No immunological changes after factor VIII product switch: An in depth analysis in haemophilia A patients.

BACKGROUND: A challenging complication in the treatment of haemophilia A is the formation of neutralizing anti-FVIII antibodies (inhibitors). There is ongoing debate on the effect of FVIII product and inhibitor risk, rendering patients and physicians reluctant to switch FVIII-products. AIM: This study aimed to evaluate changes in the immune profile of haemophilia A patients after switching FVIII products and their possible relation to inhibitor development. Secondary, FVIII efficacy after switching were assessed. METHODS: Patients, who switched FVIII-products between 2017-2019, were included in this single centre cohort study. Prospective comparison of immunoregulatory cells and markers by flow-cytometry before and after the switch was performed in a subgroup. For the total cohort clinical data regarding inhibitor development and FVIII efficacy 1 year before and after switching were retrospectively collected. RESULTS: One-hundred patients (including 39 with prospective immunological assessment) were analyzed, of which 31% switched from plasma-derived (pdFVIII) to recombinant standard half-life FVIII (SHL-rFVIII), 47% between different SHL-rFVIII, and 22% from pdFVIII/SHL-rFVIII to rFVIII-Fc. No remarkable changes in immunoregulatory cell functions were observed after switching, regardless the type of switch. None of the patients developed an inhibitor. FVIII efficacy, that is, FVIII usage, half-life and annual bleeding rate (ABR), was similar before and after switch for the SHL products, whereas rFVIII-Fc associated with a longer half-life (13.1 vs. 15.0 h) and lower ABR (3.0 vs. 1.0). CONCLUSIONS: Switching to a different FVIII product was not associated with inhibitor development, nor with differences in the immune profile. Switching to rFVIII-Fc lead to lower ABR.

Evaluation and Management of Bing-Neel Syndrome.

Bing-Neel syndrome is a rare manifestation of Waldenström macroglobulinemia (WM), which is caused by infiltration of the malignant lymphoplasmacytic cells in the central nervous system. Patients can present with a diverse range of neurologic symptoms, and differentiation with other comorbidities seen in WM, such as immunoglobulin M-related polyneuropathy, can be challenging. Both the rarity of this disorder and the heterogeneity of the clinical presentation often cause a significant diagnostic delay with the risk of permanent neurologic damage. This review summarizes current knowledge regarding diagnosis, treatment and prognosis of Bing-Neel syndrome.

Role of Regulatory Cells in Immune Tolerance Induction in Hemophilia A.

The main complication of hemophilia A treatment is the development of neutralizing antibodies (inhibitors) against factor VIII (FVIII). Immune tolerance induction (ITI) is the prescribed treatment for inhibitor eradication, although its working mechanism remains unresolved. To clarify this mechanism, we compared blood samples of hemophilia A patients with and without inhibitors for presence of immunoregulatory cells and markers, including regulatory B-cells (Bregs), regulatory T-cells (Tregs), myeloid-derived suppressor cells (MDSCs), and expression of regulatory markers on T-cells (programmed cell death protein 1 [PD1], inducable T-cell costimulator, cytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated protein 4 [CTLA4]), by use of flow cytometry. By cross-sectional analysis inhibitor patients (N = 20) were compared with inhibitor-negative (N = 28) and ex-inhibitor (N = 17) patients. In another longitudinal study, changes in immunoregulatory parameters were evaluated during ITI (N = 12) and compared with inhibitor-negative hemophilia A patients (N = 36). The frequency of Bregs, but not of Tregs nor MDSCs, was significantly reduced in inhibitor patients (3.2%) compared with inhibitor-negative (5.9%) and ex-inhibitor patients (8.9%; P < 0.01). CTLA4 expression on T-cells was also reduced (mean fluorescence intensity 133 in inhibitor versus 537 in inhibitor-negative patients; P < 0.01). Fittingly, in patients followed during ITI, inhibitor eradication associated with increased Bregs, increased Tregs, and increased expression of CTLA4 and PD1 on CD4+ T-cells. In conclusion, inhibitor patients express significantly lower frequency of Bregs and Tregs marker expression, which are restored by successful ITI. Our findings suggest that an existing anti-FVIII immune response is associated with deficits in peripheral tolerance mechanisms and that Bregs and changes in immunoregulatory properties of CD4+ T-cells likely contribute to ITI in hemophilia A patients with inhibitors.

Treatment of acquired hemophilia A, a balancing act: results from a 27-year Dutch cohort study.

Acquired hemophilia A (AHA) is a severe auto-immune bleeding disorder. Treatment of AHA is burdensome and optimal management is still unresolved. Therefore a retrospective nationwide multi-center cohort study (1992-2018) was performed to evaluate clinical presentation and treatment efficacy and safety of AHA in the Netherlands. Multivariate logistic and Cox regression analysis was used to study independent associations between patient characteristics and clinical outcomes. A total of 143 patients (median age 73 years; 52.4% male) were included with a median follow-up of 16.8 months (IQR 3.6-41.5 months). First-line immunosuppressive treatment was mostly steroid monotherapy (67.6%), steroids/cyclophosphamide (11.9%) and steroids/rituximab (11.9%), with success rates of 35.2%, 80.0% and 66.7% respectively, P < .05. Eventually 75% of patients achieved complete remission (CR). A high anti-FVIII antibody titer, severe bleeding and steroid monotherapy were associated with lower CR rates. Infections, the most important adverse event, occurred significantly more often with steroid combination therapy compared to steroids alone (38.7% vs 10.6%; P = .001). Overall mortality was 38.2%, mostly due to infections (19.2%) compared to 7.7% fatal bleeds. Advanced age, underlying malignancy and ICU admission were predictors for mortality. This study showed that AHA is characterized by significant disease-related and treatment-related morbidity and mortality. A high anti-FVIII titer, severe bleeding and steroid monotherapy were associated with a lower CR rate. The efficacy of steroid combination therapies however, was overshadowed by higher infection rates and infections represented the most important cause of death. The challenging and delicate balance between treatment effectivity and safety requires ongoing monitoring of AHA and further identification of prognostic markers.

An update on the 'danger theory' in inhibitor development in hemophilia A.

INTRODUCTION: Nowadays, one of the most serious treatment complications in hemophilia A is the formation of neutralizing antibodies against coagulation factor VIII (FVIII). These so-called inhibitors develop in about 30% of all patients with severe hemophilia A. Once formed, inhibitors reduce FVIII efficacy in blood coagulation, which has a negative impact on patients' health and quality of life and significantly increases hemophilia A treatment costs. The pathophysiology of inhibitor development is a complex and multi-causal process, in which both genetic factors as well as environmental factors participate. So-called 'danger signals' are considered contributors to inhibitor formation, and can be triggered by surgery, joint bleeds or infections. A pro-inflammatory tissue micro-environment is thereby established, which is characterized by the upregulation of costimulatory molecules on antigen-presenting cells (APCs), that can facilitate the alloimmunization to FVIII and thereby inhibitor formation. Here, the authors will discuss evidence from (pre)clinical studies about this theory in hemophilia A. Areas covered: In this review, the current knowledge regarding the 'danger theory' with regard to inhibitor development in hemophilia A is summarized. Expert opinion: Danger signals might contribute to inhibitor development; however, the evidence is scarce and not conclusive. Future studies, like multinational registries, are warranted but challenging.

Health-related quality of life in children with newly diagnosed immune thrombocytopenia.

Despite its generally transient and benign course, childhood immune thrombocytopenia has a large impact on health-related quality of life. Recently published guidelines state that quality of life should be taken into account while making decisions on management in childhood immune thrombocytopenia. We, therefore, assessed health-related quality of life in children with newly diagnosed immune thrombocytopenia in a prospective multicenter study. One hundred and seven children aged 6 months-16 years (mean age 5.57 years) were included. We used Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory™ and Kids' ITP Tools questionnaires at diagnosis and during standardized follow-up. Scores on the Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory™ Core Scales were compared with those of healthy children. Relationships between health-related quality of life scores and treatment modality, bleeding tendency and course of the disease were examined. Kids' ITP Tools proxy reports and parent self-reports showed significant higher health-related quality of life scores in children who recovered than in children with persistent immune thrombocytopenia (at 3 months: Kids' ITP Tools parent self-report score 80.85 for recovered patients (n=69) versus 58.98 for patients with persistent disease (n=21), P<0.001). No significant differences in health-related quality of life were found between children with mild or moderate bleeding or between children who received intravenous immunoglobulin or children who were carefully observed. In conclusion, health-related quality of life of children with newly diagnosed immune thrombocytopenia is not influenced by treatment modality or bleeding severity, but only by clinical course of the disease. (Dutch Trial Register identifier: NTR TC1563).