Expanded Indications for Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy and Immediate Breast Reconstruction in Patients Older Than 60 Years.

INTRODUCTION: Although nipple-sparing mastectomy (NSM) and immediate breast reconstruction (IBR) have long been praised for excellent cosmetic results and the resultant psychosocial benefits, the feasibility and safety of these procedures in patients older than 60 years have yet to be demonstrated in a large population. METHODS: Patients undergoing NSM with or without IBR at the MedStar Georgetown University Hospital between 1998 and 2017 were included. Patient demographics, surgical intervention, and complication and recurrence events were retrieved from electronic medical records. Primary outcomes were recurrence and complication rates by age groups older and younger than 60 years. RESULTS: There were 673 breasts from 397 patients; 58 (8.6%) older than 60 years and 615 (91.4%) younger than 60 years with mean follow-up of 5.43 (0.12) years. The mean age for those older than 60 was 63.9 (3.3) years, whereas that for those younger than 60 was 43.1 (7.9) years (P < 0.001). The older than 60 group had significantly higher prevalence of diabetes, rates of therapeutic (vs prophylactic) and unilateral (vs bilateral) NSM, and mastectomy weight. However, there were no significant differences by age group in complication rates or increased risk of locoregional or distant recurrence with age. CONCLUSIONS: Based on similar complication profiles in both age groups, we demonstrate safety and feasibility of both NSM and IBR in the aging population. Despite increased age and comorbidity status, appropriately selected older women were able to achieve similar outcomes to younger women undergoing NSM with or without IBR.

The Use of Flap Techniques to Preserve Limb Length in Patients with Transmetatarsal Amputations.

BACKGROUND: Chronic lower extremity wounds affect up to 13% of the US population. Transmetatarsal amputation (TMA) is frequently performed in patients with chronic forefoot wounds. TMA allows limb salvage and preserves functional gait, without need for prosthesis. Traditionally, when tension-free primary closure is not possible, a higher-level amputation is performed. This is the first series to evaluate the outcomes of local and free flap coverage of TMA stumps in patients with chronic foot wounds. METHODS: A retrospective cohort of patients who underwent TMA with flap coverage from 2015 through 2021 was reviewed. Primary outcomes included flap success, early postoperative complications, and long-term outcomes (limb salvage and ambulatory status). Patient-reported outcome measures using the Lower Extremity Functional Scale (LEFS) were also collected. RESULTS: Fifty patients underwent 51 flap reconstructions (26 local, 25 free flap) after TMA. Average age and body mass index were 58.5 years and 29.8 kg/m 2 , respectively. Comorbidities included diabetes [ n = 43 (86%)] and peripheral vascular disease [ n = 37 (74%)]. Flap success rate was 100%. At a mean follow-up of 24.8 months (range, 0.7 to 95.7 months), the limb salvage rate was 86.3% ( n = 44). Forty-four patients (88%) were ambulatory. The LEFS survey was completed by 24 surviving patients (54.5%). Mean LEFS score was 46.6 ± 13.9, correlating with 58.2% ± 17.4% of maximal function. CONCLUSIONS: Local and free flap reconstruction after TMA are viable methods of soft-tissue coverage for limb salvage. Applying plastic surgery flap techniques for TMA stump coverage allows for preservation of increased foot length and ambulation without a prosthesis. CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic, IV.

Intraoperative Radiation Therapy as a Safe Alternative to Whole Breast Radiation for Treatment of Minimally Invasive Breast Cancers: A Retrospective Cohort Study.

BACKGROUND: Intraoperative radiation therapy (IORT) in select populations is a viable alternative to whole breast radiation therapy (WBRT) in the treatment of biopsy-proven localized invasive and non-invasive breast cancer. We aim to assess recurrence and complication rates following IORT in lumpectomy patients at a community hospital in Baltimore City. METHODS: An IRB-approved retrospective cohort study was conducted on consecutive cases of lumpectomy with IORT from 2013 through 2020 by a single surgeon. Patient demographics, tumor and operative characteristics, and complications were retrieved from electronic medical records. Primary outcomes were postoperative complications and local recurrence rates. RESULTS: The final cohort included 117 patients with mean follow-up time of 2.60 + 1.78 years. Mean age was 69.84 + 8.77 years. Thirty-three (28.21%) of patients developed a seroma. Odds of seroma formation were mildly significant for skin spacing [OR: 1.18, 95% CI: (1.02-1.37)] and balloon fill volume [1.04 (1.00-1.08)], but not for age, BMI, diabetes, former or current smoking status, history of WBRT, tumor size, or balloon size. Three (2.6%) patients had local recurrence. Odds of local recurrence were mildly significant for increased tumor size [1.14 (1.04-1.24)] and not significant for any other covariates. CONCLUSIONS: IORT exposure did not confer higher rates of complications and the local recurrence rate mirrored that of the general population undergoing lumpectomy and WBRT. This study demonstrates the need for equitable treatment options based on individual needs: IORT is a safe alternative to WBRT in certain subpopulations, especially those with physical, social, or personal limitations preventing participation in a 3- to 7-week time commitment of WBRT.

To Mesh or Not to Mesh: What Is the Ideal Meshing Ratio for Split Thickness Skin Grafting of the Lower Extremity?

Split-thickness skin grafts can provide effective autologous wound closure in patients with dysvascular comorbidities. Meshing the graft allows for reduced donor site morbidity and expanded coverage. This study directly compares outcomes across varying meshing ratios used to treat chronic lower extremity wounds. Patients who received split-thickness skin grafts to their lower extremity for chronic ulcers from December 2014 to December 2019 at a single center were retrospectively reviewed. Patients were stratified by meshing ratios: nonmeshed (including pie crusting), 1.5:1, and 3:1. The primary outcome was clinical "healing" as determined by surgeon discretion at 30 days, 60 days, and the latest follow-up. Secondary outcomes included postoperative complications, graft loss, ulcer recurrence, progression to amputation, and mortality. A total of 321 patients were identified. Wound sizes and location differed significantly, with 3:1 meshing applied to the largest wounds (187.8 ± 157.6 cm2; 1.5:1 meshed, 110.4 ± 103.9 cm2; nonmeshed 38.7 ± 55.5 cm2; p < .0001) mostly of the lower leg (n = 18, 75%; 1.5:1 meshed, n = 23, 43.4%; nonmeshed n = 62, 25.7%; p < .0001). Meshed grafts displayed a significantly higher proportion of healing at 30 and 60 days, but no differences persisted by the final follow-up (16.5 ± 20.5 months). Longitudinally, nonmeshed STSG was associated with most graft loss (46, 19.1%; p = .011) and ulcer recurrence (44, 18.3%; p = .011). Of the 3 meshing ratios, 3:1 exhibited the lowest rates of complications. Our results suggest that 3:1 meshing is a safe option for coverage of large lower extremity wounds to minimize donor site morbidity.

Clinical utility of the modified frailty index in predicting adverse outcomes in patients undergoing lower extremity free flap reconstruction.

BACKGROUND: Identifying at-risk patients for complications remains challenging in patients with chronic lower extremity (LE) wounds receiving free tissue transfer (FTT) for limb salvage. The modified-5 frailty index (mFI-5) has been utilized to predict postoperative complications, yet it has not been studied in this population. The aim of this study was to determine the utility of the mFI-5 in predicting adverse postoperative outcomes. METHODS: Patients ≥60 years, who underwent LE FTT reconstruction at a single institution from 2011 to 2022, were retrospectively reviewed. Patient characteristics, mFI-5, and postoperative outcomes were collected. Cohorts were divided by an mFI-5 score of <2 or ≥2. RESULTS: A total of 115 patients were identified, of which 71.3% (n = 82) were male, 64.3% (n = 74) had a mFI-5 score of ≥2, and 35.7% (n = 41) had a score <2. The average age and body mass index were 67.8 years and 28.7 kg/m2 , respectively. The higher mFI-5 cohort had lower baseline albumin levels (3.0 vs. 4.0 g/dL, p = .015) and higher hemoglobin A1c levels (7.4 vs. 5.8%, p < .001). The postoperative length of stay was longer in the higher mFI-5 cohort (18 vs. 13.4 days, p = .003). The overall flap success was 96.5% (n = 111), with no difference between cohorts (p = .129). Postoperative complications were comparable between cohorts (p = .294). At a mean follow-up of 19.8 months, eight patients (7.0%) underwent amputation, and 91.3% (n = 105) were ambulatory. CONCLUSION: High microsurgical success rates can be achieved in comorbid patients with high frailty indexes who undergo FTT for limb salvage. A multidisciplinary team approach may effectively mitigate negative outcomes in elderly, frail patients.

Can Mentorship Shatter the Glass Ceiling in Academic Microsurgery? A National Survey of Microsurgery Fellowship-Trained Women.

BACKGROUND: The "leaky pipeline" phenomenon has caused women to remain underrepresented at higher levels of academic plastic surgery. No study has considered the availability of mentorship within any subset of academic plastic surgery. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the current representation of women in academic microsurgery and to determine the impact of mentorship on career progression. METHODS: An electronic survey was designed to determine the availability and quality of mentorship respondents received at different stages of their career (from medical student to attending physician). The survey was distributed to women who completed a microsurgery fellowship and were current faculty at an academic plastic surgery program. RESULTS: Twenty-seven of 48 survey recipients participated (56.3% response rate). Most held an associate professor (20.0%) or assistant professor (40.0%) position. Respondents had an average of 4.1 ± 2.3 mentors throughout their entire training. A minority of mentors were microsurgery trained (28.3%), and only 29.2% of respondents reported female mentorship throughout their training. Attending physicians least often received formative mentorship (52.0%). Fifty percent of respondents sought female mentors, citing that they desired female insight. Of those who did not seek female mentors, 72.7% cited a lack of access to female mentors. CONCLUSIONS: Evidenced by female trainees being unable to find female mentors and low rates of mentorship at the attending physician level, there is currently not enough capacity to meet the demand for female mentorship by women pursuing academic microsurgery. Many individual and structural barriers to quality mentorship and sponsorship exist within this field.

The application of targeted muscle reinnervation in lower extremity amputations: A systematic review.

BACKGROUND: Targeted muscle reinnervation (TMR) is a promising surgical modality for reducing post-amputation pain. We sought to provide a succinct overview of TMR specific to the lower extremity (LE) amputation population. METHODS: A systematic review was performed per PRISMA guidelines. Ovid MEDLINE, PubMed, and Web of Science were queried for records using various combinations of Medical Subject Heading (MeSH) terms such as "LE "amputation," "below-knee amputation" (BKA), "above-knee amputation" (AKA), and "TMR." Primary outcomes included (1) operative techniques, (2) changes in neuroma, phantom limb pain (PLP), or residual limb pain (RLP), and (3) postoperative complications. Studies were only included if outcomes data were discretely provided for LE patients. RESULTS: Eleven articles examining 318 patients were identified. Average patient age was 47.5 ± 9.3 years, and most patients were male (n = 246, 77.4%). Eight manuscripts (72.7%) described TMR at the index amputation. The average number of nerve transfers performed per TMR case was 2.1 ± 0.8, and the most commonly employed nerve was the tibial (178/498; 35.7%). Nine (81.8%) articles incorporated patient-reported outcomes after TMR, with common methods including the Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) and questionnaires. Four studies (33.3%) reported functional outcomes such as ambulation ability and prosthesis tolerance. Complications were described in seven manuscripts (58.3%), with postoperative neuroma development being the most common (21/371; 7.2%). CONCLUSIONS: The application of TMR to LE amputations is effective in reducing PLP and RLP with limited complications. Continued investigations are warranted to better understand patient outcomes specific to anatomic location using validated patient-reported outcome measures (PROM).

Amputation Acceptance: A Survey of Factors Influencing the Decision to Undergo Lower Extremity Amputation.

Accepting to undergo amputation is an arduous process often fraught with confusion, fear, and uncertainty. To assess how to best facilitate discussions with at-risk patients, we surveyed lower extremity amputees about their experiences surrounding this decision-making process. Patients who underwent lower extremity amputation at our institution from October 2020 to October 2021 were asked to complete a 5-item telephone survey assessing their decision to undergo amputation and postoperative satisfaction. Retrospective chart review of respondent demographics, comorbidities, operative details, and complications was conducted. Of 89 lower extremity amputees identified, 41 (46.07%) responded to the survey, with the majority undergoing below-knee amputations (n = 34, 82.93%). At a mean follow-up of 5.90 ± 3.45 months, 20 patients (48.78%) were ambulatory. Surveys were completed at a mean of 7.74 ± 4.03 months since amputation. Factors that helped patients decide to undergo amputation included discussions with doctors (n = 32, 78.05%) and concern for worsening health (n = 19, 46.34%). Deteriorating ability to walk (n = 18, 45.00%) was the most common concern prior to surgery. Recommendations by survey respondents to ease the decision-making process included speaking with amputees (n = 9. 22.50%), more discussions with doctors (n = 8, 20.00%), and access to mental health and social services (n = 2, 5.00%); however, many had no recommendations (n = 19, 47.50%), and most were pleased with their decision to undergo amputation (n = 38, 92.68%). Despite most patients primarily citing satisfaction with their decision to undergo lower extremity amputation, it is critical to consider factors that affect patient decisions and recommendations to improve this decision-making process.

Trends in Craniofacial Fellowship Career Outcomes: A Call for Expanding Professional Opportunities in Craniofacial Surgery.

PURPOSE: Limited available pediatric plastic surgery positions fail to accommodate the increasing number of craniofacial fellows trained annually. However, many adult indications have increased the demand for craniofacial expertise. Given new opportunities available to craniofacial surgeons, the authors aim to evaluate career prospects for recent craniofacial graduates and explore additional career opportunities. METHODS: Upon approval from the American Society of Craniofacial Surgeons (ASCFS), an anonymous online survey invitation was sent to craniofacial fellows who graduated from 2016 to 2021. Respondents were queried regarding their craniofacial fellowship and subsequent career prospects. RESULTS: A total of 124 eligible participants were identified, of which 30 (24.2%) responded. Craniomaxillofacial case distribution at respondents' current practices varied, with 42.3% reporting a 50% to 75% craniofacial caseload and 38.5% reporting less than 25%. Craniofacial trauma reconstruction was performed most at current positions (92.3%), followed by general reconstruction (92.3%) and breast surgery (69.2%); the least commonly performed was facial feminization (23.1%). Most respondents desired an increased craniomaxillofacial caseload (65.4%). However, 26.9% were unable to secure their current position before fellowship completion, and 80.0% cited limited craniofacial job availability. Recommendations to improve fellowship comprehensiveness and increase candidate competitiveness included increased facial feminization, facial esthetic, and microsurgical experience. CONCLUSION: To adapt to trends in craniomaxillofacial surgery, ASCFS should encourage developing fellowships that increase exposure to gender-affirming, adult craniofacial reconstruction, orthognathic, and skeletal facial esthetic surgery. Expanding training beyond congenital deformities can provide additional employment opportunities while maintaining excellence and innovation in facial plastic surgery.

Perioperative misgendering experiences in patients undergoing gender-affirming surgery: a call for a gender-inclusive healthcare environment.

Background: Transgender individuals have long experienced discrimination and exclusion from medicine. Misgendering occurs when an individual is referred to using a gender or address incongruent with their identity. We evaluated the incidence of misgendering throughout the perioperative experience for patients undergoing gender-affirming surgery (GAS). Methods: Patients diagnosed with gender dysphoria who previously received GAS by the senior author were contacted to complete an IRB-approved survey to evaluate instances of misgendering while in the hospital for GAS. Study results were summarized using descriptive statistics. Results: Of 471 patients contacted, 182 completed the survey (38.6%). The most cited gender identity was transfemale (28.0%). Most patients reported respect for their gender identity (60.4%) and name (76.8%) during their perioperative experience. Twenty-two percent cited triggering experiences, and 15.4% reported interactions with healthcare employees causing them to reach out to a support system. Misgendering most commonly included incorrect use of patients' preferred names and/or pronouns (n = 50, 86.2%), most commonly at surgical check-in (n = 10, 45.5%). Recommendations to improve feelings of gender congruence during patients' stay included updated names and gender identities in electronic medical records (80.8%), and names and pronouns listed on curtains and doors (52.3%) and name tags (51.5%). Conclusions: Until now, the exact incidence of misgendering among patients seeking GAS have not been well established. Despite high levels of satisfaction, a large proportion still reported serious instances of misgendering. Improvements must be made to the perioperative experience to reduce misgendering and provide support and comfort during the sensitive period surrounding patients' gender transition.Level of evidence: Not gradable. Supplementary Information: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00238-022-02040-2.

A comparative analysis of fasciocutaneous versus muscle free flaps in peripheral vascular disease patients.

OBJECTIVE: Chronic lower extremity (LE) wounds are common in patients with peripheral vascular disease (PVD). Free tissue transfer (FTT) provides healthy soft tissue for wound coverage and additional blood supply to promote wound healing. Given previous studies demonstrate increased complications in LE fasciocutaneous flaps, it was hypothesized that low vascular resistance in muscle flaps may be more advantageous for wound healing in PVD patients. Therefore, this study compared outcomes in PVD patients undergoing LE reconstruction with fasciocutaneous versus muscle free flaps. METHODS: Retrospectively reviewed PVD patients undergoing FTT between 2011 and 2021. Patients were stratified into fasciocutaneous and muscle free flap groups. Primary outcomes included complications, flap success, post-reconstruction vascular interventions, limb salvage, and ambulatory status. RESULTS: One hundred thirteen patients with PVD were identified, of which 60.2% received fasciocutaneous (n = 68) and 39.8% received muscle flaps (n = 45). Forty-two patients (37.2%) underwent pre-flap endovascular interventions. Flap success rate was 98.2% (n = 111). Overall complication rate was 41.2% following fasciocutaneous flaps compared to 24.4% in muscle flaps (p = 0.067). Fasciocutaneous flaps had higher odds of ulceration requiring repeat angiogram within 1 year of reconstruction compared to muscle flaps (OR 3.4, 95% CI: 1.07-10.95, p = 0.047), and higher odds of requiring repeat angiogram overall (OR 3.4, 95% CI: 1.07-10.95, p = 0.047). No difference in requiring procedures in the operated limb within 1 year was observed (p = 0.155). At mean follow-up, there was no difference in limb salvage, ambulatory, and mortality rate between groups. CONCLUSION: This study demonstrates that fasciocutaneous flaps had higher postoperative complication rates and more commonly required repeat arteriograms following LE FTT reconstruction due to recurrent ulcerations, suggesting greater utility of muscle flaps for FTT reconstruction in PVD patients.

Long-Term Outcomes in Patients With Peripheral Arterial Disease Who Undergo Free Flap Reconstruction for Chronic Lower Extremity Wounds.

BACKGROUND: Free tissue transfer (FTT) is critical for limb salvage of chronic lower extremity (LE) wounds. In patients with peripheral arterial disease (PAD), FTT LE reconstruction can be challenging due to limited vessel selection for anastomosis. The study aims to evaluate our surgical and functional outcomes after FTT to LE in patients with PAD. METHODS: A retrospective review identified patients who underwent LE free flap reconstruction between 2011 and 2021. All patients underwent preoperative arteriogram and subsequent FTT. Patients were classified into PAD or non-PAD cohorts, based on the presence of LE arterial stenoses or occlusions identified on arteriogram. Primary outcomes included complications, flap success, need for post-FTT vascular reintervention, limb salvage, and ambulatory status. RESULTS: A total of 253 patients underwent FTT to LE, with 84 patients (33.2%) in the PAD cohort. Patients with PAD had a higher prevalence of diabetes (83.3% vs 39.1%, P < 0.001) and end-stage renal disease (8.3% vs 2.4%, P = 0.028). Osteomyelitis was more common in the PAD group (73.8% vs 55.0%, P = 0.004). Free tissue transfer donor sites and flap composition were similar between cohorts. At a mean follow-up of 21.1 months, limb salvage rates were similar between non-PAD and PAD cohorts (90.5% vs 84.5%, P = 0.158), with no significant differences in ambulatory status or mortality. Higher complication rates occurred in the PAD cohort (38.1% vs 20.7%, P = 0.003), of which partial flap necrosis was more prevalent in the PAD group (6.0% vs 0.6%, P = 0.016). There was no difference in flap success rates between groups (P = 0.430). More postflap angiograms were performed in the PAD group (29.8% vs 7.1%, P < 0.001), with repeat percutaneous endovascular intervention performed in 68.0% of the PAD group versus 33.3% of the non-PAD group (P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: This is the largest study to demonstrate excellent long-term limb salvage outcomes in patients with PAD who undergo FTT to LE. Percutaneous endovascular intervention and FTT are effective methods to achieve limb salvage in vasculopathic patients with chronic LE wounds.

Composite Free Tissue Transfer for Reconstruction of Lower Extremity Tendon Injuries: A Systematic Review.

BACKGROUND: Tendon rupture with extensive soft tissue loss has few reconstructive options. Composite free tissue transfers including skin and tendon offer an attractive reconstructive approach. Unfortunately, most studies discussing them come from sparse case reports. We systematically assess evidence supporting composite flap use in single-stage reconstruction of lower extremity tendon and soft tissue defects. METHODS: A systematic review was performed in accordance with Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. OvidMEDLINEqueried for records pertaining to the study question using Medical Subject Heading (MeSH) terms such as "lower extremity," "tendon," and "composite flap." No limitations were placed on the year of publication, country of origin, or study size. Study characteristics and patient demographics were collected. Primary outcomes included:(1) defect location, composite flap characteristics;(2) return to ambulation;(3) joint range of motion;(4) patient satisfaction, and (5) complications. RESULTS: In total, 29 articles examining 173 patients with lower extremity tendon defects and soft tissue loss were identified. Average age was 44.3 years (SD 17.5); most patients were male (n = 110, 66.3%). Achilles defect was mostly reported (n = 151, 86.8%), followed by patellar (n = 17, 9.8%) and other tendon defects (n = 6, 3.4%). Average tendon defect size was 8.4 cm (SD 4.0), average soft tissue loss was 80.2 cm2 (SD 40.0). Most employed composite flap was anterolateral thigh and fascia lata (ALT + FL) (n = 101, 58.0%). Most patients (n = 134, 99.3%) returned to ambulation in an average 123.1 days (SD 78.3). Average reconstructive joint degree of motion was 62.1 degrees compared with normal degree of motion 62.3 degrees. Patient-reported outcomes demonstrated increased satisfaction after reconstruction. CONCLUSION: Composite flaps effectively reconstruct a variety of tendon and soft tissue defects; the most reported flap is ALT + FL, which provides large flap territories and rapid healing in Achilles, patellar, and other tendon defects. In this review, patients with composite flaps demonstrated return to ambulation, minimal impairment in range of motion, and notable postoperative satisfaction.

Comparison of Charlson Comorbidity Index and Modified 5-Factor Frailty Index as Clinical Risk Stratification Tools in Predicting Adverse Outcomes in Patients Undergoing Lower Extremity Free-Flap Reconstruction.

BACKGROUND: Free tissue transfer (FTT) reconstruction is associated with a high rate of limb salvage in patients with chronic lower extremity (LE) wounds. Studies have shown perioperative risk stratification tools (e.g., 5-factor modified frailty index [mFI-5] and Charlson comorbidity index [CCI]) to be useful in predicting adverse outcomes; however, no studies have compared them in patients undergoing LE reconstruction. The aim of this study is to compare the utility of mFI-5 and CCI in predicting postoperative morbidity in elderly patients receiving LE FTT reconstruction. METHODS: A retrospective review of patients aged 60 years or older who underwent LE FTT reconstruction from 2011 to 2022 was performed. Comorbidity burden was measured by two validated risk-stratification tools: mFI-5 and CCI. Primary outcomes included prolonged postoperative length of stay (LOS), defined as greater than 75th percentile of the cohort, postoperative complications, and eventual amputation. RESULTS: A total of 115 patients were identified. Median CCI and mFI-5 were 5 (interquartile range [IQR]: 4-6) and 2 (IQR: 1-3), respectively. Average postoperative LOS was 16.4 days. Twenty-nine patients (25.2%) experienced a postoperative complication, and eight patients (7%) required LE amputation at a mean follow-up of 19.8 months. Overall, flap success was 96.5% (n = 111), and limb salvage rate was 93% (n = 108). Increased CCI was found to be independently predictive of only eventual amputation (odds ratio: 1.59; p = 0.039), while mFI-5 was not predictive of prolonged postoperative LOS, flap complications, or eventual amputation. CONCLUSION: This is the first study to compare the utility of mFI-5 and CCI in predicting adverse outcomes in elderly patients undergoing LE FTT reconstruction. Our results demonstrate CCI to be a superior predictor of secondary amputation in this patient population and mFI-5 to have limited utility. Further investigation in a prospective multicenter cohort is warranted.

A retrospective cohort study comparing reconstructive techniques and outcomes in post-mastectomy triple negative breast cancer patients.

Background: Up to 42% of all breast cancer patients undergo post-mastectomy reconstruction, however reconstructive techniques have not been widely studied in patients with triple negative breast cancer (TNBC). Reconstructive complications may delay adjuvant treatments; in TNBC, which inherently carries an increased risk of locoregional recurrence, this can greatly affect oncological outcomes. Therefore, we evaluate factors influencing choice of reconstructive techniques following mastectomy in TNBC patients and assess operative and oncologic safety outcomes. Methods: A single institution retrospective chart review identified TNBC patients who underwent post-mastectomy reconstruction between 2010 to 2020. Clinical characteristics collected included demographics, cancer history, reconstructive techniques [autologous-based reconstruction (ABR) vs. implant-based reconstruction (IBR)] and surgical and oncologic outcomes such as complications, recurrence, and mortality. Factors impacting whether patients underwent ABR versus IBR were assessed, as well as differences in outcomes between the two procedures. Statistical significance was defined as P<0.05. Results: During the 10-year period, 52.9% (n=127) of all post-mastectomy TNBC patients (n=240) underwent breast reconstruction, most frequently immediately after mastectomy (97.0%). Most patients underwent IBR compared to ABR (82.4% vs. 14.5%). Patients undergoing ABR were older than IBR patients (54.3 vs. 46.4 years; P=0.040) and had a higher body mass index (BMI; 30.0 vs. 26.1 kg/m2; P=0.007). Patients more often pursued ABR if they had a prior breast cancer history (36.8% vs. 16.7%; P=0.041) or experienced TNBC recurrence (26.3% vs. 9.3%; P=0.034), while primary TNBC patients more often opted for IBR. Reconstructive type did not impact complications (ABR 31.6% vs. IBR 16.8%, P=0.131), recurrence (ABR 15.8% vs. IBR 13.0%, P=0.719), or mortality (ABR 0.0% vs. IBR 6.5%, P=0.593) rates. Conclusions: Factors such as age, BMI, and breast cancer history impacted choice of reconstructive technique among TNBC women. No differences in complications, recurrence, or mortality occur in these high-risk patients regardless of reconstructive technique, highlighting that neither ABR nor IBR is superior in regard to surgical and oncologic safety in post-mastectomy TNBC patients.

Preserving Nipple Sensitivity after Breast Cancer Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Purpose: As breast-conserving procedures become increasingly safe and viable options for surgical management of breast cancer, efforts have focused on assessing and optimizing patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs), such as nipple sensation. This study aims to evaluate the current understanding of nipple-areolar complex (NAC) sensation outcomes in breast cancer patients undergoing breast cancer surgeries, namely, nipple-sparing mastectomies (NSM), skin-sparing mastectomies (SSM), and lumpectomies. Methods: Articles including terms related to "nipple," "mastectomy," "sensation," and "patient-reported outcome" were queried from three databases according to PRISMA guidelines. Study characteristics, patient demographics, and surgical details were recorded. Outcomes of interest included objective nipple sensitivity testing and PROMs. Results: Of 888 manuscripts identified, 28 articles met the inclusion criteria. Twelve studies (n = 578 patients) used objective measures to evaluate sensitivity, such as monofilament testing. Sixteen studies (n = 1785 patients) assessed PROMs through validated or investigator-generated surveys. Three of the included studies reported NAC sensitivity in patients who received NSM with neurotization (n = 203 patients) through a variety of techniques that used various grafts to coapt a lateral intercostal nerve to the NAC nerve stumps. Results of investigator surveys showed that of 1565 patients without neurotization, nipple sensation was maintained in 29.0% (n = 453) of patients. Of 138 NSM patients without NAC neurotization, SWM testing showed an average loss of protective sensation in the nipple (average SWM score: 4.7) compared to normal or diminished sensation to light touch in nonoperated controls (average SWM score: 2.9, n = 195). Of patients who underwent NSM with neurotization, one study (n = 78) reported maintenance of NAC sensation in 100% of patients, while another study (n = 7) reported average diminished protective sensation in the nipple (average SWM score: 3.9). Conclusion: Our study has shown that objective and patient-reported results of nipple sensitivity support nipple-sparing techniques as a viable option for preserving NAC sensation, although patients can expect a decrease in sensation overall. Neurotization of the NAC during NSM shows promising results of improved postoperative nipple sensitivity, though additional studies are warranted to confirm this finding. Variations between study methodologies highlight the lack of standardization in sensory testing techniques when evaluating NAC sensation.

Review of Autologous Fat Grafting in Postmastectomy Reconstruction Patients: Nonroutine Diagnostics and Oncologic Safety.

Autologous fat grafting (FG) is increasingly used as an adjunctive reconstruction technique to augment volume, achieve symmetry, and improve contour deformities. This study aims to characterize the oncologic and surgical safety of FG in women undergoing autologous breast reconstruction (ABR) or implant-based reconstruction (IBR). Methods: A retrospective chart review was performed for all patients undergoing FG at a multi-site single health system between 2015 to 2018. A total of 228 eligible breasts from 155 patients were identified using Current Procedural Terminology codes. Patients were divided by reconstructive technique. Bivariate analyses compared baseline characteristics and post-FG outcomes. Results: Mean age for patients undergoing ABR (129 breasts) was 52.8 years compared to 48.6 years for those undergoing IBR (99 breasts; P = 0.002). A heavier volume of fat was grafted per ABR breast (143.8mL) than per IBR breast (102.2mL; P = 0.002). Forty-seven (20.6%) breasts required FG revision, more frequently in ABR breasts (31.0%) than IBR breasts (7.1%; P < 0.001). Following FG, 17.5% of patients experienced a palpable mass, and 18.9% of breasts underwent nonroutine diagnostics or procedures, with no difference between ABR and IBR groups. Most biopsies noted benign findings such as fat necrosis (2.2%) or a benign mass (0.9%), with recurrence only noted in two patients (0.9%). Mean follow-up was 20.4 months. Conclusion: FG is a safe, surgically simple procedure more commonly performed in ABR breasts. FG use in ABR and IBR breasts is oncologically safe, with no impairment in breast surveillance and low rates of locoregional recurrence, but possibly increased incidence of nonroutine imaging and biopsies.