Vaccine effectiveness against severe COVID-19 during the Omicron wave in Germany: results from the COViK study.

PURPOSE: COViK, a prospective hospital-based multicenter case-control study in Germany, aims to assess the effectiveness of COVID-19 vaccines against severe disease. Here, we report vaccine effectiveness (VE) against COVID-19-caused hospitalization and intensive care treatment during the Omicron wave. METHODS: We analyzed data from 276 cases with COVID-19 and 494 control patients recruited in 13 hospitals from 1 December 2021 to 5 September 2022. We calculated crude and confounder-adjusted VE estimates. RESULTS: 21% of cases (57/276) were not vaccinated, compared to 5% of controls (26/494; p < 0.001). Confounder-adjusted VE against COVID-19-caused hospitalization was 55.4% (95% CI: 12-78%), 81.5% (95% CI: 68-90%) and 95.6% (95%CI: 88-99%) after two, three and four vaccine doses, respectively. VE against hospitalization due to COVID-19 remained stable up to one year after three vaccine doses. CONCLUSION: Three vaccine doses remained highly effective in preventing severe disease and this protection was sustained; a fourth dose further increased protection.

Implementation of the ESC STEMI guidelines in female and elderly patients over a 20-year period in a large German registry.

AIMS: We investigated the implementation of new guidelines in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) patients in a large real-world patient population in the metropolitan area of Berlin (Germany) over a 20-year period. METHODS: From January 2000 to December 2019, a total of 25 792 patients were admitted with STEMI to one of the 34 member hospitals of the Berlin-Brandenburg Myocardial Infarction Registry (B2HIR) and were stratified for sex and age < 75 and ≥ 75 years. RESULTS: The median age of women was 72 years (IQR 61-81) compared to 61 years in men (IQR 51-71). PCI treatment as a standard of care was implemented in men earlier than in women across all age groups. It took two years from the 2017 class IA ESC STEMI guideline recommendation to prefer the radial access route rather than femoral until > 60% of patients were treated accordingly. In 2019, less than 60% of elderly women were treated via a radial access. While the majority of patients < 75 years already received ticagrelor or prasugrel as antiplatelet agent in the year of the class IA ESC STEMI guideline recommendation in 2012, men ≥ 75 years lagged two years and women ≥ 75 three years behind. Amongst the elderly, in-hospital mortality was 22.6% (737) for women and 17.3% (523) for men (p < 0.001). In patients < 75 years fatal outcome was less likely with 7.2% (305) in women and 5.8% (833) in men (p < 0.001). After adjustment for confounding variables, female sex was an independent predictor of in-hospital mortality in patients ≥ 75 years (OR 1.37, 95% CI 1.12-1.68, p = 0.002), but not in patients < 75 years (p = 0.076). CONCLUSION: In-hospital mortality differs considerably by age and sex and remains highest in elderly patients and in particular in elderly females. In these patient groups, guideline recommended therapies were implemented with a significant delay.

Effectiveness of vaccines in preventing hospitalization due to COVID-19: A multicenter hospital-based case-control study, Germany, June 2021 to January 2022.

We included 852 patients in a prospectively recruiting multicenter matched case-control study in Germany to assess vaccine effectiveness (VE) in preventing COVID-19-associated hospitalization during the Delta-variant dominance. The two-dose VE was 89 % (95 % CI 84-93 %) overall, 79 % in patients with more than two comorbidities and 77 % in adults aged 60-75 years. A third dose increased the VE to more than 93 % in all patient-subgroups.

Changes in treatment for NSTEMI in women and the elderly over the past 16 years in a large real-world population.

AIMS: This study investigates the changes in therapy for Non-ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction (NSTEMI) over the past 16 years in a large German registry. In particular, the high-risk population of female and elderly patients was analyzed. METHODS: In total, 19.383 patients presenting with NSTEMI were included in this study. Patients were stratified by age groups <75 years and ≥75 years and by sex. Four different time periods from 2000-2004, 2005-2008, 2009-2012 and 2013-2016 were compared. Influence on hospital mortality as the primary outcome measure was assessed by logistic regression analysis. Secondary outcome measures included percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), the use of drug eluting stents (DES), radial access route and major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), defined as all-cause mortality, stroke, re-infarction, percutaneous re-intervention, intervention-related bleeding, cardiopulmonary resuscitation and new onset of cardiogenic shock or need for mechanical ventilation. RESULTS: Mortality decreased in all age groups between the initial time period and the most recent one (8.9% vs. 4.5%, p < 0.01), particularly in female patients ≥75 years (18.2% in 2000-2004 vs. 7.9% in 2013-2016, p < 0.01). Revascularization rates differed by gender (68.3% in women vs. 78.1% in men, p < 0.01) and by age (64.2% for ≥75 years vs. 80.9% for <75 years, p < 0.01). PCI rates in elderly female patients increased from 28.7% to 69.8% (p < 0.01) from the initial to the latest period. CONCLUSIONS: The present study demonstrates, that revascularization rates improved in all patient groups over the study period. However, females and elderly patients still remain less likely to be treated according to current guidelines.

Ticagrelor or Prasugrel in Patients with Acute Coronary Syndromes.

BACKGROUND: The relative merits of ticagrelor as compared with prasugrel in patients with acute coronary syndromes for whom invasive evaluation is planned are uncertain. METHODS: In this multicenter, randomized, open-label trial, we randomly assigned patients who presented with acute coronary syndromes and for whom invasive evaluation was planned to receive either ticagrelor or prasugrel. The primary end point was the composite of death, myocardial infarction, or stroke at 1 year. A major secondary end point (the safety end point) was bleeding. RESULTS: A total of 4018 patients underwent randomization. A primary end-point event occurred in 184 of 2012 patients (9.3%) in the ticagrelor group and in 137 of 2006 patients (6.9%) in the prasugrel group (hazard ratio, 1.36; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.09 to 1.70; P = 0.006). The respective incidences of the individual components of the primary end point in the ticagrelor group and the prasugrel group were as follows: death, 4.5% and 3.7%; myocardial infarction, 4.8% and 3.0%; and stroke, 1.1% and 1.0%. Definite or probable stent thrombosis occurred in 1.3% of patients assigned to ticagrelor and 1.0% of patients assigned to prasugrel, and definite stent thrombosis occurred in 1.1% and 0.6%, respectively. Major bleeding (as defined by the Bleeding Academic Research Consortium scale) was observed in 5.4% of patients in the ticagrelor group and in 4.8% of patients in the prasugrel group (hazard ratio, 1.12; 95% CI, 0.83 to 1.51; P = 0.46). CONCLUSIONS: Among patients who presented with acute coronary syndromes with or without ST-segment elevation, the incidence of death, myocardial infarction, or stroke was significantly lower among those who received prasugrel than among those who received ticagrelor, and the incidence of major bleeding was not significantly different between the two groups. (Funded by the German Center for Cardiovascular Research and Deutsches Herzzentrum München; ISAR-REACT 5 ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT01944800.).

Comparing routine administrative data with registry data for assessing quality of hospital care in patients with myocardial infarction using deterministic record linkage.

BACKGROUND: Assessment of quality of care in patients with myocardial infarction (MI) should be based on data that effectively enable determination of quality. With the need to simplify measurement techniques, the question arises whether routine data can be used for this purpose. We therefore compared data from a German sickness fund (AOK) with data from the Berlin Myocardial Infarction Registry (BMIR). METHODS: We included patients hospitalised for treatment of MI in Berlin from 2009-2011. We matched 2305 patients from AOK and BMIR by using deterministic record linkage with indirect identifiers. For matched patients we compared the frequency in documentation between AOK and BMIR for quality assurance variables and calculated the kappa coefficient (KC) as a measure of agreement. RESULTS: There was almost perfect agreement in documentation between AOK and BMIR data for matched patients for: catheter laboratory (KC: 0.874), ST elevation MI (KC: 0.826), diabetes (KC: 0.818), percutaneous coronary intervention (KC: 0.860) and hospital mortality (KC: 0.952). The remaining variables compared showed moderate or less than moderate agreement (KC < 0.6), and were grouped in Category II with less frequent documentation in AOK for risk factors and aspects of patients' history; in Category III with more frequent documentation in AOK for comorbidities; and in Category IV for medication at and after hospital discharge. CONCLUSIONS: Routine data are primarily collected and defined for reimbursement purposes. Quality assurance represents merely a secondary use. This explains why only a limited number of variables showed almost perfect agreement in documentation between AOK and BMIR. If routine data are to be used for quality assessment, they must be constantly monitored and further developed for this new application. Furthermore, routine data should be complemented with registry data by well-established methods of record linkage to realistically reflect the situation - also for those quality-associated variables not collected in routine data.

The Emergency Medical Care of Patients With Acute Myocardial Infarction.

BACKGROUND: Optimizing the emergency medical care chain might shorten the time to treatment of patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). The initial care by a physician, and, in particular, correct ECG interpretation, are critically important factors. METHODS: From 1999 onward, data on the care of patients with myocardial infarction have been recorded and analyzed in the Berlin Myocardial Infarction Registry. In the First Medical Contact Study, data on initial emergency medical care were obtained on 1038 patients who had been initially treated by emergency physicians in 2012. Their pre-hospital ECGs were re-evaluated in a blinded fashion according to the criteria of the European Society of Cardiology. RESULTS: The retrospective re-evaluation of pre-hospital ECGs revealed that 756 of the 1038 patients had sustained a STEMI. The emergency physicians had correctly diagnosed STEMI in 472 patients (62.4%), and they had correctly diagnosed ventricular fibrillation in 85 patients (11.2%); in 199 patients (26.3%), the ECG interpretation was unclear. The pre-hospital ECG interpretation was significantly associated with the site of initial hospitalization and the ensuing times to treatment. In particular, the time from hospital admission to cardiac catheterization was longer in patients with an unclear initial ECG interpretation than in those with correctly diagnosed STEMI (121 [54; 705] vs. 36 [19; 60] minutes, p <0.001). After multivariate adjustment, this corresponded to a hazard ratio* of 2.67 [2.21; 3.24]. CONCLUSION: Pre-hospital ECG interpretation in patients with STEMI was a trigger factor with a major influence on the time to treatment in the hospital. The considerable percentage of pre-hospital ECGs whose interpretation was unclear implies that there is much room for improvement.

Immediate multivessel percutaneous coronary intervention versus culprit lesion intervention in patients with acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock: results of the ALKK-PCI registry.

AIMS: Current guidelines recommend immediate multivessel percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in patients with cardiogenic shock, despite the lack of randomised trials. We sought to investigate the use and impact on outcome of multivessel PCI in current practice in cardiogenic shock in Germany. METHODS AND RESULTS: Between January 2008 and December 2011 a total of 735 consecutive patients with acute myocardial infarction, cardiogenic shock and multivessel coronary artery disease underwent immediate PCI in 41 hospitals in Germany. Of these, 173 (23.5%) patients were treated with immediate multivessel PCI. The acute success of PCI with respect to TIMI 3 flow did not differ between the groups (82.5% versus 79.6%). In-hospital mortality with multivessel PCI and culprit lesion PCI was 46.8% and 35.8%, respectively. In multivariate analysis multivessel PCI was associated with an increased mortality (odds ratio 1.5; 95% confidence interval 1.15-1.84). CONCLUSIONS: In current clinical practice in Germany multivessel PCI is used only in one quarter of patients with cardiogenic shock treated with primary PCI. We observed an adverse effect of immediate multivessel PCI. Therefore, a randomised trial is needed to determine the definitive role of multivessel PCI in cardiogenic shock.

Randomized comparison of ticagrelor versus prasugrel in patients with acute coronary syndrome and planned invasive strategy--design and rationale of the iNtracoronary Stenting and Antithrombotic Regimen: Rapid Early Action for Coronary Treatment (ISAR-REACT) 5 trial.

In acute coronary syndromes (ACS), a dual antiplatelet regimen with an adenosine diphosphate (ADP) receptor antagonist plus aspirin has become the cornerstone of treatment. The third-generation thienopyridine prasugrel and the cyclopentyl-triazolo-pyrimidine ticagrelor provide a greater, more rapid and consistent platelet inhibition compared to their predecessor clopidogrel. Based on their advantages over clopidogrel in two landmark studies, both drugs received a class I recommendation for their use in ACS patients with and without ST segment elevation. Due to differences in ACS populations and conditions investigated, the relative merits of ticagrelor versus prasugrel in the treatment of ACS patients with planned invasive strategy cannot be reliably estimated from independent trials. To date, no direct head-to-head comparison of ticagrelor and prasugrel in terms of clinical outcome exists. The aim of this multicenter, randomized, open-label trial is to assess whether ticagrelor is superior to prasugrel in ACS patients with planned invasive strategy.

One-year outcomes with abciximab and unfractionated heparin versus bivalirudin during percutaneous coronary interventions in patients with non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction: updated results from the ISAR-REACT 4 trial.

AIMS: Thirty-day results of the double-blind, randomised Intracoronary Stenting and Antithrombotic Regimen -Rapid Early Action for Coronary Treatment (ISAR-REACT) 4 trial showed no difference in ischaemic complications and a reduction in bleeding by bivalirudin versus abciximab and heparin in 1,721 patients with non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI) undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). A longer follow-up may be required to assess the whole potential benefit of a periprocedural antithrombotic therapy. METHODS AND RESULTS: The primary outcome for this analysis was the composite of death, myocardial infarction or target vessel revascularisation one year after randomisation. Secondary outcome was the composite of death or myocardial infarction. At one year, the primary outcome occurred in 21.3% of patients assigned to abciximab and heparin versus 21.5% assigned to bivalirudin (hazard ratio [HR] 0.99; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.80-1.21; p=0.94). The combined incidence of death or myocardial infarction was 15.7% in the abciximab and heparin group versus 16.0% in the bivalirudin group (HR 0.99; 95% CI: 0.78-1.26; p=0.94). The mortality rates were 4.0% and 4.7%, respectively (HR 0.85; 95% CI: 0.54-1.34; p=0.48). At one year, no significant differences in the primary outcome were observed with abciximab and heparin versus bivalirudin in any of the subgroups analysed. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with NSTEMI undergoing PCI, abciximab with heparin and bivalirudin provide comparable outcomes at one year, although bivalirudin reduced the rate of bleeding at 30 days. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION INFORMATION: URL www.clinicaltrials.gov; Unique identifier NCT00373451.

[Intracoronary Stenting and Angiographic Results Strut Thickness Effect on Restenosis Outcome (ISAR-STEREO) Trial].

BACKGROUND: Increased thrombogenicity and smooth muscle cell proliferative response induced by the metal struts compromise the advantages of coronary stenting. The objective of this randomized, multicenter study was to ascertain whether a reduced strut thickness of a stent is associated with improved follow-up angiographic and clinical results. METHODS AND RESULTS: The study covered 651 patients with stenosis in the native coronary arteries > 2.8 mm in diameter. They were randomly assigned to receive 1 of 2 commercially available stents of comparable design but different thickness: 326 patients to the thin-strut stent (strut thickness of 50 microm) and 325 patients to the thicker-strut stent (strut thickness of 140 microm). The primary end point was the angiographic restenosis (> or = 50% diameter luminal stenosis at follow-up angiography). The secondary end points were the incidence of reinterventions due to restenosis-induced ischemia and the total rate of death and myocardial infarctions at 1 year (a combined end point). The incidence of angiographic restenosis was 15.0% in the thin-strut group and 25.8% in the thick-strut group (relative risk, 0.58; 95% CI, 0.39 to 0.87; p = 0.003). Clinical restenosis was also significantly reduced. Reinterventions were made in 8.6% of the thin-strut patients and in 13.8% of the thick-strut patients (relative risk, 0.62; 95% CI, 0.39 to 0.99; p = 0.03). No difference was observed in the combined 1-year rate of death and myocardial infarction. CONCLUSIONS: The use of a thin-strut device is associated with a significant reduction of angiographic and clinical restenosis after coronary artery stenting. These findings may have relevant implications for the currently most widely used percutaneous coronary intervention.

Routine early invasive strategy and in-hospital mortality in women with non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction: results from the Berlin Myocardial Infarction Registry (BMIR).

BACKGROUND: It is under discussion whether female patients with non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI) benefit from routine invasive treatment strategy. We accordingly applied our data from the Berlin Myocardial Infarction Registry (BMIR) to analyze the association between early percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) and hospital mortality in NSTEMI patients. METHODS: Data prospectively collected in the BMIR between 2004 and 2008 from 2808 patients (m=1820/w=988) directly admitted to hospitals with 24-h PCI facilities were included in the analysis. After adjustment for confounding variables, we compared in-hospital mortality for patients of both sexes with vs. without early PCI. RESULTS: Women with NSTEMI were, on average, 7years older than men and demonstrated significantly more comorbidities. A GPIIb/IIIa antagonist was applied in women less often than in men (31.4% vs. 38.4%, p=0.001), and an early PCI was also performed less often in women than in men (64.0% vs. 76.2%, p<0.001). In-hospital mortality was higher in women than in men (5.4% vs. 3.6%, p=0.027). In female patients with NSTEMI, after adjustment for differences in patients' characteristics, hospital mortality did not differ between those treated with early PCI and those managed conservatively (OR: 1.24, 95% CI 0.53-2.91). In contrast, hospital mortality in male patients was lower in those treated with an early PCI (OR: 0.41, 95% CI 0.21-0.78). CONCLUSION: In our clinical registry, early PCI in female patients with NSTEMI was not associated with lower hospital mortality. Further randomized-controlled trials are needed to better understand which women may benefit from early invasive therapy, and under which conditions such benefits are possible.

[Intensive blood pressure reduction in patients with increased cardiovascular risk with high-dose combination therapy of 160 mg valsartan plus 25 mg hydrochlorothiazide. Results of the MACHT II observational study]. / Starke Blutdrucksenkung durch hochdosierte Kombinationstherapie von 160 mg Valsartan und 25 mg HCT in der alltäglichen Behandlungspraxis bei Patienten mit erhöhtem kardiovaskulären Risiko: Ergebnisse der MACHT-II-Beobachtungsstudie.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Hypertension is one of the most common cardiovascular risk factors. Thus, achievement and maintenance of a sufficient reduction of blood pressure markedly contribute to successful risk prevention. Therefore, the primary objective of this observational postmarketing study MACHT II was to examine the efficacy and the tolerability of the combined therapy with 160 mg valsartan plus 25 mg hydrochlorothiazide (HCT) in a large population of patients with a well-defined individual risk profile and treatment status at baseline. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This multicenter, open singlearm trial involved 17,591 patients, either without or with insufficient prior antihypertensive medication. RESULTS: The mean absolute blood pressure improvement obtained for the total population was -26.8 mmHg systolic and -13.5 mmHg diastolic. The maximum absolute improvement in blood pressure was observed in patients with severe hypertension: on average, the systolic blood pressure decreased by 41.7 mmHg and the diastolic blood pressure by 20.5 mmHg compared to baseline. The results demonstrated an effective blood pressure reduction in every subgroup analyzed: mean values of systolic and diastolic blood pressure decreased to high normal values. More than two thirds of the patients achieved normalization of the diastolic blood pressure. Normalization of diastolic blood pressure was observed in 65.2% of the patients with previous antihypertensive medication and in 74.3% of those without previous antihypertensive medication. The overall incidence of adverse drug reactions was 0.6%. CONCLUSION: The combined antihypertensive therapy with 160 mg valsartan plus 25 mg HCT shows a high degree of efficacy and a very favorable safety profile.

The European cobalt STent with Antiproliferative for Restenosis trial (EuroSTAR): 12 month results.

AIMS: To demonstrate the safety, performance and efficacy of the Conor CoStar(R) cobalt chromium paclitaxel-eluting Stent System in the treatment of de novo coronary lesions in up to two native coronary arteries. METHODS AND RESULTS: Two groups of patients were treated with the CoStar(R) stent in a prospective multicentre two arm registry; 145 patients received 194 stents releasing 10 microgm of paclitaxel over 30 days (Arm 1), and 137 patients were treated with 158 stents releasing 30 microgm of paclitaxel over 30 days (Arm 2). Baseline demographics were well matched. Overall device success was 98.2%. Intention-to-treat in-segment late loss at six months was 0.09+/-0.40 mm in Arm 1, and 0.22+/-0.46 mm in Arm 2 (p=0.015), with an in-stent late loss of 0.28+/-0.42 mm and 0.40+/-0.48 mm in Arm 1 and Arm 2 respectively (p=0.028), with no deleterious edge effect in either group. Cumulative MACE at 12 months in Arm 1 was 8.3%, with a stent thrombosis rate of 0.7%, and in Arm 2, 10.2% and 1.4% respectively (MACE: p=0.682). Hierarchical target lesion revascularisation (TLR) at 12 months was 2.8% in Arm 1 and 3.4% in Arm 2 respectively (p=0.759). CONCLUSIONS: The Conor CoStar(R) cobalt chromium stent system is highly deliverable and when loaded with low dose slow release paclitaxel (10 microgm released over 30 days), the stent appears safe and efficacious as judged by angiographic and clinical variables assessed at six and 12 months respectively.

Sustained increased risk of adverse cardiac events over 5 years after implantation of gold-coated coronary stents.

OBJECTIVE: To study the 5-year outcome of patients treated with gold-coated stent placement. BACKGROUND: We have previously shown in the setting of a randomized trial that gold-coated stents are associated with worse mid-term outcome, mainly because of an increased risk of restenosis, compared to uncoated stents. The long-term outcome and, in particular, mortality risk after implantation of gold-coated stents are not known. METHODS: A total of 731 patients with symptoms or signs of ischemia received randomly either a gold-coated (n = 367) or an uncoated steel stent (n = 364) of identical design. Patients were clinically followed-up at 1 and 5 years. The primary endpoint of the study was the composite of major cardiac events (death, myocardial infarction, or target vessel revascularization (TVR)). The incidence of death was a secondary endpoint. RESULTS: Five-year follow-up was available in 97.5% of the patients. The composite of death, myocardial infarction, or TVR occurred in 51% of the patients treated with gold-coated stents and 40% of the patients treated with uncoated stents (P = 0.005). Of note, there was a marked increase in the absolute difference in mortality between patients in the gold-coated and uncoated stent groups, from 1.6% at 1 year to 4.9% after 5-year follow-up (P = 0.09). A multivariate analysis showed that gold-coated stent implantation was independently associated with 5-year mortality (hazard ratio, 1.46; 95% confidence interval, 1.02-2.09; P = 0.04). CONCLUSIONS: Gold-coated stents are associated with a sustained increased overall risk for major cardiac events, and notably, they may increase the long-term mortality risk.

Abciximab and angiographic restenosis after coronary stent placement. Analysis of the angiographic substudy of ISAR-REACT--a double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized trial evaluating abciximab in patients undergoing elective percutaneous coronary interventions after pretreatment with a high loading dose of clopidogrel.

BACKGROUND: ISAR-REACT was a trial designed to evaluate whether the glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitor abciximab is beneficial in patients undergoing elective percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with stent placement after pretreatment with a 600 mg loading dose of clopidogrel. Objective for the angiographic substudy was to determine the impact of abciximab on angiographic restenosis after coronary stent placement. Previous analyses have suggested a reduction in the incidence of restenosis after the administration of abciximab. METHODS: The angiographic substudy comprises 1885 of 2159 patients enrolled in ISAR-REACT: 994 patients were randomly assigned to abciximab and 941 patients to placebo. All patients were scheduled for a routine angiographic follow-up after 6 months (performed in 80% of eligible patients). End points for the angiographic substudy were the rates of angiographic restenosis (> or = 50% diameter stenosis) and target lesion revascularization. RESULTS: The incidence of angiographic restenosis was 27% in the abciximab group and 29% in the placebo group (relative risk 0.92, 95% CI 0.79-1.06, P = .27). Late angiographic lumen loss was 0.95 +/- 0.68 and 0.99 +/- 0.70 mm, respectively (P = .25). Similar results were obtained in a subgroup analysis focusing on high-risk subsets. The rate of target lesion revascularization procedures was 22% in the abciximab group and 23% in the placebo group (relative risk 0.94, 95% CI 0.79-1.12, P = .52). CONCLUSIONS: In low- to intermediate-risk patients who undergo elective PCI after pretreatment with a high loading dose of clopidogrel >2 hours before PCI, the additional administration of the glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitor abciximab is not associated with a significant reduction in angiographic restenosis.

Abciximab in patients with acute coronary syndromes undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention after clopidogrel pretreatment: the ISAR-REACT 2 randomized trial.

CONTEXT: No specifically designed studies have addressed the role of the glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitor abciximab in patients with non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndromes (ACS) undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) after pretreatment with 600 mg of clopidogrel. OBJECTIVE: To assess whether abciximab is associated with clinical benefit in high-risk patients with ACS undergoing PCI after pretreatment with 600 mg of clopidogrel. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PATIENTS: International, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study conducted from March 2003 through December 2005, enrolling 2022 patients (mean age, 66 years) with non-ST-segment elevation ACS undergoing PCI. INTERVENTIONS: Patients were assigned to receive either abciximab (0.25 mg/kg of body weight bolus, followed by a 0.125-microg/kg per minute [maximum, 10 microg/min] infusion for 12 hours, plus heparin, 70 U/kg of body weight) or placebo (placebo bolus and infusion of 12 hours, plus heparin bolus, 140 U/kg). All patients received clopidogrel, 600 mg, at least 2 hours prior to the procedure, as well as 500 mg of oral or intravenous aspirin. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary end point was a composite of death, myocardial infarction, or urgent target vessel revascularization occurring within 30 days after randomization; secondary end points were rates of in-hospital major and minor bleeding. RESULTS: Of 2022 patients enrolled, 1012 were assigned to abciximab and 1010 to placebo. The primary end point was reached in 90 patients (8.9%) assigned to abciximab vs 120 patients (11.9%) assigned to placebo, a 25% reduction in risk with abciximab (relative risk [RR], 0.75; 95% CI, 0.58-0.97; P = .03). Among patients without an elevated troponin level, there was no difference in the incidence of primary end point events between the abciximab group (23/499 patients [4.6%]) and the placebo group (22/474 patients [4.6%]) (RR, 0.99; 95% CI, 0.56-1.76; P = .98), whereas among patients with an elevated troponin level, the incidence of events was significantly lower in the abciximab group (67/513 patients [13.1%]) compared with the placebo group (98/536 patients [18.3%]), which corresponds to an RR of 0.71 (95% CI, 0.54-0.95; P = .02) (P = .07 for interaction). There were no significant differences between the 2 groups regarding the risk of major and minor bleeding as well as need for transfusion. CONCLUSIONS: Abciximab reduces the risk of adverse events in patients with non-ST-segment elevation ACS undergoing PCI after pretreatment with 600 mg of clopidogrel. The benefits provided by abciximab appear to be confined to patients presenting with an elevated troponin level. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT00133003.