High throughput echocardiography in conscious mice: training and primary screens.

PURPOSE: Genetic engineering techniques led to an exponential increase in the number of transgenic and knock-out mouse models. For many genetically modified mice, high throughput echocardiography is an essential part of a systematic screening workflow. Many researchers perform mouse echocardiography in conscious animals to avoid anesthesia-induced impairment of cardiac function. However, it has been controversially discussed whether mice need to be habituated to handling before their cardiac function can be assessed. The aim of this study was to test the influence of training on parameters assessed during conscious mouse echocardiography. In addition, we tested whether a simple and fast echocardiography protocol has sufficient sensitivity and specificity for primary screening. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Examined parameters include fractional shortening, heart rate and respiratory rate. A total of 139 mice were examined in this study with a total of 587 echocardiograms. 103 mice were examined on five consecutive days (with examinations on day 1 - 4 regarded as training), 36 mice were only examined on day 1 and 5. RESULTS: Fractional shortening, heart rate and respiratory rate did not show any statistically significant difference between day 1 and day 5 in both groups. The sensitivity and specificity of fractional shortening assessment for predicting a homozygote knock out genotype were 86 % and 97 %, respectively. CONCLUSION: We conclude that conscious mouse echocardiography can be performed in untrained mice. Fractional shortening measurements may suffice for correct phenotyping in a high throughput setting.

The German Mouse Clinic: a platform for systemic phenotype analysis of mouse models.

The German Mouse Clinic (GMC) is a large scale phenotyping center where mouse mutant lines are analyzed in a standardized and comprehensive way. The result is an almost complete picture of the phenotype of a mouse mutant line--a systemic view. At the GMC, expert scientists from various fields of mouse research work in close cooperation with clinicians side by side at one location. The phenotype screens comprise the following areas: allergy, behavior, clinical chemistry, cardiovascular analyses, dysmorphology, bone and cartilage, energy metabolism, eye and vision, host-pathogen interactions, immunology, lung function, molecular phenotyping, neurology, nociception, steroid metabolism, and pathology. The German Mouse Clinic is an open access platform that offers a collaboration-based phenotyping to the scientific community (www.mouseclinic.de). More than 80 mutant lines have been analyzed in a primary screen for 320 parameters, and for 95% of the mutant lines we have found new or additional phenotypes that were not associated with the mouse line before. Our data contributed to the association of mutant mouse lines to the corresponding human disease. In addition, the systemic phenotype analysis accounts for pleiotropic gene functions and refines previous phenotypic characterizations. This is an important basis for the analysis of underlying disease mechanisms. We are currently setting up a platform that will include environmental challenge tests to decipher genome-environmental interactions in the areas nutrition, exercise, air, stress and infection with different standardized experiments. This will help us to identify genetic predispositions as susceptibility factors for environmental influences.

Environmental bias? Effects of housing conditions, laboratory environment and experimenter on behavioral tests.

Behavioral testing does not always yield similar results when replicated in different laboratories, and it usually remains unclear whether the variability in results is caused by different laboratory environments or different experimenters conducting the tests. In our study, we applied a systematic variation of housing conditions, laboratories and experimenters in order to test the influence of these variables on the outcome of behavioral tests. We wanted to know whether known effects of different housing conditions on behavior can be demonstrated regardless of the respective laboratory and experimenters. In this study, we compared the behavior of mice kept under enriched housing conditions with mice kept in unstructured cages regarding their exploratory, locomotor and anxiety-related behavior in the barrier test, in the open-field test and in the elevated plus-maze test. Experiments were conducted by six different persons in two different laboratories. In spite of an extensive protocol standardizing laboratory environment, animal maintenance and testing procedures, significant differences in absolute values between different laboratories as well as between different experimenters were noticed in the barrier test and in the elevated plus-maze test but not in the open-field test. However, with regard to the differences between enriched and unstructured housing conditions, overall consistent results were achieved by different experimenters in both laboratories. We conclude that the reliability of behavioral phenotyping is not challenged seriously by experimenter and laboratory environment as long as appropriate standardizations are met and suitable controls are involved.