A Randomized Thorough QT Study of Apomorphine Sublingual Film in Patients With Parkinson's Disease.

A randomized thorough QT study was conducted to assess the effects of apomorphine sublingual film (SL-APO) on corrected QT interval (QTc) and other cardiac conduction parameters in patients with Parkinson's disease (PD) and "OFF" episodes. Patients were titrated to an SL-APO dose that resulted in FULL "ON," followed by up to two additional doses (maximum 60 mg), then randomized at the highest tolerated dose to a treatment sequence of SL-APO, placebo, and moxifloxacin (400 mg, positive control) in a three-way crossover design. Changes from baseline in time-matched, placebo-adjusted Fridericia-corrected QTc interval (ΔΔQTcF) and Bazett-corrected QTc interval (ΔΔQTcB) were analyzed from postdose electrocardiograms. Forty patients were randomized and received single doses of study treatments. Upper limits of 90% confidence intervals (CIs) for ΔΔQTcF of SL-APO were below the 10-millisecond regulatory threshold at all prespecified timepoints, demonstrating no clinically significant effect on QTcF. Lower limits of 90% CIs for ΔΔQTcF of moxifloxacin exceeded the 5-millisecond regulatory threshold at all timepoints up to 3 hours, confirming assay sensitivity. SL-APO had no clinically meaningful effects on QTcB, PR/QRS intervals, heart rate, or electrocardiogram-derived morphology (EudraCT identifier: 2016-001762-29; ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03187301).

Dose optimization of apomorphine sublingual film for treating "OFF" episodes in Parkinson's disease.

INTRODUCTION: Apomorphine sublingual film is approved for the "on-demand" treatment of "OFF" episodes in Parkinson's disease (PD). Patients must undergo dose titration to determine their most effective and tolerable dose. We assessed whether higher doses than those that provide an initial "ON" response could yield more effective treatment. METHODS: Patients with PD were assessed in the "OFF" state and the apomorphine sublingual film dose was titrated to a level that provided a tolerable "ON" response. The dose was then increased by up to two dose levels, if tolerated. A comparison in the Movement Disorder Society Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (MDS-UPDRS) Part III scores was made following administration of the dose that provided the initial "ON" response and following the higher dose. Treatment-emergent adverse events were also reported. RESULTS: Thirty-five patients were titrated to higher apomorphine sublingual film doses than those that provided an initial "ON" response. A mean improvement in MDS-UPDRS Part III score was observed compared with the initial dose of 5.6 points (P = 0.034), 4.4 points (P = 0.009), and 3.7 points (P = 0.018) at 30, 60, and 90 min postdose, respectively. Adverse events were mild or moderate and resolved with dose reduction without concomitant treatment. CONCLUSION: Higher doses of apomorphine sublingual film than those initially perceived to provide an "ON" response can be tolerated and provide additional improvement in motor function in many patients.

Apomorphine sublingual film for off episodes in Parkinson's disease: a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase 3 study.

BACKGROUND: Many patients with Parkinson's disease have potentially disabling off episodes that are not predictably responsive to levodopa. In this study, we assessed the safety and efficacy of apomorphine sublingual film as an on-demand therapy for off episodes in patients with Parkinson's disease. METHODS: This randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled study was done by movement disorder specialists at 32 sites in the USA and one in Canada. Patients with Parkinson's disease who had 2 h or more of off time per day with predictable morning off periods, were responsive to levodopa, and were on stable doses of anti-parkinsonian medication were eligible. In an open-label titration phase, increasing doses of apomorphine sublingual film (10-35 mg) were administered until a tolerable full on response was achieved. Patients were then randomly assigned (1:1) with an interactive web-response system to receive the effective dose of apomorphine sublingual film or matching placebo in a 12-week, double-blind maintenance phase. Randomisation was not stratified, and the block size was four. All patients and study personnel were masked to treatment assignments. The primary endpoint was the in-clinic change from predose to 30 min post-dose in the Movement Disorder Society Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (MDS-UPDRS) part 3 (motor) score at week 12, analysed on a modified intention-to-treat population by use of a mixed-effect model for repeated measures. Safety analyses were done on all enrolled patients who received at least one dose of study medication. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02469090. FINDINGS: Between June 18, 2015, and Dec 11, 2017, 109 patients were enrolled and randomly assigned to receive apomorphine sublingual film (n=54) or placebo (n=55). All patients received the assigned study treatment, and 34 (63%) of 54 patients receiving apomorphine sublingual film and 46 (84%) of 55 receiving placebo completed the study. Least squares mean (SE) change from predose to 30 min post-dose in MDS-UPDRS part 3 score at week 12 was -11·1 (SE 1·46, 95% CI -14·0 to -8·2) with apomorphine sublingual film and -3·5 (1·29, -6·1 to -0·9) with placebo (difference -7·6, SE 1·96, 95% CI -11·5 to -3·7; p=0·0002). Mild-to-moderate oropharyngeal events were the most common side-effect, reported in 17 (31%) of 54 patients receiving apomorphine sublingual film and in four (7%) of 55 patients receiving placebo, leading to treatment discontinuation in nine (17%) patients treated with apomorphine and in one (2%) patient treated with placebo. Other treatment-emergent adverse events were transient nausea (in 15 [28%] patients receiving apomorphine sublingual film), somnolence (seven [13%]), and dizziness (five [9%]). Orthostatic hypotension, syncope, dyskinesia, hallucinations, prolongation of the QT interval, and impulse control disorders were infrequent (prevalence ≤2% of all patients) or did not occur. One patient treated with apomorphine sublingual film (with known cardiac risk factors) had a fatal cardiac arrest. INTERPRETATION: Although nearly a third of patients discontinued treatment primarily because of oropharyngeal side-effects, apomorphine sublingual film provided an efficacious, on-demand treatment for off episodes for most patients with Parkinson's disease in this trial. The long-term safety and efficacy of apomorphine sublingual film are currently being investigated. FUNDING: Cynapsus Therapeutics and Sunovion.