Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 24
Filter
1.
BMJ Open ; 13(12): e074120, 2023 12 07.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38149429

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: Population ageing is a global phenomenon. Resultant healthcare workforce shortages are anticipated. To ensure access to comprehensive primary care, which correlates with improved health outcomes, equity and costs, data to inform workforce planning are urgently needed. We examined the medical and social characteristics of patients attached to near-retirement comprehensive primary care physicians over time and explored the early-career and mid-career workforce's capacity to absorb these patients. DESIGN: A serial cross-sectional population-based analysis using health administrative data. SETTING: Ontario, Canada, where most comprehensive primary care is delivered by family physicians (FPs) under universal insurance. PARTICIPANTS: All insured Ontario residents at three time points: 2008 (12 936 360), 2013 (13 447 365) and 2019 (14 388 566) and all Ontario physicians who billed primary care services (2008: 11 566; 2013: 12 693; 2019: 15 054). OUTCOME MEASURES: The number, proportion and health and social characteristics of patients attached to near-retirement age comprehensive FPs over time; the number, proportion and characteristics of near-retirement age comprehensive FPs over time. SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES: The characteristics of patients and their early-career and mid-career comprehensive FPs. RESULTS: Patient attachment to comprehensive FPs increased over time. The overall FP workforce grew, but the proportion practicing comprehensiveness declined (2008: 77.2%, 2019: 70.7%). Over time, an increasing proportion of the comprehensive FP workforce was near retirement age. Correspondingly, an increasing proportion of patients were attached to near-retirement physicians. By 2019, 13.9% of comprehensive FPs were 65 years or older, corresponding to 1 695 126 (14.8%) patients. Mean patient age increased, and all physicians served markedly increasing numbers of medically and socially complex patients. CONCLUSIONS: The primary care sector faces capacity challenges as both patients and physicians age and fewer physicians practice comprehensiveness. Nearly 15% (1.7 million) of Ontarians may lose their comprehensive FP to retirement between 2019 and 2025. To serve a growing, increasingly complex population, innovative solutions are needed.


Subject(s)
Physicians, Family , Retirement , Humans , Ontario , Cross-Sectional Studies , Comprehensive Health Care
2.
CMAJ Open ; 11(6): E1102-E1108, 2023.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38016759

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Five million Canadians lack a family doctor or primary care team. Our goal was to examine trends over time in family physician workforce and service provision in Ontario and Alberta, with a view to informing policy discussions on primary care supply and delivery of services. METHODS: We used cross-sectional analyses in Ontario and Alberta for 2005/06, 2012/13 and 2017/18 to examine family physician provision of service days by provider demographic characteristics and geographic location. A service day was defined as 10 or more clinic visits worth $20 or more on the same calendar day. We included all active family physicians who had evidence of billing in each fiscal year analyzed. RESULTS: From 2005/06 to 2017/18, the number of family physicians increased by 35.3% in Ontario and 48.7% in Alberta; however, annual average service days per physician declined by 10.6% in Ontario and 5.9% in Alberta. The average daily patient volume remained stable in Ontario and declined in Alberta, and services per population kept pace modestly with population growth in both provinces. Rural areas had the smallest increases in physician counts and largest declines in average annual service days per physician. Physicians in both provinces who had graduated from medical school at least 30 years earlier accounted for more than one-third of the workforce in 2017/18. INTERPRETATION: Ontario and Alberta experienced rapid growth in the number of family physicians, with the largest increases among those in late career and the lowest increases in rural areas. The decline in service provision among physicians overall and in subgroups in both provinces highlights the importance of measuring activity to inform workforce planning.

3.
CMAJ Open ; 11(2): E345-E356, 2023.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37171909

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Walk-in clinics are common in North America and are designed to provide acute episodic care without an appointment. We sought to describe a sample of walk-in clinic patients in Ontario, Canada, which is a setting with high levels of primary care attachment. METHODS: We performed a cross-sectional study using health administrative data from 2019. We compared the sociodemographic characteristics and health care utilization patterns of patients attending 1 of 72 walk-in clinics with those of the general Ontario population. We examined the subset of patients who were enrolled with a family physician and compared walk-in clinic visits to family physician visits. RESULTS: Our study found that 562 781 patients made 1 148 151 visits to the included walk-in clinics. Most (70%) patients who attended a walk-in clinic had an enrolling family physician. Walk-in clinic patients were younger (mean age 36 yr v. 41 yr, standardized mean difference [SMD] 0.24), yet had greater health care utilization (moderate and high use group 74% v. 65%, SMD 0.20) than the general Ontario population. Among enrolled Ontarians, walk-in patients had more comorbidities (moderate and high count 50% v. 45%, SMD 0.10), lived farther from their enrolling physician (median 8 km v. 6 km, SMD 0.21) and saw their enrolling physician less in the previous year (any visit 67% v. 80%, SMD 0.30). Walk-in encounters happened more often after hours (16% v. 9%, SMD 0.20) and on weekends (18% v. 5%, SMD 0.45). Walk-in clinics were more often within 3 km of patients' homes than enrolling physicians' offices (0 to < 3 km: 32% v. 22%, SMD 0.21). INTERPRETATION: Our findings suggest that proximity of walk-in clinics and after-hours access may be contributing to walk-in clinic use among patients enrolled with a family physician. These findings have implications for policy development to improve the integration of walk-in clinics and longitudinal primary care.


Subject(s)
Ambulatory Care Facilities , Physicians, Family , Humans , Adult , Ontario/epidemiology , Cross-Sectional Studies , Delivery of Health Care
4.
PLoS One ; 15(7): e0234876, 2020.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32645017

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Access to neurology specialty care can influence outcomes in individuals with multiple sclerosis (MS), but may vary based on patient sociodemographic characteristics, including immigration status. OBJECTIVE: To compare health services utilization in the year of MS diagnosis, one year before diagnosis and two years after diagnosis in immigrants versus long-term residents in Ontario, Canada. METHODS: We identified incident cases of MS among adults aged 20-65 years by applying a validated algorithm to health administrative data in Ontario, Canada, a region with universal health insurance and comprehensive coverage. We separately assessed hospitalizations, emergency department (ED) visits, outpatient neurology visits, other outpatient specialty visits, and primary care visits. We compared rates of health service use in immigrants versus long-term residents using negative binomial regression models with generalized estimating equations adjusted for age, sex, socioeconomic status, urban/rural residence, MS diagnosis calendar year, and comorbidity burden. RESULTS: From 2003 to 2014, there were 13,028 incident MS cases in Ontario, of whom 1,070 (8.2%) were immigrants. As compared to long-term residents, rates of hospitalization were similar (Adjusted rate ratio (ARR) 0.86; 95% CI: 0.73-1.01) in immigrants the year before MS diagnosis, but outpatient neurology visits (ARR 0.93; 95% CI: 0.87-0.99) were slightly less frequent. However, immigrants had higher rates of hospitalization during the diagnosis year (ARR 1.20, 95% CI: 1.04-1.39), and had greater use of outpatient neurology (ARR 1.17, 95% CI: 1.12-1.23) but fewer ED visits (ARR 0.86; 95% CI: 0.78-0.96). In the first post-diagnosis year, immigrants continued to have greater numbers of outpatient neurology visits (ARR 1.16; 95% CI: 1.10-1.23), but had fewer hospitalizations (ARR 0.79; 95% CI: 0.67-0.94). CONCLUSIONS: Overall, our findings were reassuring concerning health services access for immigrants with MS in Ontario, a publicly funded health care system. However, immigrants were more likely to be hospitalized despite greater use of outpatient neurology care in the year of MS diagnosis. Reasons for this may include more severe disease presentation or lack of social support among immigrants and warrant further investigation.


Subject(s)
Emigrants and Immigrants/psychology , Patient Acceptance of Health Care/ethnology , Patient Acceptance of Health Care/psychology , Adult , Ambulatory Care/trends , Canada/ethnology , Cohort Studies , Emergency Service, Hospital/trends , Female , Hospitalization/trends , Humans , Male , Mental Disorders/therapy , Mental Health Services/trends , Middle Aged , Multiple Sclerosis/psychology , Ontario/ethnology , Primary Health Care/trends , Retrospective Studies , Social Class
5.
CMAJ Open ; 8(2): E455-E461, 2020.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32561592

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Mental health disorders are associated with high morbidity and reduced life expectancy, and are largely managed in primary care. We sought to assess the equity of distribution of new alternative payment models and teams introduced under primary care reform in Ontario for patients with mental health disorders. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective observational study using population-level administrative data for insured Ontario adults (age ≥ 18 yr) to identify all primary care payments to physicians that were allocated to individual patients in 2002/03 and 2011/12. We identified patients with mental health disorders using validated algorithms, and modelled the relations between per capita primary care costs and mental health disorders over time, stratified by type of mental health or substance use disorder and type of primary care payment. In an adjusted model, we adjusted for age, sex, rurality, neighbourhood income quintile, immigrant status, comorbidity and primary care model. For comparative purposes, we also examined the distribution of primary care payments for people with diabetes mellitus. RESULTS: Total per capita primary care payments increased more slowly over the study period for patients with mental health disorders (62.0%) than for the general population (88.3%). Total payments for patients with substance use disorders increased by 142.7%, largely owing to urine drug testing in opioid substitution clinics. Adjusted total payments for those with versus without mental health disorders decreased by 10% between 2002/03 and 2011/12, driven by lower alternative payments. Similar decreases, also driven by lower alternative payments, were found for all mental health disorder subgroups except substance use and for diabetes. INTERPRETATION: Payment and team reforms were associated with inequitable resource allocation to people with mental health disorders. The findings suggest the need for monitoring reforms for their impact on high-needs populations and making appropriate adjustments.


Subject(s)
Capital Financing , Financial Statements , Health Care Reform , Mental Disorders/epidemiology , Mental Health , Primary Health Care , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Ontario/epidemiology , Population Surveillance , Primary Health Care/economics , Primary Health Care/trends , Retrospective Studies , Young Adult
6.
Neuroepidemiology ; 54(2): 148-156, 2020.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32023615

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Little is known about how mortality in multiple sclerosis (MS) may differ based on sociodemographic factors, such as immigrant status. We compared mortality in immigrants versus long-term residents with MS in Ontario, Canada. METHODS: In this retrospective cohort study, we applied a validated algorithm to linked, population-based immigration and health administrative data to identify incident MS cases in Ontario between 1994 and 2014. We identified date of death, if it occurred. We used a Cox model adjusting for age, sex, income, and comorbidity, to compare survival in immigrants versus long-term residents. RESULTS: There were 23,603 incident MS cases of whom 1,410 (6.0%) were immigrants. After adjusting for covariates, risk of death was higher in immigrants in the first year after diagnosis (hazard ratio [HR] 1.66; 95% CI 1.05-2.63, p = 0.031). However, in years 1-5 (HR 0.63; 95% CI 0.40-0.98, p = 0.041) and 5-10 (HR 0.42; 95% CI 0.24-0.75, p = 0.003) after diagnosis, risk of death was lower in immigrants. Older age at onset and comorbidity were associated with higher mortality; female sex and higher socioeconomic status were associated with lower mortality. CONCLUSIONS: In this large population with universal access to health care, immigrants with MS had higher mortality compared to long-term residents in the first year after onset and lower mortality thereafter. Lower mortality in immigrants to Canada is well described and thought to be due to the healthy immigrant effect. Higher mortality in the first year after MS onset warrants further investigation as some early deaths may be preventable.


Subject(s)
Emigrants and Immigrants/statistics & numerical data , Multiple Sclerosis/mortality , Adult , Aged , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Ontario/epidemiology , Proportional Hazards Models , Retrospective Studies , Risk , Time Factors , Universal Health Insurance/statistics & numerical data , Young Adult
7.
Neurology ; 93(24): e2203-e2215, 2019 12 10.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31690681

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To determine risk factors for multiple sclerosis (MS) in immigrants and to compare MS risk in immigrants and long-term residents in Ontario, Canada. METHODS: We applied a validated algorithm to linked, population-based immigration and health claims data to identify incident cases of MS in immigrants and long-term residents between 1994 and 2016. We conducted 2 multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression analyses: 1 analysis limited to the immigrant cohort assessing potential risk factors for developing MS, and 1 analysis comparing MS risk between immigrants and matched long-term residents (1:3 match). RESULTS: We identified 2,304,302 immigrants for the immigrant-only analysis, of whom 1,526 (0.066%) developed MS. Risk was greatest in those <15 years old at landing (referent <15 years; 16-30 years: hazard ratio [HR] 0.73, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.63-0.85; 31-45 years: HR 0.55, 95% CI 0.47-0.64). Immigrants from the Middle East (HR 1.22, 95% CI 1.06-1.40) were at greater MS risk than immigrants from Western nations; all other regions had lower risk (p < 0.0001). The matched analysis included 2,207,751 immigrants and 6,362,169 long-term residents. Immigrants were less likely to develop MS than long-term residents (p < 0.0001), although this lower risk was attenuated with longer residence in Canada. CONCLUSIONS: MS incidence in immigrants to Ontario, Canada, varied widely by region of origin, with greatest risk seen in those from the Middle East. Longer residence in Canada was associated with increased risk, even with migration in adulthood, suggesting that environmental exposures into adulthood contribute to MS risk.


Subject(s)
Emigrants and Immigrants , Multiple Sclerosis/epidemiology , Multiple Sclerosis/etiology , Adolescent , Adult , Cohort Studies , Female , Humans , Incidence , Male , Middle Aged , Ontario/epidemiology , Retrospective Studies , Risk Factors , Young Adult
8.
BMJ Open ; 9(6): e026296, 2019 06 11.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31189675

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: Medical Regulatory Authorities (MRAs) provide licences to physicians and monitor those physicians once in practice to support their continued competence. In response to physician shortages, many Canadian MRAs developed alternative licensure routes to allow physicians who do not meet traditional licensure criteria to obtain licences to practice. Many physicians have gained licensure through alternative routes, but the performance of these physicians in practice has not been previously examined. This study compared the performance of traditionally and alternatively licenced physicians in Ontario using quality indicators of primary care. The purpose of this study was to examine the practice performance of alternatively licenced physicians and provide evaluative evidence for alternative licensure policies. DESIGN: A cross-sectional retrospective examination of Ontario health administrative data was conducted using Poisson regression analyses to compare the performance of traditionally and alternatively licenced physicians. SETTING: Primary care in Ontario, Canada. PARTICIPANTS: All family physicians who were licenced in Ontario between 2000 and 2012 and who had complete medical billing data in 2014 were included (n=11 419). OUTCOME MEASURES: Primary care quality indicators were calculated for chronic disease management, preventive paediatric care, cancer screening and hospital readmission rates using Ontario health administrative data. RESULTS: Alternatively licenced physicians performed similarly to traditionally licenced physicians in many primary care performance measures. Minimal differences were seen across groups in indicators of diabetic care, congestive heart failure care, asthma care and cancer screening rates. Larger differences were found in preventive care for children less than 2 years of age, particularly for alternatively licenced physicians who entered Ontario from another Canadian province. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings demonstrate that alternatively licenced physicians perform similarly to traditionally licenced physicians across many indicators of primary care. Our study also demonstrates the utility of administrative data for examining physician performance and evaluating medical regulatory policies and programmes.


Subject(s)
Physicians, Family/statistics & numerical data , Primary Health Care/organization & administration , Primary Health Care/statistics & numerical data , Quality Indicators, Health Care/statistics & numerical data , Adult , Chronic Disease/therapy , Cross-Sectional Studies , Early Detection of Cancer/statistics & numerical data , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Ontario , Patient Readmission , Physicians, Family/legislation & jurisprudence , Regression Analysis , Retrospective Studies
9.
CMAJ Open ; 5(4): E856-E863, 2017 Dec 19.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29259018

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Given the changing landscape of primary care, there may be fewer primary care physicians available to provide a broad range of services to patients of all age groups and health conditions. We sought to identify physicians with comprehensive primary care practices in Ontario using administrative data, investigating how many and what proportion of primary care physicians provided comprehensive primary care and how this changed over time. METHODS: We identified the pool of active primary care physicians in linked population-based databases for Ontario from 1992/93 to 2014/15. After excluding those who saw patients fewer than 44 days per year, we identified physicians as providing comprehensive care if more than half of their services were for core primary care and if these services fell into at least 7 of 22 activity areas. Physicians with 50% or less of their services for core primary care but with more than 50% in a single location or type of service were identified as being in focused practice. RESULTS: In 2014/15, there were 12 891 physicians in the primary care pool: 1254 (9.7%) worked fewer than 44 days per year, 1619 (12.6%) were in focused practice, and 1009 (7.8%) could not be classified. The proportion in comprehensive practice ranged from 67.5% to 74.9% between 1992/93 and 2014/15, with a peak in 2002/03 and relative stability from 2009/10 to 2014/15. Over this period, there was an increase of 8.8% in population per comprehensive primary care physician. INTERPRETATION: We found that just over two-thirds of primary care physicians provided comprehensive care in 2014/15, which indicates that traditional estimates of the primary care physician workforce may be too high. Although implementation will vary by setting and available data, this approach is likely applicable elsewhere.

10.
CMAJ Open ; 5(4): E760-E767, 2017 Oct 13.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29042408

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: In 2012, the Ontario government withdrew public insurance coverage of imaging tests for uncomplicated low back pain. We studied the impact of this restriction on test ordering by physicians. METHODS: We compared the numbers of lumbar spine radiography, computed tomography (CT) and single-segment magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) studies ordered by physicians in the 3 years before and after the policy change. We linked claims data from the Ontario Health Insurance Program with physician details to calculate rates per test-ordering physician. We compared changes in rates of monthly test ordering by family physicians and specialists before and after the policy change using segmented regression analysis of interrupted time series data. RESULTS: The number of lumbar spine radiography and spine CT studies ordered by family physicians decreased by 98 597 (28.7%) and 17 499 (28.7%), respectively, in the year after the policy change; there was little change in ordering by specialists. The number of lumbar spine radiography studies ordered per family physician by month decreased by 0.81 tests (p < 0.001) after the intervention, followed by a smaller rebound increase that remained below baseline. Monthly ordering of spine CT per family physician declined by 0.1 tests (p < 0.001), and that of limited spine MRI rose before the intervention, decreased by 0.18 tests (p < 0.001) after the intervention, then started to rise again. Monthly ordering of limited spine MRI by specialists, which had been stable before the policy change, decreased by 0.1 tests per specialist (p < 0.001) afterward, then rose to preintervention levels. INTERPRETATION: The restriction in coverage of imaging tests caused a larger decrease in test ordering by family physicians than by specialists and a larger, more sustained reduction in the use of lumbar spine radiography and spine CT than of spine MRI.

11.
Open Med ; 7(2): e40-55, 2013.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24348884

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Large multispecialty physician group practices, with a central role for primary care practitioners, have been shown to achieve high-quality, low-cost care for patients with chronic disease. We assessed the extent to which informal multispecialty physician networks in Ontario could be identified by using health administrative data to exploit natural linkages among patients, physicians, and hospitals based on existing patient flow. METHODS: We linked each Ontario resident to his or her usual provider of primary care over the period from fiscal year 2008/2009 to fiscal year 2010/2011. We linked each specialist to the hospital where he or she performed the most inpatient services. We linked each primary care physician to the hospital where most of his or her ambulatory patients were admitted for non-maternal medical care. Each resident was then linked to the same hospital as his or her usual provider of primary care. We computed "loyalty" as the proportion of care to network residents provided by physicians and hospitals within their network. Smaller clusters were aggregated to create networks based on a minimum population size, distance, and loyalty. Networks were not constrained geographically. RESULTS: We identified 78 multispecialty physician networks, comprising 12,410 primary care physicians, 14,687 specialists, and 175 acute care hospitals serving a total of 12,917,178 people. Median network size was 134,723 residents, 125 primary care physicians, and 143 specialists. Virtually all eligible residents were linked to a usual provider of primary care and to a network. Most specialists (93.5%) and primary care physicians (98.2%) were linked to a hospital. Median network physician loyalty was 68.4% for all physician visits and 81.1% for primary care visits. Median non-maternal admission loyalty was 67.4%. Urban networks had lower loyalties and were less self-contained but had more health care resources. INTERPRETATION: We demonstrated the feasibility of identifying informal multispecialty physician networks in Ontario on the basis of patterns of health care-seeking behaviour. Networks were reasonably self-contained, in that individual residents received most of their care from providers within their respective networks. Formal constitution of networks could foster accountability for efficient, integrated care through care management tools and quality improvement, the ideas behind "accountable care organizations."


Subject(s)
Accountable Care Organizations/organization & administration , Chronic Disease/therapy , Delivery of Health Care, Integrated/organization & administration , Physicians/organization & administration , Primary Health Care/organization & administration , Accountable Care Organizations/standards , Cluster Analysis , Community Networks , Delivery of Health Care, Integrated/standards , Disease Management , Group Practice/organization & administration , Group Practice/standards , Hospital-Physician Relations , Humans , Interprofessional Relations , Medical Record Linkage , Ontario , Patient Care Team/organization & administration , Patient Care Team/standards , Primary Health Care/standards , Specialization , Workforce
12.
CJEM ; 15(1): 34-41, 2013 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23283121

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Recently, many Canadian emergency departments (EDs) have struggled with physician staffing shortages. In 2006, the Ontario Ministry of Health and Long-Term Care funded a brief "emergency medicine primer" (EMP) course for family physicians to upgrade or refresh skills, with the goal of increasing their ED work intensity. We sought to determine the effect of the EMP on the ED work intensity of family physicians. METHODS: A retrospective longitudinal study was conducted of the ED work of 239 family physicians in the 2 years before and after a minimum of 6 months and up to 2 years from completing an EMP course in 2006 to 2008 compared to non-EMP physicians. ED work intensity was defined as the number of ED shifts per month and the number of ED patients seen per month. We conducted two analyses: a before and after comparison of all EMP physicians and a matched cohort analysis matching each EMP physician to four non-EMP physicians on sex, year of medical school graduation, rurality, and pre-EMP ED work intensity. RESULTS: Postcourse, EMP physicians worked 0.5 more ED shifts per month (13% increase, p  =  0.027). Compared to their matched controls, EMP physicians worked 0.7 more shifts per month (13% increase, p  =  0.0032) and saw 15 more patients per month (17% increase, p  =  0.0008) compared to matched non-EMP physicians. The greatest increases were among EMP physicians who were younger, were urban, had previous ED experience, or worked in a high-volume ED. The effect of the EMP course was negligible for physicians with no previous ED experience or working in rural areas. CONCLUSION: The EMP course is associated with modest increases in ED work intensity among some family physicians, in particular younger physicians in urban areas. No increase was seen among physicians without previous ED experience or working in rural areas.


Subject(s)
Emergency Medicine/education , Emergency Service, Hospital , Personnel Staffing and Scheduling/organization & administration , Physicians, Family/education , Adult , Clinical Competence , Curriculum , Education, Medical, Continuing/organization & administration , Female , Humans , Longitudinal Studies , Male , Middle Aged , Ontario , Program Evaluation , Retrospective Studies , Workforce
13.
Can Fam Physician ; 58(10): e578-87, 2012 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23064937

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To compare FP and GP performance of office-based procedures between urban and rural practices. DESIGN: Descriptive cohort study using health administrative data. SETTING: Ontario. PARTICIPANTS: All FPs and GPs who billed the Ontario Health Insurance Plan for at least 1 office-based procedure between January 1 and December 31, 2006 (N = 8648). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Ontario Health Insurance Plan billings for office-based procedures were adjusted by full-time equivalent (FTE) so that the means are for 1 FTE. Office-based procedures were grouped into 1) surgical procedures, 2) injections and immunizations, 3) electrocardiograms (ECGs), and 4) venipunctures and laboratory tests. The analyses were stratified for FP and GP age, sex, rurality of practice, and participation in a primary care model. RESULTS: There were no substantial differences between FPs and GPs in rural practices compared with those in more urban practices with respect to surgical procedures. Rural FPs and GPs had lower mean numbers of injections and immunizations, ECGs, and venipunctures and laboratory tests than FPs and GPs practising in urban areas. Family physicians and GPs in primary care models had a lower mean number of surgical procedures but a higher adjusted mean number of injections and immunizations, ECGs, and venipunctures and laboratory tests. CONCLUSION: For those procedures that are not dependent on specialist backup or access to more advanced technology, there were no substantial differences between rural and urban FPs and GPs. All comprehensive FPs and GPs should be able to provide these services to their patients. Training programs for all family medicine residents should ensure future FPs and GPs are able to perform these procedures.


Subject(s)
General Practice/statistics & numerical data , Practice Patterns, Physicians'/statistics & numerical data , Primary Health Care/statistics & numerical data , Rural Health Services/statistics & numerical data , Urban Health Services/statistics & numerical data , Ambulatory Surgical Procedures/statistics & numerical data , Cohort Studies , Diagnostic Tests, Routine/statistics & numerical data , Electrocardiography/statistics & numerical data , Humans , Injections/statistics & numerical data , Insurance Claim Reporting/classification , Insurance Claim Reporting/statistics & numerical data , Ontario , Phlebotomy/statistics & numerical data
15.
CMAJ ; 184(14): E765-73, 2012 Oct 02.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22908143

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Heart failure is a leading cause of admission to hospital, but whether the incidence of heart failure is increasing or decreasing is uncertain. We examined temporal trends in the incidence and outcomes of heart failure in Ontario, Canada. METHODS: Using population-based administrative databases of hospital discharge abstracts and physician health insurance claims, we identified 419 551 incident cases of heart failure in Ontario between Apr. 1, 1997, and Mar. 31, 2008. All patients were classified as either inpatients or outpatients based on the patient's location at the time of the initial diagnosis. We tracked subsequent outcomes through linked administrative databases. RESULTS: The age- and sex-standardized incidence of heart failure decreased 32.7% from 454.7 per 100 000 people in 1997 to 306.1 per 100 000 people in 2007 (p < 0.001). A comparable decrease in incidence occurred in both inpatient and outpatient settings. The greatest relative decrease occurred in patients aged 85 and over. Over the study period, 1-year risk-adjusted mortality decreased from 17.7% in 1997 to 16.2% in 2007 (p = 0.02) for outpatients, with a nonsignificant decrease from 35.7% in 1997 to 33.8% in 2007 (p = 0.1) for inpatients. INTERPRETATION: The incidence of heart failure decreased substantially during the study period. Nevertheless, the prognosis for patients with heart failure remains poor and is associated with high mortality.


Subject(s)
Heart Failure/epidemiology , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Female , Heart Failure/mortality , Hospitalization/trends , Humans , Incidence , Male , Middle Aged , Ontario/epidemiology , Prognosis , Young Adult
16.
BMC Fam Pract ; 13: 26, 2012 Mar 28.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22453049

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: There are continued concerns over an adequate supply of family physicians (FPs) practicing in Canada. While most resource planning has focused on intake into postgraduate education, less information is available on what postgraduate medical training yields. We therefore undertook a study of Family Medicine (FM) graduates from the University of Toronto (U of T) to determine the type of information for physician resource planning that may come from tracking FM graduates using health administrative data. This study compared three cohorts of FM graduates over a 10 year period of time and it also compared FM graduates to all Ontario practicing FPs in 2005/06. The objectives for tracking the three cohorts of FM graduates were to: 1) describe where FM graduates practice in the province 2) examine the impact of a policy introduced to influence the distribution of new FM graduates in the province 3) describe the services provided by FM graduates and 4) compare workload measures. The objectives for the comparison of FM graduates to all practicing FPs in 2005/06 were to: 1) describe the patient population served by FM graduates, 2) compare workload of FM graduates to all practicing FPs. METHODS: The study cohort consisted of all U of T FM postgraduate trainees who started and completed their training between 1993 and 2003. This study was a descriptive record linkage study whereby postgraduate information for FM graduates was linked to provincial health administrative data. Comprehensiveness of care indicators and workload measures based on administrative data where determined for the study cohort. RESULTS: From 1993 to 2003 there were 857 University of Toronto FM graduates. While the majority of U of T FM graduates practice in Toronto or the surrounding Greater Toronto Area, there are FM graduates from U of T practicing in every region in Ontario, Canada. The proportion of FM graduates undertaking further emergency training had doubled from 3.6% to 7.8%. From 1993 to 2003, a higher proportion of the most recent FM graduates did hospital visits, emergency room care and a lower proportion undertook home visits. Male FM graduates appear to have had higher workloads compared with female FM graduates, though the difference between them was decreasing over time. A 1997 policy initiative to discount fees paid to new FPs practicing in areas deemed over supplied did result in a decrease in the proportion of FM graduates practicing in metropolitan areas. CONCLUSIONS: We were able to profile the practices of FM graduates using existing and routinely collected population-based health administrative data. Further work tracking FM graduates could be helpful for physician resource forecasting and in examining the impact of policies on family medicine practice.


Subject(s)
Education, Medical, Graduate , Family Practice/education , Professional Practice Location , Adult , Cohort Studies , Comprehensive Health Care/statistics & numerical data , Female , Health Planning , Health Services Needs and Demand , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Ontario , Physicians, Family/supply & distribution , Physicians, Family/trends , Workforce , Workload/statistics & numerical data
17.
Healthc Policy ; 8(2): 30-6, 2012 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23968613

ABSTRACT

We used data collected in the 2010 National Physician Survey and public payment data published in the Institute for Clinical and Evaluative Sciences report Payments to Ontario Physicians from Ministry of Health and Long-Term Care Sources 1992/93 to 2009/10 to estimate 2009/2010 net physician income from public payments for Ontario physicians by specialty. Incorporating overhead substantially affects estimates of physician income and changes relative position. For example, ophthalmologists were ranked second when only public payments were considered but eighth when overhead was included. Conversely, hospital-based specialties such as anaesthesia, radiation oncology and emergency medicine rank significantly higher after overhead is included.


Subject(s)
Physicians/economics , Reimbursement Mechanisms/economics , Fees and Charges/statistics & numerical data , Financing, Government/economics , Financing, Government/statistics & numerical data , Humans , Income/statistics & numerical data , Long-Term Care/economics , Medicine/statistics & numerical data , Ontario
18.
Ann Thorac Surg ; 91(2): 361-6, 2011 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21256270

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Surgery is the primary curative treatment for lung cancer and thus appropriate surgical resource allocation is critical. This study describes the distribution of lung cancer incidence and surgical care in Ontario, a Canadian province with universal health care, for the fiscal year of 2004. METHODS: All new lung cancer cases in Ontario between April 1, 2003 and March 31, 2004 were identified in the Ontario Cancer Registry. Incidence rates and surgical procedures were compared by age, health region, neighborhood income, and community size. RESULTS: Lung cancer incidence was highest in lower income neighborhoods (90.2 cases of 100,000 vs 55.6 in the highest quintile, p < 0.001) and smaller communities (87.1 of 100,000 in communities less than 100,000 vs 56.3 of 100,000 in cities greater than 1.25 million, p < 0.001). Surgical interventions were most common in younger patients (47.4% aged 20 to 54 years versus 30.5% greater than 75 years, p < 0.001), and those in wealthier neighborhoods (43.4% in highest quintile versus 35.8% in the lowest, p < 0.001). Surgical procedures overall and specifically formal resections (20% in cities >1.25 million versus 18% in communities <100,000, p < 0.03) were more common in larger communities (43.4% versus 37.7%, p < 0.001). Pneumonectomy was more common in smaller communities (14.5% vs 9.9%, p = 0.048, whereas more lobar (53.8 vs 45.2%, p = 0.01) and sublobar resections (44.9% vs 31.7%, p < 0.0001) were more common in larger communities. Thoracic surgeons provided the majority of formal resections (51% to 57%) compared with general surgeons (17% to 21%). CONCLUSIONS: Lung cancer incidence and surgical care vary significantly by health region, income level, and community size. These disparities require further evaluation to meet the needs of patients with lung cancer.


Subject(s)
Lung Neoplasms/epidemiology , Lung Neoplasms/surgery , Resource Allocation/methods , Adult , Aged , Bronchoscopy/statistics & numerical data , Female , General Surgery/methods , General Surgery/statistics & numerical data , Hospitals/classification , Humans , Incidence , Male , Mediastinoscopy/statistics & numerical data , Middle Aged , Ontario/epidemiology , Palliative Care/methods , Pleurodesis/statistics & numerical data , Pneumonectomy/statistics & numerical data , Registries , Socioeconomic Factors , Thoracic Surgery/methods , Thoracic Surgery/statistics & numerical data , Thoracoscopy/statistics & numerical data , Thoracostomy/statistics & numerical data , Young Adult
19.
Can J Gastroenterol ; 21(7): 431-4, 2007 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17637944

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To conduct a population-based study on the provision of large bowel endoscopic services in Ontario. METHODS: Data from the following databases were analyzed: the Ontario Health Insurance Plan, the Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences Physicians Database and Statistics Canada. The flexible sigmoidoscopy and colonoscopy rates per 10,000 persons (50 to 74 years of age) by region between April 1, 2001, and March 31, 2002, were calculated, as well as the numbers and types of physicians who performed each procedure. RESULTS: In 2001/2002, a total of 172,108 colonoscopies and 43,400 flexible sigmoidoscopies were performed in Ontario for all age groups. The colonoscopy rate was approximately five times that of flexible sigmoidoscopy; rates varied from 463.1 colonoscopies per 10,000 people in the north to 286.8 colonoscopies per 10,000 people in the east. Gastroenterologists in all regions tended to perform more procedures per physician, but because of the large number of general surgeons, the total number of procedures performed by each group was almost the same. CONCLUSION: Population-based rates of colonoscopies and flexible sigmoidoscopies are low in Ontario, as are the procedure volumes of approximately one-quarter of physicians.


Subject(s)
Colonoscopy/statistics & numerical data , Colorectal Neoplasms/diagnosis , Health Services Accessibility , Practice Patterns, Physicians'/statistics & numerical data , Aged , Colorectal Neoplasms/epidemiology , Colorectal Neoplasms/therapy , Databases, Factual , Female , Health Maintenance Organizations , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Ontario/epidemiology , Population Surveillance , Sigmoidoscopy/statistics & numerical data
20.
Am J Epidemiol ; 161(8): 787-98, 2005 Apr 15.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15800272

ABSTRACT

Smoking-attributable mortality (SAM) is the number of deaths in a population caused by smoking. In this study, the authors examined and empirically quantified the effects of methodological problems in the estimation of SAM through population attributable fraction methods. In addition to exploring common concerns regarding generalizability and residual confounding in relative risks, the authors considered errors in measuring estimates of risk exposure prevalence and mortality in target populations and estimates of relative risks from etiologic studies. They also considered errors resulting from combining these three sources of data. By modifying SAM estimates calculated using smoking prevalence obtained from the 2000-2001 Canadian Community Health Survey, a population-based survey of 131,535 Canadian households, the authors observed the following effects of potential errors on estimated national SAM (and the range of effects on 87 regional SAMs): 1) using a slightly biased, mismatched definition of former smoking: 5.3% (range, 1.8% to 11.6%); 2) using age-collapsed prevalence and relative risks: 6.9% (range, 1.1% to 15.5%) and -15.4% (range, -7.9% to -21.0%), respectively; 3) using relative risks derived from the same cohort but with a shorter follow-up period: 8.7% (range, 4.5% to 11.8%); 4) using relative risks for all diseases with age-collapsed prevalence: 49.7% (range, 24.1% to 82.2%); and 5) using prevalence estimates unadjusted for exposure-outcome lag: -14.5% (range, -20.8% to 42.6%) to -1.4% (range, -0.8% to -2.7%), depending on the method of adjustment. Applications of the SAM estimation method should consider these sources of potential error.


Subject(s)
Smoking/mortality , Canada/epidemiology , Female , Humans , Male , Population , Risk Assessment , Risk Factors , Smoking/epidemiology , Survival Analysis
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...