[Indicadores de salud perinatal en una región española entre los años 2015 y 2020.] / Perinatal health indicators in a region of Spain corresponding to the period 2015 to 2020.

OBJECTIVE: The availability in the literature of data related to perinatal variables in the Spanish population is very scarce. The aim of this study was to know the evolution of perinatal health indicators according to the risk groups of prematurity and birth weight, the proportion of multiple births, caesarean section and stillbirths. METHODS: We conducted a population-based cross-sectional study of births in eleven hospitals in Castilla y León (January 2015 to June 2020). There were 70,024 newborns from 68,769 deliveries. Jointpoint regression analysis was used to identify changes in trend over the years, and binomial logistic regression was used to adjust for the potential interaction of hospital type, sex, type of delivery and multiple births on the frequencies of prematurity and death. RESULTS: There was a 19.9% decrease in deliveries and a 42% decrease in multiple births, with no change in preterm (7.7%) and stillbirths (0.44%). The percentage of caesarean sections was 21.5% with a slight downward trend over time. Death (stillbirth) was associated with preterm multiple birth; especially with the male-male combination (p<0.05). Late preterm and early term newborns showed higher risk of death compared to term newborns: OR 7.7 (95%CI 5.6-10.7) and 2.4 (95%CI 1.6-3.6), respectively; as well as the low birth weight group (OR 17.6; 95%CI 13.9-22.2) and small for gestational age (OR 3.4; 95%CI 1.9-5.8), compared to those of adequate weight. CONCLUSIONS: Prior to the development of the COVID-19 pandemic there is a decline in births, including multiple births, with no change in stillbirths or prematurity. Late preterm and early term newborns are at increased risk of intrauterine death.

OBJETIVO: La disponibilidad en la literatura de datos relacionados con variables perinatales en la población española son muy escasos. El objetivo de este estudio fue conocer la evolución de los indicadores de salud perinatal atendiendo a los grupos de riesgo de prematuridad y de peso al nacimiento, la proporción de parto múltiple, de cesárea y de mortinatos. METODOS: Se realizó un estudio transversal poblacional de los partos en once hospitales de Castilla y León (enero de 2015 a junio de 2020). Hubo 70.024 recién nacidos (RN) procedentes de 68.769 partos. Se utilizó el análisis de regresión Jointpoint para identificar cambios en la tendencia a lo largo de los años, y la regresión logística binomial para ajustar la potencial interacción del tipo de hospital, el sexo, el tipo de parto y el parto múltiple en las frecuencias de prematuridad y de fallecimiento. RESULTADOS: Hubo un descenso de partos del 19,9% y de los múltiples del 42%, sin cambios en los RN prematuros (7,7%) ni en los mortinatos (0,44%). El porcentaje de cesáreas fue del 21,5% con una ligera tendencia temporal descendente. El fallecimiento (mortinato) se asoció al parto múltiple pretérmino; especialmente a la combinación varón-varón (p<0,05). Los RN pretérminos tardíos y términos precoces mostraron mayor riesgo de fallecer frente a los RN a término: OR 7,7 (IC95% 5,6-10,7) y 2,4 (IC95% 1,6-3,6), respectivamente; así como el grupo de bajo peso (OR 17,6; IC95% 13,9-22,2) y el pequeño para la edad gestacional (OR 3,4; IC95% 1,9-5,8), frente a los de peso adecuado. CONCLUSIONES: Previo al desarrollo de la pandemia por COVID-19 existe un descenso de la natalidad, incluidos los partos múltiples, sin cambios en los mortinatos ni en la prematuridad. Los RN pretérminos tardío y términos precoces tienen mayor riesgo de fallecer intraútero.

Inter-observer reliability for amplitude-integrated electroencephalography in the newborn with perinatal asphyxia.

INTRODUCTION: Amplitude integrated electroencephalography (aEEG) is a tool widely used for neuromonitoring in the critical neonate. In the patient with perinatal asphyxia, its interpretation is key to identifying candidates for therapeutic hypothermia, detecting subclinical seizures and providing pronostic information. Our aim was to analyze the concordance in the interpretation of aEEG among neonatologists with different levels of experience. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Unicenter retrospective study of newborns ≥ 35 weeks with perinatal asphyxia included consecutively over a two-year period and monitored with aEEG for at least 6 h. The bedside neonatologist interpreted aEEG regarding background pattern, sleep-wake cycling, and seizures. The aEEG tracings were blindly reviewed by two neonatologists with different experience. The aEEG tracings were divided into periods of 0-3 h and 3-6 h of life, and the concordance (Cohen Kappa coefficient, k), between the two examiners and that of their consensus with the bedside neonatologist, was analyzed. RESULTS: Seventy-five newborns were included, 5 of them were not aEEG-monitored. 132 tracings were analyzed with a very good concordance between the two examiners in the three characteristics of the aEEG. The k for the bedside neonatologist was very good for background pattern (k = 0.93), moderate (k = 0.52) for sleep-wake cycling, and weak (k = 0.32) for seizures. CONCLUSIONS: This study supports that background pattern is easily interpreted compared to sleep-wake cycling or crisis, improving when targeted training on aEEG is received.

Concordancia interobservador del electroencefalograma integrado por amplitud en el neonato con asfixia perinatal / Inter-observer reliability for amplitude-integrated EEG in the newborn with perinatal asphyxia

Introducción: La electroencefalografía integrada por amplitud (aEEG) es una herramienta utilizada en la neuromonitorización del neonato crítico. En el paciente con asfixia perinatal, su interpretación es clave para identificar a los candidatos a hipotermia terapéutica, detectar crisis subclínicas y aportar información pronóstica. Nuestro objetivo fue analizar la concordancia en la interpretación del aEEG entre neonatólogos con distinto nivel de experiencia. Material y métodos: Estudio retrospectivo unicéntrico de los recién nacidos ≥ 35 semanas con asfixia perinatal incluidos consecutivamente durante un periodo de dos años y monitorizados con aEEG durante al menos 6 horas. El médico de guardia interpretó el aEEG respecto al trazado de base, los ciclos vigilia-sueño y las crisis. Los aEEG fueron revisados de forma ciega por dos neonatólogas con distinta experiencia. Se analizó la concordancia (coeficiente Kappa de Cohen, k) de los aEEG divididos en periodos de 0-3 horas y 3-6 horas de vida, entre ambas y la de su consenso con el médico de guardia. Resultados: Se incluyeron 75 neonatos, 5 de ellos no se monitorizaron. Se analizaron 132 trazados con una concordancia muy buena entre las dos examinadoras en las tres características del aEEG. El k respecto al médico de guardia fue muy bueno para el trazado de base (k=0,93), moderado (k=0,52) para los ciclos vigilia-sueño y débil (k=0,32) para las crisis. Conclusiones: Este estudio apoya una mayor facilidad para interpretar adecuadamente el trazado de base frente a los ciclos vigilia-sueño o las crisis, mejorando cuando se recibe una formación dirigida en el aEEG. (AU)

Introduction: Amplitude integrated electroencephalography (aEEG) is a widely tool used for neuromonitoring in the critical neonate. In the patient with perinatal asphyxia, its interpretation is key to identifying candidates for therapeutic hypothermia, detecting subclinical seizures and providing pronostic information. Our aim was to analyze the concordance in the interpretation of aEEG among neonatologists with different level of experience. Material and methods: Unicenter retrospective study of newborns ≥35 weeks with perinatal asphyxia included consecutively over a two-year period and monitored with aEEG for at least 6h. The bedside neonatologist interpreted aEEG regarding background pattern, sleep-wake cycling, and seizures. The aEEG tracings were blindly reviewed by two neonatologists with different experience. The aEEG tracings were divided into periods of 0–3h and 3-6h of life, and the concordance (Cohen Kappa coefficient, k), between the two examiners and that of their consensus with the bedside neonatologist, was analyzed. Results: Seventy-five newborns were included, 5 of them were not aEEG-monitored. 132 tracings were analyzed with a very good concordance between the two examiners in the three characteristics of the aEEG. The k for the bedside neonatologist was very good for background pattern (k=0.93), moderate (k=0.52) for sleep-wake cycling, and weak (k=0.32) for seizures. Conclusions: This study supports that background pattern is easily interpreted compared to sleep-wake cycling or crisis, improving when targeted training on aEEG is received. (AU)

[Inter-observer reliability for amplitude-integrated EEG in the newborn with perinatal asphyxia]. / Concordancia interobservador del electroencefalograma integrado por amplitud en el neonato con asfixia perinatal.

INTRODUCTION: Amplitude integrated electroencephalography (aEEG) is a widely tool used for neuromonitoring in the critical neonate. In the patient with perinatal asphyxia, its interpretation is key to identifying candidates for therapeutic hypothermia, detecting subclinical seizures and providing pronostic information. Our aim was to analyze the concordance in the interpretation of aEEG among neonatologists with different level of experience. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Unicenter retrospective study of newborns ≥35 weeks with perinatal asphyxia included consecutively over a two-year period and monitored with aEEG for at least 6h. The bedside neonatologist interpreted aEEG regarding background pattern, sleep-wake cycling, and seizures. The aEEG tracings were blindly reviewed by two neonatologists with different experience. The aEEG tracings were divided into periods of 0-3h and 3-6h of life, and the concordance (Cohen Kappa coefficient, k), between the two examiners and that of their consensus with the bedside neonatologist, was analyzed. RESULTS: Seventy-five newborns were included, 5 of them were not aEEG-monitored. 132 tracings were analyzed with a very good concordance between the two examiners in the three characteristics of the aEEG. The k for the bedside neonatologist was very good for background pattern (k=0.93), moderate (k=0.52) for sleep-wake cycling, and weak (k=0.32) for seizures. CONCLUSIONS: This study supports that background pattern is easily interpreted compared to sleep-wake cycling or crisis, improving when targeted training on aEEG is received.

Lack of changes in preterm delivery and stillbirths during COVID-19 lockdown in a European region.

Preliminary data in Europe have suggested a reduction in prematurity rates during the COVID-19 pandemic, implying that contingency measures could have an impact on prematurity rates. We designed a population-based prevalence proportion study to explore the potential link between national lockdown measures and a change in preterm births and stillbirths. Adjusted multivariate analyses did not show any decrease in preterm proportions during the lockdown period with respect to the whole prelockdown period or to the prelockdown comparison periods (2015-2019): 6.5% (95%CI 5.6-7.4), 6.6% (95%CI 6.5-6.8), and 6.2% (95%CI 5.7-6.7), respectively. Proportions of preterm live births did not change during lockdown when different gestational age categories were analyzed, nor when birthweight categories were considered. No differences in stillbirth rates among the different study periods were found: 0.33% (95%CI 0.04-0.61) during the lockdown period vs. 0.34% (95%CI 0.22-0.46) during the prelockdown comparison period (2015-2019).Conclusion: We did not find any link between prematurity and lockdown, nor between stillbirths and lockdown. Collaborative efforts are desirable to gather more data and additional evidence on this global health issue. What is Known: • Prematurity is associated with increased risk of morbidity and mortality. • Contingency measures during the COVID-19 pandemic may have an impact on reducing prematurity rates. What is New: • Prematurity and stillbirth rates remained stable in Castilla-y-León, a Spanish region, during COVID-19 lockdown. • The role of behavioral patterns and sociocultural factors in the prevention of preterm birth as a result of lockdown measures remains a subject for debate.