Small bowel intussusception - aetiology & management.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Adult small bowel intussusception (SBI) differs in incidence, symptomatology and management from the more commonly encountered paediatric intussusception. This review spans across the multitude of causes of adult SBI, and summarises the diagnostic work-up and management options according to recent literature. RECENT FINDINGS: There has been an increase in use of small bowel capsule endoscopy and point-of-care ultrasound for the diagnosis of acute adult SBI. SUMMARY: A high degree of suspicion of a malignant cause of SBI is required in the adult population. Alarm clinical features include weight loss, history of malignancy, and iron deficiency anaemia. CT remains the gold standard imaging technique as it may identify the lead point and thus aid in endoscopic or surgical management. If malignancy is excluded and no lead point is identified, serology and histology may be helpful to look for inflammatory, infective and autoimmune aetiology.

Management of small bowel angioectasias diagnosed during video capsule endoscopy.

Small bowel angioectasias (SBA) are vascular malformations consisting of thin-walled, dilated capillaries located in the gastrointestinal mucosa. They are responsible for 10% of all causes of gastrointestinal bleeding and 60% of small bowel bleeding pathologies. The diagnosis and management of SBA depend upon bleeding acuity, patient stability and patient characteristics. Small bowel capsule endoscopy is a relatively noninvasive diagnostic approach ideal for non-obstructed and hemodynamically stable patients. It is superior to computed tomography scans in visualizing mucosal lesions, such as angioectasias, as it provides mucosal views. Management of these lesions will depend on the patient's clinical condition and associated comorbidities, and very often consists of medical and/or endoscopic treatment delivered through small bowel enteroscopy.

An Updated Comparative Study on the Impact of COVID-19 Infection and Vaccination in Patients with Inflammatory Bowel Disease and Irritable Bowel Syndrome.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: This study assessed the differences in swabbing rates, vaccine uptake, COVID-19 infection, hospitalization rates and outcomes in patients suffering from inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) on immunomodulation and patients diagnosed with irritable bowel syndrome (IBS). METHODS: A population consisting of 250 IBD and 250 IBS patients was randomly selected from the local database. Apart from demographic data, the following data was collected: number of COVID-19 swabs taken, vaccination rates, type of vaccine administered, infection secondary to COVID-19, hospitalization and outcomes. RESULTS: IBD patients performed significantly more swabs tests for SARS-CoV-2 detection compared with IBS patients in both phases of the study. Whilst the IBS cohort recorded a larger number of COVID-19 infection and less hospitalisations whilst infected, IBD patients had a better outcome whilst infected since hospitalisation reason in the latter was not related to COVID-19 infection. IBD patients had a larger uptake of COVID-19 vaccines. CONCLUSIONS: This study was the first of its nature locally and internationally as it compared two unrelated cohorts of patients followed up in gastroenterology. Vaccination rates in both cohorts were higher than those reported internationally. In concordance with international studies, IBD patients are not at an increased risk of worse outcomes from COVID-19 infection compared to non-IBD cohorts.