Implementation and evaluation of a team-based pharmacy practice model in a community health system.

PURPOSE: The development and implementation of a team-based pharmacy practice model is described. METHODS: In January 2016 a transition from a staff-specialist to a team-based pharmacy practice model was implemented. The overall goal of the model change was to enhance the pharmacist's clinical roles and further integrate pharmacists into the healthcare team. Before implementation of the new staffing model, a formalized metric evaluation process was created. The aim of this metric evaluation was to gauge model success, determine areas of model revision, and objectively communicate pharmacist impact. Objective metrics were evaluated before implementation and 1 year after implementation. In addition, surveys were distributed to pharmacists, physicians, nursing and hospital administration before and after model implementation. RESULTS: At 1-year postimplementation, the pharmacist:patient bed ratio decreased from 1:87 to 1:47, the number of rounds/huddles with pharmacist attendance increased by 63% to 80 per week, and the number of clinical interventions and new clinical consultations increased from 57 to 62 and from 12 to 16 per day, respectively. Nonformulary medication use also decreased from 1.77 to 0.623 per 1000 patient days, and compliance with therapeutic initiatives increased from 77%to 91%. Overall, 72% of pharmacist survey responses indicated satisfaction with the model change. CONCLUSION: A team-based pharmacy practice model was designed and successfully implemented over a 3-year period. Data analysis revealed improvements in clinical and operational endpoints and enhanced pharmacist, physician, and nursing satisfaction.

Impact of fluconazole administration on outcomes in critically ill patients.

BACKGROUND: Serious infections caused by Candida spp. are an increasingly important cause of morbidity and mortality in critically ill patients. It is unclear which patients will benefit from therapy and at what point to institute treatment. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the impact of administration of fluconazole therapy in critically ill trauma patients on mortality, length of hospital stay, incidence of deep-seated fungal infection, and positive fungal cultures from any site. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective, matched case-control study of 116 critically ill surgical trauma patients who did or did not receive fluconazole. Patients were followed until hospital discharge or death. A consecutive sample of 58 patients who received fluconazole was selected. A parallel group of patients was evaluated, from which 58 were matched with fluconazole-treated patients based on age (+/- 5 y), gender, and APACHE II score (+/- 3). RESULTS: The groups of patients were well matched, with the exception of central venous catheter placement and broad-spectrum antibiotic use. We found no difference between groups in hospital mortality (21% vs 26%; p = 0.661) or incidence of deep-seated fungal infection (0% vs 2%; p = NS). However, patients receiving fluconazole had a significantly longer stay in both the intensive care unit (ICU) (18 +/- 13 vs 7 +/- 11 days; p < 0.001) and hospital (25 +/- 15 vs 9 +/- 11 days; p < 0.001). Fluconazole patients were significantly more likely to have Candida cultured from sites associated with colonization (43% vs 2%; p < 0.001), possibly explaining why they received fluconazole. CONCLUSIONS: We were unable to detect a benefit from use of fluconazole in our surgical trauma patient population. Isolation of Candida from the mouth or throat alone, in the absence of correlating clinical signs of infection, should not lead to initiation of fluconazole therapy. Fluconazole use should be reserved for carefully selected patients in the trauma ICU setting.