ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Life balance is defined as "a satisfying pattern of daily activity that is healthful, meaningful, and sustainable to an individual within the context of his or her current life circumstances". To assess life balance, the self-report instrument Life Balance Inventory (LBI) has been developed in the US. The aim of this study was to evaluate cross-cultural, construct validity and test-retest reliability of translated versions of the LBI in people with multiple sclerosis (MS) within different European cultures (Dutch, Flemish, Slovenian, and Spanish). METHOD: The LBI was translated according to the principles of forward/backward translation and the cultural adaption process of patient-reported outcomes and evaluated in people with MS in each country/language area. LBI (score range 1-3; higher scores refer to better balance) was registered twice with an interval of 7 days to evaluate test-retest reliability using Intraclass Correlation Coefficients (ICCs) and Bland Altman analyses. To evaluate construct validity, Pearson correlations of the LBI with quality of life, fatigue, depression and self-efficacy were explored. RESULTS: The total sample (n = 313, 50 ± 11 years of age, MS duration 13 ± 8 years) consisted of five subsamples: Dutch (n = 81, 74% women, 54 ± 9.6 years of age), Flemish 1 (n = 42, 57% women, 49 ± 12 years), Flemish 2 (n = 105, 63% women, 50 ± 10.6 years), Slovenian (n = 48, 79% women, 44 ± 11.2 years) and Spanish (n = 37, 62% women, 47 ± 9.0 years). Baseline total LBI scores differed between subsamples (F(4, 312)=7.19, p < 0.001). ICC [95% CI] of total LBI was 0.88 [0.83-0.92] (Flemish 2), 0.65 [0.39-0.82] (Flemish 1), 0.55 [0.37-0.69] (Dutch), 0.45 [0.15-0.67] (Spanish) and 0.35 [0.07-0.59] (Slovenian). Systematic error was present in one sample; no proportional bias occurred. Correlations ranged from 0.05 to 0.55 for quality of life and self-efficacy, from -0.50 to 0.05 for fatigue and from -0.44 to -0.28 for depression, not fully supporting the hypotheses. CONCLUSION: The study results provide limited support for test-retest reliability, cross-cultural and construct validity of the LBI in different European subsamples. Although LBI may serve as a supportive tool in goalsetting in rehabilitation, the current version of LBI is not recommended for (international) research purposes.
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Task-oriented training promotes functional recovery in Multiple Sclerosis (MS). Know-how to determine an individualized training intensity and intensity-dependent effects are, however, unknown. The objective of the study was to investigate the feasibility and the clinical effects of a task-oriented upper limb training program at different individualized training intensities with conventional occupational therapy. METHODS: People with MS (nâ¯=â¯20, EDSS range 4-8) were divided into three groups, receiving task-oriented training at 100% (nâ¯=â¯7) or 50% (nâ¯=â¯8) of their individual maximal number of repetitions, or conventional occupational therapy (nâ¯=â¯5). Effects were evaluated using different upper limb capacity and perceived performance measures on activity level, and measures on body functions and structures level. RESULTS: Mixed model analyses revealed significant improvements (p < 0.05) over time on the Box and block test (BBT), Action Research Arm Test and the Manual Ability Measure-36. Significant interaction effects (group*time) in favor of the task-oriented group training at the highest intensity were found for BBT and static fatigue index during a maximal sustained handgrip strength test. CONCLUSION: All participants were able to perform the task-oriented training at their individualized intensity without any adverse effects. Several improvements over time were found for all intervention groups, however the results suggest a superiority of task-oriented training at 100%. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER ON CLINICALTRIALS.GOV: = NCT02688231.
