[The effect of intensified training therapy on axial spondylarthritis in day care units]. / Der Effekt intensivierter Trainingstherapie bei axialer Spondyloarthritis im teilstationären Setting.

BACKGROUND: Day care units are an essential part of psychiatric treatment in Germany. In rheumatology they are also regularly used. Axial spondylarthritis (axSpA) is an inflammatory rheumatic disease that causes pain, diminished quality of life, limitations in activities of daily living and ability to work, especially if insufficiently treated. The multimodal rheumatologic complex treatment with at least 14 days of inpatient care is an established tool to control exacerbated disease activity. The feasibility and effect of an equivalent treatment in a day care setting has not yet been evaluated. METHODS: The effect of a therapy in a day care unit comparable to the inpatient multimodal rheumatologic complex treatment was investigated using clinically established patient reported outcomes (NAS pain, FFbH, BASDAI, BASFI). RESULTS: Selected subgroups of axSpA patients can routinely and effectively be treated in day care units. Intensified multimodal as well as nonintensified treatment forms lead to reduced disease activity. Additionally, compared to nonintensified treatment, the intensified multimodal treatment approach leads to significantly reduced pain, and disease-related and functional limitations in daily life. CONCLUSION: If available, treatment in a day care unit can complement the established inpatient treatment modalities in selected axSpA patients. In cases with high disease activity and suffering, intensified multimodal treatment should be preferred due to better outcomes.

The influence of the SARS-CoV-2 lockdown on patients with inflammatory rheumatic diseases on their adherence to immunomodulatory medication: a cross sectional study over 3 months in Germany.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the influence of the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic on the adherence of patients with inflammatory rheumatic diseases (IRD) to their immunomodulatory medication during the three-month lockdown in Germany. METHODS: From 16th March until 15th June 2020, IRD patients from private practices and rheumatology departments were asked to answer a questionnaire addressing their behaviour with respect to their immunomodulating therapy. Eight private practices and nine rheumatology departments that included rheumatology primary care centres and university hospitals participated. A total of 4252 questionnaires were collected and evaluated. RESULTS: The majority of patients (54%) were diagnosed with RA, followed by psoriatic arthritis (14%), ankylosing spondylitis (10%), connective tissue diseases (12%) and vasculitides (6%). Most of the patients (84%) reported to continue their immunomodulatory therapy. Termination of therapy was reported by only 3% of the patients. The results were independent from the type of IRD, the respective immunomodulatory therapy and by whom the patients were treated (private practices vs rheumatology departments). Younger patients (<60 years) reported just as often as older patients to discontinue their therapy. CONCLUSION: The data show that most of the patients continued their therapy in spite of the pandemic. A significant change in behaviour with regard to their immunomodulatory therapy was not observed during the three months of observation. The results support the idea that the immediate release of recommendations of the German Society of Rheumatology were well received, supporting the well-established physician-patient relationship in times of a crisis.