Palladium-catalyzed enantioselective three-component synthesis of α-arylglycine derivatives from glyoxylic acid, sulfonamides and aryltrifluoroborates.

A palladium-catalyzed enantioselective three-component reaction of glyoxylic acid, sulfonamides and aryltrifluoroborates is described. This process provides modular access to the important α-arylglycine motif in moderate to good yields and enantioselectivies. The formed α-arylglycine products constitute useful building blocks for the synthesis of peptides or arylglycine-containing natural products.

The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic restrictions on the health care utilization of cancer patients.

BACKGROUND: COVID-19 has impacted both society and medical care. While Germany entered the first lockdown in spring 2020, the PIKKO study (Patient information, communication and competence empowerment in oncology) was still active. The intervention modules, patient navigator (PN), services of the Saarland Cancer Society (SCS), psycho-social counseling and different courses, and online knowledge database (ODB) continued to be offered, but in an adapted form. It was the aim of this supplementary survey to identify the restrictions and burdens of the pandemic containment strategies on the PIKKO patients and thus on the PIKKO study itself. Furthermore, this work shows how the PIKKO modules were used during the lockdown. METHODS: All patients in the PIKKO intervention group (IG) were invited to complete a questionnaire, n = 503. Furthermore, utilization of the SCS and log files of the ODB were analyzed. For socio-demographic data and contacts with the PN, data from the regular PIKKO surveys were used. In addition to descriptive statistics, chi²-tests, F-tests and linear regression analyses were performed. RESULTS: 356 patients participated in this supplemental survey. 37.6% reported restrictions. "Restrictions on accompanying persons", "ban on visits to the wards" and "protective mouth-nose-mask" were reported as the greatest burdens. 39.0% expressed fears that the restrictions would have an impact on the course of their disease. Linear regression analyses showed differences in feelings of burden among age groups (more among < 60-year-olds), gender (more among women), children in the household (more with children), and preexisting financial stress (more with financial worries). In April 2020, there was more patient contact with PNs by phone, more SCS psycho-social counseling by phone, adapted SCS course offering, but with significantly fewer participants, and high activity on the ODB. CONCLUSION: Cancer patients in the IG reported restrictions from the pandemic containment strategies and feared an impact on their recovery. However, whether a burden is perceived as heavy depends more on gender, age, or pre-existing burdens than on whether the lockdown affects PIKKO or not. The utilization of counseling, courses or the ODB despite lockdown shows the need for such services, especially in times of crisis. TRIAL REGISTRATION: This study was retrospectively registered in the German Clinical Trial Register under DRKS00016703 (21 Feb 2019, retrospectively registered). https://www.drks.de/drks_web/navigate.do?navigationId=trial.HTML&TRIAL_ID=DRKS00016703 .

Patient information, communication and competence empowerment in oncology: Results and learnings from the PIKKO study.

PURPOSE: Many concepts for accompanying and supporting cancer patients exist and have been studied over time. One of them was PIKKO (a German acronym for "Patient information, communication and competence empowerment in oncology"), which combined a patient navigator, socio-legal and psychological counseling (with psychooncologists), courses dealing with various supportive aspects, and a knowledge database with validated and easy-to-understand disease-related information. The aim was to increase the patients' health-related quality of life (HRQoL), self-efficacy as well as health literacy and to reduce psychological complaints such as depression and anxiety. METHODS: To this purpose, an intervention group was given full access to the modules in addition to treatment as usual, while a control group received only treatment as usual. Over twelve months, each group was surveyed up to five times. Measurements were taken using the SF12, PHQ-9, GAD, GSE, and HLS-EU-Q47. RESULTS: No significant differences were found in scores on the mentioned metrics. However, each module was used many times and rated positively by the patients. Further analyses showed a tendency higher score in health literacy with higher intensity of use of the database and higher score in mental HRQoL with higher intensity of use of counseling. CONCLUSION: The study was affected by several limitations. A lack of randomization, difficulties in recruiting the control group, a heterogeneous sample, and the COVID-19 lockdown influenced the results. Nevertheless, the results show that the PIKKO support was appreciated by the patients and the lack of measurable effects was rather due to the mentioned limitations than to the PIKKO intervention. TRIAL REGISTRATION: This study was retrospectively registered in the German Clinical Trial Register under DRKS00016703 (21.02.2019, retrospectively registered). https://www.drks.de/drks_web/navigate.do?navigationId=trial.HTML&TRIAL_ID=DRKS00016703.

[Psychometric Properties of the Qualiskope-A for Measuring Patient Satisfaction with Outpatient Medical Treatment: Use in Oncology and Transferability to Inpatient Care]. / Psychometrische Eigenschaften des Qualiskope-A zur Messung der Patientenzufriedenheit mit der ambulant-ärztlichen Behandlung: Einsatz in der Onkologie und Übertragbarkeit auf die stationäre Versorgung.

AIM: The Qualiskope-A is a German-language PREM (Patient Reported Experience Measure) which, with the help of 27 items allocated to four scales, enables measurement of patient satisfaction with outpatient medical treatment along four dimensions of patient satisfaction. This study examined whether the questionnaire delivers reliable results in an oncological population and whether its application can be extended to inpatient care. METHOD: Required data was collected as part of the PIKKO study. Initially, descriptive statistics and internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha) of the PREM's scales were analyzed. In addition, a sub-sample that assessed the same doctor at two consecutive measurement time points was observed with regard to test-retest reliability (Spearman correlation (rs) between both measurement time points). The measurement model of the Qualiskope-A was then examined using confirmatory factor analysis. To test the transferability to inpatient care, measurement invariance with regard to outpatients and inpatients was computed. RESULTS: A total of 476 patients was included in the study. Every score of the Qualiskope-A showed a left-skewed distribution in the sample and revealed pronounced ceiling effects. Cronbach's alpha coefficients were consistently>0,8. Within the test-retest group (n=197), a strong correlation (rs>0,5) was observed between the measurement time points. The fit indices calculated using confirmatory factor analysis showed a good model fit (CFI=0,958; RMSEA=0,026; SRMR=0,040; every factor loadings>0,6). The fit indices, calculated as part of the investigation of measurement invariance, consistently met the defined threshold values. CONCLUSION: The Qualiscope-A shows good reliability in the examined oncological sample. It can be used in both outpatient and inpatient settings (no indications of non-invariance were found). Due to pronounced ceiling effects, however, the item scaling should be revised.

[Biographical Interviews with GDR Psychotherapists - First Hypotheses on their Social Positioning and Professional Action]. / Lebensgeschichtliche Interviews mit DDR-PsychotherapeutInnen.

OBJEKTIVE: First results of a socio-historical analysis of the life stories of GDR psychotherapists are presented. Interviews, carried out as part of the project Seelenarbeit im Sozialismus, are intended to enable statements about social and family backgrounds, educational paths and social position. An exemplary case is presented in order to develop hypotheses for the design of professional behavior by GDR psychotherapists. METHODS: Narrative/biographical interviews are processed as a source for historical and sociological research strategies. For a descriptive presentation of the topics described in the interviews, a cross-case category system was created inductively, which should enable statements about the frequency of certain characteristics. The individual case is analyzed by using the grounded theory method. RESULTS: A first overview of the sample relates to the demographic characteristics of the interviewed persons, their level of awareness and professional qualifications. The interviewed psychotherapists can be assigned to different decades of the historical development of GDR psychotherapy with regard to their years of birth. They are further determined with regard to their social origin (parenting professions), their professional career (distribution of qualification paths), their party membership (SED or block party) and experience disadvantages by the state. In the case study, the dependence of the professional attitude on socializing influences is illustrated. DISCUSSION: Ultimately, the study can show a heterogeneous group of psychotherapists from the GDR, whose biographies can be used to trace the historical development of psychotherapy in the GDR. A look at the actors' families shows that the profession from fathers were often located in the field of self-employed entrepreneurs or academics. In addition, only a few psychotherapists were members of the SED, but frequent disadvantages by the state are named. As a conclusion there is an advice of a high importance of personal reflexivity and a reflective professional self-image.Conclusions Further evaluations should prove the social and political positioning as well as the professional self-image of GDR psychotherapists.

Healthcare Utilization and Costs in Sepsis Survivors in Germany-Secondary Analysis of a Prospective Cohort Study.

Background: Survivors of sepsis often face long-term sequelae after intensive care treatment. Compared to the period of hospitalization, little is known about the ambulatory healthcare utilization in sepsis patients. The study evaluated healthcare utilization and associated costs of sepsis care including allied health professions after initial hospitalization. Methods: Secondary analysis was performed on data in 210 sepsis patients prospectively enrolled from nine intensive care study centers across Germany. Data was collected via structured surveys among their Primary care (Family-) physicians (PCPs) within the first month after discharge from ICU (baseline) and again at 6, 12 and 24 months after discharge, each relating to the period following the last survey. Costs were assessed by standardized cost unit rates from a health care system's perspective. Changes in healthcare utilization and costs over time were calculated using the Wilcoxon rank-sum test. Results: Of the 210 patients enrolled, 146 (69.5%) patients completed the 24 months follow-up. In total, 109 patients were hospitalized within the first 6 months post-intensive care. Mean total direct costs per patient at 0-6 months were €17,531 (median: €6047), at 7-12 months €9029 (median: €3312), and at 13-24 months €18,703 (median: €12,828). The largest contributor to the total direct costs within the first 6 months was re-hospitalizations (€13,787 (median: €2965). After this first half year, we observed a significant decline in inpatient care costs for re-hospitalizations (p ≤ 0.001). PCPs were visited by more than 95% of patients over 24 months. Conclusions: Sepsis survivors have high health care utilization. Hospital readmissions are frequent and costly. Highest costs and hospitalizations were observed in more than half of patients within the first six months post-intensive care. Among all outpatient care providers, PCPs were consulted most frequently. Clinical impact: Sepsis survivors have a high healthcare utilization and related costs which persist after discharge from hospital. Within outpatient care, possible needs of sepsis survivors as physiotherapy or psychotherapy seem not to be met appropriately. Development of sepsis aftercare programs for early detection and treatment of complications should be prioritized.

[Psychotherapeutic Literature of the GDR and FRG: A Comparative Citation Analysis]. / Psychotherapeutische Fachliteratur der DDR und BRD: Eine vergleichende Zitationsanalyse.

ZIEL: Erste Hypothesen zur wissenschaftlichen Rezeption von psychotherapeutischer Literatur aus der DDR und der Sowjetunion in einem Psychotherapieliteratur-Korpus der BRD (Praxis der Psychotherapie und Psychosomatik 1979-1990) sollten geprüft werden. Außerdem sollten inhaltliche Schwerpunkte der identifizierten wissenschaftlichen Communities verglichen werden. METHODIK: Es wurde eine bibliometrische und netzwerkanalytische Untersuchung von Zitationsbeziehungen sowie eine qualitative Inhaltsanalyse der Rezeption von DDR-Literatur und der thematischen Schwerpunkte der identifizierten wissenschaftlichen Communities in Literaturkorpora aus Ost und West durchgeführt. ERGEBNISSE: Psychotherapeutische Literatur der DDR wird im untersuchten BRD-Korpus kaum zitiert. Inhaltlich wird diese Literatur nicht tiefergehend in die wissenschaftliche Argumentation des BRD-Korpus eingebunden. Die bekanntesten Vertreter*innen der DDR-Psychotherapie(-forschung) werden im BRD-Korpus gar nicht zitiert. Es lassen sich thematische Überschneidungen in beiden Korpora identifizieren, allerdings spielen DDR-spezifische Themen inhaltlich keine Rolle im BRD-Korpus. OBJECTIVE: The aim this study was to test first hypotheses on the scientific reception of literature on psychotherapy from the GDR and the Soviet Union in a corpus of psychotherapy literature from the FRG and to compare content-related foci of the identified scientific communities. METHODS: A bibliometric and network analysis of citation relations as well as a qualitative content analysis of the reception of GDR literature and the thematic foci of the identified scientific communities in both literature corpora were conducted. RESULTS: Psychotherapeutic literature of the GDR was barely cited in the examined FRG corpus. In terms of content, this literature was not integrated more deeply into the scientific argumentation of the FRG corpus. The best-known representatives of GDR psychotherapy (research) were not at all cited in the FRG corpus. Thematic overlaps could be identified in both corpora, but GDR-specific topics did not play a role in the FRG corpus. CONCLUSION: For the examined literature corpora it can be seen that publications from the GDR and Soviet Union are cited considerably less often in FRG literature than publications from the West in GDR literature. Thematically, original GDR psychotherapy content does not play a role in FRG literature either.

Patient characteristics as predictors of sleep disturbances in multimorbid primary care patients - A secondary analysis.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of the study was to identify patient characteristics (adult attachment, health status, number and severity of chronic conditions, social support) predictive sleep disturbances after 12 months. METHODS: In a secondary analysis of a prospective longitudinal study dealing with adult attachment and self-management, attachment- and health-related characteristics, socio-demographic data at baseline and symptoms of insomnia at the follow up (12 month later) was recorded by 219 patients between the ages of 50 and 85 years with multimorbidity in primary care. Adult attachment was measured by the ECR-RD12. The overall health status was measured using a visual analogue scale (VAS) and a standardized list of chronic conditions. The number and severity of chronic diseases (CIRS-G) was assessed by general practitioners (GPs). Sleep disturbances was measured by the ISI 12 month later. RESULTS: Approximately 19% of the respondents were found to have clinically relevant symptoms of insomnia, and a further 34% to be subclinical insomnia. Attachment-related anxiety, a poorer perceived social support, the number of chronic conditions and a better general health status could predict higher levels of sleep disturbance after 12 month. CONCLUSION: Sleep disorders can play a major role in patients with multimorbidity. Attachment anxiety and lack of social support may also be possible risk factors for the development of sleep disturbances.

[The Influence of Attachment Characteristics and Disease-Specific Predictors on Health-Related Quality of Life in Elderly Patients with Multimorbidity]. / Der Einfluss von Bindungsmerkmalen und erkrankungsspezifischen Prädiktoren auf die gesundheitsbezogene Lebensqualität von älteren Patienten und Patientinnen mit Multimorbidität.

OBJECTIVE: Our aim was to further investigate factors influencing multimorbid primary care patients in relation to mental and physical quality of life. METHODS: 219 elderly patients over 50 years with multiple chronic conditions were assessed for quality of life, attachment, depression, and health status at baseline and follow-up after 12 months. Multivariate analyses were performed to identify potential predictors. RESULTS: Depression, age, and avoidance had a negative influence, and health a positive influence, on physical quality of life. Mental quality of life was negatively influenced by attachment-related anxiety and depression. Relevant predictors that predicted quality of life in one year were health status, depression, and attachment-related anxiety. CONCLUSION: To maintain quality of life, mental health and attachment needs of multimorbid patients should be considered.

[Brief Scale to assess Social Support in Chronic Diseases (SUCE-4)]. / Kurzfragebogen zur Sozialen Unterstützung bei chronischen Erkrankungen (SUCE-4).

AIM OF THE STUDY: Social support is an important resource for coping with serious chronic diseases such as cancer. The available questionnaires for the measurement of social support are usually extensive. So far, available short versions do not completely aim at situation-specific requirements of the social environment of chronically ill patients. Therefore, a short form of a measure of perceived social support was developed consisting of only 4 items: the SUCE-4. METHODS: A sample of cancer patients (N=424) was examined at 2 time points. The factor structure was evaluated using exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) and reliability and validity were examined. RESULTS: The expected factor structure was confirmed (for CFA: RMSEA=0.028). The short questionnaire revealed a good internal consistency (Cronbach's α>0.86). In terms of the first indications of validity, significant and expected correlations with psychological quality of life, self-efficacy expectations, depression and anxiety were found at both time points. CONCLUSION: The SUCE-4 is an economical, reliable and valid instrument for the assessment of perceived social support in the context of severe chronic diseases such as cancer.

Patient information, communication and competence empowerment in oncology (PIKKO) - evaluation of a supportive care intervention for overall oncological patients. Study protocol of a non-randomized controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Cancer patients have to undergo a difficult medical therapy and are also confronted with various psychological, social and economic problems. Support is available from many providers, but patients often gain no access to it. Accordingly, there is a need for a single point of contact that can provide advice, information and assistance. In the state of Saarland, Germany, a supportive new consulting and information path (PIKKO) for all types of cancer is currently evaluated by the German Cancer Society, the Cancer Society of the Saarland, three statutory health insurances and the Jena University Hospital. PIKKO is designed to improve quality of life, self-efficacy, health literacy and patient satisfaction and to reduce psychological distress, related health care costs and the days of inability to work. This methodical work presents the process and analysis planning of this evaluation. METHODS: The study population includes all cancer types, both new and existing diseases. PIKKO (with patient navigator, oncological knowledge database, specialized oncological counseling) is evaluated within a controlled, non-randomized, comparative, multicenter, longitudinal design. In addition to patient surveys, data from statutory health insurances and utilization data from the web database are collected, and interviews with patient navigators and doctors are carried out. Patients are assigned to a control (usual care) or an intervention group (u. c. + PIKKO). Primary outcome is the health related quality of life (SF-12) six months after baseline. Secondary outcomes are self-efficacy (GSE), psychological distress such as depression (PHQ-9) or anxiety (GAD-7), health literacy (HLS-EU-Q47) and patient satisfaction in health care (Qualiskope-A). Furthermore, the time course of direct costs of medical care (e.g. work disability days) and usage data of the intervention modules are analyzed. Among other statistical procedures, we use t-tests, univariate tests and growth curve models. DISCUSSION: If PIKKO proves to be effective, recommendations can be made to health organizations, which should lead to the concept being rolled out throughout Germany and included into oncological guidelines. We expect PIKKO to be a useful addition to usual cancer care, helping to improve the quality of life of cancer patients and reduce healthcare costs. TRIAL REGISTRATION: This study was retrospectively registered in the German Clinical Trial Register under DRKS00016703 (21.02.2019, the reason for the delay was the prioritization of the study management in the first year to establish the new approach into practice). https://www.drks.de/drks_web/navigate.do?navigationId=trial.HTML&TRIAL_ID=DRKS00016703.

Long-Term Courses of Sepsis Survivors: Effects of a Primary Care Management Intervention.

BACKGROUND: Sepsis survivors face mental and physical sequelae even years after discharge from the intensive care unit. The aim of this study was to evaluate the long-term courses of sepsis survivors and the effects of a primary care management intervention in sepsis aftercare. METHODS: This study presents a 24-month follow-up of a randomized controlled trial that recruited 291 patients who survived sepsis (including septic shock) from nine German intensive care units. Participants were randomized to usual care (n=143) or to a 12-month-intervention (n=148). The intervention included training of patients and their primary care physicians (PCP) in evidence-based post-sepsis care, case management provided by trained nurses, and clinical decision support for PCPs by consulting physicians. Usual care was provided by PCPs in the control group. At the 24-month follow-up, 12 months after the 1-year-intervention, survival and measures of mental and physical health were collected by telephone interviews. RESULTS: One hundred eighty-six (63.9%, 98 intervention, 88 control) of 291 patients completed the 24-month follow-up, showing both increased mortality and recovery from functional impairment. Unlike the intervention group, the control group showed a significant increase of posttraumatic stress symptoms according to the Posttraumatic Symptom Scale (difference between baseline and 24-months follow-up values, mean [standard deviation] 3.7 [11.8] control vs -0.7 [12.1] intervention; P = .016). There were no significant differences in all other outcomes between the intervention and control groups. CONCLUSIONS: Twelve months after completion, a primary care management intervention among survivors of sepsis did not improve mental health-related quality of life. Patients in the intervention group showed less posttraumatic stress symptoms.

Panic Disorder in Primary Care.

BACKGROUND: We evaluated a team-based program of exercises for patients with panic disorder with or without agoraphobia (PDA) in primary care. METHODS: 419 patients with PDA (mean age 46.2 years, standard deviation 14.4 years; 74% female) were included in this cluster-randomized, controlled intervention trial. The patients were blinded with respect to their group assignment at baseline. Patients in the intervention group (36 primary-care practices, 230 patients) underwent a 23-week exercise program combined with case management, while patients in the control group (37 practices, 189 patients) received standard care. Symptoms of anxiety (according to the Beck Anxiety Inventory, BAI) at six months were the primary endpoint. Patients were followed up at six months (n = 338, 81%) and at twelve months (n = 318, 76%). The analysis was by intention to treat. RESULTS: Symptoms of anxiety improved to a significantly greater extent in the intervention group (p = 0.008). The intergroup dif- ference in the reduction of the BAI score (range: 0-63) was 3.0 points (95% confidence interval [-5.8; -0.2]) at six months and 4.0 points [-6.9; -1.2] at twelve months. In the intervention group, there was a significantly greater reduction in the frequency of panic attacks (p = 0.019), in avoidant behavior (p = 0.016), and in depressiveness (p<0.001), as well as a greater improvement of the quality of treatment (p<0.001). CONCLUSION: In primary-care patients who have panic disorder with or without agoraphobia, a team-based exercise program combined with case management can improve symptoms to a greater extent than standard primary-care treatment.

Applicability of Motivational Interviewing for Chronic Disease Management in Primary Care Following a Web-Based E-Learning Course: Cross-Sectional Study.

BACKGROUND: Motivational interviewing (MI) is an established communication method for enhancing intrinsic motivation for changing health behavior. E-learning can reduce the cost and time involved in providing continuing education and can be easily integrated into individual working arrangements and the daily routines of medical professionals. Thus, a Web-based course was devised to familiarize health professionals with different levels of education and expertise with MI techniques for patients with chronic conditions. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to report participants' opinion on the practicality of MI (as learned in the course) in daily practice, stratified by the level of education. METHODS: Participants (N=607) of the MI Web-based training course evaluated the course over 18 months, using a self-administered questionnaire. The evaluation was analyzed descriptively and stratified for the level of education (medical students, physicians in specialist training [PSTs], and general practitioners [GPs]). RESULTS: Participants rated the applicability of the skills and knowledge gained by the course as positive (medical students: 94% [79/84] good; PSTs: 88.6% [109/123] excellent; and GPs: 51.3% [182/355] excellent). When asked whether they envisage the use of MI in the future, 79% (67/84) of the students stated to a certain extent, 88.6% (109/123) of the PSTs stated to a great extent, and 38.6% (137/355) of GPs stated to a great extent. Participants acknowledged an improvement of communication skills such as inviting (medical students: 85% [72/84]; PSTs: 90.2% [111/123]; GPs: 37.2% [132/355]) and encouraging (medical students: 81% [68/84]; PSTs: 45.5% [56/123]; GPs: 36.3% [129/355]) patients to talk about behavior change and conveying respect for patient's choices (medical students: 72% [61/84]; PSTs: 50.0% [61/123]; GPs: 23.4% [83/355]). CONCLUSIONS: Participants confirmed the practicality of MI. However, the extent to which the practicality of MI was acknowledged as well as its expected benefits depended on the individual's level of education/expertise.

Evaluation of the short form of "Experience in Close Relationships" (Revised, German Version "ECR-RD12") - A tool to measure adult attachment in primary care.

Attachment theory helps us to understand patients´ health behavior. Attachment styles might explain patient differences in coping behavior, self-treatment, or patient-provider relationships. In primary care time constrains are relevant. A short instrument may facilitate screening and assessment in daily medical practice. The aim of this study was to evaluate a 12-item short version of the Experience in Close Relationships-revised (ECR-R-D) to be used in primary care settings. We included 249 patients from ten general practices in central Germany into a cross-sectional study. Exploratory factor analysis was performed to evaluate the factor structure of the ECR-items. Cronbach's alpha was used to assess internal consistency. The results related to the short form of the ECR are in line with those of the German full-length version of the measure (ECR-RD 36). Internal consistencies were in an adequate range. The ECR short form can be recommended as a screening measure of attachment styles in primary care.

[Usual Care for Panic Disorder with/without Agoraphobia in Primary Care]. / Standardtherapie für Panikstörung mit/ohne Agoraphobie in der Hausarztpraxis.

OBJECTIVE: To describe therapy as usual (TAU) for panic disorder with/without agoraphobia (PDA) in primary care. METHOD: Written survey of 38 general practitioners (GPs) who provided TAU to 189 patients with PDA as part of an interventional study. Data were analyzed descriptively. RESULTS: The most common TAU-interventions were: exploration of psychosocial problems (83 %), recommendation not to avoid anxiety-provoking stimuli (72 %), prescription of SSRIs (62 %). Common reasons for referrals were various psychiatric comorbidities and treatment-refractory anxiety (77 %). GPs rarely used validated diagnostic tools such as structured interviews (18 %) or questionnaires (14 %). CONCLUSIONS: TAU mostly involved guideline-recommended psychosocial and pharmacological interventions. Study-related procedures may limit the generalizability of findings.

Patient-provider relationship as mediator between adult attachment and self-management in primary care patients with multiple chronic conditions.

OBJECTIVE: The conceptual model of attachment theory has been applied to understand the predispositions of patients in medical care and the patient-provider relationship. In patients with chronic conditions insecure attachment was connected to poorer self-management. The patient-provider relationship is associated with a range of health related outcomes and self-management skills. We determined whether the quality of the patient-provider relationship mediates the link between adult attachment and self-management among primary care patients with multiple chronic diseases. METHOD: 209 patients with a minimum of three chronic diseases (including type II diabetes, hypertension and at least one other chronic condition) between the ages of 50 and 85 from eight general practices were included in the APRICARE cohort study. Adult attachment was measured via self-report (ECR-RD), self-management skills by the FERUS and the patient-provider relationship by the PRA-D. The health status and chronicity were assessed by the GP. Multiple mediation analyses were used to examine whether aspects of the patient-provider relationship (communication, information, affectivity) are a mediators of associations between adult attachment and self-management. RESULTS: The analysis revealed that the quality of the patient-provider relationship mediated the effect of attachment on self-management in patients with multiple chronic conditions. Particularly the quality of communication and information over the course of treatment has a significant mediating influence. CONCLUSION: A personalized, attachment-related approach that promotes active patient-provider communication and gives information about the treatment to the patient may improve self-management skills in patients.

Effect of a Primary Care Management Intervention on Mental Health-Related Quality of Life Among Survivors of Sepsis: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

IMPORTANCE: Survivors of sepsis face long-term sequelae that diminish health-related quality of life and result in increased care needs in the primary care setting, such as medication, physiotherapy, or mental health care. OBJECTIVE: To examine if a primary care-based intervention improves mental health-related quality of life. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Randomized clinical trial conducted between February 2011 and December 2014, enrolling 291 patients 18 years or older who survived sepsis (including septic shock), recruited from 9 intensive care units (ICUs) across Germany. INTERVENTIONS: Participants were randomized to usual care (n = 143) or to a 12-month intervention (n = 148). Usual care was provided by their primary care physician (PCP) and included periodic contacts, referrals to specialists, and prescription of medication, other treatment, or both. The intervention additionally included PCP and patient training, case management provided by trained nurses, and clinical decision support for PCPs by consulting physicians. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: The primary outcome was change in mental health-related quality of life between ICU discharge and 6 months after ICU discharge using the Mental Component Summary (MCS) of the 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36 [range, 0-100; higher ratings indicate lower impairment; minimal clinically important difference, 5 score points]). RESULTS: The mean age of the 291 patients was 61.6 years (SD, 14.4); 66.2% (n = 192) were men, and 84.4% (n = 244) required mechanical ventilation during their ICU stay (median duration of ventilation, 12 days [range, 0-134]). At 6 and 12 months after ICU discharge, 75.3% (n = 219 [112 intervention, 107 control]) and 69.4% (n = 202 [107 intervention, 95 control]), respectively, completed follow-up. Overall mortality was 13.7% at 6 months (40 deaths [21 intervention, 19 control]) and 18.2% at 12 months (53 deaths [27 intervention, 26 control]). Among patients in the intervention group, 104 (70.3%) received the intervention at high levels of integrity. There was no significant difference in change of mean MCS scores (intervention group mean at baseline, 49.1; at 6 months, 52.9; change, 3.79 score points [95% CI, 1.05 to 6.54] vs control group mean at baseline, 49.3; at 6 months, 51.0; change, 1.64 score points [95% CI, -1.22 to 4.51]; mean treatment effect, 2.15 [95% CI, -1.79 to 6.09]; P = .28). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Among survivors of sepsis and septic shock, the use of a primary care-focused team-based intervention, compared with usual care, did not improve mental health-related quality of life 6 months after ICU discharge. Further research is needed to determine if modified approaches to primary care management may be more effective. TRIAL REGISTRATION: isrctn.org Identifier: ISRCTN61744782.