ABSTRACT
The nomenclatural type material of Rhizophagus intraradices (basionym Glomus intraradices) was originally described from a trap pot culture established with root fragments, subcultures of which later became registered in the INVAM culture collection as FL 208. Subcultures of FL 208 (designated as strain ATT 4) and a new strain, independently isolated from the type location (ATT 1102), were established as both pot cultures with soil-like substrate and in vitro root organ culture. Long-term sampling of these cultures shows spores of the species to have considerable morphological plasticity, not described in the original description. Size, shape and other features of the spores were much more variable than indicated in the protologue. Phylogenetic analyses confirmed earlier published evidence that sequences from all R. intraradices cultures formed a monophyletic clade, well separated from, and not representing a sister clade to, R. irregularis. Moreover, new phylogenetic analyses show that Rhizoglomus venetianum and R. irregularis are synonymous. The morphological characters used to separate these species exemplify the difficulties in species recognition due to the high phenotypic plasticity in the genus Rhizophagus. Rhizophagus intraradices is morphologically re-described, an epitype is designated from a single-spore isolate derived from ATT 4, and R. venetianum is synonymised with R. irregularis.
ABSTRACT
Arbuscular mycorrhizal (AM) fungi form a widespread and ecologically important symbiosis with plants in the land ecosystem. The phylogeny of the largest presently accepted genus, Glomus, of the monogeneric family Glomaceae (Glomales; AM fungi) was analyzed. Phylogenetic trees were computed from nearly full-length SSU rRNA gene sequences of 30 isolates, and show that "Glomus" is not monophyletic. Even after the very recent separation of Archaeospora and Paraglomus from "Glomus," the genus further separates into two suprageneric clades. One of them diverges further into two subclades, differing by phylogenetic distances equivalent to family level. The other, comprising Glomus versiforme, G. spurcum, and a species morphologically similar to G. etunicatum, is not closely related to the Glomaceae, but clusters together with the Acaulosporaceae and Gigasporaceae in a monophyletic clade. Based on the molecular evidence, a new family, separate from the Glomaceae, is required to accommodate this group of organisms, initially named Diversisporaceae fam. ined. The current taxonomic concept of the recently erected family Archaeosporaceae also requires future emendation, because Geosiphon pyriformis (Geosiphonaceae) renders Archaeospora, the sole genus formally included in this family, paraphyletic. The suborders Gigasporineae and Glominaeae are not congruent with the natural phylogeny of the AM fungi. Our data necessitate a general reexamination of the generic concepts within the Glomales. In addition to the new family structure hypothesized herein, establishment of at least three new genera will be necessary in the future.
Subject(s)
Fungi/genetics , Phylogeny , DNA, Fungal/chemistry , DNA, Fungal/genetics , Fungi/classification , Molecular Sequence Data , RNA, Ribosomal, 18S/genetics , Sequence Analysis, DNAABSTRACT
Geosiphon pyriforme inhabiting the surface of humid soils represents the only known example of endocytobiosis between a fungus (Zygomycotina; macrosymbiont) and cyanobacteria (Nostoc; endosymbiont). In order to elucidate the taxonomical and evolutionary relationship of Geosiphon pyriforme to fungi forming arbuscular mycorrhiza (AM fungi), the small-subunit (SSU) ribosomal RNA genes of Geosiphon pyriforme and Glomus versiforme (Glomales; a typical AM fungus) were analyzed and aligned with SSU rRNA sequences of several Basidiomycetes, Ascomycetes, Chytridiomycetes, and Zygomycetes, together with all AM-fungal (Glomales) sequences published yet. The distinct group of the order Glomales, which includes Geosiphon, does not form a clade with any other group of Zygomycetes. Within the Glomales, two main lineages exist. One includes the families Gigasporaceae and Acaulosporaceae; the other one is represented by the genus Glomus, the members of which are very divergent. Glomus etunicatum and Geosiphon pyriforme both form independent lineages ancestral to the Glomales. The data provided by the present paper confirm clearly that Geosiphon represents a fungus belonging to the Glomales. The question remains still open as to whether or not Geosiphon is to be placed within or outside the genus Glomus, since this genus is probably polyphyletic and not well defined yet. Geosiphon shows the ability of a Glomus-like fungus to form a "primitive" symbiosis with a unicellular photoautotrophic organism, in this case a cyanobacterium, leading to the conclusion that a hypothetical association of a Glomus-like fungus with a green alga as a step during the evolution of the land plants appears probable.
Subject(s)
Cyanobacteria/physiology , Fungi/classification , Mucorales/physiology , Phylogeny , RNA, Fungal/genetics , RNA, Ribosomal/genetics , Base Sequence , DNA Primers , DNA, Fungal/chemistry , DNA, Fungal/genetics , DNA, Ribosomal/chemistry , DNA, Ribosomal/genetics , Endocytosis , Fungi/genetics , Molecular Sequence Data , Mucorales/classification , Mucorales/genetics , Polymerase Chain Reaction , Sequence Homology, Nucleic AcidABSTRACT
Facing the empirical infant research the traditional psychoanalytic theory of development for the first two years of life needs revision. D. N. Stern and J. D. Lichtenberg described new models. In the first part the concept of four phases of self-development according to Stern is described. Past II compares this model with the theory of J. D. Lichtenberg. Furthermore principles of a new theory are discussed.
Subject(s)
Ego , Mother-Child Relations , Object Attachment , Personality Development , Psychoanalytic Theory , Humans , Infant , Infant, Newborn , ResearchABSTRACT
Both D.N. Stern and J.D. Lichtenberg have outlined new models of a psychoanalytic theory of development taking into account the results of empirical infant research. The theory of Lichtenberg is described, whereas part I centered about the model of Stern. Both theories are discussed and central principles of development are specified: activity, social adaption, the influence of genetic factors, the importance of affect and a transactional model of development.