Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Glob Adv Integr Med Health ; 13: 27536130241241259, 2024.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38585239

ABSTRACT

Background: Assessing the use and effectiveness of complementary and integrative health (CIH) therapies via survey can be complicated given CIH therapies are used in various locations and formats, the dosing required to have an effect is unclear, the potential health and well-being outcomes are many, and describing CIH therapies can be challenging. Few surveys assessing CIH therapy use and effectiveness exist, and none sufficiently reflect these complexities. Objective: In a large-scale Veterans Health Administration (VA) quality improvement effort, we developed the "Complementary and Integrative Health Therapy Patient Experience Survey", a longitudinal, electronic patient self-administered survey to comprehensively assess CIH therapy use and outcomes. Methods: We obtained guidance from the literature, subject matter experts, and Veteran patients who used CIH therapies in designing the survey. As a validity check, we completed cognitive testing and interviews with those patients. We conducted the survey (March 2021-April 2023), inviting 15,608 Veterans with chronic musculoskeletal pain with a recent CIH appointment or referral identified in VA electronic medical records (EMR) to participate. As a second validity check, we compared VA EMR data and patient self-reports of CIH therapy utilization a month after survey initiation and again at survey conclusion. Results: The 64-item, electronic survey assesses CIH dosing (amount and timing), delivery format and location, provider location, and payor. It also assesses 7 patient-reported outcomes (pain, global mental health, global physical health, depression, quality of life, stress, and meaning/purpose in life), and 3 potential mediators (perceived health competency, healthcare engagement, and self-efficacy for managing diseases). The survey took 17 minutes on average to complete and had a baseline response rate of 45.3%. We found high degrees of concordance between self-reported and EMR data for all therapies except meditation. Conclusions: Validly assessing patient-reported CIH therapy use and outcomes is complex, but possible.

2.
Ann Intern Med ; 150(7): 465-73, 2009 Apr 07.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19349631

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The Veterans Health Administration, the American Cancer Society, and the American Geriatrics Society recommend colorectal cancer screening for older adults unless they are unlikely to live 5 years or have significant comorbidity that would preclude treatment. OBJECTIVE: To determine whether colorectal cancer screening is targeted to healthy older patients and is avoided in older patients with severe comorbidity who have life expectancies of 5 years or less. DESIGN: Cohort study. SETTING: Veterans Affairs (VA) medical centers in Minneapolis, Minnesota; Durham, North Carolina; Portland, Oregon; and West Los Angeles, California, with linked national VA and Medicare administrative claims. PATIENTS: 27 068 patients 70 years or older who had an outpatient visit at 1 of 4 VA medical centers in 2001 or 2002 and were due for screening. MEASUREMENTS: The main outcome was receipt of fecal occult blood testing (FOBT), colonoscopy, sigmoidoscopy, or barium enema in 2001 or 2002, on the basis of national VA and Medicare claims. Charlson-Deyo comorbidity scores at the start of 2001 were used to stratify patients into 3 groups ranging from no comorbidity (score of 0) to severe comorbidity (score > or =4), and 5-year mortality was determined for each group. RESULTS: 46% of patients were screened from 2001 through 2002. Only 47% of patients with no comorbidity were screened despite having life expectancies greater than 5 years (5-year mortality, 19%). Although the incidence of screening decreased with age and worsening comorbidity, it was still 41% for patients with severe comorbidity who had life expectancies less than 5 years (5-year mortality, 55%). The number of VA outpatient visits predicted screening independent of comorbidity, such that patients with severe comorbidity and 4 or more visits had screening rates similar to or higher than those of healthier patients with fewer visits. LIMITATIONS: Some tests may have been performed for nonscreening reasons. The generalizability of findings to persons who do not use the VA system is uncertain. CONCLUSION: Advancing age was inversely associated with colorectal cancer screening, whereas comorbidity was a weaker predictor. More attention to comorbidity is needed to better target screening to older patients with substantial life expectancies and avoid screening older patients with limited life expectancies. primary funding source: VA Health Services Research and Development.


Subject(s)
Colorectal Neoplasms/epidemiology , Mass Screening/statistics & numerical data , Veterans , Age Factors , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Cohort Studies , Colonoscopy , Colorectal Neoplasms/diagnosis , Comorbidity , Early Detection of Cancer , Female , Humans , Male , Mass Screening/methods , Medicare , Practice Guidelines as Topic , United States/epidemiology , United States Department of Veterans Affairs
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...