ABSTRACT
Background and objective: Nodal metastasis is a major survival and prognostic factor in penile cancer (PeCa). Thus, accurate staging, prognosis, and treatment selection require adequate inguinal lymphadenectomy (ILND). ILND surgery should balance oncologic rigor with morbidity and postoperative complications. Our aim was to compare the feasibility and safety of open ILND (OILND) and videoendoscopic ILND (VEILND) in patients with PeCa. Methods: We conducted a single-center randomized trial with a within-patient design between October 2019 and April 2023. Patients who were undergoing either staging or radical ILND for PeCa were included and randomized to receive either OILND or VEILND on one side, with the other technique then used on the contralateral side. The trial was approved by the local ethics committee and was registered on ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT05887921). The primary outcome was the safety of VEILND. Secondary outcomes included intraoperative and postoperative morbidity rates and surgical outcomes for the two procedures, as well as oncological outcomes according to survival estimates. Key findings and limitations: We included 14 patients in the study. Median follow-up was 12 mo (interquartile range [IQR] 12-17). There were no significant differences in operative time and the number of lymph nodes removed between OILND and VEILND. However, the median time to drain removal was significantly shorter in the VEILND group (15 d, IQR 13-17, 95% confidence interval [CI] 12-17) than in the OILND group (27 d, IQR 20-41, 95% CI 24-31; p = 0.025). No intraoperative complications were observed, but postoperative complications occurred in three cases (21.4%, 95% CI 8.4-37.8%) in the VEILND group and eight (57.1%, 95% CI 18.6-54.3%) in the OILND group (p = 0.032). Conclusions and clinical implications: VEILND represents a safe technique to consider for either staging or curative intent in PeCa and seems to have an advantage over OILND in terms of morbidity. Further high-powered studies are warranted to confirm these preliminary results. Patient summary: We compared the outcomes of two different surgical techniques to remove lymph nodes in patients with penile cancer. We found that a video-assisted keyhole surgery approach seems to result in a lower rate of complications than after open surgery.
ABSTRACT
Adult Acquired Buried Penis (AABP) is a pathological condition necessitating surgical correction, ranging from simple to complex procedures involving the utilization of full-thickness (FTSG) or split-thickness (STSG) skin grafts especially in cases of substantial viable penile skin loss. In this retrospective study, we aimed to compare the surgical, functional, and patient-reported outcomes (PROs) of graft types that were utilized to treat AABP among 39 patients at a single center between November 2017 and May 2023. Among these patients, 22 needed skin grafts, with 9 undergoing FTSG and the remainder receiving STSG. Lichen Sclerosus (LS) was the primary cause (54.6%) of AABP requiring skin grafts. Patients primarily presented with voiding (63.6%) and sexual (27.3%) dysfunction. The STSG group had a lower mean age (64.7 ± 11.6) than the FTSG group (66.7 ± 11.6; P = 0.015), with no significant differences in BMI (p = 0.643). Complex repairs (Santucci grade ≥3) were performed in 81.0% of cases, with 88.9% in the FTSG group and 75.0% in the STSG group. Operative times were similar (160.2 ± 31.7 vs 161.5 ± 50.3, p = 0.945). No significant differences in preoperative penis length were found between the FTSG and STSG groups (P = 0.918). Postoperative complications occurred in 36.4% of patients, with severe complications (Clavien grade ≥3) in 9.1%. General postoperative complications and recurrence rates did not significantly differ between groups (P = 0.397 and 0.375; respectively). Functional outcomes, evaluated using the International Index of Erectile Function and the International Prostate Symptom Score, improved significantly in both groups after surgical procedures (P < 0.001 for all). Patient-reported satisfaction for the operation was 81.3% calculated by ad-hoc questionnaire. In conclusion, no discernible differences in outcomes were observed between STSG and FTSG. Larger comparative studies with extended follow-up periods and validated questionnaires are warranted for confirmation. Physicians should consider specialized centers for AABP surgical repair due to its intricacies.
ABSTRACT
Total phallic construction with radial artery forearm free-flap (RAFFF) is widely regarded as the gold standard approach for phalloplasty. However, donor-site morbidity remains a significant concern, which is typically managed by using a full-thickness skin graft (FTSG) on the forearm. Split thickness skin grafts (STSG) have been proposed as an alternative, along with the use of an acellular dermal matrix substitute. A retrospective comparative analysis was performed to assess the differences in operative, functional and cosmetic outcomes between FTSG (Group A) and the combination of acellular dermal matrix with STSG (Group B). A retrospective cohort study was conducted on all patients who underwent total phallic construction with RAFFF, between 2016 and 2021. Post-operative surgical and functional outcomes were evaluated using validated tools. A total of 34 patients were included in the study, with 18 patients (52.9%) in Group A and 16 patients (47.1%) in Group B. Group B demonstrated a significant advantage in terms of healing time (24 days vs. 30 days, p = 0.003) and complete graft take (93.8% vs. 27.8%, p = 0.001). Group B also had significantly shorter operative times (310 min vs. 447 min, p = 0.001) and a reduced median hospital stay (8 days vs. 10 days, p = 0.001). Satisfaction with cosmesis was significantly higher in Group B (93.8% vs. 66.7%, p = 0.048).
ABSTRACT
Background and Objectives: The peak of incidence of testicular cancer (TC) occurs among individuals in their reproductive age, emphasizing the importance of fertility preservation as an integral aspect of disease management. Sperm cryopreservation performed before orchiectomy is ineffective in azoospermic men, necessitating alternative approaches such as microdissection testicular sperm extraction (mTESE) at the time of orchiectomy (onco-mTESE) to obtain viable sperm. This study presents the findings from our institution's experience with onco-mTESE and critically discusses our results in light of the existing body of literature. Materials and Methods: This is a tertiary center retrospective analysis of onco-mTESE procedures performed at a single center between December 2011 and July 2022. The included patients were post-puberal men with testicular tumors requiring orchiectomy, along with concomitant severe oligozoospermia or azoospermia. Bilateral mTESE was performed in all cases. Surgical outcomes, sperm retrieval rates, the usage of preserved viable sperm, assistive reproductive techniques' results, and post-operative serum testosterone were recorded. Results: A total of nine patients were included, with a median age of 34 (IQR 29-36) years. All patients had germ cell tumors (GCTs), with seminomatous and non-seminomatous GCTs accounting for 44.4% (n = 4) and 55.6% (n = 5) of patients, respectively. Sperm retrieval occurred in three (33%) patients: one patient in the ipsilateral testis, one in the contralateral testis, and one in both testes. No complications were reported during the procedure, and no post-operative hypogonadism was observed. Among the three patients with successful sperm retrieval, an intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) was performed in two patients, resulting in two pregnancies, leading to one healthy live birth and one miscarriage. Conclusions: In the context of TC, it is essential to conduct a thorough evaluation of testicular function, including a semen analysis and cryopreservation. Onco-mTESE has proven its safety in preserving fertility in azoospermic cases while ensuring the efficacy of oncological treatment.
Subject(s)
Azoospermia , Testicular Neoplasms , Pregnancy , Female , Humans , Male , Adult , Testicular Neoplasms/surgery , Testicular Neoplasms/pathology , Azoospermia/complications , Azoospermia/pathology , Retrospective Studies , Semen , SpermatozoaABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: The treatment of invasive penile cancer is based on partial or total penectomy and perineal urethrostomy configuration.1-3 To report surgical and functional outcomes of penile amputation and perineal urethrostomy configuration in a consecutive series of patients with invasive penile cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A single-center retrospective analysis was conducted from January 2018 to December 2022. Data were extracted from clinical records and operative notes. As primary outcomes, surgical complications were described. Oncological outcomes through cancer-specific survival and overall survival were analyzed. Patient survival was estimated by a Kaplan-Meier analysis. Functional outcomes were assessed through the administration of the International Prostatic Symptoms Score (IPSS) questionnaire at 3 months follow-up. RESULTS: Overall 10 patients were enrolled. The median follow-up was 16 months (Interquartile range (IQR 12-18)). The median age was 71 years (IQR 63-79). Operative time was set at 195 minutes (IQR 155-275). The median hospital stay was 8 days (IQR: 6-10). Postoperative complications occurred in 20% of patients, in 1 case surgical revision was necessary. Positive surgical margins were detected only in 1 patient. The median catheterization time was 15 days (IQR: 15-32). One patient developed local recurrence. At 1 year, the cancer-specific survival was 80% and overall survival was 60%. The median preoperative IPSS was 15 (IQR 12-19). The median postoperative IPSS was 6 (IQR 5-7). CONCLUSION: Penile amputation and perineal urethrostomy configuration was demonstrated to be a safe and effective procedure to address invasive penile cancer.
