Assessing the optimal MAP target in pre-capillary PH patients with RV failure: A retrospective analysis.

Right ventricular failure (RVF) in pre-capillary pulmonary hypertension (PH) is associated with high morbidity and mortality. While mean arterial pressure (MAP) goals have been well established in critical care literature, the optimal MAP target for patients with RVF secondary to pre-capillary PH remains unknown. The objective of this study was to evaluate the difference in outcomes between patients who were managed with different MAP targets. We retrospectively analyzed records of 60 patients who were admitted to the intensive care unit for decompensated RVF secondary to pre-capillary PH. The records were stratified into two groups: 30 patients who were treated with a static MAP goal of either 65 or 70 mmHg (MAP65/70) and 30 patients who received a dynamic MAP goal (MAPCVP) determined by invasively obtained central venous pressure or right atrial pressure. The dynamic MAP group had a statistically significant decrease in in-hospital mortality and incidence of acute kidney injury compared to the static MAP cohort.

Post Heart Transplantation Outcomes of Patients Supported on Biventricular Mechanical Support.

With the implementation of the new heart transplant (HT) allocation system, patients requiring biventricular support systems have the highest priority, a shorter waitlist time, and a higher frequency of HT. However, the short-term and long-term outcomes of such patients are often disputed. Hence, we examined the outcomes of these patients who underwent HT before change in allocation scheme. Additionally, we compared post-HT outcomes of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) with other nondischargeable biventricular (BiVAD) supported patients. We identified adult ECMO or BiVAD supported HT recipients between 2000 and 2018 in the Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients database. We compared survival with the Kaplan-Meier method. Using overlap propensity score weighting, we constructed Cox proportional hazards regression models to determine the risk-adjusted influence of BiVAD versus ECMO on survival. Of the 730 patients HT recipients; 528 (72.3%) and 202 (27.7%) were bridged with BiVAD and ECMO, respectively. For BiVAD versus ECMO patients, the 30-day, 1-year, 3-year, and 5-year mortality rates were 8.0% versus 14.4%, 16.3% versus 21.3%, 22.4% versus 25.3%, and 26.3% versus 25.7%, respectively. Risk-adjusted post-HT survival of BiVAD and ECMO patients at 30-day (HR 1.24 [95% CI, 0.68-2.27]; P = 0.4863), 1-year (HR 1.29 [95% CI, 0.80-2.09]; P = 0.3009), 3-year (HR 1.27 [95% CI, 0.83-1.94]; P = 0.2801), and 5-year (HR 1.35, 95% CI, 0.90-2.05; P = 0.1501) were similar. Around three-fourth of the ECMO or BiVAD supported patients were alive at 5-years post-HT. The short-term and long-term post-HT survivals of groups were comparable.

Clinical outcomes of older adults listed for heart transplantation in the United States.

OBJECTIVE: To examine if older age (>70 years) should be a relative contraindication for heart transplantation, we evaluated the characteristics and outcomes of patients with age ≥70 years listed for heart transplantation; and whether post-transplantation survival was inferior to younger counterparts. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort analysis. SETTING: The scientific registry of transplant recipients (SRTR). PARTICIPANTS: Adults (≥18 years) listed for heart transplantation in the SRTR between 2000 and 2018. INTERVENTIONS: Heart transplantation. MEASUREMENTS: Characteristics and outcomes were compared for adults ≥70 years and <70 years. We evaluated waitlist mortality and post-transplant 1-year and 5-year survivals. RESULTS: The study included 57,285 patients (age range 18-79 years) listed for heart transplantation; 1203 (2.1%) age ≥70 years. Of these, 37,135 patients underwent heart transplantation; 806 (2.2%) were age ≥70 years. Yearly listing of those age ≥70 years has consistently increased from 2.5% (n = 30) in 2000 to 11% (n = 132) in 2017 (p < 0.01). As compared with the age <70 years group, those ≥70 years had a similar risk of death while waiting (sub-hazard ratio [SHR] 0.86, 95% confidence interval [HR] 0.68-1.08; p = 0.19) but were more likely to be transplanted (SHR 1.36, 95% CI 1.26-1.48; p < 0.01). Among the older patients, the overall post-transplant 1- and 5-year mortality rate was 10.4% and 19.2%, respectively. Older recipients had lower unadjusted survival compared with younger recipients (log-rank p = 0.03). However, after adjustment for relevant covariates, there was no significant difference in 5-year mortality between both groups (HR 1.06, 95% CI 0.91-1.254; p = 0.43). CONCLUSIONS: Post-transplant survival up to 5 years among patients of age ≥70 years was similar to that of younger recipients. Older patients who received heart transplantation appear to have lower risk features but receive hearts from higher risk donors. Chronologic age alone should not constitute a contraindication for heart transplantation, although careful patient selection criteria should be applied.

Clinical Outcomes, Trends in Weight, and Weight Loss Strategies in Patients With Obesity After Durable Ventricular Assist Device Implantation.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: To discuss clinical outcomes, changes in weight, and weight loss strategies of patients with obesity post left ventricular assist device (LVAD) implantation. RECENT FINDINGS: Despite increased complications in patients with obesity after LVAD implantation, survival is comparable to patients without obesity. A minority of patients with obesity lose significant weight and become eligible for heart transplantation after LVAD implantation. In fact, a great majority of such patients gain weight post-implantation. Obesity by itself should not be considered prohibitive for LVAD therapy but, rather, should be incorporated into the overall risk assessment for LVAD implantation. Concerted strategies should be developed to promote sustainable weight loss in patients with obesity and LVAD to improve quality of life, eligibility, and outcomes after heart transplantation. Investigation of the long-term impact of weight loss on patients with obesity with LVAD is warranted.

Early Real-World Experience with CoreValve Evolut PRO and R Systems for Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement.

OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to compare the efficacy and safety of the Evolut PRO to the Evolut R valve in a real-world setting. BACKGROUND: The next-generation self-expanding transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) system, the CoreValve Evolut PRO was designed with an outer pericardial skirt to improve valve-sealing performance. Safety and efficacy of this valve have not previously been compared to its predecessor, the Evolut R valve. METHODS: We retrospectively studied 134 patients who underwent TAVR with the Evolut PRO or Evolut R valve over one year at a tertiary center. Endpoints, defined by the Valve Academic Research Consortium-2 criteria, included device success, paravalvular leak (PVL), and a composite safety endpoint including mortality, stroke, major vascular complications, life-threatening bleeding, acute kidney injury, coronary artery obstruction, and repeat procedure for valve-related dysfunction. RESULTS: 60 Evolut PRO and 56 Evolut R patients met the study criteria. Both groups had similar device success rates (90 vs. 89%, p=0.44). Incidence of moderate PVL was similar on discharge (5 vs. 11%, p=0.68) and at 30 days (11 vs. 13%, p=0.79), with nil incidence of severe PVL. There were no mortalities, and the VARC-2 safety endpoint at 30 days was comparable. CONCLUSION: Despite the additional pericardial skirt and larger sheath size of Evolut PRO, outcomes were comparable between the two Evolut systems, supporting adoption of the newest generation valve in the management of severe aortic stenosis as well as continued use of the Evolut R in patients with smaller vasculature warranting a lower profile device.