Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
Add more filters










Publication year range
1.
Arch. Soc. Esp. Oftalmol ; 96(12): 649-652, dic. 2021. mapas
Article in Spanish | IBECS | ID: ibc-218361

ABSTRACT

El uso de anestésicos locales para la realización de procedimientos odontológicos es una práctica ampliamente extendida que puede causar efectos adversos. Sin embargo, muy infrecuentemente puede causar complicaciones oculares como diplopía, ptosis, visión borrosa, miosis, disminución de la agudeza visual o amaurosis. Presentamos un caso de un paciente varón de 26 años que se presentó a la consulta por una disminución de la agudeza visual en su ojo derecho 48h después de una intervención odontológica del lado ipsilateral, logrando una recuperación de la misma en los 6 meses posteriores, sin tratamiento alguno. Diferentes teorías que justifiquen la aparición de complicaciones oculares como consecuencia de esta clase de procedimientos han sido propuestas en la literatura. En nuestro caso, una inyección intravenosa inadvertida habría sido la causa posible del hecho (AU)


The use of intra-oral local anaesthetics for dental procedures is a widely extended practice that may cause side effects. As such, in rare cases it may cause ocular complications such as diplopia, ptosis, blurry vision, miosis, vision loss, or amaurosis. (Most of them are transient, recovering after several hours or days). A case is presented of a 26 year-old male patient who had visual impairment in the right eye 2 days after a dental procedure was performed. Six months later he had a complete restoration of the previous visual acuity, despite the fact that he had not received any treatment. Several ways have been proposed in the literature that may explain the appearance of ocular complications following these kinds of procedures. In this case, inadvertent intravenous injection is believed to have been the cause (AU)


Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Adult , Anesthesia, Local/adverse effects , Anesthetics/adverse effects , Diplopia/etiology , Vision Disorders/etiology , Tooth Extraction/adverse effects , Visual Acuity/drug effects
2.
Arch Soc Esp Oftalmol (Engl Ed) ; 96(12): 649-652, 2021 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34844685

ABSTRACT

The use of intra-oral local anaesthetics for dental procedures is a widely extended practice that may cause side effects. As such, in rare cases it may cause ocular complications such as diplopia, ptosis, blurry vision, miosis, vision loss, or amaurosis. (Most of them are transient, recovering after several hours or days). A case is presented of a 26 year-old male patient who had visual impairment in the right eye 2 days after a dental procedure was performed. Six months later he had a complete restoration of the previous visual acuity, despite the fact that he had not received any treatment. Several ways have been proposed in the literature that may explain the appearance of ocular complications following these kinds of procedures. In this case, inadvertent intravenous injection is believed to have been the cause.


Subject(s)
Anesthesia, Local , Vision Disorders , Adult , Anesthetics, Local/adverse effects , Blindness , Diplopia/etiology , Humans , Male , Vision Disorders/etiology
3.
Article in English, Spanish | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33371999

ABSTRACT

The use of intra-oral local anaesthetics for dental procedures is a widely extended practice that may cause side effects. As such, in rare cases it may cause ocular complications such as diplopia, ptosis, blurry vision, miosis, vision loss, or amaurosis. (Most of them are transient, recovering after several hours or days). A case is presented of a 26 year-old male patient who had visual impairment in the right eye 2 days after a dental procedure was performed. Six months later he had a complete restoration of the previous visual acuity, despite the fact that he had not received any treatment. Several ways have been proposed in the literature that may explain the appearance of ocular complications following these kinds of procedures. In this case, inadvertent intravenous injection is believed to have been the cause.

SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...