Thymic tumors and results of radiotherapy.

AIM: The aim of this study was to evaluate thymic epithelial tumors (TETs) for treatment outcomes and prognostic factors on survival. BACKGROUND: TETs are very rare neoplasms and multidisciplinary approach is recommended according to prognostic factors. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Between 1995 and 2013, 31 patients were treated with median 5400 cGy (range: 1620-6596 cGy) radiotherapy (RT). Eleven patients received adjuvant or concurrent chemotherapy. There were 25 thymomas, 4 thymic carcinomas and 2 thymic neuroendocrin carcinomas. According to Masaoka, staging and WHO classification, cases were divided to good (n: 10), moderate (n: 9) and poor (n: 12) prognostic risk groups. Survival was calculated from diagnosis. RESULTS: In January 2016, 22 cases were alive with median 51.5 months (range: 2-170.5) follow-up. Recurrences were observed in 29% of patients in median 29.5 months (range: 6.5-105). Local control, mean overall (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) rates were 86%, 119 and 116 months, respectively. There was a significant difference for R0 vs. R+ resection (81% vs. 43%, p = 0.06, and 69% vs. 46%, p = 0.05), Masaoka stage I-II vs. III-IV (75% vs. 52%, p = 0.001, and 75% vs. 37%, p < 0.001), and also prognostic risk groups (100% vs. 89% vs. 48%, p = 0.003, and 100% vs. 87% vs. 27%, p = 0.004) in terms of 5-year OS and DFS, respectively. CONCLUSION: In our study, prognostic risk stratification was shown to be a significant predictor of survival. There is a need to investigate subgroups that may or may not benefit from adjuvant RT.

The relationship between dosimetric factors, side effects, and survival in patients with non-small cell lung cancer treated with definitive radiotherapy.

The patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) treated with definitive conformal radiotherapy (RT) were evaluated in terms of side effects and survival. Normal tissue complication probability (NTCP) was calculated for 68 patients treated between 2009 and 2012. Clinical and dosimetric factors were analyzed. The median dose of 63 Gy (range: 54 to 70 Gy) was given with conformal RT with blocks (n = 37), 3-dimensional conformal RT (3DCRT) (n = 11), or intensity-modulated RT (IMRT) (n = 20). Acute grade 1 to 2 radiation pneumonitis (RP) was seen in 13% of the patients. No significant relationship was found between RP and treatment and dosimetric factors (p > 0.05). There was a positive correlation between median "mean lung dose" (MLD) (17 Gy), lung V30 (20.5%), and NTCP (14%) (p < 0.001). Median and 2-year overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were 27 and 18 months and 51% and 42%, respectively. In univariate analysis, significant dose range for survival was found between 59.4 and 63 Gy (p < 0.01). In multivariate analysis, response (p = 0.001), fraction dose of 1.8 Gy (p = 0.002), MLD <18 Gy (p = 0.04) for OS and response (p < 0.001), total dose > 59.4 Gy (p = 0.01), and tumor biologically effective dose (BED)3(Gy) ≤ 100.8 (p = 0.01) for PFS were found to be favorable factors. In our study, we found a linear correlation between NTCP and MLD for RP risk estimation in patients with NSCLC. Therapeutic dose range where MLD can be kept under 20 Gy with significant survival benefit was found between 59.4 and 63 Gy. Increased therapeutic efficacy will be possible using risk-adaptive RT techniques.

Evaluating quality of life and pulmonary function of long-term survivors of non-small cell lung cancer treated with radical or postoperative radiotherapy.

BACKGROUND: Our aim in the present study was to describe the quality of life (QOL), evaluate pulmonary function, and compare demographic and clinical characteristics with QOL in long-term survivors of non-small cell lung cancer treated with radical or postoperative radiotherapy. METHODS: Twenty-eight patients were recruited in the study. QOL was evaluated using The European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer, Quality of Life Core Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30, v.3). Statistical analysis was performed by SPSS 14. RESULTS: Patients' files were reviewed in October 2006. Median duration of follow-up was 46 months (range: 25-125 months). Seven of 9 scales were found to meet the minimal reliability limit (Cronbach's alpha >0.70). The lowest and highest reliability coefficients were 0.56 and 0.93 for social and role functioning, respectively. All interscale correlations were statistically significant (P < 0.01). The strongest positive correlation was found between physical functioning and, role and cognitive functioning (r = 0.59, r = 0.37 or P = 0.01, P = 0.05, respectively). The highest correlation of EORTC QLQ-C30 and the Karnofsky performance scale (KPS) during the questionnaire was found to be with physical functioning and constipation (r = 0.41, r = 0.44 or P = 0.02, P = 0.01, respectively). When the effect of various demographic and clinical parameters on QOL was evaluated; initial KPS, age, educational level, health insurance status, stage, chemotherapy, comorbid disease, and passive smoking were determined as significant factors influencing QOL. Physical, role, cognitive, and emotional functions were found to be significantly lower in the presence of dyspnea (r = 0.42, r = 0.58, r = 0.50, r = 0.63 or P = 0.02, P < 0.01, P < 0.01, P < 0.05, respectively). Regarding the symptom scales, dyspnea was found to be correlated with increasing of fatigue, pain, insomnia, and appetite loss (r = 0.52, r = 0.40, r = 0.64, r = 0.38 or P < 0.01, P = 0.03, P < 0.05, P = 0.04, respectively). The parameters of pulmonary function tests (FEV1, FVC, and FEV1/FVC) did not show any significant relation with any scale of QOL. CONCLUSION: Overall, we found that QOL of our patients who survived at least 2 years after radiotherapy, was good. The Turkish version of the EORTC QLQ-C30, v.3 is a valid and reliable instrument for Turkish lung cancer patients and can be used in clinical studies. We believe further studies are needed to have a better understanding of patients' pretreatment and posttreatment QOLs.

Evaluation of lung cancer metastases to the spine.

Most metastatic spinal lesions (70%) are found at the thoracic level, 20% in the lumbar region, and 10% in the cervical region. A variety of benign and malignant tumours may arise in the lung, but the vast majority is bronchogenic carcinomas (90 to 95%). The aim of this study was to evaluate the lung cancer metastases to the vertebral column in terms of type, localisation and metastasis pattern. Between the years 1995 and 2003, 168 lung cancer patients with metastatic spinal tumour who had received radiotherapy and chemotherapy were retrospectively evaluated. The total number of vertebrae in which metastases were detected was 328. The most common site for metastasis was the thoracic spine. In 49 (29%) patients, there was only one vertebral involvement. Additional extravertebral bony metastases were present in 37 (22%) patients; the femur (20 patients) was the most common site. Only 25 of 168 patients were operated due to spinal cord compression leading to neurological deficit. The rest of the patients were treated by appropriate chemotherapy and radiotherapy protocols. The mean survival after diagnosis of vertebral metastasis was 7.1 months. Squamous cell carcinoma and adenocarcinoma are the lung cancers that mostly metastasise to vertebrae. Most of the metastases involve multiple spinal levels. After the diagnosis of vertebral metastasis, the mean survival is seven months. Pain relief and maintaining quality of life must be balanced with the patient's life expectancy, comorbidities and immunological, nutritional and functional status in treatment decision.

Treatment results of 165 pediatric patients with non-metastatic nasopharyngeal carcinoma: a Rare Cancer Network study.

PURPOSE: This Rare Cancer Network (RCN) study was performed in pediatric nasopharyngeal carcinoma (PNPC) patients to evaluate the optimal dose of radiotherapy and to determine prognostic factors. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The study included 165 patients with the diagnosis of PNPC treated between 1978 and 2003. The median age was 14 years. There were 3 (1.8%) patients with stage I, 1 (0.6%) with IIA, 10 (6.1%) with IIB, 60 (36.4%) with III, 44 (26.7%) with IVA, and 47 (29%) with IVB disease. While 21 (12.7%) patients were treated with radiotherapy (RT) alone, 144 (87.3%) received chemotherapy and RT. The median follow-up time was 48 months. RESULTS: The actuarial 5-year overall survival (OS) was 77.4% (95% CI: 70.06-84.72), whereas the actuarial 5-year disease-free survival (DFS) rate was 68.8% (95% CI: 61.33-76.31). In multivariate analysis, unfavorable factors were age >14 years for LRC (p=0.04); male gender for DMFS (p=0.03); T3/T4 disease for LRFS (p=0.01); and N3 disease for DFS (p=0.002) and OS (p=0.002); EBRT dose of less than 66 Gy for LRFS (p=0.02) and LRRFS (p=0.0028); and patients treated with RT alone for LRFS (p=0.0001), LRRFS (p=0.007) and DFS (p=0.02). CONCLUSION: Our results support the current practice of using combined radiation and chemotherapy for optimal treatment of NPC. However, research should be encouraged in an attempt to reduce the potential for long-term sequelae in pediatric patients given their relatively favorable prognosis and potential for longevity.

Assessment of quality of life of nasopharyngeal carcinoma patients with EORTC QLQ-C30 and H&N-35 modules.

PURPOSE: The current study reports on long-term quality of life (QoL) status after conventional radiotherapy in 187 nasopharyngeal carcinoma patients from 14 centers in Turkey. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with the diagnosis of nasopharyngeal carcinoma, who were treated in 14 centers in Turkey with minimum 6 months of follow-up and were in complete remission, were asked to complete Turkish versions of EORTC QLQ-C30 questionnaire and the HN-35 module. Each center participated with the required clinical data that included age at diagnosis, gender, symptoms on admission, follow-up period, treatment modalities, radiotherapy dose, and AJCC 1997 tumor stage. Each patient's 33 QoL scores, which included function, global health status, and symptoms, were calculated as instructed in EORTC QLQ-C30 scoring manual. All of the scales and single-item measures range from 0 to 100. A high score represents a higher response level. Kruskal-Wallis and Mann-Whitney U nonparametric tests were used for comparisons. RESULTS: One hundred eighty-seven patients with median age of 46 years (range, 16-79 years) participated and completed the questionnaires. Median follow-up time was 3.4 years (range, 6 months-24 years). All patients have received external-beam radiotherapy. Beside external-beam radiotherapy, 59 patients underwent brachytherapy boost, 70 patients received concomitant chemotherapy, and 95 patients received adjuvant/neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Most of the patients in the analysis (75%) were in advanced stage (Stage III, n = 85 [45.4%]; Stage IV, n = 55 [29%]). Mean global health status was calculated as 73. Parameters that increased global health status were male gender, early-stage disease, and less than 4-year follow-up (p < 0.05). Functional parameters were better in males and in early-stage disease. Factors that yielded better symptom scores were short interval after treatment (10 scores), male gender (7 scores), and lower radiation dose (6 scores). Neoadjuvant or adjuvant chemotherapy did not have any effect on QoL, whereas concomitant chemotherapy adversely affected 5 symptom scores. CONCLUSION: Quality of life is adversely affected in our nasopharyngeal carcinoma patients treated with combined therapies. The factors that adversely affect quality of life are advanced tumor stage, female gender, and long-term follow-up. Further controlled studies to evaluate both preradiotherapy and postradiotherapy status are necessary to clarify the contribution of each treatment modality to QoL.

Evaluation of infections in non-small cell lung cancer patients treated with radiotherapy.

PURPOSE: We aim to determine infections occurring in patients with non-small cell lung cancer during radiotherapy (RT). METHODS AND MATERIALS: A total of 181 patients had been treated with thoracic radiotherapy between October 1995 and December 1999. Radiotherapy was given using 1.8-3Gray (Gy) fraction daily, five fractions a week for a total dose of 59.4Gy (30-70.2Gy). A complete history was collected retrospectively for each patient. All microbiological examinations were performed according to the routine procedures of the hospital laboratory. Numeric and categoric variables were employed such as sex, age, performance status, histology, stage, chemotherapy, usage of corticosteroids, neutropenia, surgery, hospitalization, associated diseases, smoking during treatment, package per year of cigarette smoking, dose of radiotherapy, and response rates. RESULTS: Infections developed in 84 patients (46%, 84/181) during thoracic radiotherapy. A 101 episodes of infections developed in these patients. Most patients suffered from sputum production (65%), cough (59%), auscultation findings (31%) and fever (31%). Gram-negative bacteria were the most frequently isolated pathogens in the cultures of specimens (70%, 16/23 samples). Neoadjuvant chemotherapy (OR=4.81; 95% CI, 1.57-9.12; p=0.003) and neutropenia (OR=4.25; 95% CI, 1.44-6.89; p=0.009) were found as risk factors for influencing infection based on logistic regression analyses. Package per year of cigarette smoking was found statistically significantly higher in patients with infections than patients without infections (p=0.001). A slight increase in infections, which was of borderline statistical significance (p=0.07), was observed in patients age over 70. Ciprofloxacin and clarithromycin were the most frequently used agents in treatment. Median survival was 9 months in the patients with infection and 13 months in the 97 patients without infection. Overall survival seemed to be statistically significantly better in patients without infection than patients with infection (p=0.042) calculated using Kaplan-Meier method. Based on Cox regression analyses; overall survival was not correlated to presence of infection but associated with poor performance status (5940 cGy (OR=2.06; 95% CI, 0.72-7.18; p=0.007) and the absence of response to treatment (OR=2.45; 95% CI, 0.89-14.23; p<0.001) were also found to be risk factors for survival. CONCLUSIONS: Infections are important causes of morbidity and mortality in lung cancer patients. The control of infection in these patients may improve the survival. Predisposing factors and treatment management approaches in non-small cell lung cancer should be defined carefully.