Ablation of Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation: between Present and Future.

Pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) is the established cornerstone for atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation, indeed current guidelines recognize PVI as the gold standard for first-time AF ablation, regardless of if it is paroxysmal or persistent. Since 1998 when Haïssaguerre pioneered AF ablation demonstrating a burden reduction after segmental pulmonary vein (PV) ablation, our approach to PVI was superior in terms of methodology and technology. This review aims to describe how paroxysmal atrial fibrillation ablation has evolved over the last twenty years. We will focus on available techniques, a mechanistic understanding of paroxysmal AF genesis and the possibility of a tailored approach for the treatment of AF, before concluding with a future perspective.

Management of cerebral amyloid angiopathy and atrial fibrillation: We are still far from precision medicine.

The use of anticoagulation therapy could prove to be controversial when trying to balance ischemic stroke and intracranial bleeding risks in patients with concurrent cerebral amyloid angiopathy (CAA) and atrial fibrillation (AF). In fact, CAA is an age-related cerebral vasculopathy that predisposes patients to intracerebral hemorrhage. Nevertheless, many AF patients require oral systemic dose-adjusted warfarin, direct oral anticoagulants (such as factor Xa inhibitors) or direct thrombin inhibitors to control often associated with cardioembolic stroke risk. The prevalence of both CAA and AF is expected to rise, due to the aging of the population. This clinical dilemma is becoming increasingly common. In patients with coexisting AF and CAA, the risks/benefits profile of anticoagulant therapy must be assessed for each patient individually due to the lack of a clear-cut consensus with regard to its risks in scientific literature. This review aims to provide an overview of the management of patients with concomitant AF and CAA and proposes the implementation of a risk-based decision-making algorithm.

Thromboembolic prevention in athletes: management of anticoagulation in sports players affected by atrial fibrillation.

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is a common cardiac arrhythmia that poses a significant risk of stroke and thromboembolic events. Anticoagulation therapy is essential for preventing stroke in patients with AF. An increasing number of people of all ages, including cardiac patients, approach physical activity as both a leisure-time exercise and a competitive sport. Therefore, patients at risk of AF are increasingly allowed to practice sports activities. Management of oral anticoagulant therapy (OAT) in these patients is extremely challenging because of the need to balance the risks and benefits of medications, considering both hemorrhagic (in case of trauma) and ischemic complications when the drugs are avoided. Official recommendations are limited for these patients and forbid sports that increase the risk of trauma and consequent bleeding in most cases. These recommendations are strongly influenced by the "traditional" management of OAT, which mainly involves coumarin derivatives. Non-vitamin K antagonist direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs), with their more favorable pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic profile than that of coumarin derivatives, may represent an opportunity to modify the approach to sports activity in patients with AF and indications for OAT. This study aimed to review the use of anticoagulants in athletes with AF, highlight their efficacy and safety, and provide practical considerations regarding their management.

Non-Pharmacological Treatment of Heart Failure-From Physical Activity to Electrical Therapies: A Literature Review.

Heart failure (HF) represents a significant global health challenge that is still responsible for increasing morbidity and mortality despite advancements in pharmacological treatments. This review investigates the effectiveness of non-pharmacological interventions in the management of HF, examining lifestyle measures, physical activity, and the role of some electrical therapies such as catheter ablation, cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT), and cardiac contractility modulation (CCM). Structured exercise training is a cornerstone in this field, demonstrating terrific improvements in functional status, quality of life, and mortality risk reduction, particularly in patients with HF with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). Catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation, premature ventricular beats, and ventricular tachycardia aids in improving left ventricular function by reducing arrhythmic burden. CRT remains a key intervention for selected HF patients, helping achieve left ventricular reverse remodeling and improving symptoms. Additionally, the emerging therapy of CCM provides a novel opportunity for patients who do not meet CRT criteria or are non-responders. Integrating non-pharmacological interventions such as digital health alongside specific medications is key for optimizing outcomes in HF management. It is imperative to tailor approaches to individual patients in this diverse patient population to maximize benefits. Further research is warranted to improve treatment strategies and enhance patient outcomes in HF management.

Electrocardiographic predictors of left ventricular scar in athletes with right bundle branch block premature ventricular beats.

AIMS: Right bundle branch block (RBBB) morphology non-sustained ventricular arrhythmias (VAs) have been associated with the presence of non-ischaemic left ventricular scar (NLVS) in athletes. The aim of this cross-sectional study was to identify clinical and electrocardiogram (ECG) predictors of the presence of NLVS in athletes with RBBB VAs. METHODS AND RESULTS: Sixty-four athletes [median age 39 (24-53) years, 79% males] with non-sustained RBBB VAs underwent cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) with late gadolinium enhancement in order to exclude the presence of a concealed structural heart disease. Thirty-six athletes (56%) showed NLVS at CMR and were assigned to the NLVS positive group, whereas 28 athletes (44%) to the NLVS negative group. Family history of cardiomyopathy and seven different ECG variables were statistically more prevalent in the NLVS positive group. At univariate analysis, seven ECG variables (low QRS voltages in limb leads, negative T waves in inferior leads, negative T waves in limb leads I-aVL, negative T waves in precordial leads V4-V6, presence of left posterior fascicular block, presence of pathologic Q waves, and poor R-wave progression in right precordial leads) proved to be statistically associated with the finding of NLVS; these were grouped together in a score. A score ≥2 was proved to be the optimal cut-off point, identifying NLVS athletes in 92% of cases and showing the best accuracy (86% sensitivity and 100% specificity, respectively). However, a cut-off ≥1 correctly identified all patients with NLVS (absence of false negatives). CONCLUSION: In athletes with RBBB morphology non-sustained VAs, specific ECG abnormalities at 12-lead ECG can help in detecting subjects with NLVS at CMR.

In athletes with right bundle branch block (RBBB) morphology non-sustained ventricular arrhythmias (VAs), the presence of a non-ischaemic left ventricular scar (NLVS) may be highly suspected if one or more of the following electrocardiogram (ECG) characteristics are present at the 12-lead resting ECG: low QRS voltages in limb leads, negative T waves in inferior leads, negative T waves in limb leads I­aVL, negative T waves in precordial leads V4­V6, presence of left posterior fascicular block, presence of pathologic Q waves, and poor R-wave progression in right precordial leads. This score should be externally validated in a larger population of athletes with VAs. In athletes with RBBB morphology non-sustained Vas, attention should be placed on the 12-lead resting ECG to suspect the presence of an NLVS. In athletes with RBBB VAs and the presence of one or more of the identified ECG characteristics, a cardiac magnetic resonance with late gadolinium enhancement is useful to rule out an NLVS.