echocardiography examination between 2010 and 2021 with evidence of combined non-severe AS and MR. We excluded patients with ≥moderate aortic valve regurgitation or mitral stenosis, as well as patients who underwent any aortic or mitral intervention either prior or following our assessment (n=372). RESULTS: The final cohort consisted of 2933 patients with non-severe AS, 506 of them with >mild MR. Patients with both pathologies had lower cardiac output and worse diastolic function.Patients with an AVA ≤1.35 cm² in the presence of >mild MR had the highest rates of heart failure (HF) hospitalisations (HR 3.1, IQR 2.4-4, p<0.001) or mortality (HR 2, IQR 1.8-2.4, p<0.001), which remained significant after adjusting for clinical and echocardiographic parameters. CONCLUSION: Patients with combined non-severe AS and MR have a higher rate of HF hospitalisations and mortality. An AVA≤1.35 cm² in the presence of >mild MR is associated with worse clinical outcomes.