ABSTRACT
HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) has proven efficacy in reducing the risk of HIV infection in men who have sex with men (MSM), but has not yet been commissioned in the UK. The aim of this study was to investigate perceived need and benefit (or experience of) PrEP among HIV-negative MSM attending sexual health clinics. HIV-negative MSM attending three sexual health centres in London, UK were opportunistically invited to complete a questionnaire. Data collected comprised demographic data and sexual and drug use behaviours as well as questions regarding perceptions of risk and need for PrEP. Logistic regression analysis was undertaken to identify variables predicting acceptability of, and intention to use, PrEP. In addition, data were gathered in respondents already taking PrEP. Eight hundred and thirty-nine questionnaires were analysed. The median age of respondents was 35 years (IQR 28-41, range 18-78), 650 (77%) were of white ethnicity and 649 (77%) had a university education. Four hundred and fifty-six (54%) reported at least one episode of condomless anal sex in the preceding three months, 437 (52%) reported recreational drug use in the preceding three months and 311 (37%) had been diagnosed with a sexually transmitted infection within the preceding six months. Four hundred and sixty-three (64%) of 726 strongly agreed with the statement 'I think I would benefit from PrEP'. Multivariate logistic regression analysis demonstrated that having receptive anal intercourse (RAI) without condoms, having an awareness of the risk of unprotected RAI and having belief in the effectiveness of PrEP were independent predictors for someone thinking they would benefit from taking PrEP. Eight percent of respondents (59/724) had already taken or were currently taking PrEP. The results suggest that individuals at risk are likely to perceive themselves as benefiting from PrEP. The majority perceived their risk of acquiring HIV and benefit from PrEP accurately. Overall they appeared to have little concern over the use of PrEP and generally positive attitudes. Further investigation is warranted to understand why those at risk do not perceive benefit from PrEP.
Subject(s)
Anti-HIV Agents/therapeutic use , HIV Infections/prevention & control , Health Services Needs and Demand , Homosexuality, Male/psychology , Pre-Exposure Prophylaxis , Adult , Aged , Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice , Health Surveys , Homosexuality, Male/statistics & numerical data , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Pre-Exposure Prophylaxis/methods , Sexual Health , Sexual Partners/psychology , Surveys and Questionnaires , United Kingdom , Young AdultABSTRACT
E2F-1, a key transcription factor necessary for cell growth, DNA repair, and differentiation, is an attractive target for development of anticancer drugs in tumors that are E2F "oncogene addicted". We identified a peptide isolated from phage clones that bound tightly to the E2F-1 promoter consensus sequence. The peptide was coupled to penetratin to enhance cellular uptake. Modeling of the penetratin-peptide (PEP) binding to the DNA E2F-1 promoter demonstrated favorable interactions that also involved the participation of most of the penetratin sequence. The penetratin-peptide (PEP) demonstrated potent in vitro cytotoxic effects against a range of cancer cell lines, particularly against Burkitt lymphoma cells and small cell lung cancer (SCLC) cells. Further studies in the H-69 SCLC cell line showed that the PEP inhibited transcription of E2F-1 and also several important E2F-regulated enzymes involved in DNA synthesis, namely, thymidylate synthase, thymidine kinase, and ribonucleotide reductase. As the PEP was found to be relatively unstable in serum, it was encapsulated in PEGylated liposomes for in vivo studies. Treatment of mice bearing the human small cell lung carcinoma H-69 with the PEP encapsulated in PEGylated liposomes (PL-PEP) caused tumor regression without significant toxicity. The liposome encapsulated PEP has promise as an antitumor agent, alone or in combination with inhibitors of DNA synthesis.