Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Acta Med Acad ; 51(1): 1-13, 2022 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35695397

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of lysozyme-based oral antiseptic in the therapy of non-infectious sore throat in teachers. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A non-interventional, prospective, pilot study was conducted with two examinations. The first was performed as part of a general medical examination. If a non-infectious sore throat was confirmed by clinical checkup and all other inclusion and non-exclusion criteria confirmed, patients were offered to be enrolled in the study. After signing the informed consent form, patients were advised to use lysozyme-based lozenges, six times a day, for a period of five days. A telephone call follow-up examination was performed within 24 hours from the therapy completion. RESULTS: This was a pilot study involving 25 adult patients of both genders. Lysozyme-based lozenges showed positive effects in relieving the symptoms of non-infectious sore throat in teachers. At the same time, the lozenges showed excellent tolerability, and no side effects were reported during the study. 92% of patients confirmed they would take the same medicine again due to the same problem. CONCLUSION: The results of this "proof-of-concept" study indicated that lysozyme-based antiseptic could be effective and safe in the treatment of non-infectious sore throat in teachers and should be further evaluated as treatment option in this condition.


Subject(s)
Anti-Infective Agents, Local , Pharyngitis , Administration, Oral , Adult , Double-Blind Method , Female , Humans , Male , Muramidase/therapeutic use , Pharyngitis/drug therapy , Pilot Projects , Prospective Studies
2.
Acta Med Acad ; 48(2): 140-146, 2019 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31718214

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: Lysozyme is a natural antimicrobial and immunomodulatory enzyme, which is produced as a host response to infectious agents. The objective of this study was to compare the efficacy and safety of lysozyme-based versus benzydamine and chlorhexidinebased oral spray in patients with an acute tonsillopharyngitis associated with a common cold. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A prospective twoarm pilot study (lysozyme/cetylpyridinium/lidocaine spray versus: benzydamine spray-arm 1; chlorhexidine/lidocaine spray-arm 2) was conducted in the primary health care unit. Efficacy was evaluated by the patient's self-assessment of pain, difficulty in swallowing and the throat swelling, by using the visual analog scale (VAS) at baseline and three follow-up visits. Safety was evaluated by the assessment of the frequency and severity of adverse effects. RESULTS: Lysozyme-based spray reduced pain faster than benzydamine-based spray and slower than chlorhexidine-based spray. Lysozyme-based and chlorhexidinebased sprays similarly reduced difficulty in swallowing, but were faster than benzydamine-based spray. Similar effects on the reduction of throat swelling were seen in all treated groups. All tested products showed proper safety and were well tolerated, with no serious adverse events reported. CONCLUSIONS: The lysozyme-based oral spray was shown to be effective and safe in the reduction of pain, difficulty in swallowing and throat swelling in patients with acute tonsillopharyngitis associated with a common cold. Lysozyme-based oral spray (containing natural compound with advantages of influencing immune system and preventing recurrences) had similar activity to benzydamine and chlorhexidine-based oral antiseptic sprays.


Subject(s)
Anti-Infective Agents, Local/administration & dosage , Anti-Inflammatory Agents/administration & dosage , Benzydamine/administration & dosage , Chlorhexidine/administration & dosage , Pharyngitis/drug therapy , Tonsillitis/drug therapy , Acute Disease , Administration, Oral , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Oral Sprays , Pilot Projects , Prospective Studies , Young Adult
3.
Med Arch ; 66(6): 396-8, 2012.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23409520

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Meniere's disease is a condition with sudden attacks of vertigo with nausea and vomiting accompanied by loss of hearing and buzzing sensation in the ears, most commonly unilateral. The exact cause of the disease is unknown. Betahistine is the analogue of histamine with weaker agonistic effect on histamine H1 receptors and stronger effect on histamine H3 receptors, while Cinnarizine has more effective effect on H1 receptors. GOAL: The aim is to determine which drug is more effective in the treatment of Meniere's disease Betahistine or Cinnarizine. MATERIAL AND METHODS: This study evaluates the effectiveness of Betahistine in 37 patients with the Meniere's syndrome accompanied by classic triad of symptoms treated in hospital conditions and Cinnarizine effect in 36 patients with a less severe clinical picture, which were treated as outpatients. To all patients were conducted laboratory tests, brain CAT (to exclude possible expansive process, MS or stroke) and TCD in order to eliminate any possible circulatory disturbances in VB basin. Group with classic Meniere's syndrome was treated at a dose of Betahistine of 3 x 16 mg and followed 8 weeks, while the second group was treated with Cinnarizine at a dose of 2 x 75 mg and also followed for 8 weeks. CONCLUSIONS: Already after one month of therapy was noticed better effect in case of Betahistine in terms of symptoms reduction compared to the Cinnarizine effect.


Subject(s)
Betahistine/therapeutic use , Cinnarizine/therapeutic use , Histamine Agonists/therapeutic use , Histamine H1 Antagonists/therapeutic use , Meniere Disease/drug therapy , Adult , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...