Hiatal Hernia Evaluation Before Bariatric Surgery: Should It Be Routinely Done?

PURPOSE: The necessity of routine preoperative esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) and upper gastrointestinal series (UGIS) in the evaluation of hiatal hernia (HH) among bariatric surgery candidates is controversial since most are detected during surgery, regardless of the preoperative work-up. The aim is to determine the accuracy of preoperative EGD and UGIS for HH diagnosis among bariatric surgery candidates. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The records of bariatric surgery patients between 2011 and 2015 were reviewed. Patients underwent routine UGIS and/or EGD before the surgery. The positive and negative predictive values (PPV, NPV) for each study were calculated based on operative findings. RESULTS: A total of 463 patients were included in the study. Mean age was 44.34 ± 12.99 years. Mean preoperative body mass index (BMI) was 42.7 ± 5.15 kg/m2. A total of 450 patients (97.2%) had a UGIS, 263 patients underwent EGD (56.8%), and 258 (55.7%) patients had both tests. HH was diagnosed in 26 (5.8%), 60 (13%), and 72 (27.8%) patients, respectively. HH was found intra-operatively in 53 patients (11.4%). It was associated with heartburn (P = 0.005) and previous bariatric surgery (P = 0.008). EGD had a greater sensitivity than UGIS (47.4% vs. 30.2%) and a lower specificity (81.4% vs. 97.5%). PPV and NPV for UGIS and EGD were 61.5% and 91.3% vs. 30% and 90.2%, respectively. The sensitivity of both tests when combined together reached 60.5%. CONCLUSIONS: Both EGD and UGIS, whether solely performed or combined, have low sensitivity for diagnosis of HH and can probably be omitted from the preoperative evaluation, except for high-risk patients.

SYMPTOMATIC AND ASYMPTOMATIC HYPOGLYCEMIA POST THREE DIFFERENT BARIATRIC PROCEDURES: A COMMON AND SEVERE COMPLICATION.

Background: The prevalence of post-bariatric surgery hypoglycemia (PBH) remains unclear due to diagnostic criteria variability, types of bariatric procedures and possible unawareness. Objective: To determine the frequency, pattern and severity of symptomatic and asymptomatic hypoglycemia in subjects post three different bariatric procedures performed >1 year before evaluation and a group of obese subjects before surgery. Design and Setting: Observational cohort study. Fifty-one consecutive patients participated: post Roux-en-Y gastric-bypass (RYGB) (n=16), post omega-loop gastric-bypass (OLGB) (n=12), post sleeve-gastrectomy (SG) (n=15), obese subjects before surgery (controls) (n=8). Hypoglycemic events (glucose ≤54 mg/dL) and severe hypoglycemia (glucose ≤40 mg/dL) were evaluated by symptoms' questionnaire, mixed-meal tolerance test (MMTT) and continuous glucose monitoring (CGM). Results: According to questionnaires, meal-related complaints were reported in 11 (26%) of the surgical group and in one control subject. During MMTT, 88%, 82% and 67% experienced hypoglycemia in RYGB, OMGB and SG groups, respectively, vs. none of the controls (P<0.001). Severe hypoglycemia occurred in 38%, 45% and 7% in RYGB, OMGB and SG groups, respectively (P=0.025), but only 10 of the total operated patients (24%) reported any symptoms. During CGM, fasting hypoglycemic events occurred more in RYGB and OLGB vs. SG group: 55%, 63% and 17% respectively (P=0.036). Conclusions: PBH is very common after RYGB, OMGB and SG and can be severe especially following bypass procedures. Our results show that hypoglycemia occurs not only postprandially but also in the fasting state, especially following bypass procedures. In most cases, there were no specific complaints, possibly leading to its underestimation.

Anastomotic Stricture Rates Following Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass for Morbid Obesity: A Comparison Between Linear and Circular-Stapled Anastomosis.

BACKGROUND: Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (LRYGB) is an effective procedure in the management of morbid obesity with variations in outcome, which are technique dependent. Anastomotic stricture remains an important complication. The aim of this study was to assess the long-term outcome of patients undergoing either a linear-stapled anastomosis (LSA) or circular-stapled anastomosis (CSA) with an emphasis on postoperative stricture formation and excess body weight loss (EBWL). METHODS: Medical records of all patients who underwent bariatric surgery between 2008 and 2013 at a single bariatric surgical center were reviewed. All patients who had a LRYGB were included in the study. Patients were divided in two groups based on stapling technique-LSA and CSA. Patient groups were compared with regard to perioperative complication, EBWL. RESULTS: A total of 114 patients were included in the study. There were 51 patients in the LSA group and 63 in the CSA group. No differences were found between the two groups with regard to operative time, hospital stay, or in the EBWL over a 12-month follow-up period. Anastomotic stricture developed in 4 patients, all occurring in the LSA group (7.8%). Three of these patients had undergone successful endoscopic dilatation. CONCLUSIONS: Both stapling techniques resulted in a similar EBWL during the follow-up period and an acceptable safety profile. Anastomotic stricture rate was slightly higher in the LSA, but this did not affect EBWL.

Modified Endoscopic Vacuum Therapy for Nonhealing Esophageal Anastomotic Leak: Technique Description and Review of Literature.

BACKGROUND: Endoscopic vacuum-assisted closure (EVAC) therapy is increasingly being used as a new promising method for repairing upper gastrointestinal defects of different etiologies with high success rates. EVAC therapy consists of placing a sponge either within the lumen or within an abscess cavity connected with a nasogastric (NG) tube to a negative pressure system, thus decreasing bacterial contamination and edema and promoting granulation tissue proliferation, thereby gradually decreasing the cavity size until complete closure. Herein, we describe a modified technique for EVAC therapy in which the NG tube is passed into the esophagus through an existing intrapleural drain tract using a rendezvous technique. The small residual fistula was amendable to fibrin glue embolization. This allows easier sponge placement and exchange compared to traditional EVAC technique, and allows oral intake during treatment. We also review the literature regarding other endoscopic treatment options for esophageal anastomotic leaks and perforations. METHODS: The PubMed database was searched using the terms "esophagus," "esophageal," "leak," "fistula," "endoluminal vacuum-assisted closure (VAC)," "endoscopic VAC," "stent," "sealant," "glue," and "over-the-scope clip (OTSC)." Reference lists of identified articles were searched for further articles, and the "similar articles" function was used on all included articles. RESULTS: Complete closure of the nonhealing fistula was achieved after 8 days of EVAC treatment and fibrin glue embolization. CONCLUSIONS: Modified EVAC technique as described is feasible and safe. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first description of this technique. The technique allows easier sponge placement and exchange compared to traditional EVAC technique, and allows oral intake during treatment.

Gastric wall necrosis following late prolapse after laparoscopic banding.

A 20-year-old female, who had suffered from morbid obesity with a BMI of 41.2, was admitted 3 years after undergoing laparoscopic gastric banding. 3 days before her present admission, she began suffering from abdominal pain without vomiting. On admission investigation, gastric prolapse was diagnosed with complete obstruction of passage through the band. Emergency laparoscopy was performed, which showed devitalization of the stomach above the band. At the operation, the band was removed, and conservative treatment was begun with nasogastric aspiration, total parenteral nutrition, and close observation.

Disconnection of port after laparoscopic gastric banding: causes and solution.

BACKGROUND: Gastric banding is a popular operation for the treatment of morbid obesity. However, the procedure itself is not free from complications. Our study describes port disconnection, and our suggested solution. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In 6 of 58 patients who underwent gastric banding, we diagnosed disconnection of the tube from the port and found the tube in the pelvis. This required laparoscopic retrieval and reconnection of the tube. RESULTS: All 6 patients noticed that the moment that the tube disconnected from the port, they felt sharp right abdominal pain. They all sought medical aid, and abdominal plain films showed the tubing in the pelvis. The 6 patients underwent a second laparoscopic procedure, during which the tube was found in the lower abdomen. A grasper was passed through the endoscope, and the tube was pulled out and reconnected to the port. 2 of the 6 patients required complete change of the port to a new one. CONCLUSIONS: Disconnection of the tubing from the port must be considered in patients who previously underwent gastric banding and suffer from acute abdominal pain.