A Randomized Clinical Trial of Catheter Ablation and Antiarrhythmic Drug Therapy for Suppression of Ventricular Tachycardia in Ischemic Cardiomyopathy: The VANISH2 Trial.

Recurrent ventricular tachycardia (VT) in patients with prior myocardial infarction is associated with adverse quality of life and clinical outcomes, despite the presence of implanted defibrillators (ICDs). Suppression of recurrent VT can be accomplished with antiarrhythmic drug therapy or catheter ablation. The Ventricular Tachycardia Antiarrhythmics or Ablation In Structural Heart Disease 2 (VANISH2) trial is designed to determine whether ablation is superior to antiarrhythmic drug therapy as first line therapy for patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy and VT. The VANISH2 trial enrolls patients with prior myocardial infarction and VT (with one of: ≥1 ICD shock; ≥3 episodes treated with antitachycardia pacing (ATP) and symptoms; ≥5 episodes treated with ATP regardless of symptoms; ≥3 episodes within 24 hours; or sustained VT treated with electrical cardioversion or pharmacologic conversion). Enrolled patients are classified as either sotalol-eligible, or amiodarone-eligible, and then are randomized to either catheter ablation or to that antiarrhythmic drug therapy, with randomization stratified by drug-eligibility group. Drug therapy, catheter ablation procedures and ICD programming are standardized. All patients will be followed until two years after randomization. The primary endpoint is a composite of mortality at any time, appropriate ICD shock after 14 days, VT storm after 14 days, and treated sustained VT below detection of the ICD after 14 days. The outcomes will be analyzed according to the intention-to-treat principle using survival analysis techniques. The results of the VANISH2 trial are intended to provide data to support clinical decisions on how to suppress VT for patients with prior myocardial infarction. Clinicaltrials.gov registration NCT02830360.

Understanding the Utility of Endocardial Electrocardiographic Imaging in Epi-Endocardial Mapping of 3D Reentrant Circuits.

Background: Studies of VT mechanisms are largely based on a 2D portrait of reentrant circuits on one surface of the heart. This oversimplifies the 3D circuit that involves the depth of the myocardium. Simultaneous epicardial and endocardial (epi-endo) mapping was shown to facilitate a 3D delineation of VT circuits, which is however difficult via invasive mapping. Objective: This study investigates the capability of noninvasive epicardial-endocardial electrocardiographic imaging (ECGI) to elucidate the 3D construct of VT circuits, emphasizing the differentiation of epicardial, endocardial, and intramural circuits and to determine the proximity of mid-wall exits to the epicardial or endocardial surfaces. Methods: 120-lead ECGs of VT in combination with subject-specific heart-torso geometry are used to compute unipolar electrograms (CEGM) on ventricular epicardium and endocardia. Activation isochrones are constructed, and the percentage of activation within VT cycle length is calculated on each surface. This classifies VT circuits into 2D (surface only), uniform transmural, nonuniform transmural, and mid-myocardial (focal on surfaces). Furthermore, the endocardial breakthrough time was accurately measured using Laplacian eigenmaps, and by correlating the delay time of the epi-endo breakthroughs, the relative distance of a mid-wall exit to the epicardium or the endocardium surfaces was identified. Results: We analyzed 23 simulated and in-vivo VT circuits on post-infarction porcine hearts. In simulated circuits, ECGI classified 21% as 2D and 78% as 3D: 82.6% of these were correctly classified. The relative timing between epicardial and endocardial breakthroughs was correctly captured across all cases. In in-vivo circuits, ECGI classified 25% as 2D and 75% as 3D: in all cases, circuit exits and entrances were consistent with potential critical isthmus delineated from combined LGE-MRI and catheter mapping data. Conclusions: ECGI epi-endo mapping has the potential for fast delineation of 3D VT circuits, which may augment detailed catheter mapping for VT ablation.

Hybrid Neural State-Space Modeling for Supervised and Unsupervised Electrocardiographic Imaging.

State-space modeling (SSM) provides a general framework for many image reconstruction tasks. Error in a priori physiological knowledge of the imaging physics, can bring incorrectness to solutions. Modern deep-learning approaches show great promise but lack interpretability and rely on large amounts of labeled data. In this paper, we present a novel hybrid SSM framework for electrocardiographic imaging (ECGI) to leverage the advantage of state-space formulations in data-driven learning. We first leverage the physics-based forward operator to supervise the learning. We then introduce neural modeling of the transition function and the associated Bayesian filtering strategy. We applied the hybrid SSM framework to reconstruct electrical activity on the heart surface from body-surface potentials. In unsupervised settings of both in-silico and in-vivo data without cardiac electrical activity as the ground truth to supervise the learning, we demonstrated improved ECGI performances of the hybrid SSM framework trained from a small number of ECG observations in comparison to the fixed SSM. We further demonstrated that, when in-silico simulation data becomes available, mixed supervised and unsupervised training of the hybrid SSM achieved a further 40.6% and 45.6% improvements, respectively, in comparison to traditional ECGI baselines and supervised data-driven ECGI baselines for localizing the origin of ventricular activations in real data.

Long-Term Outcomes of Resynchronization-Defibrillation for Heart Failure.

BACKGROUND: The Resynchronization-Defibrillation for Ambulatory Heart Failure Trial (RAFT) showed a greater benefit with respect to mortality at 5 years among patients who received cardiac-resynchronization therapy (CRT) than among those who received implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (ICDs). However, the effect of CRT on long-term survival is not known. METHODS: We randomly assigned patients with New York Heart Association (NYHA) class II or III heart failure, a left ventricular ejection fraction of 30% or less, and an intrinsic QRS duration of 120 msec or more (or a paced QRS duration of 200 msec or more) to receive either an ICD alone or a CRT defibrillator (CRT-D). We assessed long-term outcomes among patients at the eight highest-enrolling participating sites. The primary outcome was death from any cause; the secondary outcome was a composite of death from any cause, heart transplantation, or implantation of a ventricular assist device. RESULTS: The trial enrolled 1798 patients, of whom 1050 were included in the long-term survival trial; the median duration of follow-up for the 1050 patients was 7.7 years (interquartile range, 3.9 to 12.8), and the median duration of follow-up for those who survived was 13.9 years (interquartile range, 12.8 to 15.7). Death occurred in 405 of 530 patients (76.4%) assigned to the ICD group and in 370 of 520 patients (71.2%) assigned to the CRT-D group. The time until death appeared to be longer for those assigned to receive a CRT-D than for those assigned to receive an ICD (acceleration factor, 0.80; 95% confidence interval, 0.69 to 0.92; P = 0.002). A secondary-outcome event occurred in 412 patients (77.7%) in the ICD group and in 392 (75.4%) in the CRT-D group. CONCLUSIONS: Among patients with a reduced ejection fraction, a widened QRS complex, and NYHA class II or III heart failure, the survival benefit associated with receipt of a CRT-D as compared with ICD appeared to be sustained during a median of nearly 14 years of follow-up. (RAFT ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00251251.).

Disparities in Referral and Utilization of Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillators for Primary Prevention of Sudden Cardiac Death.

BACKGROUND: Implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (ICDs) reduce mortality in patients with reduced left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF). We investigated sex disparities in a contemporary Canadian population for utilization of primary prevention ICDs. METHODS: This was a retrospective cohort study on patients with reduced LVEF admitted to hospitals from 2010 to 2020 in Nova Scotia (population = 971,935). RESULTS: There were 4406 patients eligible for ICDs: 3108 (71%) men and 1298 (29%) women. The mean follow-up time was 3.9 ± 3.0 years. Rates of coronary disease were similar between men and women (45.8% vs 44.0%; P = 0.28), but men had lower LVEF (26.6 ± 5.9% vs 27.2 ± 5.8%; P = 0.0017). The referral rate for ICD was 11% (n = 487), with 13% of men (n = 403) and 6.5% of women (n = 84) referred (P < 0.001). The ICD implantation rate in the population was 8% (n = 358), with 9.5% of men (n = 296) and 4.8% of women (n = 62) (P < 0.001) receiving the device. Men were more likely than women to receive an ICD (odds ratio 2.08, 95% confidence interval 1.61-2.70; P < 0.0001)). There was no significant difference in mortality between men and women (P = 0.2764). There was no significant difference in device therapies between men and women (43.8% vs 31.1%; P = 0.0685). CONCLUSIONS: A significant disparity exists in the utilization of primary prevention ICDs between men and women in a contemporary Canadian population.

Improving localization accuracy for non-invasive automated early left ventricular origin localization approach.

Background: We previously developed a non-invasive approach to localize the site of early left ventricular activation origin in real time using 12-lead ECG, and to project the predicted site onto a generic LV endocardial surface using the smallest angle between two vectors algorithm (SA). Objectives: To improve the localization accuracy of the non-invasive approach by utilizing the K-nearest neighbors algorithm (KNN) to reduce projection errors. Methods: Two datasets were used. Dataset #1 had 1012 LV endocardial pacing sites with known coordinates on the generic LV surface and corresponding ECGs, while dataset #2 included 25 clinically-identified VT exit sites and corresponding ECGs. The non-invasive approach used "population" regression coefficients to predict the target coordinates of a pacing site or VT exit site from the initial 120-m QRS integrals of the pacing site/VT ECG. The predicted site coordinates were then projected onto the generic LV surface using either the KNN or SA projection algorithm. Results: The non-invasive approach using the KNN had a significantly lower mean localization error than the SA in both dataset #1 (9.4 vs. 12.5 mm, p < 0.05) and dataset #2 (7.2 vs. 9.5 mm, p < 0.05). The bootstrap method with 1,000 trials confirmed that using KNN had significantly higher predictive accuracy than using the SA in the bootstrap assessment with the left-out sample (p < 0.05). Conclusion: The KNN significantly reduces the projection error and improves the localization accuracy of the non-invasive approach, which shows promise as a tool to identify the site of origin of ventricular arrhythmia in non-invasive clinical modalities.

Optimization of a 12-Lead Electrocardiography Subset for Automated Early Left Ventricular Activation Localization Approach Based on Pace-Mapping Technology.

BACKGROUND: We previously developed an automated approach based on pace mapping to localise early left ventricular (LV) activation origin. To avoid a singular system, we require pacing from at least 2 more known sites than the number of electrocardiography (ECG) leads used. Fewer leads used means fewer pacing sites required. We sought to identify an optimal minimal ECG lead set for the automated approach. METHODS: We used 1715 LV endocardial pacing sites to create derivation and testing data sets. The derivation data set, consisting of 1012 known pacing sites pooled from 38 patients, was used to identify an optimal 3-lead set by means of random forest regression (RFR), and a second 3-lead set by means of exhaustive search. The performance of these sets and the calculated Frank leads was compared within the testing data set with 703 pacing sites pooled from 25 patients. RESULTS: The RFR yielded III, V1, and V4, whereas the exhaustive search identified leads II, V2 and V6. Comparison of these sets and the calculated Frank leads demonstrated similar performance when using 5 or more known pacing sites. Accuracy improved with additional pacing sites, achieving mean accuracy of < 5 mm, after including up to 9 pacing sites when they were focused on a suspected area of ventricular activation origin (radius < 10 mm). CONCLUSIONS: The RFR identified the quasi-orthogonal leads set to localise the source of LV activation, minimizing the training set of pacing sites. Localization accuracy was high with the use of these leads and was not significantly different from using leads identified by exhaustive search or empiric use of Frank leads.

Ventricular Tachycardia and ICD Therapy Burden With Catheter Ablation Versus Escalated Antiarrhythmic Drug Therapy.

BACKGROUND: Catheter ablation improves ventricular tachycardia (VT) event-free (time to event) survival in patients with antiarrhythmic drug (AAD)-refractory VT and previous myocardial infarction (MI). The effects of ablation on recurrent VT and implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) therapy (burden) have yet to be investigated. OBJECTIVES: This study sought to compare the VT and ICD therapy burden following treatment with either ablation or escalated AAD therapy among patients with VT and previous MI in the VANISH (Ventricular tachycardia AblatioN versus escalated antiarrhythmic drug therapy in ISchemic Heart disease) trial. METHODS: The VANISH trial randomized patients with previous MI and VT despite initial AAD therapy to either escalated AAD treatment or catheter ablation. VT burden was defined as the total number of VT events treated with ≥1 appropriate ICD therapy. Appropriate ICD therapy burden was defined as the total number of appropriate shocks or antitachycardia pacing therapies (ATPs) delivered. The Anderson-Gill recurrent event model was used to compare burden between the treatment arms. RESULTS: Of the 259 enrolled patients (median age, 69.8 years; 7.0% women), 132 patients were randomized to ablation and 129 patients were randomized to escalated AAD therapy. Over 23.4 months of follow-up, ablation-treated patients had a 40% lower shock-treated VT event burden and a 39% lower appropriate shock burden compared with patients who received escalated AAD therapy (P <0.05 for all). A reduction in VT burden, ATP-treated VT event burden, and appropriate ATP burden among ablation patients was only demonstrated in the stratum of patients with amiodarone-refractory VT (P <0.05 for all). CONCLUSIONS: Among patients with AAD-refractory VT and a previous MI, catheter ablation reduced shock-treated VT event burden and appropriate shock burden compared with escalated AAD therapy. There was also lower VT burden, ATP-treated VT event burden, and appropriate ATP burden among ablation-treated patients; however, the effect was limited to patients with amiodarone-refractory VT.

Perioperative Safety and Early Patient and Device Outcomes Among Subcutaneous Versus Transvenous Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator Implantations : A Randomized, Multicenter Trial.

BACKGROUND: Implantable cardioverter defibrillators (ICDs) improve survival in patients at risk for cardiac arrest, but are associated with intravascular lead-related complications. The subcutaneous ICD (S-ICD), with no intravascular components, was developed to minimize lead-related complications. OBJECTIVE: To assess key ICD performance measures related to delivery of ICD therapy, including inappropriate ICD shocks (delivered in absence of life-threatening arrhythmia) and failed ICD shocks (which did not terminate ventricular arrhythmia). DESIGN: Randomized, multicenter trial. (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT02881255). SETTING: The ATLAS trial. PATIENTS: 544 eligible patients (141 female) with a primary or secondary prevention indication for an ICD who were younger than age 60 years, had a cardiogenetic phenotype, or had prespecified risk factors for lead complications were electrocardiographically screened and 503 randomly assigned to S-ICD (251 patients) or transvenous ICD (TV-ICD) (252 patients). Mean follow-up was 2.5 years (SD, 1.1). Mean age was 49.0 years (SD, 11.5). MEASUREMENTS: The primary outcome was perioperative major lead-related complications. RESULTS: There was a statistically significant reduction in perioperative, lead-related complications, which occurred in 1 patient (0.4%) with an S-ICD and in 12 patients (4.8%) with TV-ICD (-4.4%; 95% CI, -6.9 to -1.9; P = 0.001). There was a trend for more inappropriate shocks with the S-ICD (hazard ratio [HR], 2.37; 95% CI, 0.98 to 5.77), but no increase in failed appropriate ICD shocks (HR, 0.61 (0.15 to 2.57). Patients in the S-ICD group had more ICD site pain, measured on a 10-point numeric rating scale, on the day of implant (4.2 ± 2.8 vs. 2.9 ± 2.2; P < 0.001) and 1 month later (1.3 ± 1.8 vs. 0.9 ± 1.5; P = 0.035). LIMITATION: At present, the ATLAS trial is underpowered to detect differences in clinical shock outcomes; however, extended follow-up is ongoing. CONCLUSION: The S-ICD reduces perioperative, lead-related complications without significantly compromising the effectiveness of ICD shocks, but with more early postoperative pain and a trend for more inappropriate shocks. PRIMARY FUNDING SOURCE: Boston Scientific.

Urban-Rural Differences in Cardiac Arrest Outcomes: A Retrospective Population-Based Cohort Study.

Background: Approximately 10% of people who suffer an out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) treated by paramedics survive to hospital discharge. Survival differs by up to 19.2% between urban centres and rural areas. Our goal was to investigate the differences in OHCA survival between urban centres and rural areas. Methods: This was a retrospective cohort study of OHCA patients treated by Nova Scotia Emergency Medical Services (EMS) in 2017. Cases of traumatic, expected, and noncardiac OHCA were excluded. Data were collected from the Emergency Health Service electronic patient care record system and the discharge abstract database. Geographic information system analysis classified cases as being in urban centres (population > 1000 people) or rural areas, using 2016 Canadian Census boundaries. The primary outcome was survival to hospital discharge. Multivariable logistic regression covariates were age, sex, bystander resuscitation, whether the arrest was witnessed, public location, and preceding symptoms. Results: A total of 510 OHCAs treated by Nova Scotia Emergency Medical Services were included for analysis. A total of 12% (n = 62) survived to discharge. Patients with OHCAs in urban centres were 107% more likely to survive than those with OHCAs in rural areas (adjusted odds ratio = 2.1; 95% confidence interval = 1.1 to 3.8; P = 0.028). OHCAs in urban centres had a significantly shorter mean time to defibrillation of shockable rhythm (11.2 minutes ± 6.2) vs those in rural areas (17.5 minutes ± 17.3). Conclusions: Nova Scotia has an urban vs rural disparity in OHCA care that is also seen in densely populated OHCA centres. Survival is improved in urban centres. Further improvements in overall survival, especially in rural areas, may arise from community engagement in OHCA recognition and optimized healthcare delivery.

Contexte: Environ 10 % des personnes qui subissent un arrêt cardiaque en milieu extrahospitalier (ACEH), traité par des intervenants paramédicaux, survivent jusqu'à leur congé de l'hôpital. Le taux de survie peut différer de 19,2 % entre les centres urbains et les régions rurales. Notre étude visait à étudier les différences en matière de survie après un ACEH entre les centres urbains et les régions rurales. Méthodologie: Il s'agissait d'une étude de cohorte rétrospective portant sur des patients ayant subi un ACEH traité par les services médicaux d'urgence de la Nouvelle-Écosse en 2017. Les cas d'ACEH traumatique, prévu et non cardiaque ont été exclus. Les données ont été recueillies à partir du système de dossiers électroniques de soins aux patients des services médicaux d'urgence et de la Base de données sur les congés des patients. L'analyse du système d'information géographique a classé les cas selon qu'ils sont survenus dans un centre urbain (population de plus de 1 000 personnes) ou dans une région rurale, en utilisant les limites du recensement canadien de 2016. Le principal paramètre d'évaluation était la survie à la sortie de l'hôpital. Les covariables utilisées dans la régression logistique multivariée étaient l'âge, le sexe, la réanimation effectuée par des témoins si présents lors de l'arrêt cardiaque, l'emplacement public et les symptômes précédents. Résultats: Au total, 510 ACEH traités par les services médicaux d'urgence de la Nouvelle-Écosse ont été inclus aux fins de l'analyse. En tout, 12 % (n = 62) des sujets ont survécu jusqu'à leur congé hospitalier. Les patients ayant subi un ACEH dans un centre urbain étaient 107 % plus susceptibles de survivre que ceux ayant subi un ACEH dans une région rurale (rapport de cotes ajusté : 2,1; intervalle de confiance à 95 % : 1,1 ­ 3,8; p = 0,028). Le temps moyen de délivrance d'un choc lors d'un ACEH avec rythme défibrillable est significativement plus court (11,2 ± 6,2 minutes) dans un centre urbain que dans une région rurale (17,5 ± 17,3 minutes). Conclusions: La Nouvelle-Écosse fait état d'une disparité dans les soins de l'ACEH entre les régions urbaines et les régions rurales, que l'on observe également dans les villes densément peuplées. La survie est plus longue dans les centres urbains. Il est possible de prolonger davantage la survie globale, en particulier dans les régions rurales, en sensibilisant la communauté à l'ACEH et en optimisant la prestation des soins de santé.

Intramural Needle Ablation for Refractory Premature Ventricular Contractions.

BACKGROUND: Frequent premature ventricular contractions (PVCs) are often amenable to catheter ablation. However, a deep intramural focus may lead to failure due to inability of standard ablation techniques to penetrate the focus. We sought to assess the efficacy and safety of infusion needle ablation (INA) for PVCs that are refractory to standard radiofrequency ablation. METHODS: Under 2 Food and Drug Administration approved protocols, INA was evaluated in patients with frequent PVCs that were refractory to standard ablation. Initial targets for ablation were selected by standard mapping techniques. INA was performed with a deflectable catheter equipped with an extendable/retractable needle at the tip that can be extended up to 12 mm into the myocardium and is capable of pacing and recording. After contrast injection for location assessment, radiofrequency ablation was performed with the needle tip using a temperature-controlled mode (maximum temperature 60 °C) with saline infusion from the needle. The primary end point was a decrease in PVC burden to <5000/24 hours at 6 months. The primary safety end point was incidence of procedure- or device-related serious adverse events. RESULTS: At 4 centers, 35 patients (age 55.3±16.9 years, 74.2% male) underwent INA. The baseline median PVC burden was 25.4% (interquartile range, 18.4%-33.9%) and mean left ventricular ejection fraction was 37.7±12.3%. Delivering 10.3±8.0 INA lesions/patient (91% had adjunctive standard radiofrequency ablation also) resulted in acute PVC elimination in 71.4%. After a mean follow-up of 156±109 days, the primary efficacy end point was met in 73.3%. The median PVC burden decreased to 0.8% (interquartile range, 0.1%-6.0%; P<0.001). The primary safety end point occurred in 14.3% consisting of 1 (2.9%) heart block, 1 (2.9%) femoral artery dissection, and 3 (8.6%) pericardial effusions (all treated percutaneously). CONCLUSIONS: INA is effective for the elimination of frequent PVCs that are refractory to conventional ablation and is associated with an acceptable safety profile. REGISTRATION: URL: https://www. CLINICALTRIALS: gov; Unique identifier: NCT01791543 and NCT03204981.

Randomized Ablation-Based Rhythm-Control Versus Rate-Control Trial in Patients With Heart Failure and Atrial Fibrillation: Results from the RAFT-AF trial.

BACKGROUND: Atrial fibrillation (AF) and heart failure (HF) frequently coexist and can be challenging to treat. Pharmacologically based rhythm control of AF has not proven to be superior to rate control. Ablation-based rhythm control was compared with rate control to evaluate if clinical outcomes in patients with HF and AF could be improved. METHODS: This was a multicenter, open-label trial with blinded outcome evaluation using a central adjudication committee. Patients with high-burden paroxysmal (>4 episodes in 6 months) or persistent (duration <3 years) AF, New York Heart Association class II to III HF, and elevated NT-proBNP (N-terminal pro brain natriuretic peptide) were randomly assigned to ablation-based rhythm control or rate control. The primary outcome was a composite of all-cause mortality and all HF events, with a minimum follow-up of 2 years. Secondary outcomes included left ventricular ejection fraction, 6-minute walk test, and NT-proBNP. Quality of life was measured using the Minnesota Living With Heart Failure Questionnaire and the AF Effect on Quality of Life. The primary analysis was time-to-event using Cox proportional hazards modeling. The trial was stopped early because of a determination of apparent futility by the Data Safety Monitoring Committee. RESULTS: From December 1, 2011, to January 20, 2018, 411 patients were randomly assigned to ablation-based rhythm control (n=214) or rate control (n=197). The primary outcome occurred in 50 (23.4%) patients in the ablation-based rhythm-control group and 64 (32.5%) patients in the rate-control group (hazard ratio, 0.71 [95% CI, 0.49-1.03]; P=0.066). Left ventricular ejection fraction increased in the ablation-based group (10.1±1.2% versus 3.8±1.2%, P=0.017), 6-minute walk distance improved (44.9±9.1 m versus 27.5±9.7 m, P=0.025), and NT-proBNP demonstrated a decrease (mean change -77.1% versus -39.2%, P<0.0001). Minnesota Living With Heart Failure Questionnaire demonstrated greater improvement in the ablation-based rhythm-control group (least-squares mean difference of -5.4 [95% CI, -10.5 to -0.3]; P=0.0036), as did the AF Effect on Quality of Life score (least-squares mean difference of 6.2 [95% CI, 1.7-10.7]; P=0.0005). Serious adverse events were observed in 50% of patients in both treatment groups. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with high-burden AF and HF, there was no statistical difference in all-cause mortality or HF events with ablation-based rhythm control versus rate control; however, there was a nonsignificant trend for improved outcomes with ablation-based rhythm control over rate control. REGISTRATION: URL: https://www. CLINICALTRIALS: gov; Unique identifier: NCT01420393.

Ventricular tachycardia characteristics and outcomes with catheter ablation vs. antiarrhythmic therapy: insights from the VANISH trial.

AIMS: Catheter ablation is superior to escalated antiarrhythmic drugs among patients with ventricular tachycardia (VT) and prior myocardial infarction (MI). However, it is uncertain whether clinical VT characteristics, should influence choice of therapy. The purpose of this study was to evaluate whether presentation with electrical storm and the clinical VT cycle length predicted response to ablation vs. escalated antiarrhythmic therapy. METHODS AND RESULTS: All patients enrolled in the Ventricular Tachycardia Ablation vs. Escalated Antiarrhythmic Drug Therapy in Ischaemic Heart Disease (VANISH) trial were included. The association between VT cycle length and presentation with electrical storm and the primary outcome of death, subsequent VT storm or appropriate ICD shock was evaluated. Among the study population of 259 patients, escalated antiarrhythmic drug therapy had worse outcomes for those presenting with a VT cycle length >400 ms [<150 b.p.m., 89/259, hazard ratio (HR) 1.7 (1.02-3.13)]. This effect was more pronounced among those taking amiodarone at baseline [HR of 2.22 (1.19-4.16)]. Presentation with VT storm (32/259) did not affect the primary outcome between groups. However, those presenting with VT storm on amiodarone had a trend towards worse outcomes with escalated antiarrhythmic therapy [HR 4.31 (0.55-33.93)]. CONCLUSION: The VT cycle length can influence response to either ablation or escalated drug therapy in patients with VT and prior MI. Those with slow VT had improved outcomes with ablation. Patients presenting with electrical storm demonstrated similar outcomes to the overall trial population, with a trend to benefit of catheter ablation, particularly in those on amiodarone.

Recent Insights Into Mechanisms and Clinical Approaches to Electrical Storm.

Electrical storm, characterized by repetitive ventricular tachycardia/ventricular fibrillation over a short period, is becoming more common with widespread use of implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) therapy. Electrical storm, sometimes called "arrhythmic storm" or "ventricular tachycardia storm," is usually a medical emergency requiring hospitalization and expert management, and significantly affects short- and long-term outcomes. This syndrome typically occurs in patients with underlying structural heart disease (ischemic or nonischemic cardiomyopathy) or inherited channelopathies. Triggers for electrical storm should be sought but are often unidentifiable. Initial management is dictated by the hemodynamic status, whereas subsequent management typically involves ICD interrogation and reprogramming to reduce recurrent shocks, identification and management of triggers like electrolyte abnormalities, myocardial ischemia, or decompensated heart failure, and antiarrhythmic drug therapy or catheter ablation. Sympathetic nervous system activation is central to the initiation and maintenance of arrhythmic storm, so autonomic modulation is a cornerstone of management. Sympathetic inhibition can be achieved with medications (particularly ß-adrenoreceptor blockers), deep sedation, or cardiac sympathetic denervation. More definitive management targets the underlying ventricular arrhythmia substrate to terminate and prevent recurrent arrhythmia. Arrhythmia targeting can be achieved with antiarrhythmic medications, catheter ablation, or more novel therapies, such as stereotactic radiation therapy, that target the arrhythmic substrate. Mechanistic studies point to adrenergic activation and other direct consequences of ICD shocks in promoting further arrhythmogenesis and hypocontractility. In this report, we review the pathophysiologic mechanisms, clinical features, prognosis, and therapeutic options for electrical storm. We also outline a clinical approach to this challenging and complex condition, along with its mechanistic basis.

Ventricular Tachycardia Burden and Mortality: Association or Causality?

Ventricular tachycardia (VT) is a potentially fatal cardiac rhythm disorder. Implantable cardioverter defibrillators (ICDs) are the primary management strategy for VT and have been shown to reduce the incidence of death but, ICDs do not reduce VT recurrences. Further, mounting evidence indicates that high VT burden, defined as the cumulative number of recurrent VTs or ICD shocks, is associated with an elevated risk of death; however, it is unclear if high VT burden is a cause of death or a marker of severe heart disease. Proposed mechanisms for a causal pathway suggest that multiple VT episodes or potential deleterious effects from ICDs might alter the myocardium of the ventricles to induce worsening heart disease, which might translate to an increased risk of mortality. In this review, we present the evidence to support association and causation hypotheses for the relationship between VT burden and risk of mortality and indicate potential gaps in evidence. Overall, there is insufficient evidence to prove causal hypotheses for the relationship between VT burden and mortality. Consistent definitions for VT burden, randomized controlled trials that assess the relationship between VT burden and mortality, and observational studies that capture VT burden are warranted to investigate if a potential causal relationship exists.

Learning to Disentangle Inter-Subject Anatomical Variations in Electrocardiographic Data.

OBJECTIVE: This work investigates the possibility of disentangled representation learning of inter-subject anatomical variations within electrocardiographic (ECG) data. METHODS: Since ground truth anatomical factors are generally not known in clinical ECG for assessing the disentangling ability of the models, the presented work first proposes the SimECG data set, a 12-lead ECG data set procedurally generated with a controlled set of anatomical generative factors. Second, to perform such disentanglement, the presented method evaluates and compares deep generative models with latent density modeled by nonparametric Indian Buffet Process to account for the complex generative process of ECG data. RESULTS: In the simulated data, the experiments demonstrate, for the first time, concrete evidence of the possibility to disentangle key generative anatomical factors within ECG data in separation from task-relevant generative factors. We achieve a disentanglement score of 92.1% while disentangling five anatomical generative factors and the task-relevant generative factor. In both simulated and real-data experiments, this work further provides quantitative evidence for the benefit of disentanglement learning on the downstream clinical task of localizing the origin of ventricular activation. Overall, the presented method achieves an improvement of around 18.5%, and 11.3% for the simulated dataset, and around 7.2%, and 3.6% for the real dataset, over baseline CNN, and standard generative model, respectively. CONCLUSION: These results demonstrate the importance as well as the feasibility of the disentangled representation learning of inter-subject anatomical variations within ECG data. SIGNIFICANCE: This work suggests the important research direction to deal with the well-known challenge posed by the presence of significant inter-subject variations during an automated analysis of ECG data.