miRNA-34a is associated with docetaxel resistance in human breast cancer cells.

Docetaxel is a chemotherapy drug to treat breast cancer, however as with many chemotherapeutic drugs resistance to docetaxel occurs in 50% of patients, and the underlying molecular mechanisms of drug resistance are not fully understood. Gene regulation through microRNAs (miRNA) has been shown to play an important role in cancer drug resistance. By directly targeting mRNA, miRNAs are able to inhibit genes that are necessary for signalling pathways or drug induced apoptosis rendering cells drug resistant. This study investigated the role of differential miRNA expression in two in vitro breast cancer cell line models (MCF-7, MDA-MB-231) of acquired docetaxel resistance. MiRNA microarray analysis identified 299 and 226 miRNAs altered in MCF-7 and MDA-MB-231 docetaxel-resistant cells, respectively. Docetaxel resistance was associated with increased expression of miR-34a and miR-141 and decreased expression of miR-7, miR-16, miR-30a, miR-125a-5p, miR-126. Computational target prediction revealed eight candidate genes targeted by these miRNAs. Quantitative PCR and western analysis confirmed decreased expression of two genes, BCL-2 and CCND1, in docetaxel-resistant cells, which are both targeted by miR-34a. Modulation of miR-34a expression was correlated with BCL-2 and cyclin D1 protein expression changes and a direct interaction of miR-34a with BCL-2 was shown by luciferase assay. Inhibition of miR-34a enhanced response to docetaxel in MCF-7 docetaxel-resistant cells, whereas overexpression of miR-34a conferred resistance in MCF-7 docetaxel-sensitive cells. This study is the first to show differences in miRNA expression, in particular, increased expression of miR-34a in an acquired model of docetaxel resistance in breast cancer. This serves as a mechanism of acquired docetaxel resistance in these cells, possibly through direct interactions with BCL-2 and CCND1, therefore presenting a potential therapeutic target for the treatment of docetaxel-resistant breast cancer.

Nutrition and the surgical patient: triumphs and challenges.

The understanding of the role of nutrition in the surgical patient has lead to major developments in the nutritional support of patients undergoing surgery. Reductions in morbidity by ensuring that patients receive optimal nutritional support can be achieved. Furthermore, the use of nutrients to modify immune, inflammatory and metabolic processes also offers new possibilities for reducing morbidity following major surgery. However, we are only at an embryonic stage in our understanding of how nutrients and nutrition affect the genome and this knowledge offers exciting possibilities in the future for modulating many key intracellular processes, particularly in the patient with cancer.

Immunonutrition in clinical practice: what is the current evidence?

The clinical trials of immunonutrition that we have undertaken have often been small, single centre studies. They have often been of limited statistical power and have often included patients with a variety of underlying disease states and at different points in the disease process. Three meta-analysis and a consensus statement in conjunction with a systematic review, have been performed in an attempt to overcome many of these limitations and understand further the clinical place for immunonutrition. However, there are still many questions regarding the place of immunonutrition in clinical practice that we still do not understand or have definitive answers to. For example, do we really know what is the optimal combination of nutrients and in what quantities they should be provided? Do we understand any potential interactions that might occur between these nutrients? What is the effect of the patients nutritional state? When and for how long should immunonutrition provided? What is the impact of the patients' underlying disease process and how does this interact with the provision of immunonutrition? At the present time whilst there is some indication and evidence as to which patients might benefit most, and as to those who may not benefit or even suffer detrimental effects from immunonutrition, we still can not answer these questions with any definitive authority. It is essential now that we undertake large well designed, well controlled multicentre studies with adequate statistical power to answer these questions. The indications are that immunonutrition has the potential to help patients but its place must be more clearly defined before its widespread acceptance into clinical practice is based on sound scientific evidence.

Folate and breast cancer: the role of polymorphisms in methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase (MTHFR).

Evidence is growing that low folate status may be a factor in the aetiology of several cancers, including breast cancer. The methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase gene (MTHFR), which has a key role in folate metabolism, is polymorphic. We report a case-control study of two functional polymorphisms in MTHFR, dietary folate intake and breast cancer. Sixty-two cases with invasive breast cancer and sixty-six general practice controls participated. Women reporting the highest dietary folate intake had non-significantly reduced breast cancer risk (odds ratio (OR) = 0.49, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.20-1.20). Risk was significantly lower for the 1298CC genotype compared to AA (OR = 0.24, 95% CI 0.06-0.97). Relative to compound wild-type subjects, compound heterozygotes had moderately reduced risk (OR = 0.47, 95% CI 0.11-1.92) and homozygote variants (677TT and/or 1298CC) greater reduced risk (OR = 0.26, 95% CI 0.07-0.96); the trend was statistically significant. Patterns in risk with regard to genotype and folate combinations are broadly similar those reported for colorectal neoplasia. The roles of MTHFR and folate in breast cancer aetiology are likely to be complex.

Germ line BRCA1 & BRCA2 mutations in Greek breast/ovarian cancer families: 5382insC is the most frequent mutation observed.

BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes were screened for loss-of-function mutations in a series of 85 patients having at least one first- or second-degree relative affected by breast and/or ovarian cancer. All BRCA1 exons and BRCA2 exons 10 and 11 were screened with a combination of methods including SSCP, PTT and direct sequencing. We have found disease-associated mutations in 14 families (16.5%), eleven in BRCA1 and three in BRCA2. The known founder mutation 5382insC of BRCA1 was identified in seven unrelated families. The other mutations identified include the non-sense R1751X, the splice junction variant 5586G>A of BRCA1 and three frameshifts, 2024del5, 3034del4, and 6631del5, of BRCA2. Nine out of these 14 families had a family history of three or more breast/ovarian cancer cases. A large number of polymorphic or unclassified variants is also reported. Combined with our previously published data 5382insC was found in nine out of 20 families (45%), suggesting that this mutation may represent a common founder mutation in the Greek population.

Effects of pattern, spatial frequency, number, and rate of stimulus presentation on the accuracy of detection.

Brief trains of pulsed stimuli were used to assess whether magnocellular or parvocellular visual pathways could be differentiated perceptually. Trains of either one to four sine-wave, square-wave, or checkerboard gratings were presented at three temporal and two spatial frequencies to six observers. The task of the observer was to report the perceived number of stimuli (gratings) in a train. The difference between actual number and perceived number of gratings was recorded as an error score. It was found that neither the pattern nor the spatial frequency of the gratings significantly affected perceptual accuracy. On the other hand, the number of gratings in a train and the interstimulus interval between gratings produced significant differences. Perceptual accuracy was greater when lower numbers of gratings in a train were presented with longer interstimulus intervals. The observers typically reported fewer stimuli than were presented. The source of the discrepancy is discussed in terms of a light adaptive process initiated in the retina.