Identification of intracellular bacteria from multiple single-cell RNA-seq platforms using CSI-Microbes.

The study of the tumor microbiome has been garnering increased attention. We developed a computational pipeline (CSI-Microbes) for identifying microbial reads from single-cell RNA sequencing (scRNA-seq) data and for analyzing differential abundance of taxa. Using a series of controlled experiments and analyses, we performed the first systematic evaluation of the efficacy of recovering microbial unique molecular identifiers by multiple scRNA-seq technologies, which identified the newer 10x chemistries (3' v3 and 5') as the best suited approach. We analyzed patient esophageal and colorectal carcinomas and found that reads from distinct genera tend to co-occur in the same host cells, testifying to possible intracellular polymicrobial interactions. Microbial reads are disproportionately abundant within myeloid cells that up-regulate proinflammatory cytokines like IL1Β and CXCL8, while infected tumor cells up-regulate antigen processing and presentation pathways. These results show that myeloid cells with bacteria engulfed are a major source of bacterial RNA within the tumor microenvironment (TME) and may inflame the TME and influence immunotherapy response.

Chromosome 7 gain compensates for chromosome 10 loss in glioma.

The co-occurrence of chromosome 10 loss and chromosome 7 gain in gliomas is the most frequent loss-gain co-aneuploidy pair in human cancers. This phenomenon has been investigated since the late 1980s without resolution. Expanding beyond previous gene-centric studies, we investigated the co-occurrence in a genome-wide manner taking an evolutionary perspective. Mining of large-scale tumor aneuploidy data confirmed the previous finding of a small-scale longitudinal study that the most likely order is chromosome 10 loss followed by chromosome 7 gain. Extensive analysis of genomic and transcriptomic data from both patients and cell lines revealed that this co-occurrence can be explained by functional rescue interactions that are highly enriched on chromosome 7, which could potentially compensate for any detrimental consequences arising from the loss of chromosome 10. Transcriptomic data from various normal, non-cancerous human brain tissues were analyzed to assess which tissues may be most predisposed to tolerate compensation of chromosome 10 loss by chromosome 7 gain. The analysis indicated that the pre-existing transcriptomic states in the cortex and frontal cortex, where gliomas arise, are more favorable than other brain regions for compensation by rescuer genes that are active on chromosome 7. Collectively, these findings suggest that the phenomenon of chromosome 10 loss and chromosome 7 gain in gliomas is orchestrated by a complex interaction of many genes residing within these two chromosomes and provide a plausible reason why this co-occurrence happens preferentially in cancers originating in certain regions of the brain.

PERCEPTION predicts patient response and resistance to treatment using single-cell transcriptomics of their tumors.

Tailoring optimal treatment for individual cancer patients remains a significant challenge. To address this issue, we developed PERCEPTION (PERsonalized Single-Cell Expression-Based Planning for Treatments In ONcology), a precision oncology computational pipeline. Our approach uses publicly available matched bulk and single-cell (sc) expression profiles from large-scale cell-line drug screens. These profiles help build treatment response models based on patients' sc-tumor transcriptomics. PERCEPTION demonstrates success in predicting responses to targeted therapies in cultured and patient-tumor-derived primary cells, as well as in two clinical trials for multiple myeloma and breast cancer. It also captures the resistance development in patients with lung cancer treated with tyrosine kinase inhibitors. PERCEPTION outperforms published state-of-the-art sc-based and bulk-based predictors in all clinical cohorts. PERCEPTION is accessible at https://github.com/ruppinlab/PERCEPTION . Our work, showcasing patient stratification using sc-expression profiles of their tumors, will encourage the adoption of sc-omics profiling in clinical settings, enhancing precision oncology tools based on sc-omics.

Outcome differences by sex in oncology clinical trials.

Identifying sex differences in outcomes and toxicity between males and females in oncology clinical trials is important and has also been mandated by National Institutes of Health policies. Here we analyze the Trialtrove database, finding that, strikingly, only 472/89,221 oncology clinical trials (0.5%) had curated post-treatment sex comparisons. Among 288 trials with comparisons of survival, outcome, or response, 16% report males having statistically significant better survival outcome or response, while 42% reported significantly better survival outcome or response for females. The strongest differences are in trials of EGFR inhibitors in lung cancer and rituximab in non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (both favoring females). Among 44 trials with side effect comparisons, more trials report significantly lesser side effects in males (N = 22) than in females (N = 13). Thus, while statistical comparisons between sexes in oncology trials are rarely reported, important differences in outcome and toxicity exist. These considerable outcome and toxicity differences highlight the need for reporting sex differences more thoroughly going forward.

Chromosome 7 to the rescue: overcoming chromosome 10 loss in gliomas.

The co-occurrence of chromosome 10 loss and chromosome 7 gain in gliomas is the most frequent loss-gain co-aneuploidy pair in human cancers, a phenomenon that has been investigated without resolution since the late 1980s. Expanding beyond previous gene-centric studies, we investigate the co-occurrence in a genome-wide manner taking an evolutionary perspective. First, by mining large tumor aneuploidy data, we predict that the more likely order is 10 loss followed by 7 gain. Second, by analyzing extensive genomic and transcriptomic data from both patients and cell lines, we find that this co-occurrence can be explained by functional rescue interactions that are highly enriched on 7, which can possibly compensate for any detrimental consequences arising from the loss of 10. Finally, by analyzing transcriptomic data from normal, non-cancerous, human brain tissues, we provide a plausible reason why this co-occurrence happens preferentially in cancers originating in certain regions of the brain.

A systematic analysis of the landscape of synthetic lethality-driven precision oncology.

BACKGROUND: Synthetic lethality (SL) denotes a genetic interaction between two genes whose co-inactivation is detrimental to cells. Because more than 25 years have passed since SL was proposed as a promising way to selectively target cancer vulnerabilities, it is timely to comprehensively assess its impact so far and discuss its future. METHODS: We systematically analyzed the literature and clinical trial data from the PubMed and Trialtrove databases to portray the preclinical and clinical landscape of SL oncology. FINDINGS: We identified 235 preclinically validated SL pairs and found 1,207 pertinent clinical trials, and the number keeps increasing over time. About one-third of these SL clinical trials go beyond the typically studied DNA damage response (DDR) pathway, testifying to the recently broadening scope of SL applications in clinical oncology. We find that SL oncology trials have a greater success rate than non-SL-based trials. However, about 75% of the preclinically validated SL interactions have not yet been tested in clinical trials. CONCLUSIONS: Dissecting the recent efforts harnessing SL to identify predictive biomarkers, novel therapeutic targets, and effective combination therapy, our systematic analysis reinforces the hope that SL may serve as a key driver of precision oncology going forward. FUNDING: Funded by the Samsung Research Funding & Incubation Center of Samsung Electronics, the Institute of Information & Communications Technology Planning & Evaluation (IITP) grant funded by the Republic of Korea government (MSIT), the Kwanjeong Educational Foundation, the Intramural Research Program of the National Institutes of Health (NIH), National Cancer Institute (NCI), and Center for Cancer Research (CCR).

ClinGen guidance for use of the PP1/BS4 co-segregation and PP4 phenotype specificity criteria for sequence variant pathogenicity classification.

The 2015 American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics and the Association for Molecular Pathology variant classification publication established a standard employed internationally to guide laboratories in variant assessment. Those recommendations included both pathogenic (PP1) and benign (BS4) criteria for evaluating the inheritance patterns of variants, but details of how to apply those criteria at appropriate evidence levels were sparse. Several publications have since attempted to provide additional guidance, but anecdotally, this issue is still challenging. Additionally, it is not clear that those prior efforts fully distinguished disease-gene identification considerations from variant pathogenicity considerations nor did they address autosomal-recessive and X-linked inheritance. Here, we have taken a mixed inductive and deductive approach to this problem using real diseases as examples. We have developed a practical heuristic for genetic co-segregation evidence and have also determined that the specific phenotype criterion (PP4) is inseparably coupled to the co-segregation criterion. We have also determined that negative evidence at one locus constitutes positive evidence for other loci for disorders with locus heterogeneity. Finally, we provide a points-based system for evaluating phenotype and co-segregation as evidence types to support or refute a locus and show how that can be integrated into the Bayesian framework now used for variant classification and consistent with the 2015 guidelines.