Handoffs and transitions of care: A systematic review, meta-analysis, and practice management guideline from the Eastern Association for the Surgery of Trauma.

BACKGROUND: The Joint Commission reports that at least half of communication breakdowns occur during handovers or transitions of care. There is no consensus on how best to approach the transfer of care within acute care surgery (ACS). We conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis of the current data on handoffs and transitions of care in ACS patients and evaluate the impact of standardization and formalized communication processes. METHODS: Clinically relevant questions regarding handoffs and transitions of care with clearly defined patient Population(s), Intervention(s), Comparison(s), and appropriately selected Outcomes were determined. These centered around specific transitions of care within the setting of ACS, specifically perioperative interactions, emergency medical services and trauma team interactions, and intra/interfloor and intensive care unit (ICU) interactions. A systematic literature review and meta-analysis were conducted using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation methodology. RESULTS: A total of 10 studies were identified for analysis. These included 5,113 patients in the standardized handoff group and 5,293 in the current process group. Standardized handoffs reduced handover errors for perioperative interactions and preventable adverse events for intra/interfloor and ICU interactions. There were insufficient data to evaluate outcomes of clinical complications and medical errors. CONCLUSION: We conditionally recommend a standardized handoff in the field of ACS, including perioperative interactions, emergency medical services and trauma team interactions, and intra/interfloor and ICU interactions. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Systematic Review/Meta-analysis; Level III.

Educational Value of Surgical Residents Operating as Teaching Assistant.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the educational of value of teaching assistant (TA) cases from the perspectives of attending, chief resident, and junior resident. We hypothesized the greatest educational value of TA cases would be for chief residents more so than other team members. DESIGN: A prospective survey was designed and collected for TA cases separately from attendings, chief residents, and junior residents to assess operative details and educational value. The study period ran from August 2021 through December 2022. Qualitative and quantitative analysis was undertaken to compare answers and discover themes in the free-text responses of attendings and residents. SETTING: Single center, tertiary care institution, Maine Medical Center, Department of Surgery, Portland, ME PARTICIPANTS: Sixty-nine teaching assistant cases were captured from a total of 117 completed surveys that were completed by 44 chief residents, 49 junior residents, 22 attendings (n = 22) and 2 APPs. RESULTS: A wide variety of TA cases were included in the study with the most common reason for performing a TA case being resident request 68%. Operative complexity was most commonly rated easiest third (50%) and middle third (41%) of overall cases. Both junior and chief residents felt that compared to working with an attending alone, TA cases contributed more or much more to their procedural independence >80% of the time. Attendings reported learning something about the resident's skills that they were not expecting in 59% of the cases. Thematic analysis: attendings focused on the steps of the procedure, including the technical aspects, particularly regarding opening while residents largely focused on communication and preparation. CONCLUSIONS: Teaching assistant cases seem to have more educational value for chief and junior residents than attendings. Both junior and chief residents felt that compared to working with an attending alone, TA cases contributed more or much more to their procedural independence >80% of the time.

Outcomes of Protocol-Driven Venous Thromboembolic Chemo-Prophylaxis in Trauma Patients: A Trauma Quality Improvement Project Analysis.

INTRODUCTION: Low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) is the standard for venous thromboembolic (VTE) chemo-prophylaxis in trauma patients; however, inconsistencies in the use of LMWH exist. The objective of this study was to assess VTE outcomes in response to a chemo-prophylaxis protocol guided by patient physiology (eg, creatinine clearance) and comorbidities. METHODS: ACS TQIP Benchmark Reports at a level 1 trauma center using a patient physiology and comorbidity directed VTE chemo-prophylaxis protocol were analyzed for Spring 2019 to Fall 2021. Patient demographics, VTE rates and pharmacologic VTE prophylaxis type were collected for "All Patients" and "Elderly" (TQIP: age ≥ 55 years) cohorts. RESULTS: Data was analyzed for 1919183 "All Hospitals" (AH) and 5843 patients single institution (SI) using the physiologic and comorbidity guided VTE chemo-prophylaxis protocol. Elderly subgroup had 701965 (AH) and 2939 (SI) patients. Use of non-LMWH chemo-prophylaxis was significantly higher at SI: All patients = 62.6% SI vs 22.1% (P < .01); Elderly = 68.8% SI vs 28.1% AH (P < .01). VTE, DVT, and PE rates for All Patients and Elderly subgroup were significantly reduced at SI, except Elderly PE which was statistically equivalent. CONCLUSIONS: Protocol-driven VTE chemo-prophylaxis was associated with significantly lower LMWH use accompanied by significant reductions in All VTE, DVT, PE, and Elderly VTE and DVT with no difference in Elderly PE rates. These results may imply that adherence to a physiologic and comorbidity directed chemo-prophylaxis protocol, rather than LMWH, reduces VTE events in trauma patients. Further investigation to elucidate best practice is warranted.

Management of rhabdomyolysis: A practice management guideline from the Eastern Association for the Surgery of Trauma.

BACKGROUND: The treatment of rhabdomyolysis remains controversial. Although there is no question that any associated compartment syndrome needs to be identified and released, debate persists regarding the benefit of further therapy including aggressive intravenous fluid resuscitation (IVFR), urine alkalization with bicarbonate, and the use of mannitol. The goal of this practice management guideline was to evaluate the effects of bicarbonate, mannitol, and aggressive intravenous fluids on patients with rhabdomyolysis. METHODS: A systematic review and meta-analysis comparing treatments in patients with rhabdomyolysis was performed. The Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) methodology was applied to assess the quality of evidence and to create evidence-based recommendations regarding the use of bicarbonate, mannitol, and aggressive IVFR in patients with rhabdomyolysis. RESULTS: A total of 12 studies were identified for analysis. On quantitative analysis, IVFR decreased the incidence of acute renal failure (ARF) and need for dialysis in patients with rhabdomyolysis. Neither bicarbonate nor mannitol administration improved the incidence of acute renal failure and need for dialysis in patients with rhabdomyolysis. Quality of evidence was deemed to be very low, with the vast majority of the literature being retrospective studies. CONCLUSION: In patients with rhabdomyolysis, we conditionally recommend for aggressive IVFR to improve outcomes of ARF and lessen the need for dialysis. We conditionally recommend against treatment with bicarbonate or mannitol in patients with rhabdomyolysis.

Transdiaphragmatic Chest Wall Herniation.

BACKGROUND: The combination of traumatic simultaneous diaphragmatic rupture and chest wall herniation remains rare, with 42 cases of traumatic transdiaphragmatic intercostal hernia (TDIH) reported in the literature since 1946. An accurate count of cases is difficult to obtain, as TDIH nomenclature has been variable.1-5 Risk factors for traumatic TDIH are not well established. As these injuries are uncommon, best management techniques have yet to be established. Reported repair techniques include primary closure, closure with mesh, and implantation of prosthetic or autologous material. We present our single-center series of 7 patients, the largest reported to our knowledge, and discuss the challenges of repairing these difficult injuries. METHODS: After obtaining institutional review board approval, data were abstracted from the electronic medical record on all adults who underwent evaluation and treatment for traumatic TDIH between July 2014 and January 2019. RESULTS: Of the 7 cases of traumatic TDIH, 6 patients developed TDIH secondary to cough; the seventh patient presented with chronic chest wall pain after an episode of heavy lifting. All patients were obese or overweight. Pain and a "popping sensation" were the most common presenting symptoms. All patients underwent operative intervention with primary repair of the diaphragm and suture approximation of the ribs. 3 patients had onlay mesh repair of the chest wall and/or abdominal wall. 1 patient had plating of his rib fracture. 3 patients had a recurrence of the intercostal portion of the hernia No patients have undergone reoperation thus far. DISCUSSION: While previously thought to more commonly occur on the left side due to the protective effects of the diaphragm,2 the majority in this series had right-sided injuries. Herniation through the ninth-10th interspace remains the most common location.4 Computed tomography imaging should be used for diagnosis and operative planning. It is best to manage these hernias acutely to re-establish normal anatomy. Mesh may be required in delayed reconstructions of if the chest wall cannot be re-approximated. Rib plating should be considered in cases of instability or flail. High rates of complications are not unexpected given the complicated and rare nature of the injury. Given the high rate of intercostal hernia recurrence, it is likely that mesh repair or should be more often used in the treatment of this injury.

Thromboelastography and rotational thromboelastometry in bleeding patients with coagulopathy: Practice management guideline from the Eastern Association for the Surgery of Trauma.

BACKGROUND: Assessment of the immediate need for specific blood product transfusions in acutely bleeding patients is challenging. Clinical assessment and commonly used coagulation tests are inaccurate and time-consuming. The goal of this practice management guideline was to evaluate the role of the viscoelasticity tests, which are thromboelastography (TEG) and rotational thromboelastometry (ROTEM), in the management of acutely bleeding trauma, surgical, and critically ill patients. METHODS: Systematic review and meta-analyses of manuscripts comparing TEG/ROTEM with non-TEG/ROTEM-guided blood products transfusions strategies were performed. The Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation methodology was applied to assess the level of evidence and create recommendations for TEG/ROTEM-guided blood product transfusions in adult trauma, surgical, and critically ill patients. RESULTS: Using TEG/ROTEM-guided blood transfusions in acutely bleeding trauma, surgical, and critically ill patients was associated with a tendency to fewer blood product transfusions in all populations. Thromboelastography/ROTEM-guided transfusions were associated with a reduced number of additional invasive hemostatic interventions (angioembolic, endoscopic, or surgical) in surgical patients. Thromboelastography/ROTEM-guided transfusions were associated with a reduction in mortality in trauma patients. CONCLUSION: In patients with ongoing hemorrhage and concern for coagulopathy, we conditionally recommend using TEG/ROTEM-guided transfusions, compared with traditional coagulation parameters, to guide blood component transfusions in each of the following three groups: adult trauma patients, adult surgical patients, and adult patients with critical illness. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Systematic Review/Meta-Analysis, level III.

The Effect of Resident Participation on Appendectomy Operative Times.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the association between level of resident autonomy and operative times for appendectomies. DESIGN: A single center retrospective analysis of electronic medical record data of patients who underwent an appendectomy from 1/1/2017 to 12/31/2018. Medical record numbers s were matched with cases entered in the ACGME Resident Case Log system. Cases were stratified by resident role ("First Assistant," "Surgeon Junior," "Surgeon Chief," or "Teaching Assistant") and operative times were compared to cases without resident participation using student's t test. SETTING: Maine Medical Center, Department of Surgery, Portland, Maine. PARTICIPANTS: Inclusion criteria: ≥5 years old, underwent appendectomy at a tertiary medical center during the study duration, and either had corresponding Case-log data or had no resident involvement. Patients who underwent appendectomy as part of a larger procedure were excluded. RESULTS: Six hundred eighty-eight patients met inclusion criteria, with residents participating in 574 (83.5%) cases. Overall mean operating time was 51 ± 21.5 minutes. Attending physicians without resident participation had the shortest OR times (43 ± 19.1 minutes). There was no difference in operating time between chief resident involvement and attending physicians without resident participation (45 ± 21; p = 0.43). Cases with residents involved as "First Assistant" (53 ± 18.6 minutes; p = 0.04) "Surgeon Junior" (52 ± 24.0 minutes; p < 0.001), or "Teaching Assistant" (57 ± 21.6 minutes; p < 0.001) were found to have longer operating times as compared to attending physicians operating without a resident. CONCLUSIONS: Operative times for appendectomies are impacted by resident role. Chief residents' operative times approach that of attendings when operating as Surgeon Chief, however they are significantly longer when operating as Teaching Assistant. Involvement of junior residents in any role lengthen operating times. This suggests that surgical education influences operating room efficiency.

Impact of Type of Health Insurance on Infection Rates among Young Trauma Patients.

BACKGROUND: Many studies have described the detrimental effect of lack of health insurance on trauma-related outcomes. It is unclear, though, whether these effects are related to pre-injury health status, access to trauma centers, or differences in quality of care after presentation. The aim of this study was to determine if patient and insurance type affect outcomes after trauma surgery. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective chart review of prospectively collected data at the American College of Surgeons level 1 trauma registry in Rhode Island. All blunt trauma patients aged 18-45 observed from 2004 to 2014 were included. Patients were divided into one of four groups on the basis of their type of insurance: Private/commercial, Medicare, Medicaid, and uninsured. Co-morbidities and infections were recorded. Analysis of variance or the Mann-Whitney U test, as appropriate, was used to analyze the data. RESULTS: A total of 8,018 patients were included. Uninsured patients were more likely to be male and younger, whereas the Medicare patient group had significantly fewer male patients. Rates of co-morbidities were highest in the Medicare group (28.1%) versus the private insurance (16.7%), Medicaid (19.9%), and uninsured (12.9%) groups (p < 0.05). However, among patients with any co-morbidity, there was no difference in the average number of co-morbidities between insurance groups. The rate of infection was highest in Medicaid patients (7.7%) versus private (5.6%), Medicare (6.3%), and uninsured (4.3%) patients (p < 0.05). Only Medicaid was associated with a significantly greater risk of developing a post-injury infection (odds ratio 1.6; 95% confidence interval 1.1-2.3). CONCLUSION: The presence of insurance, namely Medicaid, does not equate to diagnosis and management of conditions that affect trauma outcomes. Medicaid is associated with worse pre-trauma health maintenance and a greater risk of infection.