Endometrial Cancer Molecular Risk Stratification is Equally Prognostic for Endometrioid Ovarian Carcinoma.

PURPOSE: Endometrioid ovarian carcinoma (ENOC) is generally associated with a more favorable prognosis compared with other ovarian carcinomas. Nonetheless, current patient treatment continues to follow a "one-size-fits-all" approach. Even though tumor staging offers stratification, personalized treatments remain elusive. As ENOC shares many clinical and molecular features with its endometrial counterpart, we sought to investigate The Cancer Genome Atlas-inspired endometrial carcinoma (EC) molecular subtyping in a cohort of ENOC. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: IHC and mutation biomarkers were used to segregate 511 ENOC tumors into four EC-inspired molecular subtypes: low-risk POLE mutant (POLEmut), moderate-risk mismatch repair deficient (MMRd), high-risk p53 abnormal (p53abn), and moderate-risk with no specific molecular profile (NSMP). Survival analysis with established clinicopathologic and subtype-specific features was performed. RESULTS: A total of 3.5% of cases were POLEmut, 13.7% MMRd, 9.6% p53abn, and 73.2% NSMP, each showing distinct outcomes (P < 0.001) and survival similar to observations in EC. Median OS was 18.1 years in NSMP, 12.3 years in MMRd, 4.7 years in p53abn, and not reached for POLEmut cases. Subtypes were independent of stage, grade, and residual disease in multivariate analysis. CONCLUSIONS: EC-inspired molecular classification provides independent prognostic information in ENOC. Our findings support investigating molecular subtype-specific management recommendations for patients with ENOC; for example, subtypes may provide guidance when fertility-sparing treatment is desired. Similarities between ENOC and EC suggest that patients with ENOC may benefit from management strategies applied to EC and the opportunity to study those in umbrella trials.

Independent validation of the prognostic significance of invasion patterns in endocervical adenocarcinoma: Pattern A predicts excellent survival.

OBJECTIVE: Recently, the pattern of invasion in usual-type human papillomavirus-associated endocervical adenocarcinoma (AC) was put forward as a novel variable to select patients with favourable prognosis. Based on destructiveness of stromal invasion, three patterns were proposed: A - no destructive stromal invasion, B - focal destructive stromal invasion, and C - diffuse destructive stromal invasion. We aimed to independently validate the clinical significance of this classification-system in 82 AC patients, and explored associations between invasion pattern and somatic mutations. METHODS: All patients surgically treated for FIGO stage IB-IIA usual type AC (1990-2011, n = 82) were retrospectively reviewed and classified into pattern A, B or C. Additional immunohistochemical analyses were performed for p53, MSH6, and PMS2. Moreover, previously obtained data on somatic hotspot mutations in 13 relevant genes was integrated. RESULTS: Of 82 AC, 22% showed pattern A, 37% pattern B, and 41% pattern C. Significant differences were observed between invasion patterns and tumour size, depth of invasion (DOI), lymph-vascular invasion (LVI), and lymph-node metastasis. Significantly fewer mutations were present in tumours with pattern A morphology (p = 0.036). All pattern A patients survived (p = 0.002) without recurrent disease (p = 0.005). In multivariate regression analysis including tumour size, DOI, LVI, and lymph node metastasis, invasion pattern was a strong independent predictor for recurrence-free and disease-specific survival (HR 3.75, 95%CI 1.16-12.11, and HR 5.08, 95%CI 1.23-20.98, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: We have independently validated the clinical significance of invasion patterns for usual type endocervical AC. Pattern A predicts excellent survival, and a clinical trial should prove safety of a more conservative treatment for these patients.