ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: The development and evaluation of new employees in air medical transport has historically lacked standardization and competency-based learning goals. Here we discuss the development, implementation, and assessment of a new competency-based education and evaluation method at Geisinger's Life Flight air medical transport service. METHODS: Using Bloom's taxonomy of learning, 14 competencies for flight employees were identified. An electronic database was created to track progress across competencies and serve as an information repository for the identification of goals and the development of individualized learning plans. Ten months after implementation of the new method, 11 preceptors and education team members were surveyed to understand their views on the new program. RESULTS: At the time of survey administration, 20 orientees had completed orientation under the new education and evaluation program in an average of 6.45 weeks, with a range of 3 to 10 weeks. Of the 11 surveyed instructors, 81.1% definitely agree that the new method adequately assesses performance compared with 45.5% with the previous unstandardized method; 81.8% of the instructors rated the overall change as very helpful. CONCLUSION: The adoption of a competency-based learning model for air medical transport employee education and evaluation improves the assessment of performance and allows for the development of customized learning plans.
Subject(s)
Competency-Based Education , Learning , Clinical Competence , Humans , Program Evaluation , Surveys and QuestionnairesABSTRACT
Emergency Medical Services (EMS) providers face many ethical issues while providing prehospital care to children and adults. Although provider judgment plays a large role in the resolution of conflicts at the scene, it is important to establish protocols and policies, when possible, to address these high-risk and complex situations. This article describes some of the common situations with ethical underpinnings encountered by EMS personnel and managers including denying or delaying transport of patients with non-emergency conditions, use of lights and sirens for patient transport, determination of medical futility in the field, termination of resuscitation, restriction of EMS provider duty hours to prevent fatigue, substance abuse by EMS providers, disaster triage and difficulty in switching from individual care to mass-casualty care, and the challenges of child maltreatment recognition and reporting. A series of ethical questions are proposed, followed by a review of the literature and, when possible, recommendations for management.