Opinion & Special Articles: Navigating Your First Academic Job Search. Pearls, Pitfalls, and Lessons Learned

Most graduating neurology residents plan to pursue an academic career after completing residency or fellowship training. Although a career in academic neurology has many benefits, the path to finding the right first academic job can be challenging. For many, this may be their first professional job, and finding an ideal academic position requires a tailored approach, focus, timeline, and scope. In this article, we outline a roadmap for navigating the first academic job search after neurology training and share pearls and pitfalls related to the job search.

The Neurology Fellowship Application Conundrum: Finding Common Ground.

For many neurologic subspecialties, the fellowship application process begins early in the first half of the second year of neurology-specific training (PGY3 for adult neurology residents and PGY4 for child neurology residents). In 2019, the American Academy of Neurology (AAN) published a position statement recommending communication between fellowship candidates and training programs begin no sooner than March 1 of the penultimate year of training and that programs offer fellowship positions no sooner than August 1 of the final year of training. A few pilot subspecialties adopted this timeline for 2021 recruitment for positions beginning in 2022. All United States-based AAN-affiliated neurology and child neurology residents who recently completed the fellowship application process received a survey about their fellowship application experience. Of the 291 residents who responded to the survey, 96% agree that applications should not be submitted before March 1 of the penultimate year of training and 72% believe that August 1 of the final year is a reasonable time to begin offering positions. Nearly half (49%) of residents believe that there is too little time for subspecialty/clinical exposure before applying for fellowship and 88% feel the current process and timeline are stressful. Residents who applied to programs in pilot subspecialties report more time to choose, less stress, and a lower number of time-pressured offers. A large majority of residents (89%) prefer to submit a single application through a centralized system. The survey results suggest that residents who just completed the fellowship application process agree with the AAN recommended timeline for all subspecialties and that all neurology subspecialties should consider adopting a fellowship match. Programs can help facilitate a better fellowship application experience by providing earlier exposure to a broad range of neurologic subspecialties and ensure that residents are given opportunities to attend national meetings and participate in appropriately scoped scholarly endeavors.

Immigrant Neurologists in the United States: The Path of Most Resistance.

International Medical Graduates (IMGs), individuals who graduated from medical school outside of the United States or Canada, constitute 31.3% of active neurologists and one-third of current neurology trainees. While three-fourths of IMG neurology trainees are not U.S. citizens, they are an integral part of our trainee and practice workforce. IMGs play a vital role in providing greater access to healthcare for millions of patients, particularly in traditionally underserved regions and in the face of a current global healthcare crisis.With this article, we outline some of the unique challenges faced by immigrant, U.S.-trained neurologists as they seek to provide neurological care across the country, including preparing and applying for residency, securing authorization to remain in the U.S. to practice, and positioning themselves for successful careers in academic and private practice. We also call for advocacy and legislation to help reduce these barriers as a means to address the increasing physician workforce gap.

Identifying Gaps and Missed Opportunities for Intravenous Thrombolytic Treatment of Inpatient Stroke.

Background: Inpatient stroke-codes (ISC) have traditionally seen low treatment rates with IV-thrombolytic (IVT). The purpose of this study was to identify the predictors of true stroke, prevalent IVT-treatment gap and study the factors associated with such missed treatment opportunities (MTO). Methods: A retrospective chart review identified ISC from March 2017 to March 2018. Clinical, radiographic and demographic data were collected. Primary analysis was performed between stroke vs. non-stroke diagnoses. Dichotomous variables were analyzed using Chi-Square test of proportions and continuous variables with Wilcoxon-Ranked-Sum test. Significant factors were then tested in a multivariate logistic regression model for independence. Results: From 211 ISC, 36% (n = 76) had an acute stroke. Hemorrhagic stroke (HS) was present in 5.7% (n = 12). Of the remaining 199, 44% (n = 87) were IVT-eligible but only 3.4% (n = 3) were treated. Of the remaining 84 IVT-eligible-but-untreated patients, 69(82.1%) were mimics, while 15 (17.9%) had an ischemic stroke (IS), constituting a MTO of 1 in 6 IVT-eligible patients, with National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) ≤4 being the commonest deterrent. Independent predictors of stroke were ejection fraction (EF) <30% (p = 0.030, OR = 3.06), post-operative status (p = 0.001, OR = 3.71), visual field-cut (p = 0.008, OR = 3.70), and facial droop (p = 0.010, OR = 2.59). Conclusion: In our study, one in three ISC were true strokes. IVT treatment rates were low with a MTO of 1 in 6 IVT-eligible patients. The most common reason for not treating was NIHSS ≤4. Knowing predictors of true stroke and the common barriers to IVT treatment can help narrow this treatment gap.

2017 Program Director Survey: Feedback from your adult neurology residency leadership.

OBJECTIVE: To survey adult neurology program directors (PDs) and inform the future development of neurology training programs. METHODS: All US adult neurology PDs were invited to complete the survey. The goals were to determine the demographic makeup of residency programs, characterize curricula, understand PD and program needs, and compare results to those of a similar survey in 2007. RESULTS: The response rate was 70.6%. PD demographics for age, faculty track status, and academic rank remain unchanged over the last decade. The proportion of female PDs and assistant PDs has increased significantly. The mean number of residents per training program has also increased significantly. Female PDs are more likely to have a junior academic rank than their male colleagues. Disparities remain between the PDs' time spent on teaching/program administration and salary support. Most PDs support moving fellowship applications later in the training cycle. The majority of PDs find the Clinical Competency Committee process useful in assessing resident competence. A minority of PDs feel that the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education Milestones meet their intended purpose. Half of programs include a curriculum to supplement the clinical experience on child neurology rotations. A third of programs include a supplemental curriculum for psychiatry rotations. The majority of programs offer a general fund for residents to use to support their education. CONCLUSION: Deficiencies exist in compensation for PDs' teaching and administrative time and for academic promotion for female PDs. These results serve as a benchmark for comparison across programs and the basis to advocate for further improvements and support for neurology residency training.

Heredity, genes, and headache.

It is well recognized that headache, and especially migraine, runs in families. Recent studies into the heritability of primary headache subtypes, migraine, cluster and tension headache, and conditions in which headache is a prominent feature, such as the mitochondrial disease, mitochondrial encephalopathy, lactic acidosis, and strokelike episodes, and the arteriopathy, cerebral autosomal-dominant arteriopathy with subcortical infarctions and leukoencephalopathy, are improving our understanding of the genetic contribution to headache. Studies of the rare familial hemiplegic migraine are leading to advances in understanding the pathophysiological mechanisms of the more common migraine types. Current knowledge of hereditary and genetic features of headache subtypes is reviewed and the implications for understanding the pathophysiology of migraine are discussed.