ABSTRACT
Introduction: Little is known if, and to what extent, outpatient red blood cell (RBC) transfusions benefit chronic transfusion-dependent patients. Costs, labour, and potential side effects of RBC transfusions cause a restrictive transfusion strategy to be the standard of care. However, effects on the actual performance and quality of life of patients who require RBCs on a regular basis are hardly studied. The aim of this study was to assess if new technologies and techniques like wearable biosensor devices and web-based testing can be used to measure physiological changes, functional activity, and hence eventually better assess quality of life in a cohort of transfusion-dependent patients. Methods: We monitored 5 patients who regularly receive transfusions during one transfusion cycle with the accelerateIQ biosensor platform, the Withings Steel HR, and web-based cognitive and quality of life testing. Results: Data collection by the deployed devices was shown to be feasible; the AccelerateIQ platform rendered data of which 97.8% was of high quality and usable; of the data the Withings Steel HR rendered, 98.9% was of high quality and usable. Furthermore, heart rate decreased and cognition improved significantly following RBC transfusions. Activity and quality of life measures did not show transfusion-induced changes. Conclusion: In a 5-patient cohort of transfusion-dependent patients, we found that the accelerateIQ, Withings Steel HR, and CANTAB platforms enable acquisition of high-quality data. The collected data suggest that RBC transfusions significantly and reversibly decrease heart rate and increase sustained attention in this cohort. This feasibility study justifies larger validation trials to confirm that these wearables can indeed help to determine personalized RBC transfusion strategies and thus optimization of each patient's quality of life.
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: While iron deficiency (ID) is the most common cause of anaemia, little is known about the prevalence and type of ID in preoperative surgical patients. The aims of the present study were to investigate the prevalence and types of ID in a large cohort of surgical patients, and how these are related to perioperative blood use after correction for confounders such as haemoglobin level. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Data were retrospectively extracted from electronic case records of all patients who underwent elective surgery between September 2016 and November 2017 (n = 2711). Iron parameters, haemoglobin and details of perioperative red cell transfusions were collected. RESULTS: Of 2711 patients, 618 (22.8%) were iron deficient (= transferrin saturation [TSAT] < 16%) preoperatively, 173 (6.4% of the cohort) had an absolute iron deficiency (AID; TSAT < 16% and ferritin < 30 µg/L) and 445 (16.4%) had functional/mixed ID (TSAT < 16% and ferritin ≥ 30 µg/L). Corrected for Hb level, iron-deficient patients received significantly more red cell units than patients without ID (p = 0.026). AID was not associated with a significantly higher incidence of transfusions (7.5% of patients transfused; p = 0.12 after correction for Hb) than patients without ID, whereas patients with functional/mixed deficiency did receive significantly more transfusions (6.1%; p = 0.021) as compared to patients without ID (1.7%). CONCLUSION: Preoperative ID, in particular the functional/mixed type, was associated with a higher risk of receiving perioperative red cell transfusions as compared to patients without ID. Adequately treating ID might, therefore, reduce the need for perioperative red cell transfusions.
Subject(s)
Anemia, Iron-Deficiency , Iron Deficiencies , Anemia, Iron-Deficiency/epidemiology , Anemia, Iron-Deficiency/etiology , Erythrocyte Transfusion/adverse effects , Humans , Prevalence , Retrospective StudiesABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Frequent vital sign monitoring during and after transfusion of blood products and certain chemotherapies or immunotherapies is critical for detecting infusion reactions and treatment management in patients. Currently, patients return home with instructions to contact the clinic if they feel unwell. Continuous monitoring of vital signs for hematological patients treated with immunotherapy or chemotherapy or receiving blood transfusions using wearable electronic biosensors during and post treatment may improve the safety of these treatments and make remote data collection in an outpatient care setting possible. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to evaluate patient experiences with the VitalPatch wearable sensor (VitalConnect) and to evaluate the usability of data generated by the physIQ accelerateIQ monitoring system for the investigator and nurse. METHODS: A total of 12 patients with hematological disorders receiving red blood cell transfusions, an intravenous (IV) proteasome inhibitor, or an IV immunotherapy agent were included in the study and wore the VitalPatch for 12 days. Patients completed questionnaires focusing on wearability and nurses completed questionnaires focusing on the usability of the VitalPatch. RESULTS: A total of 12 patients were enrolled over 9 months, with 4 receiving red blood cell transfusions, 4 receiving IV proteasome inhibitors, and 4 receiving IV immunotherapy. These patients were treated for diseases such as multiple myeloma, myelodysplastic syndrome, and non-Hodgkin lymphoma. Of these patients, 83% (10/12) were aged 60 years and older. A total of 4 patients (4/12, 33%) withdrew from the study (3 because of skin irritation and 1 because of patch connection issues). Patients wore biosensor patches at baseline and for 1-week post administration. Patient-reported outcomes (PROs) were collected at baseline, day 1, day 5, and day 8. No difference in the PRO was observed when nurses or patients applied the patch. PRO data indicated minimal impact on the patient's life. Ease of use, influence on sleep, impact on follow-up of health, or discomfort with continuous monitoring did not change between baseline and day 8. Changes in PRO were observed on day 5, where a 20% (2/10) increase in skin irritation was reported. Withdrawals because of skin irritation were reported in all cases when wearing the second patch. Nurses reported the placement of the VitalPatch to be easy and felt measurements to be reliable. CONCLUSIONS: Generally, the VitalPatch was well tolerated and shown to be an attractive device because of its wearability and low impact on daily activities in patients, therefore making it suitable for implementation in future studies.
