ABSTRACT
PURPOSE: The purpose of this study is to identify predictive factors on baseline [18F]NaF positron emission tomography (PET)/computed tomography (CT) of early response to radium-223 dichloride after 3 cycles of treatment in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer patients. PROCEDURES: Analysis of 152 metastases was performed in six consecutive patients who underwent [18F]NaF PET/CT at baseline and for early monitoring after 3 cycles of radium-223 dichloride. All metastases depicted on whole-body [18F]NaF PET/CT were contoured and CT (density in Hounsfield units, sclerotic, mixed, or lytic appearance) as well as [18F]NaF [maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax), SUVmean, and lesion volume (V18F-NaF)] patterns were recorded. Tumor response was defined as percentage change in SUVmax and SUVmean between baseline and post-treatment PET. Bone lesions were defined as stable, responsive, or progressive, according to thresholds derived from a recent multicentre test-retest study in [18F]NaF PET/CT. Total [18F]NaF uptake in metastases, defined as MATV × SUVmean, was correlated to uptake of radium-223 on biodistribution scintigraphy performed 7 days after the first cycle of treatment. RESULTS: Among metastases, 116 involved the axial skeleton and 36 the appendicular skeleton. Lesions were sclerotic in 126 cases and mixed in 26 cases. No lytic lesion was depicted. ROC analysis showed that SUVmax and SUVmean were better predictors of lesion response than V18F-NaF and density on CT (P < 0.0001 and P = 0.001, respectively). SUVmax and SUVmean were predictors of individual tumor response in separate multivariate models (P = 0.01 and P = 0.02, respectively). CT pattern (mixed versus sclerotic) and lesion density were independent predictors only when assessing response with delta SUVmax (P = 0.002 and 0.007, respectively). A good correlation between total [18F]NaF uptake within metastases and their relative radium-223 uptake assessed by two observers 7 days after treatment (r = 0.72 and 0.77, P < 0.0001) was found. CONCLUSIONS: SUVmax and SUVmean on baseline [18F]NaF PET/CT are independent predictors of bone lesions' response to 3 cycles of radium-223 dichloride, supporting the use of NaF to select patients more likely to respond to treatment.
Subject(s)
Positron-Emission Tomography , Prostatic Neoplasms, Castration-Resistant/diagnostic imaging , Radium/pharmacokinetics , Sodium Fluoride/pharmacokinetics , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Fluorine Radioisotopes , Humans , Logistic Models , Male , Multivariate Analysis , Pilot Projects , Prostatic Neoplasms, Castration-Resistant/pathology , ROC Curve , Radioisotopes/pharmacokinetics , Tissue Distribution , Tomography, X-Ray ComputedABSTRACT
Consumers often have a positive attitude to the option of receiving personalized nutrition advice based upon genetic testing, since the prospect of enhancing or maintaining one's health can be perceived as empowering. Current direct-to-consumer services over the Internet, however, suffer from a questionable level of truthfulness and consumer protection, in addition to an imbalance between far-reaching promises and contrasting disclaimers. Psychological and behavioral studies indicate that consumer acceptance of a new technology is primarily explained by the end user's rational and emotional interpretation as well as moral beliefs. Results from such studies indicate that personalized nutrition must create true value for the consumer. Also, the freedom to choose is crucial for consumer acceptance. From an ethical point of view, consumer protection is crucial, and caution must be exercised when putting nutrigenomic-based tests and advice services on the market. Current Internet offerings appear to reveal a need to further guaranty legal certainty by ensuring privacy, consumer protection and safety. Personalized nutrition services are on the borderline between nutrition and medicine. Current regulation of this area is incomplete and undergoing development. This situation entails the necessity for carefully assessing and developing existing rules that safeguard fundamental rights and data protection while taking into account the sensitivity of data, the risks posed by each step in their processing, and sufficient guarantees for consumers against potential misuse.