Prognostic Role of NECPAL CCOMS-ICO Tool on One-Year Mortality in a Hospitalized Older Population.

Background: It is essential to establish both the appropriateness of palliative care (PC) and the prognosis in daily clinical practice to guide decision making in the management of older people with multiple advanced chronic diseases. Objectives: We assessed patients who were appropriate for PC using the NECPAL tool in a hospitalized older population and then we investigated its predictive validity on one-year mortality compared with the multidimensional prognostic index (MPI), a validated geriatric prognostic tool. Design: Prospective cohort study. Setting/Subjects: We enrolled 103 older adults hospitalized for acute medical and surgical conditions in a geriatric hospital in Italy. Measurements: The variables of interest were obtained at baseline through interviews of the ward medical staff and by consulting the computerized medical records. Long-term mortality (one-year) was assessed through the analysis of data acquired from hospital or territorial databases or through telephone contact with caregivers. Results: Mean age was 86.8 ± 7.2 years, with a female prevalence of 54.4%. Prevalence of NECPAL+ patients was 65.1%. MPI low risk: 30.1%; moderate risk: 41.7%; severe risk: 28.2%. Patients deceased during follow-up were 54.4%. NECPAL+ patients were more likely to die, even after adjusting for age, sex, and MPI score (hazard ratio [HR] 2.7, p = 0.020). All the NECPAL categories were associated with one-year mortality. MPI showed a better predictive power than NECPAL (area under the curve [AUC] 0.85 vs. 0.75, p = 0.030). After the exclusion of "Comorbidity: ≥2 concurrent diseases" item from NECPAL, its AUC increased to 0.78 with no statistically significant differences from MPI (p = 0.122). Conclusions: NECPAL is useful to identify the appropriateness of PC in hospitalized older adults, also allowing to predict long-term mortality with a performance similar to that of a validated geriatric prognostic tool.

Patient-reported muscle symptoms and their characterization in a hypertensive population eligible for statin therapy: An exploratory study.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Statin-associated muscle symptoms (SAMS) are claimed to be frequent in clinical practice. We evaluated the prevalence and characteristics of patient-reported muscle symptoms (PRMS) attributed to drugs/nutraceuticals in hypertensive patients, focusing the attention on statin treatment. METHODS AND RESULTS: Observational study on 390 consecutive outpatients. All patients were asked the following question: "Have you ever taken a drug/nutraceutical that you think gave you muscle symptoms?". Patients who answered "yes" were evaluated with a modified version of the SAMS-clinical index (SAMS-CI). Mean age: 60.5 ± 13.5 years (males 53.8%.). Patients who have ever taken a statin: 250. Patients who have never taken a statin: 140. Prevalence of PRMS (48.5% of the entire study population) did not differ between groups (p = 0.217). Only age, followed by number of drugs taken, was significantly associated with PRMS at multivariate analysis. A high prevalence of low scores to all the questions of "modified" SAMS-CI was found in both groups. Localization and pattern of PRMS did not differ between groups (p = 0.170). Timing of PRMS onset after starting the drug (p = 0.036) and timing of improvement after withdrawal (p = 0.002) were associated with statin therapy. CONCLUSION: PRMS are highly prevalent among the hypertensive population and are believed to be drug-related, especially with aging and regardless of whether the drug taken is a statin or not. These findings are in line with the growing evidence that subjective muscle symptoms are often misattributed to statins, while they may more likely be related to the nocebo/drucebo effect or to other common undiagnosed conditions.

Painful and recurring injection site reaction to alirocumab and evolocumab in a young woman with familial hypercholesterolemia and effective therapeutic alternative based on inclisiran: a case report.

A 28-year-old woman with autosomal dominant familial hypercholesterolemia (FH) with a probable coexistent polygenic contribution causing very high low-density lipoprotein-cholesterol (LDL-C) levels, started therapy with the proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9-inhibitor (PCSK9i) alirocumab, in addition to high-intensity statin plus ezetimibe. Forty-eight hours after the second injection of alirocumab, the patient developed a painful palpable injection site reaction (ISR) that recurred after the third administration of the drug. Treatment was then switched to evolocumab, another PCSK9i, but the patient had an ISR with similar features. The most conceivable cause of the ISR was a cell-mediated hypersensitivity reaction to polysorbate, an excipient contained in both drugs. Although ISR after PCSK9i administration is usually transient and does not compromise the continuation of treatment, in this case the recurrence of such side effect in an exacerbated way led to treatment withdrawal, with a subsequent re-exposure to increased cardiovascular (CV) risk. As soon as it became available in clinical practice, the patient started treatment with inclisiran, a small interfering RNA targeting hepatic PCSK9 synthesis. No adverse events were reported after inclisiran administration and LDL-C levels decreased significantly, confirming the evidence that this innovative approach to hypercholesterolemia is a safe and effective resource in patients at high CV risk who cannot achieve LDL-C goal with conventional lipid-lowering therapies and antibody-based PCSK9i.