Emergency Department Utilization for Pediatric Gastrostomy Tubes Across the United States.

INTRODUCTION: Emergency Department (ED) visits for gastrostomy tube complications in children represent a substantial health-care burden, and many ED visits are potentially preventable. The number and nature of ED visits to community hospitals for pediatric gastrostomy tube complications is unknown. METHODS: Using the 2019 Nationwide Emergency Department Sample, we performed a retrospective cross-sectional analysis of pediatric patients (<18 y) with a primary diagnosis of gastrostomy tube complication. Our primary outcome was a potentially preventable ED visit, defined as an encounter that did not result in any imaging, procedures, or an inpatient admission. Univariate and multivariable logistic regression analyses were used to determine the associations between patient factors and our primary outcome. RESULTS: We observed 32,036 ED visits at 535 hospitals and 15,165 (47.3%) were potentially preventable. The median (interquartile range) age was 2 (1, 6) years and 17,707 (55%) were male. Compared to White patients, patients with higher odds of potentially preventable visits were Black (adjusted odds ratio (aOR) [95% confidence interval {CI}]: 1.07 [1.05-1.11], P < 0.001) and Hispanic (aOR [95% CI]: 1.05 [1.02-1.08], P = 0.004). Patients with residential zip codes in the first (aOR [95% CI]: 1.08 [1.04, 1.12], P < 0.001), second (aOR [95% CI]: 1.07 [1.03, 1.11], P < 0.001), and third (aOR [95% CI]: 1.09 [1.05, 1.13], P < 0.001) median household income quartiles had higher odds of potentially preventable visits compared to the highest. CONCLUSIONS: In a nationally representative sample of EDs, 47.3% of visits for pediatric gastrostomy tubes were potentially preventable. Efforts to improve outpatient management are warranted to reduce health-care utilization for these patients.

Disparities in Ultrasound Use for Diagnosing Pediatric Appendicitis Across United States Emergency Departments.

INTRODUCTION: An ultrasound (US)-first approach for evaluating appendicitis is recommended by the American College of Radiology. We sought to assess the access to and utilization of an US-first approach for children with acute appendicitis in United States Emergency Departments. METHODS: Utilizing the 2019 Nationwide Emergency Department Sample, we performed a retrospective cohort study of patients <18 y with a primary diagnosis of acute appendicitis based on International Classification of Disease 10th Edition Diagnosis codes. Our primary outcome was the presentation to a hospital that does not perform US for children with acute appendicitis. Our secondary outcome was the receipt of a US at US-capable hospital. We developed generalized linear models with inverse-probability weighting to determine the association between patient characteristics and outcomes. RESULTS: Of 49,703 total children, 24,102 (48%) received a US evaluation. The odds of presenting at a hospital with no US use were significantly higher for patients aged 11-17 compared to patients <6 y (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] [95% confidence interval (CI)]: 1.59, [1.19- 2.13], P = 0.002); lowest median household income quartile compared to highest (aOR [95% CI]: 2.50, [1.52-4.10], P < 0.001); rural locations compared to metropolitan (aOR [95% CI]: 8.36 [5.54-12.6], P < 0.001), and Hispanic compared to non-Hispanic White (aOR [95% CI]: 0.63 [0.45-0.90], P = 0.01). The odds of receiving a US at US-capable hospitals were significantly lower for patients >6 y, lowest median household income quartiles, and rural locations (P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Rural, older, and poorer children are more likely to present to hospitals that do not utilize US in the diagnosis of acute appendicitis and are less likely to undergo US at US-capable hospitals.

Hanging and Strangulation Injuries: An Institutional Review From a Level 1 Pediatric Trauma Center.

BACKGROUND: We sought to define the incidence and outcomes of pediatric hanging and strangulation injuries to inform best practices for trauma triage and management. METHODS: A retrospective review was conducted that included all patients who presented after hanging or strangulation to a Level I Pediatric Trauma Center from 2011 through 2021. Patient demographics, injury characteristics, and clinical outcomes were collected. All imaging modalities of the head and neck were reviewed to determine if a bony fracture or vascular injury was present. RESULTS: Over the 11-year study period, 128 patients met inclusion criteria. The median age of the cohort was 13 years [IQR: 8.5-15], most patients were male (60.9%), and the median GCS was 11 [3, 15]. There were 96 cases (75%) that were intentional injuries. 76 patients (59.4%) received imaging in the form of plain radiographs, CT, or MRI of the neck and cervical spine. No fractures were identified and there were 0 clinically significant cervical spine injuries. CT angiograms of the neck identified no cerebral vascular injuries. Mortality was high (32%), and 25% of patients with nonaccidental injuries had a documented prior suicide attempt. CONCLUSION: We identified no cervical spine fractures and no blunt cerebral vascular injuries after a hanging or strangulation in over 10 years at a Level 1 Pediatric Trauma Center. Use of CT and CT angiography of the neck and cervical spine should be minimized in this patient population without high clinical index of suspicion and/or significant mechanism. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV.

Caregiver health-related quality of life 1 year following pediatric gastrostomy tube placement.

Introduction: Children undergoing gastrostomy tube placement often have complex medical conditions that can increase caregiver burden and decrease caregiver health-related quality of life. Our goal was to identify changes in health-related quality of life over a 12-month period in the caregivers of these patients. Methods: We performed a prospective cohort study of pediatric patients undergoing gastrostomy tube placement. Using the PedsQL 2.0 Family Impact Module, we surveyed the caregivers of these patients at baseline (prior to gastrostomy tube placement) and 1 month, 3 months, 6 months, and 12 months following gastrostomy tube placement. We administered the same survey, at baseline only, to a control group composed of caregivers of pediatric patients undergoing elective hernia repair. Results: We enrolled 130 patients undergoing gastrostomy tube placement and 35 patients undergoing hernia repair. At baseline, these caregivers had significantly lower total health-related quality of life compared to caregivers of children undergoing hernia repair (47.4 ±â€¯16.1 vs 86.0 ±â€¯15.6, P < .001). In the first year after gastrostomy tube placement, caregivers had significant increases in total health-related quality of life (P < .01) and the physical functioning (P < .05), communication (P < .05), worry (P < .05), and daily activities (P < .001) subdomains. A within-subjects analysis comparing scores at baseline and 12 months revealed a significant increase in the total health-related quality of life score over this 1-year period (60.7 ±â€¯18.9 vs 47.4 ±â€¯16.1, P < .01). The total health-related quality of life at 12 months, however, remained significantly lower compared to controls (60.7 ±â€¯18.9 vs 86.0 ±â€¯15.6, P < .001). Conclusion: Our findings highlight the ongoing caregiver burden associated with children undergoing gastrostomy tube placement and provide evidence of the need for efforts directed at caregiver support post gastrostomy tube placement.