ABSTRACT
Summary: Background. Gibberellin Regulated Proteins (GRPs) are small glycoproteins that induce allergy to various types of fruit. This study aimed to evaluate co-sensitization to cypress pollen and other molecules responsible for fruit allergy, such as nsLTP (Pru p 3), PR-10 (Bet v1), and Profilin (Bet v2). Methods. Sixty subjects sensitized to peach GRP (Pru p 7) were consecutively recruited from four Italian centers: 28 males and 32 females (mean age 37.9 years; range 11-79). Specific IgE for Pru p 7, Pru p 3, Bet v 1, Bet v 2, cypress pollen extract (Cup s), and Cup a 1 were determined in all subjects. Results. Sensitization rates to Cup s, Cup a 1, Pru p 3, Bet v 1, and Bet v 2 in the entire studied population were 90.0%, 83.3%, 45.8%, 40.0%, and 30.0%, respectively. In subjects residing in Northern Italy, the respective sensitization rates were 96.4%, 80.0%, 50.0%, 73.3%, and 40.0%, while in those residing in Southern Italy, they were 83.3%, 86.7%, 40.0%, 6.7%, and 20.0%. The only significant difference was observed for PR-10 (p less than 0.0001) Co-sensitization to PR-10 was found to be associated with a reduced risk of anaphylaxis (OR: 0.125). Allergic reactions were most commonly triggered by peach (26/40), followed by orange (12/40), with other foods being less frequently implicated. Conclusions. This study confirms a high association between sensitization to Pru p 7 and cypress pollen and highlights a high percentage of co-sensitization to nsLTP, PR-10, and profilin. PR-10 emerged as a protective factor against anaphylaxis.
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Dermatological research has traditionally concentrated on evaluating mental comorbidities, neglecting positive concepts like happiness. Initial studies indicate that psoriasis and atopic dermatitis (AD) impair the happiness of those affected. Considering global happiness variations, this study aimed to explore the disease- and country-specific differences in disease-related quality of life and happiness, and potential influential factors on heuristic happiness among psoriasis and AD patients in Europe. METHODS: A cross-sectional multicentre study was conducted in dermatology departments of university-affiliated hospitals in eight European countries (Austria, Germany, Italy, Malta, Poland, Portugal, Romania and Ukraine) between October 2021 and February 2023. Adult psoriasis and AD patients completed a standardized questionnaire in their native languages, providing data on demographics, disease-related characteristics, disease-related quality of life (Dermatology Life Quality Index, DLQI), heuristic happiness, positive affect (PA), negative affect (NA) and satisfaction with life (SWL). Descriptive analysis and quantile regression were performed. RESULTS: Between psoriasis (n = 723) and AD (n = 316) patients almost no differences were observed in happiness, SWL and NA, except for DLQI and small differences in PA, with AD patients reporting greater impact than psoriasis patients. Country-wise variation emerged in DLQI, heuristic happiness, PA, NA and SWL with Austrian patients displaying the highest levels of happiness, satisfaction and positivity, coupled with higher treatment care and lower disease severity. Quantile regression revealed varying coefficients for predictor variables across quantiles, indicating, for example positive effects on heuristic happiness associated with current or previous receipt of systemic therapies at different quantiles. CONCLUSION: This study shows notable happiness differences across European countries and significant disease-related variations, particularly with AD patients being more impaired than psoriasis patients. The findings highlight the need for equality in treatment access and support the development of targeted positive psychological interventions to enhance happiness considering country-specific distinctions in future research and health policies for psoriasis and AD patients.
ABSTRACT
Summary: Background. Lipid transfer protein is the main cause of both primary food allergy and food-dependent exercise-induced allergic reactions (FDEIAR) in Italy. What characterizes LTP-hypersensitive patients with FDEIAR is still unclear. We investigated the key characteristics of LTP-hypersensitive patients with or without FDEIAR in a large cohort of individuals sensitized to this allergen. Methods. 1,203 food-allergic patients, diagnosed on the basis of unequivocal clinical history and presence of circulating food allergen-specific IgE were studied. Serum IgE reactivity was assessed using the Allergen ExplorerALEX® system (Macroarray Diagnostics, Vienna, Austria). Association of specific IgE reactivities with FDEIAR was investigated, and patients with and without FDEIAR sensitized to LTP were compared. Results. 116 subjects (9.6%) had FDEIAR. Among these, 77 (66.3%) were LTP-reactors and 16 (13.8%) were sensitized to Tri a 19 (omega-5-gliadin). Different LTPs and omega-5-gliadin emerged as the sole allergens clearly associated with FDEIAR. Severity of allergic reactions was paralleled the level of specific IgE to LTPs. Patients with FDEIAR showed significantly lower IgE levels than their counterparts with food allergy at rest, and displayed nearly identical IgE levels regardless of the severity of allergic reactions induced by exercise. Conclusions. FDEIAR are associated with specific allergens. Specific IgE levels in LTP-hypersensitive patients with FDEIAR show an intermediate titer between those simply sensitized and those showing classic food allergy.
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: With the global population on the rise, edible insects are considered a potential solution to food security, although concerns about risks such as anaphylaxis exist. METHODS: 2,014 participants underwent testing with the Allergy Explorer-ALEX-2 including extracts of three novel foods: Acheta Domesticus (Ad), Locusta migratoria (Lm), and Tenebrio molitor (Tm). The IgE-mediated sensitization status was investigated in participants who had never knowingly consumed these insects. Data was recorded using an electronic database. RESULTS: 195 individuals (9.7% of all participants) were sensitized to insects. Tropomyosin was co-recognized by 34%, and 18.5% were positive for arginine kinases. Reactivity to Sarcoplasmic-CB, Troponin-C, Paramyosin, or Myosin-light-chain was found in less than 5% of the population, whereas 108 individuals (55.4%) did not show any reactivity to invertebrate panallergens. Additionally, 33 individuals (16.9%) exhibited monosensitization exclusively to insects. Multivariate analysis revealed an inverse association between arachnid reactivity and sensitization to insect allergens, while Mollusca, Blattoidea, and tropomyosin reactivity displayed a direct relationship. Furthermore, Myosin-light-chain reactivity correlated with Ad and Lm, and Troponin-C with Ad and Tm sensitization. CONCLUSION: Edible insect extract IgE sensitization was observed in individuals without prior exposure to such foods. Mites showed a low likelihood of being primary sensitizers due to their inverse association with insect reactivity. Conversely, the direct association of insect sensitization with mollusk and cockroach extract reactivity suggests their potential as primary sensitizers in these participants. Tropomyosin consistently exhibited a positive association with reactivity to all studied insects, supporting its role as a primary sensitizer.
ABSTRACT
Summary: The primary cause of adult-onset food allergy in Mediterranean countries is IgE-mediated reactivity to non-specific Lipid Transfer Protein (nsLTP), with a prevalence of 9.5% in Italy. nsLTP is heat- and pepsin-stable due to its 3D structure, causing severe allergic reactions, even anaphylaxis. It's conserved across plants and a "panallergen" due to homologous forms in various vegetable foods. Found in Rosaceae fruits' skin, it's categorized into nsLTP1 (9 kDa) and nsLTP2 (7 kDa), representing 93% and 7% of the molecules described to date, respectively. Pru p 3 (nsLTP1) from peach is a primary sensitizer, binding more epitopes than other homologs. Cross-reactivity varies in sensitized patients, influenced by IgE levels. Clinical manifestations range from none to various symptoms. Managing patients sensitized to nsLTP without clinical allergy is a challenge. Sensitization hierarchy usually starts with peach, then expands through Prunoideae, Rosaceae, and other foods. Clinical symptoms don't always expand across LTPs. Patients can tolerate some nsLTP-containing foods and consuming them may maintain tolerance. The absence of guidelines led to the Associazione Allergologi Immunologi Italiani Territoriali e Ospedalieri (AAIITO) creating a consensus-based document. Strategies involve avoidance, self-injectable adrenaline, verification through in vivo and in vitro testing, considering cofactors, and peeling fruits. In localized reactions, abstinence is recommended if specific IgE is high. Concurrent pollinosis may complicates diagnosis, but may help management since symptoms are often less severe. Asymptomatic patients are advised to continue normal diets while considering cofactors and total IgE levels. Management strategies should be case-specific, based on expert Consensus Document.
ABSTRACT
Summary: Background. LTP allergy is often a challenge for clinicians. We evaluated a multiplex diagnostic approach with diverse cofactors to stratify LTP syndrome risk. Methods. Of the 1,831 participants screened with 'Allergy Explorer-ALEX-2', 426 had reactions to at least one LTP. Data was gathered and recorded via an electronic database. Results. Reactivity to peach Pru p 3 was found in 77% of individuals with LTP allergy. Higher levels of specific IgE and concurrent sensitization to more than 5 molecules (50% of all LTP-sensitised participants, 62% of symptomatic cases) were significantly associated with an increased risk of severe reactions (p = 0.001). Several cofactors, either alone or in combination, also influenced patients' clinical outcomes. Some cofactors increased the risk of severe reactions, such as mono reactivity to LTP in 44.6% of cases (p = 0.001), FDEIA in 10.8% of patients (p = 0.001), and FDNIH in 11.5% (p = 0.005). On the other hand, reactivity to PR10 (24.2%; p = 0.001), profilin hypersensitivity (10.3%; p = 0.001), and/or atopic dermatitis (16.7%; p = 0.001) had a mitigating effect on symptom severity. Conclusions. Clinical severity of LTP syndrome is associated with an expanded IgE repertoire in terms of the number of LTP components recognized and increased IgE levels in individual molecules. Ara h 9, Cor a 8, and Mal d 3 showed the strongest association with clinical severity. In addition, several cofactors may either exacerbate (FDEIA, FDHIH, and LTP monoreactivity) or ameliorate (atopic dermatitis and co-sensitization to profilin and/or PR10) individual patient outcomes. These factors may be utilized for the daily clinical management of LTP syndrome.
ABSTRACT
Abundant heterogeneous immune cells infiltrate lesions in chronic inflammatory diseases and characterization of these cells is needed to distinguish disease-promoting from bystander immune cells. Here, we investigate the landscape of non-communicable inflammatory skin diseases (ncISD) by spatial transcriptomics resulting in a large repository of 62,000 spatially defined human cutaneous transcriptomes from 31 patients. Despite the expected immune cell infiltration, we observe rather low numbers of pathogenic disease promoting cytokine transcripts (IFNG, IL13 and IL17A), i.e. >125 times less compared to the mean expression of all other genes over lesional skin sections. Nevertheless, cytokine expression is limited to lesional skin and presented in a disease-specific pattern. Leveraging a density-based spatial clustering method, we identify specific responder gene signatures in direct proximity of cytokines, and confirm that detected cytokine transcripts initiate amplification cascades of up to thousands of specific responder transcripts forming localized epidermal clusters. Thus, within the abundant and heterogeneous infiltrates of ncISD, only a low number of cytokine transcripts and their translated proteins promote disease by initiating an inflammatory amplification cascade in their local microenvironment.
Subject(s)
Skin Diseases , Transcriptome , Humans , Transcriptome/genetics , Skin/pathology , Cytokines/metabolism , Gene Expression Profiling , Skin Diseases/pathologyABSTRACT
About 10 years ago, a protein family was shown for the first time to contain allergenic members, gibberellin-regulated protein (GRP). The first reported member was from peach, Pru p 7. One can hypothesize that it was not detected before because its physicochemical characteristics overlap with those of lipid transfer protein (LTP), a well-known allergen, or because the exposure to GRP increased due to an increase in the gibberellin phythormone level in plant food, either exogenous or endogenous. Like LTPs, GRPs are small cationic proteins with disulfide bridges, are resistant to heat and proteolytic cleavage, and are involved in the defense of the plant. Besides peach, GRP allergens have been described in Japanese apricot (Pru m 7), sweet cherry (Pru av 7), orange (Cit s 7), pomegranate (Pun g 7), bell pepper (Cap a 7), strawberry (Fra a GRP), and also in pollen with a restriction to Cupressaceae tree family (Cup s 7, Cry j 7, and Jun a 7). IgE cross-reactivities were described between GRPs, and the reported peach/cypress and citrus/cypress syndromes may therefore be explained because of these GRP cross-reactivities. GRPs are clinically relevant, and severe adverse reactions may sometimes occur in association with cofactors. More than 60% and up to 95% sequence identities are calculated between various allergenic GRPs, and three-dimensional models show a cleft in the molecule and predict at least three epitopic regions. The structure of the protein and its properties and the matrix effect in the original allergenic source should be unraveled to understand why, despite the ubiquity of the protein family in plants, only a few members are able to sensitize patients.
ABSTRACT
Summary: Background. House dust mites (HDM) are among the most important allergen sources worldwide, representing a major cause of perennial allergic rhinitis and asthma. Aim. To evaluate the prevalence of IgE responses towards a comprehensive panel of HDM allergens and to evaluate the implications of molecular sensitization profiles on respiratory symptoms. Methods. 155 consecutive HDM-allergic patients (mean age: 27.5 years; range: 1-62; female: 63), 86 affected by rhinitis and 68 by asthma, were enrolled. Specific IgE reactivity to Der f 1, Der p 1, Der f 2, Der p 2, Der p 5, Der p 7, Der p 10, Der p 11, Der p 20, Der p 21 and Der p 23 was tested in patients' sera using the last version of the multiparametric assay Allergy Explorer (ALEX). Results. In all, major and minor allergens were positive, respectively, in 96.8% and 50.9% of the patients. Prevalence and IgE levels of Der f 1, Der f 2, Der p 1 and Der p 20 were significantly higher in asthmatic patients (p less than 0.05), whereas subjects negative for minor allergens resulted more frequently suffering from rhinitis (p = 0.0001). Asthmatic patients had IgE reactivity to a larger number of HDM allergens (mean 5.4; SD ± 2.3) than patients with only rhinitis (mean 4.2; SD ± 2.5) (p = 0.003), whereas no differences in the number of HDM positive molecules and in the specific IgE levels were found among different ages. Conclusions. This study confirms that the assessment of IgE to a comprehensive panel of HDM allergens defines different serological reactivity profiles that seem associated with different clinical presentations.
Subject(s)
Asthma , Hypersensitivity , Rhinitis , Adult , Allergens , Animals , Antigens, Dermatophagoides , Asthma/diagnosis , Asthma/epidemiology , Female , Humans , Hypersensitivity/diagnosis , Hypersensitivity/epidemiology , Immunoglobulin E , PyroglyphidaeABSTRACT
Summary: Background.Based on the cross-reactivity between pollen lipid transfer proteins (LTPs) and the peach LTP, Pru p 3, it has been suggested that the pollen might initiate the LTP sensitization process. Objective. To establish whether LTP allergy can be considered as a pollen-food syndrome. Methods. The literature was reviewed and new data of component-resolved diagnosis from Italy obtained by both ISAC immunoassay and ImmunoCAP on large populations of LTP hypersensitive patients were provided and analyzed. Results. Among Pru p 3 reactors, patients positive for Art v 3 and Pla a 3 largely exceeded those sensitized to the respective major pollen allergens, Art v 1 and Pla a 1/Pla a 2. Pru p 3 reactivity remained stable around 80-90% at all ages, whereas Art v 3 and Ole e 7 recognition was missing in younger patients. Pru p 3 IgE exceeded IgE specific for pollen LTP at all ages. Inhibition studies carried out on LTP reactors showed that commercial extracts of mugwort and plane pollen were unable to inhibit significantly Pru p 3 IgE reactivity. In follow-up studies, baseline Pru p 3 IgE levels exceeded Art v 3 IgE levels in 84% of those sensitized to both allergens, and all patients positive to only one LTP allergen at baseline were sensitized to Pru p 3. Further, most of the patients who did not show any LTP reactivity at baseline became exclusive Pru p 3 reactors. On ImmunoCAP singleplex Pru p 3 IgE levels exceeded Art v 3 IgE levels in 89% of cases (p less than 0.0001). Most literature data were in keeping with these new observations. Conclusions. The evidence for LTP syndrome being a pollen-food syndrome is presently very thin. Our data do not rule out the possible sensitization to the protein, via the airways or the skin.
Subject(s)
Antigens, Plant , Food Hypersensitivity , Allergens , Carrier Proteins , Cross Reactions , Food Hypersensitivity/diagnosis , Humans , Immunoglobulin E , Plant Proteins , Pollen , SyndromeABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: To our knowledge, an international consensus is lacking regarding the development of an adequate informed consent form for a patch test (PT) and the information that should be included in such document. OBJECTIVES: The aim of the study was to reach a consensus on the specific points that need to be addressed in a PT consent form. METHODS: A Delphi survey, comprising 2 rounds and 1 final discussion, was used to gather and analyse data, which was conducted over the Internet. Each statement that reached a consensus with the respondents (9 expert dermatologists from Europe) was defined as a median consensus score (MED) of ≥7 and agreement among panelists as an interquartile range (IQR) of ≤3. All study participants were members of the EADV task force on contact dermatitis. RESULTS: The expert panel addressed several topics that should be included in an informed consent form for a PT: introduction, preparation for PT, testing procedure, allowed activities, adverse events and additional authorizations. CONCLUSIONS: Our results assess recommendations regarding points to be contained in an informed consent form for a PR. Future actions towards standardization and harmonization of this specific consent form are needed.
Subject(s)
Dermatitis, Contact , Dermatology , Venereology , Consent Forms , Humans , Patch TestsABSTRACT
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Peach gibberellin-regulated protein (peamaclein) has recently emerged as a relevant food allergen in cypress pollen-hypersensitive patients. Objective: We investigated monosensitization to peamaclein among Italian cypress pollen-allergic patients. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A total of 835 cypress pollen-hypersensitive patients from 28 Italian allergy centers underwent a thorough work-up to determine food-allergic reactions and performed skin prick testing with a commercial peach extract containing peamaclein. IgE to rPru p 3 was measured in peach reactors, and those with negative results were enrolled as potentially monosensitized to peamaclein. IgE reactivity to rPru p 7 was evaluated using immunoblot and an experimental ImmunoCAP with rPru p 7. RESULTS: Skin prick tests were positive to peach in 163 patients (19.5%); however, 127 (77.9%) were excluded because they reacted to Pru p 3. Twenty-four patients (14.7%) corresponding to 2.8% of the entire study population) were considered potentially monosensitized to peamaclein. No geographic preference was observed. Seventeen of the 24 patients (70.8%) had a history of food allergy, mainly to peach (n=15). Additional offending foods included other Rosaceae, citrus fruits, fig, melon, tree nuts, and kiwi. On peach immunoblot, only 3 of 18 putative peamaclein-allergic patients reacted to a band at about 7 kDa; an additional 4 patients reacted at about 50-60 kDa. Ten of 18 patients (56%) had a positive result for Pru p 7 on ImmunoCAP. CONCLUSION: Allergy and sensitization to peamaclein seem rare in Italy. Most patients react to peach, although other Rosaceae fruits and several citrus fruits may also be offending foods. Peach and cypress pollen probably also share cross-reacting allergens other than peamaclein.
Subject(s)
Cupressus , Food Hypersensitivity , Allergens/adverse effects , Antigens, Plant/adverse effects , Cross Reactions , Food Hypersensitivity/epidemiology , Gibberellins , Humans , Immunoglobulin E , Plant Proteins/adverse effects , Pollen , Skin Tests/adverse effectsABSTRACT
Summary: The clinical usefulness of two commercial peach extracts for SPT (by Lofarma SpA and ALK-Abellò, respectively) was compared in a multicenter study carried out in Italy. Peach allergic patients were tested with the two extracts in parallel and underwent the detection of IgE specific for all three peach allergens currently available (Pru p1, Pru p3, and Pru p4, respectively). The two extracts were almost identical in terms of sensitivity and specificity, being able to detect virtually all patients sensitized to stable peach allergens (lipid transfer protein (LTP) and, presumably, peamaclein) but scoring negative in patients exclusively sensitive to labile allergens (either PR-10 and/or profilin). Thus, the two extracts represent an excellent tool to carry out a preliminary component-resolved diagnosis of peach allergy at the first patient visit.
Subject(s)
Allergens/immunology , Antigens, Plant/immunology , Food Hypersensitivity/diagnosis , Plant Extracts , Plant Proteins/immunology , Prunus persica , Skin Tests/methods , Antigens, Plant/analysis , Carrier Proteins , Food Hypersensitivity/immunology , Humans , Immunoglobulin E , Plant Extracts/chemistry , Plant Extracts/immunology , Plant Proteins/analysisABSTRACT
Summary: The recent European Union and Italian regulations in the matter of in vivo test could strongly impact on current diagnostic approach, increasing the usage of in vitro tests in daily clinical practice. We evaluated 506 patients with both skin prick test and a microarray system (ImmunoCAP ISAC 112). The overall evaluation between ImmunoCAP® ISAC vs SPT showed a moderate agreement (k=0.509, 95% C.I. 0.480-0.540, SE: 0.016) considering both aeroallergens and food allergens. When we considered the concordant results (double-positive plus double-negatives), the agreement ranged from 69% to 80% for pollen allergens, between 74% and 76% for dust mites, and between 74% and 93% for animal epithelia. In the case of food allergens, the accordance was pretty lower, accounting values ranging from 67% to 86%. ISAC testing identified from 22% to 26% more cases than SPTs in peach and nuts hyper-sensitivity. In 2.8% of the control group, the ISAC-test failed to detect an allergy sensitization caused by dust mite, shrimp, Anisakis, or seed storage proteins. Multiplex testing is more than a promising tool for more precise and comprehensive profiling of allergic patients and can be considered as a second-line approach, after the anamnesis, in the diagnosis of allergic diseases.
Subject(s)
Hypersensitivity/diagnosis , Protein Array Analysis/methods , Skin Tests/methods , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Allergens/immunology , Diagnostic Tests, Routine , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Predictive Value of Tests , Sensitivity and Specificity , Young AdultABSTRACT
Summary: Background and Objective. Sensitization and allergy to shrimp among Italian house dust mite allergic patients are not well defined and were investigated in a large multicenter study. Methods. Shrimp sensitization and allergy were assessed in 526 house dust mite (HDM)-allergic patients submitted to the detection of IgE to Der p 10 and 100 atopic control not sensitized to HDM. Results. Shrimp allergy occurred in 9% of patients (vs 0% of 100 atopic controls not sensitized to HDM; p minor 0.001). Shrimp-allergic patients were less frequently hypersensitive to airborne allergens other than HDM than crustacean-tolerant subjects (35% vs 58.8%; p minor 0.005). Only 51% of tropomyosin-sensitized patients had shrimp allergy, and these showed significantly higher Der p 10 IgE levels than shrimp-tolerant ones (mean 22.2 KU/l vs 6.2 KU/l; p minor 0.05). Altogether 53% of shrimp-allergic patients did not react against tropomyosin. Conclusions. Shrimp allergy seems to occur uniquely in association with hypersensitivity to HDM allergens and tropomyosin is the main shrimp allergen but not a major one, at least in Italy. Along with tropomyosin-specific IgE levels, monosensitization to HDM seems to represent a risk factor for the development of shrimp allergy among HDM allergic patients.
Subject(s)
Antigens, Dermatophagoides/immunology , Arthropod Proteins/immunology , Food Hypersensitivity/epidemiology , Tropomyosin/immunology , Adolescent , Adult , Animals , Cross Reactions , Female , Food Hypersensitivity/immunology , Humans , Immunoglobulin E/metabolism , Italy/epidemiology , Male , Middle Aged , Penaeidae , Prevalence , Pyroglyphidae , Young AdultABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Interleukin (IL)-26 is a signature T helper 17 cytokine described as a proinflammatory and antimicrobial mediator. So far, IL-26 has been reported in several immune-mediated inflammatory diseases, but its involvement in inflammatory skin disorders is poorly known. OBJECTIVES: To investigate the role of IL-26 in hidradenitis suppurativa (HS), through its involvement in antimicrobial activity. METHODS: IL-26 was assessed in patients with HS through gene expression and protein analysis at skin and circulating levels. Ex vivo HS organ skin cultures, together with IL-26 antibody treatment, were performed to determine the IL-26 activity. Peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) from patients with HS and healthy controls were either silenced or not with IL-26 small interfering (si)RNA in order to measure its antimicrobial, cytotoxic and phagocytic activities against Staphylococcus aureus. RESULTS: Firstly, we observed that IL-26 is able to modulate the proinflammatory response at the immune cell level. IL-26 was increased in the plasma of patients with HS compared with healthy controls. Subsequently, we explored the bactericidal, cytotoxic and phagocytic activities of PBMCs against S. aureus in patients with HS and healthy controls. These activities were lower in patients with HS than in controls. Remarkably, the killing activities were reduced when healthy control PBMCs were transfected with IL-26 siRNA. However, the transfection did not affect the killing activity of HS PBMCs, supporting the idea that IL-26 lacks efficacy in HS. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings suggest that infection susceptibility in HS might be related to IL-26. Although the role of bacteria remains controversial in HS, this paper supports that there is a defect of antimicrobial response in these patients. What's already known about this topic? Interleukin (IL)-26 is a T helper 17 cytokine described as an antimicrobial and proinflammatory mediator. IL-26 has been reported in immune-mediated inflammatory diseases, but its involvement in inflammatory skin disorders remains unclear. Hidradenitis suppurativa (HS) is a chronic inflammatory skin disorder characterized by deficiency of IL-20 and IL-22 (a close homologue of IL-26), which causes antimicrobial peptide pauperization leading to severe and recurrent skin infections. What does this study add? IL-26 plasma levels are higher in patients with HS than in healthy control individuals. The antimicrobial activity of IL-26 might be ineffective in patients with HS. What is the translational message? Cutaneous antimicrobial incompetence in HS could be related to IL-26.
Subject(s)
Hidradenitis Suppurativa/immunology , Interleukins/metabolism , Skin/pathology , Staphylococcal Skin Infections/immunology , Th17 Cells/immunology , Adult , Biopsy , Case-Control Studies , Cell Line , Female , Healthy Volunteers , Hidradenitis Suppurativa/blood , Hidradenitis Suppurativa/pathology , Humans , Interleukins/antagonists & inhibitors , Interleukins/blood , Male , Microbial Sensitivity Tests , Organ Culture Techniques , Primary Cell Culture , Skin/immunology , Skin/microbiology , Staphylococcal Skin Infections/microbiology , Staphylococcus aureus/immunology , Th17 Cells/metabolism , Young AdultSubject(s)
Dermatitis, Atopic , Eczema , Hidradenitis Suppurativa , Lichen Planus , Psoriasis , HumansABSTRACT
Summary: Background. The development of recombinant technology supported the allergy diagnostic work-up in the daily clinical practice, representing a useful tool for epidemiological studies. Methods. An atlas of the IgE sensitization profiles found throughout Italy was prepared from a nationwide, multicenter, cross-sectional study. Results. 6052 unselected consecutive individuals, belonging to North-West [NW], North-East [NE], Centre [C], South [S], and Islands subset [Is] were evaluated by means of the ImmunoCAP ISAC test. The top-ranked sensitizations found were Cup a 1 in [C] (58.1%) and [S] (53.6%), Phl p 1 in the North (from 46.1% to 49%), and Cyn d 1 in [Is] (44.2%). High frequency of house dust mite group 2 molecules sensitization was found in [C] (36.9%) and [S] Italy (40.8%), whilst low level of reactivity was recorded in [NW] (20%). Pellitory hypersensitivity was mainly found in [C], [S], and [Is], whilst ragweed Amb a 1 sensitivity was particularly found in [NW] Italy. IgE recognition of PR-10, Profilin, and nsLTP was mutually exclusive in 69.1% of cases, PR-10 reactivity mostly occurring in [NE], Profilin in [NW], and nsLTP molecules recognition mainly recorded in [C] and [S]. Conclusions. Divergent IgE sensitization patterns were found along Italy, possibly linked to the distinct geographical locations, indicating multiplex system IgE analysis as a reliable approach for epidemiological evaluation even in small geographical areas.