Severe treatment-induced inflammatory polyarthritis in advanced melanoma patients: 2 case reports.

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) and targeted therapies form the therapeutic mainstay for v-Raf murine sarcoma viral oncogene homolog B V600-mutated metastatic melanoma. Both treatment regimens can cause inflammatory arthritis. The reported incidence of treatment-induced inflammatory arthritis is low, though presumably underestimated due to lack of awareness, clear definitions and uniform grading systems. Nevertheless, recognition is important as inflammatory arthritis can become chronic and thus affect the quality of life beyond treatment. In this short communication, we present two patients with metastatic melanoma treated with ICI and targeted therapies who develop severe polyarthritis. Based on their clinical discourse we describe standard inflammatory arthritis treatment modalities and more advanced immunomodulatory treatment options with conventional synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (csDMARDs) or biologic DMARDs (bDMARDs). Long-term immunosuppressive treatment with glucocorticoids or DMARDs in this setting raises concerns about antitumour response and potential carcinogenic risk. Current literature on this topic is scarce, heterogeneous and retrospective. Prospective analysis of cancer patients treated with DMARDs is needed to clearly address these concerns.

Illustrative cases for monitoring by quantitative analysis of BRAF/NRAS ctDNA mutations in liquid biopsies of metastatic melanoma patients who gained clinical benefits from anti-PD1 antibody therapy.

Anti-programmed death 1 (PD-1) monoclonal antibodies improve the survival of metastatic melanoma patients. Predictive or monitoring biomarkers for response to this therapy could improve the clinical management of these patients. To date, no established biomarkers are available for monitoring the response to immunotherapy. Tumor- specific mutations in circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) such as BRAF and NRAS mutations for melanoma patients have been proposed for monitoring of immunotherapy response. We present seven illustrative cases for the use of ctDNA BRAF and NRAS mutations' monitoring in plasma. The cases described exemplify four distinct clinical benefit patterns: rapid and durable complete response (CR), early progression, followed by CR, CR followed by early progression after interrupting treatment and long-term disease stabilization. These representative cases suggest that comprehensive BRAF/NRAS ctDNA monitoring during anti-PD1 therapy is informative and can be of added value for the monitoring of melanoma patients gaining clinical benefit on anti-PD1 treatment. An important advantage of our approach is that using the cartridge system on the Idylla platform for mutation analysis, the results become available the same day 2 h after plasma collection. Therefore, in the future, the ctDNA level can be an element in the clinical management of the patients.

Combination of dabrafenib plus trametinib for BRAF and MEK inhibitor pretreated patients with advanced BRAFV600-mutant melanoma: an open-label, single arm, dual-centre, phase 2 clinical trial.

BACKGROUND: Patients with BRAFV600-mutant melanoma benefit from treatment with the combination of BRAF and MEK inhibitors, but resistance and disease progression develops in most patients. Preclinical studies and case studies have indicated that acquired resistance to BRAF inhibition can be reversible. We aimed to assess the anti-tumour activity of rechallenge with BRAF plus MEK inhibition in a prospective clinical trial. METHODS: In this open-label, single arm, dual-centre, phase 2 academic study in Belgium, patients aged 18 years or older with BRAFV600-mutant melanoma who had previously progressed on BRAF inhibitors (with or without MEK inhibitors) and were off-treatment for at least 12 weeks, were treated with dabrafenib 150 mg orally twice per day plus trametinib 2 mg orally once per day. The primary endpoint was the proportion of patients with investigator-assessed overall response at any time (defined as complete response or partial response according to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) version 1.1 confirmed on two occasions, at least 28 days after the first response was recorded). Analyses were done in the intention-to-treat population. The study is ongoing but no longer recruiting patients. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT02296996. FINDINGS: Between April 5, 2014, and Feb 2, 2016, 25 patients were enrolled and initiated treatment in our study. A partial response was documented in eight (32%) of 25 patients (95% CI 15-54; six patients had progressed on previous treatment with dabrafenib plus trametinib and two patients had progressed on previous BRAF inhibitor monotherapy). Stable disease was noted in ten patients (40%; 95% CI 21-61). Rechallenge with dabrafenib plus trametinib was well tolerated. There were no unexpected or grade 4 or 5 treatment-related adverse events. Grade 3 adverse events occurred in two patients (8%; panniculitis [n=1] and pyrexia [n=1]). Serious adverse events which occurred on study were one patient with an Addison crisis triggered by grade 2 pyrexia symptoms that resolved after discontinuation of dabrafenib and trametinib. No patients died as a result of study treatment. INTERPRETATION: Rechallenge with dabrafenib plus trametinib showed anti-tumour activity in patients who had previously progressed on BRAF inhibitors and as such, rechallenge represents a potential new treatment option for these patients. FUNDING: Vlaamse Liga Tegen Kanker, Novartis.

Molecular and epigenetic features of melanomas and tumor immune microenvironment linked to durable remission to ipilimumab-based immunotherapy in metastatic patients.

BACKGROUND: Ipilimumab (Ipi) improves the survival of advanced melanoma patients with an incremental long-term benefit in 10-15 % of patients. A tumor signature that correlates with this survival benefit could help optimizing individualized treatment strategies. METHODS: Freshly frozen melanoma metastases were collected from patients treated with either Ipi alone (n: 7) or Ipi combined with a dendritic cell vaccine (TriMixDC-MEL) (n: 11). Samples were profiled by immunohistochemistry (IHC), whole transcriptome (RNA-seq) and methyl-DNA sequencing (MBD-seq). RESULTS: Patients were divided in two groups according to clinical evolution: durable benefit (DB; 5 patients) and no clinical benefit (NB; 13 patients). 20 metastases were profiled by IHC and 12 were profiled by RNA- and MBD-seq. 325 genes were identified as differentially expressed between DB and NB. Many of these genes reflected a humoral and cellular immune response. MBD-seq revealed differences between DB and NB patients in the methylation of genes linked to nervous system development and neuron differentiation. DB tumors were more infiltrated by CD8(+) and PD-L1(+) cells than NB tumors. B cells (CD20(+)) and macrophages (CD163(+)) co-localized with T cells. Focal loss of HLA class I and TAP-1 expression was observed in several NB samples. CONCLUSION: Combined analyses of melanoma metastases with IHC, gene expression and methylation profiling can potentially identify durable responders to Ipi-based immunotherapy.

Incidence of Thyroid-Related Adverse Events in Melanoma Patients Treated With Pembrolizumab.

CONTEXT: Immune checkpoint blockade is associated with endocrine-related adverse events. Thyroid dysfunction during pembrolizumab therapy, an anti-programmed cell death 1 (PD-1) receptor monoclonal antibody, remains to be fully characterized. OBJECTIVE: To assess the incidence and characteristics of pembrolizumab-associated thyroid dysfunction. DESIGN AND SETTING: Thyroid function was monitored prospectively in melanoma patients who initiated pembrolizumab within an expanded access program at a referral oncology center. 18Fluorodeoxyglucose uptake on positron emission tomography/computed tomography (18FDG-PET/CT) was reviewed in cases compatible with inflammatory thyroiditis. PATIENTS: Ninety-nine patients with advanced melanoma (age, 26.3-93.6 years; 63.6% females) who received at least one administration of pembrolizumab. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Patient characteristics, thyroid function (TSH, free T4), thyroid autoantibodies, and 18FDG-PET/CT. RESULTS: Eighteen adverse events of thyroid dysfunction were observed in 17 patients. Thyrotoxicosis occurred in 12 patients, of which nine evolved to hypothyroidism. Isolated hypothyroidism was present in six patients. Levothyroxine therapy was required in 10 of 15 hypothyroid patients. Thyroid autoantibodies were elevated during thyroid dysfunction in four of 10 cases. Diffuse increased 18FDG uptake by the thyroid gland was observed in all seven thyrotoxic patients who progressed to hypothyroidism. CONCLUSIONS: Thyroid dysfunction is common in melanoma patients treated with pembrolizumab. Hypothyroidism and thyrotoxicosis related to inflammatory thyroiditis are the most frequent presentations. Serial measurements of thyroid function tests are indicated during anti-PD-1 monoclonal antibody therapy. Thyrotoxicosis compatible with inflammatory thyroiditis was associated with diffuse increased 18FDG uptake by the thyroid gland. The prospective role of thyroid autoantibodies should be further investigated, together with the histopathological correlates.

Quantitative assessment of BRAF V600 mutant circulating cell-free tumor DNA as a tool for therapeutic monitoring in metastatic melanoma patients treated with BRAF/MEK inhibitors.

BACKGROUND: BRAF V600 mutant circulating cell-free tumor DNA (BRAF V600mut ctDNA) could serve as a specific biomarker in patients with BRAF V600 mutant melanoma. We analyzed the value of BRAF V600mut ctDNA from plasma as a monitoring tool for advanced melanoma patients treated with BRAF/MEK inhibitors. METHODS: Allele-specific quantitative PCR analysis for BRAF V600 E/E2/D/K/R/M mutations was performed on DNA extracted from plasma of patients with known BRAF V600 mutant melanoma who were treated with dabrafenib and trametinib. RESULTS: 245 plasma samples from 36 patients were analyzed. In 16 patients the first plasma sample was obtained before the first dosing of dabrafenib/trametinib. At baseline, BRAF V600mut ctDNA was detected in 75 % of patients (n = 12/16). BRAF V600mut ctDNA decreased rapidly upon initiation of targeted therapy (p < 0.001) and became undetectable in 60 % of patients (n = 7/12) after 6 weeks of treatment. During treatment, disease progression (PD) was diagnosed in 27 of 36 patients. An increase of the BRAF V600mut ctDNA copy number and fraction, identified PD with a sensitivity of 70 % (n = 19/27) and a specificity of 100 %. An increase in the BRAF V600mut ctDNA fraction was detected prior to clinical PD in 44 % of cases (n = 12/27) and simultaneously with PD in 26 % of patients (n = 7/27). CONCLUSIONS: Quantitative analysis of BRAF V600mut ctDNA in plasma has unique features as a monitoring tool during treatment with BRAF/MEK inhibitors. Its potential as an early predictor of acquired resistance deserves further evaluation.

Applications for quantitative measurement of BRAF V600 mutant cell-free tumor DNA in the plasma of patients with metastatic melanoma.

Small fragments of cell-free DNA that are shed by normal and tumor cells can be detected in the plasma of patients with advanced melanoma. Quantitative measurement of BRAF V600 mutant DNA within the cell-free DNA holds promise as a tumor-specific biomarker for diagnosis and therapeutic monitoring in patients with BRAF V600 mutant melanoma. Allele-specific quantitative PCR analysis for BRAF V600 E/E2/D/K/R/M mutations on DNA extracted from 1 ml of plasma is currently under evaluation in a number of ongoing prospective clinical studies. We report five patient cases that indicate the potential applications and utility of quantitative measurements of BRAF V600 mutant cell-free tumor DNA as a diagnostic test and as a therapeutic monitoring tool in stage IV melanoma patients treated with BRAF-targeted therapy or immunotherapy. Finally, we offer novel insights into the dynamics of cell-free tumor DNA in melanoma.

Granulomatous nephritis and dermatitis in a patient with BRAF V600E mutant metastatic melanoma treated with dabrafenib and trametinib.

A 61-year-old man was diagnosed with stage IIIB BRAF V600E mutant melanoma in October 2012. He was treated with a combination therapy of dabrafenib and trametinib. He remained in complete remission for 18 months and the treatment was well tolerated after dose reduction because of pyrexia. In March 2013, he developed bilateral pitting edema of the legs with an erythematous, slightly infiltrated rash on his back and upper arms. His face was edematous, with a heliotrope rash-like aspect. Eye examination showed bilateral blepharitis. Additional blood test showed inflammation and acute kidney injury Rifle category failure. A skin and kidney biopsy indicated a granulomatous inflammation. A complete workup for other causes of granulomatous inflammation was negative. Treatment with dabrafenib and trametinib was stopped and corticosteroids were initiated, with a rapid beneficial effect on both the kidney function and skin rash. When corticosteroids were halted after 1 month, a rapid decline in the kidney function was observed. After reintroduction of corticosteroids, kidney function normalized and steroids could be tapered gradually over 6 months. To our knowledge, interstitial nephritis has not been described in patients on BRAF-targeted nor MEK-targeted therapy for melanoma, although it has been described in a melanoma patient treated with the immune checkpoint inhibitor, ipilimumab. Currently, the patient has no sign of local or distal recurrence of melanoma, notwithstanding that treatment with dabrafenib and trametinib has been stopped for 10 months and no other antimelanoma therapy was initiated.

Systemic immune changes associated with adjuvant interferon-α2b-therapy in stage III melanoma patients: failure at the effector phase?

Interferon-α (IFN-α) is the only approved adjuvant treatment for high-risk melanoma patients in Europe, but the impact on overall survival is low. Although it is believed that IFN-α exerts its effects through immunomodulation, data on its impact on circulating immune cells are scarce. Flow cytometry was performed on peripheral blood mononuclear cells of eight IFN-α2b-treated stage III melanoma patients and 26 untreated stage III melanoma patients as controls to enumerate myeloid and plasmacytoid dendritic cells (mDC and pDC), monocytic and polymorphonuclear myeloid-derived suppressor cells (mMDSC and pmnMDSC) and cytotoxic and regulatory T-cells (Tregs). The expression of several immunosuppressive markers [indoleamine 2,3-dioxygenase (IDO), programmed-death ligand-1 (PD-L1) and cytotoxic T-lymphocyte antigen-4 (CTLA4)] was explored. IDO activity in the blood was confirmed by ultra-performance liquid chromatography. Compared with controls, IFN-α2b treatment was associated with increased IDO expression by pDCs (P=0.021) and an increased kynurenine/tryptophan ratio in the serum (P=0.004), compatible with IDO enzyme activity. Furthermore, IFN-α2b-treated patients had a decreased mDC/DC ratio (P=0.002), decreased CD3+ lymphocytes (P=0.034) and increased circulating Treg (P<0.001) and PD-L1+cytotoxic T-cell (P=0.001) frequencies. IDO expression is upregulated in circulating pDCs of high-risk melanoma patients treated with adjuvant IFN-α2b. This is associated with tryptophan consumption in the patients' serum and higher Treg and PD-L1+cytotoxic T-cell frequencies. We hypothesize that in IFN-α2b-treated patients, IDO activity acts as a negative feedback mechanism and might limit the clinical efficacy of IFN-α2b therapy. The underlying mechanism should be explored as this could lead to more efficient immunotherapies.

Successful (neo)adjuvant BRAF-targeted therapy in a patient with locally advanced BRAF V600E mutant melanoma.

The treatment of locally advanced metastasized melanoma is challenging because there is no level 1 evidence to guide clinical decision-making. Moreover, the treatment options available fail to improve overall survival and are associated with considerable morbidity. Here, we show that systemic treatment with BRAF inhibitor vemurafenib substituted by dual BRAF/MEK inhibition (dabrafenib and trametinib) before surgery can offer the potential to cure the initially difficult or inoperable melanoma. A 62-year-old woman was diagnosed with an AJCC stage IIIB melanoma harboring the BRAF V600E mutation after a complete initial evaluation. Clinically, the patient presented a large primary lesion that was surrounded by ∼25 secondary epidermotropic lesions both satellite and 'in transit' with a diameter between 1 and 6 mm. Following multidisciplinary consultation, the patient was started on 960 mg twice-daily vemurafenib, which was stopped and resumed at 720 mg twice daily, and finally substituted with the combination dabrafenib and trametinib to reduce the persistent side effects. Successive clinical examinations had shown a progressive reduction in the thickness of the melanoma lesions. After about 5 months of therapy, surgery was performed and the histopathological analysis showed an almost complete regression of tumor cells. The treatment with dabrafenib/trametinib was continued only 3 months after surgery and stopped at the patient's request. The patient currently remains in complete remission at 8 months after surgery. The case presented here supports the use of neoadjuvant treatment with BRAF inhibitors in advanced 'in transit' melanoma.

Clinical significance of plasmacytoid dendritic cells and myeloid-derived suppressor cells in melanoma.

BACKGROUND: Immune markers in the peripheral blood of melanoma patients could provide prognostic information. However, there is currently no consensus on which circulating cell types have more clinical impact. We therefore evaluated myeloid-derived suppressor cells (MDSC), dendritic cells (DC), cytotoxic T-cells and regulatory T-cells (Treg) in a series of blood samples of melanoma patients in different stages of disease. METHODS: Flow cytometry was performed on peripheral blood mononuclear cells of 69 stage I to IV melanoma patients with a median follow-up of 39 months after diagnosis to measure the percentage of monocytic MDSCs (mMDSCs), polymorphonuclear MDSCs (pmnMDSCs), myeloid DCs (mDCs), plasmacytoid DCs (pDCs), cytotoxic T-cells and Tregs. We also assessed the expression of PD-L1 and CTLA-4 in cytotoxic T-cells and Tregs respectively. The impact of cell frequencies on prognosis was tested with multivariate Cox regression modelling. RESULTS: Circulating pDC levels were decreased in patients with advanced (P = 0.001) or active (P = 0.002) disease. Low pDC levels conferred an independent negative impact on overall (P = 0.025) and progression-free survival (P = 0.036). Even before relapse, a decrease in pDC levels was observed (P = 0.002, correlation coefficient 0.898). High levels of circulating MDSCs (>4.13%) have an independent negative prognostic impact on OS (P = 0.012). MDSC levels were associated with decreased CD3+ (P < 0.001) and CD3 + CD8+ (P = 0.017) T-cell levels. Conversely, patients with high MDSC levels had more PD-L1+ T-cells (P = 0.033) and more CTLA-4 expression by Tregs (P = 0.003). pDCs and MDSCs were inversely correlated (P = 0.004). The impact of pDC levels on prognosis and prediction of the presence of systemic disease was stronger than that of MDSC levels. CONCLUSION: We demonstrated that circulating pDC and MDSC levels are inversely correlated but have an independent prognostic value in melanoma patients. These cell types represent a single immunologic system and should be evaluated together. Both are key players in the immunological climate in melanoma patients, as they are correlated with circulating cytotoxic and regulatory T-cells. Circulating pDC and MDSC levels should be considered in future immunoprofiling efforts as they could impact disease management.

Objective responses can be obtained by CTLA-4 inhibition in metastatic melanoma after BRAF inhibitor failure.

The aim of this study was to determine the activity of ipilimumab (ipi)-based therapy after treatment failure with a BRAF inhibitor (BRAFi). Sixty-four patients with unresectable stage III or stage IV BRAF V600-mutant melanoma who were treated sequentially with a BRAFi and ipi-based therapy [ipi as monotherapy or ipi in combination with an autologous mRNA electroporated dendritic cell vaccine (TriMixDC-MEL)] were identified. Thirty-three patients had been treated with a BRAFi before ipi-based therapy (BRAFi-first), and 31 patients had been treated with ipi-based therapy first (ipi-first). In patients treated with a BRAFi first (n=33), the best response on sequential ipi-based therapy was three complete responses and six partial responses (best objective response rate of 27%). In patients treated with ipi-based therapy first (n=31), the best response on ipi-based therapy was 0 complete response and four partial responses (best objective response rate of 13%). The response rate did not differ significantly between the two groups (P=0.14). The median overall survival from the start of ipi-based therapy was 10 months (95% confidence interval: 5.7-14.3) in the BRAFi-first group and 12.3 months (95% confidence interval: 7.4-17.2) in the ipi-first group (P=0.34). We report that objective tumor responses to ipi-based immunotherapy can still be obtained after progression has occurred upon treatment with a BRAFi. A part of this observation might be related to the results obtained with a combination of ipi and TriMixDC-MEL.