The recombinant human chorionic gonadotropin prefilled pen: results of patient and nurse human factors usability testing.

OBJECTIVES: The first prefilled pen for administration of recombinant human chorionic gonadotropin (r-hCG) has been developed. Usability testing was undertaken to evaluate the risk of dosing errors versus the existing r-hCG prefilled syringe, and assess function and handling of the pen. METHODS: Infertile women who were trying to conceive, and specialist nurses, were recruited in Germany. Usability goals were defined and categorized as critical or functional operational goals. Individual, non-interventional, standardized, usability tests (including ease-of-use assessment) were performed with patients and nurses. Cumulative test scores for critical operations were compared. Non-standardized qualitative analyses of nurse-patient training sessions were performed. RESULTS: The cumulative test score for the r-hCG prefilled pen was better than that of the existing prefilled syringe, so it was concluded that the overall risk of dosing errors was not higher with the pen. The ease of use of the pen was rated favorably by patients and nurses. Both user groups were confident that they could inject the correct dose using the pen. CONCLUSIONS: The overall risk of dosing errors was not higher with the r-hCG prefilled pen than the existing prefilled syringe. The ease-of-use of the r-hCG prefilled pen was rated favorably by patients and nurses.

The redesigned follitropin alfa pen injector: results of the patient and nurse human factors usability testing.

OBJECTIVES: A redesigned pen injector for administration of follitropin alfa (follitropin α) has been developed for use in fertility treatment cycles. Pre-summative and summative usability testing was undertaken to assess the risk of dosing errors compared with the existing follitropin α pen. The study also assessed proper use of and dose selection with the redesigned pen. METHODS: Infertile women who were trying to conceive and specialist nurses were recruited from four cities in Germany. Usability goals relating to proper use of the pen device were defined from a risk assessment and further categorized as critical and functional operational goals. Individual, non-interventional, standardized, usability tests were performed with patients and nurses by four experienced research professionals using questionnaires that also included ease-of-use ratings. A non-standardized qualitative analysis of nurse-patient training sessions was performed in the presence of a research professional; reasons for confidence, safety, possible misunderstandings and risks when handling the pen were noted. RESULTS: The overall risk of dosing errors with the redesigned pen was not higher than with the existing pen. No unexpected operational risks and no major concerns regarding the risk of misuse or dosing errors were identified. CONCLUSIONS: The study provides useful practical information on the redesigned pen from both patient and nurse perspectives.

The redesigned follitropin α pen injector for infertility treatment.

INTRODUCTION: Treatment for infertility may require multiple drugs and complex dosing schedules. Available injection devices for patients who require regular injections during treatment are reviewed in this article, focusing on pen injectors used to self-administer recombinant human follicle-stimulating hormone (follitropin α). Following the introduction of the first and second follitropin α pen injectors in the last decade, a third pen injector with improved design for the administration of follitropin α has been developed for use in fertility treatment cycles. AREAS COVERED: This paper presents the results of the dose accuracy testing with this pen injector that was performed in accordance with international standards (EN ISO 11608-1:2000). This overview also provides an understanding of the key features of the redesigned pen injector that are of interest to healthcare professionals. EXPERT OPINION: The availability of an improved injection device for the delivery of follitropin α used during infertility treatment cycles of ovulation induction and assisted reproductive technology offers patients and healthcare professionals new treatment administration options. As fertility treatment cycles involve the use of several injectable gonadotropins, a standard device that could be used for all such treatments would simplify both the administration and the teaching of administration considerably.

Midluteal serum progesterone levels and pregnancy following ovulation induction with human follicle-stimulating hormone: results of a combined-data analysis.

OBJECTIVE: This retrospective analysis of combined data (one Phase II and three Phase III clinical trials) of patients with oligo- or anovulatory infertility aimed to evaluate the association between pregnancy and midluteal serum progesterone (P4) level following ovulation induction and hence the indicative value of P4 for ovulation and pregnancy achievement. STUDY DESIGN: All patients (n = 913) were treated with human follicle-stimulating hormone. Cycles (n = 1,554) with one or two serum P4 levels in the luteal phase (days 5-12) following human chorionic gonadotropin administration and complete data on cycle outcome were included. RESULTS: Clinical pregnancy was achieved in 295/1,554 (19.0%) cycles; 87.5% of these led to live births (16.6%/cycle). Including and excluding multiple pregnancy data, 88% and 86% of all live births had P4 values >10 ng/mL, respectively. Overall clinical pregnancy rate plateaued at midluteal P4 levels >25 ng/mL but, when multiple pregnancies were excluded, plateaued at 20-25 ng/mL and then decreased. Mean midluteal P4 levels were twice as high in multiple versus singleton pregnancies. CONCLUSION: A midluteal P4 level >10 ng/mL may represent an appropriate threshold for indication of ovulation resulting in live birth. Multiple pregnancies were associated with higher mean midluteal P4 levels.

Anastrozole versus clomiphene citrate: which is better for ovulation induction?

Although anastrozole may be used as an oral therapeutic agent in ovulation induction, it is not recommended as a replacement for clomiphene citrate. On the basis of two phase 2 studies, anastrozole should be viewed as a second-tier therapy after clomiphene citrate in anovulatory patients.

Anastrozole vs. clomiphene citrate in infertile women with ovulatory dysfunction: a phase II, randomized, dose-finding study.

OBJECTIVE: To determine an effective multiple-dose regimen of anastrozole compared with clomiphene citrate (CC) to induce follicular growth and ovulation in infertile women with ovulatory dysfunction. DESIGN: Phase II, prospective, randomized, double-blind, multicenter, dose-finding, noninferiority study. SETTING: Outpatient. PATIENT(S): Infertile women (n = 271) with ovulatory dysfunction, aged 18-40 years, with body mass index <37 kg/m(2). INTERVENTION(S): Five days of anastrozole at 1, 5, or 10 mg/d or CC at 50 mg/d. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): The primary endpoint was the ovulation rate (mid-luteal phase serum P level ≥ 10 ng/mL or clinical pregnancy) in the first treatment cycle (cycle 1). RESULT(S): In cycle 1 the ovulation rates for anastrozole at 1, 5, and 10 mg/d were 30.4% (n = 24), 36.8% (n = 28), and 35.9% (n = 14), respectively, compared with 64.9% (n = 50) for CC at 50 mg/d. In up to three cycles of treatment, cumulative ovulation rates did not differ between groups. No cases of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome were reported, and both anastrozole and CC were well tolerated. CONCLUSION(S): In terms of ovulation rates, 5-day anastrozole at 1, 5, and 10 mg/d was less effective than CC at 50 mg/d for cycle 1 (noninferiority was not shown).

Anastrozole single-dose protocol in women with oligo- or anovulatory infertility: results of a randomized phase II dose-response study.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the effects of anastrozole and clomiphene citrate (CC) on follicular development and ovulation in infertile women with ovulatory dysfunction. DESIGN: Phase II, prospective, randomized, assessor-blind, multicenter, dose-finding, noninferiority study. SETTING: Outpatient. PATIENT(S): Infertile women with ovulatory dysfunction, aged 18-35 years, and body mass index <35 kg/m(2). INTERVENTION(S): Single-dose anastrozole at 5 mg (n = 39), 10 mg (n = 39), 20 mg (n = 39), or 30 mg (n = 38) or a 5-day course of CC at 50 mg/d (n = 39) as starting doses. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): The primary endpoint was the ovulation rate in the first treatment cycle (cycle 1). Ovulation was defined as a midluteal phase serum P level ≥ 10 ng/mL or clinical pregnancy. RESULT(S): In cycle 1 the ovulation rates for a single dose of anastrozole at 5, 10, 20, and 30 mg were 46.2%, 41.0%, 23.1%, and 28.9%, respectively, whereas that for CC at 50 mg/d was 61.5%. Among women with fewer than six menses per year, the cumulative ovulation rates over three cycles were comparable in the anastrozole 5 mg (52.4%) and CC 50 mg/d (42.3%) groups. CONCLUSION(S): In terms of ovulation rates in cycle 1, single-dose anastrozole at 5, 10, 20, and 30 mg was not as effective as CC at 50 mg/d for 5 days (noninferiority was not shown).

Recombinant human follicle-stimulating hormone produces more oocytes with a lower total dose per cycle in assisted reproductive technologies compared with highly purified human menopausal gonadotrophin: a meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Human menopausal gonadotrophins and recombinant human follicle stimulating hormone are the two main gonadotrophin products utilized for controlled ovarian stimulation in assisted reproductive technologies. In this meta-analysis, the number of oocytes was designated as the most relevant endpoint directly resulting from ovarian stimulation, and therefore where the drug effect may be estimated with the best sensitivity. METHODS: All published randomized controlled trials on ovarian stimulation comparing the two gonadotrophin products were evaluated. Internal validity was determined using Chalmers' validated scale. If trials did not meet the established quality criteria, a sensitivity analysis assessed the stability of the results. The comparison of continuous variables was conducted following the weighted mean difference and the standardized mean difference (Cohen's effect size) with the random model. Given the known relationship of baseline conditions on treatment endpoints, results were adjusted for age, body mass index and type of infertility. RESULTS: Sixteen studies involving 4040 patients were included. Treatment with human menopausal gonadotrophins resulted in fewer oocytes (-1.54; 95% CI: -2.53 to -0.56; P < 0.0001) compared to recombinant human follicle-stimulating hormone. When adjusting for baseline conditions, the mean difference estimate was -2.10 (95% CI: -2.83 to -1.36; P < 0.001). A higher total dose of human menopausal gonadotrophin was necessary (mean difference, 235.46 IU [95% CI: 16.62 to 454.30; P = 0.03]; standardized mean difference, 0.33 [95% CI: 0.08 to 0.58; P = 0.01]). The pregnancy absolute risk difference (RD [hMG-r-hFSH]) for fresh transfers was 3% (P = 0.051), and the relative risk 1.10 (P = 0.06). When adjusted for baseline conditions, the relative risk was 1.04 (P = 0.49) and absolute difference was 0.01 (P = 0.34), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Because baseline conditions are predictive of outcome, meta-analytic results are more sensitive when these variables are considered. Using an endpoint closely associated with the stimulation period, sufficient sensitivity is achieved to compare gonadotrophin treatments. As the largest meta-analysis published to date on this subject, treatment with human menopausal gonadotrophins is characterized by fewer oocytes and a higher total dose. When considering only fresh transfers, pregnancy rates were similar.

A comparison of menotropin, highly-purified menotropin and follitropin alfa in cycles of intracytoplasmic sperm injection.

BACKGROUND: Over the last several decades, as a result of an evolution in manufacturing processes, a marked development has been made in the field of gonadotropins for ovarian stimulation. Initially, therapeutic gonadotropins were produced from a simple process of urine extraction and purification; now they are produced via a complex system involving recombinant technology, which yields gonadotropins with high levels of purity, quality, and consistency. METHODS: A retrospective analysis of 865 consecutive intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) cycles of controlled ovarian hyperstimulation (COH) compared the clinical efficacy of three gonadotropins (menotropin [hMG; n = 299], highly-purified hMG [HP-hMG; n = 330] and follitropin alfa [r-hFSH; n = 236]) for ovarian stimulation after pituitary down-regulation. The endpoints were live birth rates and total doses of gonadotropin per cycle and per pregnancy. RESULTS: Laboratory and clinical protocols remained unchanged over time, except for the type of gonadotropin used, which was introduced sequentially (hMG, then HP-hMG, and finally r-hFSH). Live birth rates were not significantly different for hMG (24.4%), HP-hMG (32.4%) and r-hFSH (30.1%; p = 0.09) groups. Total dose of gonadotropin per cycle was significantly higher in the hMG (2685 +/- 720 IU) and HP-hMG (2903 +/- 867 IU) groups compared with the r-hFSH-group (2268 +/- 747 IU; p < 0.001). Total dose of gonadotropin required to achieve clinical pregnancy was 15.7% and 11.0% higher for the hMG and HP-hMG groups, respectively, compared with the r-hFSH group, and for live births, the differences observed were 45.3% and 19.8%, respectively. CONCLUSION: Although similar live birth rates were achieved, markedly lower doses of r-hFSH were required compared with hMG or HP-hMG.

Luteal phase bleeding after IVF cycles: comparison between progesterone vaginal gel and intramuscular progesterone and correlation with pregnancy outcomes.

BACKGROUND: To compare luteal phase bleeding and pregnancy outcomes in normogonadotropic patients receiving progesterone vaginal gel (PVG) or intramuscular progesterone (IMP) injections. METHODS: In this retrospective cohort study, data from 270 patients (292 cycles) undergoing day-3 fresh embryo transfer were analyzed. PVG, 90 mg daily (170 cycles) or IMP, 50 mg daily (122 cycles) began at egg retrieval. RESULTS: Luteal phase bleeding was significantly more common in the PVG than the IMP group. No significant differences were observed in biochemical pregnancy or spontaneous abortion rates between the two groups. Patients who bled before the pregnancy test had significantly lower total and clinical pregnancy rates than non-bleeders. Total and ongoing pregnancy/delivery rates were higher in the PVG than IMP group, but did not achieve statistical significance. CONCLUSION: Luteal phase bleeding was more common in the PVG group than the IMP group, but pregnancy was successful in more patients in the PVG group. Luteal phase bleeding is prevented or delayed during IMP treatment, but patients who bled before the pregnancy test, whether using the gel or injected progesterone, had significantly reduced pregnancy rates compared with non-bleeders.

Patients' return to referring physicians and its relation to their infertility duration.

OBJECTIVE: To determine if length of patient-reported infertility prior to referral to a specialist is related to the likelihood that the patient will return to the referring physician for obstetrical care. METHODS: A review of our medical record database identified 430 consecutive pregnant patients, discharged between January 1, 2003, and March 1, 2004. The name of the referring and discharge obstetrician(s), duration of infertility, prior use of clomiphene citrate, and number of previous clomiphene treatment cycles were recorded. RESULTS: Of the 430 patients, 305 (71%) had information about the referring and discharge obstetrician(s) and complete records regarding prior treatment. Median duration of infertility was 1.3 years (range 0.2-12 years). Fifty-five percent (167 of 305) of patients returned to their referring physician for obstetrical care. If patients were referred prior to 6 months of treatment by the referring obstetrician, 76% (35 of 46) returned. If patients were referred after 6 months to 1 year of treatment, 67% (82 of 122) returned. If after 1-2 years, 35% (33 of 94), and after more than 2 years, 40% (10 of 25) returned to their referring physician. Overall, 25% of patients (77 of 305) patients had preliminary treatment with clomiphene citrate. If the referring physician did not give the patient clomiphene citrate, 55% (128 of 232) returned to that physician; if the patient had been given one to four clomiphene cycles, 54% (37 of 69) returned, and if given more than four cycles, 25% (2 of 8) returned. CONCLUSIONS: Although many factors may affect a patient's decision to return to the referring doctor, patient satisfaction with the referring physician may be related to timely referral to a specialist.

Patient experience with follitropin alfa prefilled pen versus previously used injectable gonadotropins for ovulation induction in oligoanovulatory women.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate patient satisfaction with the follitropin alfa prefilled pen (Gonal-f RFF Pen), compared with previously used injectable gonadotropins (vial/ampoules and syringe), in women undergoing ovulation induction (OI). RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: Women aged 18-40 years undergoing OI for oligoanovulatory infertility were enrolled from nine US fertility centers in this prospective, open-label clinical trial. Participants received recombinant follitropin alfa using a prefilled pen. Patient satisfaction was determined using a pre-treatment questionnaire to assess gonadotropin treatments undertaken within 6 months of study initiation and an in-treatment questionnaire to assess satisfaction with the prefilled pen. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary endpoint was the proportion of patients who preferred the prefilled pen compared to previous injectable gonadotropin therapies. Efficacy and safety were also assessed. RESULTS: Seventy-three subjects were screened for the study; 62 enrolled, were treated with the follitropin alfa pre-filled pen, and 61 completed the in-treatment questionnaire. Sixty-one of 61 patients who stated a preference preferred the prefilled pen to previous injectable gonadotropin therapies (61/61; 100%; 95% confidence interval: [94.1-100.0%]). One patient did not state a preference. Of these 61 patients, 54 (89%) found that the prefilled pen instructions were easy to understand compared to 17 of 59 (29%) who thought instructions for the conventional syringes were easy to understand. When preparing their dose, significantly fewer patients contacted their healthcare provider two or more times during the treatment cycle when receiving treatment with the prefilled pen (2/61, 3%) than during the first treatment cycle with prior gonadotropin treatment, 11/59 (19%, p = 0.007). The pen interfered slightly or not at all with patients' normal daily activities in 61 of 61 patients (100%) versus 50 of 59 patients (85%) who had this opinion regarding injections during their prior treatment cycles (p = 0.003). All 61 patients who stated a method of injection preference found the prefilled pen less stressful to use than syringes and would recommend the pen to another woman considering gonadotropin treatment. A total of 10/62 (16%) subjects reported 18 treatment-emergent adverse events (AEs). Two cases of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome occurred post-treatment and one serious AE occurred (post-treatment ectopic pregnancy). Injection site reactions were generally mild to moderate, with mild itching (6 patients, 9.7%) and moderate redness in one patient. Fifteen patients reported mild redness (24.2%). Mild bruising (21.0%), mild pain (33.9%), and mild burning (32.3%) were also reported by patients. Seven patients (11.3%) had moderate pain. CONCLUSIONS: In this open-label, non-comparative study, patients undergoing OI preferred administering gonadotropins using the follitropin alfa prefilled pen compared to their prior use of vials/ampoules and a syringe. Patients using the prefilled pen found it less stressful, easier to use and more convenient than a conventional syringe and would recommend the pen to another woman considering gonadotropin treatment.