Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 4 de 4
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Water Res ; 202: 117435, 2021 Sep 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34330027

ABSTRACT

The Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) is shed in the feces of infected people. As a consequence, genomic RNA of the virus can be detected in wastewater. Although the presence of viral RNA does not inform on the infectivity of the virus, this presence of genetic material raised the question of the effectiveness of treatment processes in reducing the virus in wastewater and sludge. In this work, treatment lines of 16 wastewater treatment plants were monitored to evaluate the removal of SARS-CoV-2 RNA in raw, processed waters and sludge, from March to May 2020. Viral RNA copies were enumerated using reverse transcriptase quantitative polymerase chain reaction (RT-qPCR) in 5 different laboratories. These laboratories participated in proficiency testing scheme and their results demonstrated the reliability and comparability of the results obtained for each one. SARS-CoV-2 RNA was found in 50.5% of the 101 influent wastewater samples characterized. Positive results were detected more frequently in those regions with a COVID-19 incidence higher than 100 cases per 100,000 inhabitants. Wastewater treatment plants (WWTPs) significantly reduced the occurrence of virus RNA along the water treatment lines. Secondary treatment effluents showed an occurrence of SARS-CoV-2 RNA in 23.3% of the samples and no positive results were found after MBR and chlorination. Non-treated sludge (from primary and secondary treatments) presented a higher occurrence of SARS-CoV-2 RNA than the corresponding water samples, demonstrating the affinity of virus particles for solids. Furthermore, SARS-CoV-2 RNA was detected in treated sludge after thickening and anaerobic digestion, whereas viral RNA was completely eliminated from sludge only when thermal hydrolysis was applied. Finally, co-analysis of SARS-CoV-2 and F-specific RNA bacteriophages was done in the same water and sludge samples in order to investigate the potential use of these bacteriophages as indicators of SARS-CoV-2 fate and reduction along the wastewater treatment.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Wastewater , Humans , RNA, Viral , Reproducibility of Results , SARS-CoV-2 , Sewage
2.
Sci Total Environ ; 698: 134185, 2020 Jan 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31505354

ABSTRACT

Drinking water quality has been regulated in most European countries for nearly two decades by the drinking water directive 98/83/EC. The directive is now under revision with the goal of meeting stricter demands for safe water for all citizens, as safe water has been recognized as a human right by the United Nations. An important change to the directive is the implementation of a risk-based approach in all regulated water supplies. The European Union Framework Seventh Programme Aquavalens project has developed several new detection technologies for pathogens and indicators and tested them in water supplies in seven European countries. One of the tasks of the project was to evaluate the impact of these new techniques on water safety and on water safety management. Data were collected on risk factors to water safety for five large supplies in Denmark, Germany, Spain and the UK, and for fifteen small water supplies in Scotland, Portugal and Serbia, via a questionnaire aiming to ascertain risk factors and the stage of implementation of Water Safety Plans, and via site-specific surveys known as Sanitary Site Inspection. Samples were collected from the water supplies from all stages of water production to delivery. Pathogens were detected in around 23% of the 470 samples tested. Fecal contamination was high in raw water and even in treated water at the small supplies. Old infrastructure was considered a challenge at all the water supplies. The results showed that some of the technique, if implemented as part of the water safety management, can detect rapidly the most common waterborne pathogens and fecal pollution indicators and therefore have a great early warning potential; can improve water safety for the consumer; can validate whether mitigation methods are working as intended; and can confirm the quality of the water at source and at the tap.


Subject(s)
Drinking Water/chemistry , Environmental Monitoring , Water Purification , Water Supply , Water Microbiology , Water Quality
3.
Water Res ; 44(12): 3696-702, 2010 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20427071

ABSTRACT

The presence of Arcobacter species in faecally contaminated environmental waters has previously been studied. However, the ability to eliminate Arcobacter during the water treatment processes that produce drinking water has been little studied. We have investigated the prevalence and diversity of Arcobacter spp. throughout the year at 12 sampling points in the Llobregat River catchment (Catalonia, Spain) including 3 sites at a drinking water treatment plant. Positive samples for Arcobacter spp., came predominantly from the most faecally polluted sites. Recovery rates from all sites were greater in the spring (91.7%) and summer (83.3%) than in autumn and winter (75.0% in both cases), but this trend was not statistically evaluated due to the limited number of samples. Among the 339 colonies analyzed, the most prevalent species by multiplex PCR and 16S rDNA restriction fragment length polymorphism were Arcobacter butzleri (80.2%), followed by Arcobacter cryaerophilus (19.4%) and Arcobacter skirrowii (0.3%). Isolates showed a high genotype diversity as determined by the enterobacterial repetitive intergenic consensus PCR. In fact, 91.2% (309/339) of the colonies had different genotypes, i.e. 248 of them among the 275 isolates of A. butzleri and 60 among the 63 isolates of A. cryaerophilus and 1 genotype of A. skirrowii. Arcobacter was never detected or isolated from finished drinking water, demonstrating that water treatment is effective in removing Arcobacter species.


Subject(s)
Arcobacter/genetics , Genetic Variation , Rivers/microbiology , Sewage/microbiology , Waste Disposal, Fluid , Water Purification/methods , Water Supply/analysis , Arcobacter/isolation & purification , Colony Count, Microbial , Feces/microbiology , Genotype , Geography , Seasons , Spain , Water Microbiology
4.
Environ Microbiol ; 11(1): 188-200, 2009 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18793313

ABSTRACT

Chlamydiae are obligate intracellular bacteria infecting free-living amoebae, vertebrates and some invertebrates. Novel members are regularly discovered, and there is accumulating evidence supporting a very important diversity of chlamydiae in the environment. In this study, we investigated the presence of chlamydiae in a drinking water treatment plant. Samples were used to inoculate Acanthamoeba monolayers (Acanthamoeba co-culture), and to recover autochthonous amoebae onto non-nutritive agar. Chlamydiae were searched for by a pan-chlamydia 16S rRNA gene PCR from both Acanthamoeba co-cultures and autochthonous amoebae, and phylotypes determined by 16S rRNA gene sequencing. Autochthonous amoebae also were identified by 18S rRNA gene amplification and sequencing. From a total of 79 samples, we recovered eight chlamydial strains by Acanthamoeba co-culture, but only one of 28 amoebae harboured a chlamydia. Sequencing results and phylogenetic analysis showed our strains belonging to four distinct chlamydial lineages. Four strains, including the strain recovered within its natural host, belonged to the Parachlamydiaceae; two closely related strains belonged to the Criblamydiaceae; two distinct strains clustered with Rhabdochlamydia spp.; one strain clustered only with uncultured environmental clones. Our results confirmed the usefulness of amoeba co-culture to recover novel chlamydial strains from complex samples and demonstrated the huge diversity of chlamydiae in the environment, by identifying several new species including one representing the first strain of a new family.


Subject(s)
Chlamydiales/classification , Chlamydiales/isolation & purification , Water Microbiology , Amoeba/genetics , Amoeba/microbiology , Animals , Chlamydiales/genetics , Cluster Analysis , Coculture Techniques , DNA, Bacterial/chemistry , DNA, Bacterial/genetics , DNA, Protozoan/chemistry , DNA, Protozoan/genetics , DNA, Ribosomal/chemistry , DNA, Ribosomal/genetics , Genes, rRNA , Molecular Sequence Data , Phylogeny , RNA, Bacterial/genetics , RNA, Protozoan/genetics , RNA, Ribosomal, 16S/genetics , RNA, Ribosomal, 18S/genetics , Sequence Analysis, DNA , Sequence Homology, Nucleic Acid
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...