Percutaneous tibial nerve stimulation effects on detrusor overactivity incontinence are not due to a placebo effect: a randomized, double-blind, placebo controlled trial.

PURPOSE: This is a prospective, double-blind, placebo controlled study, based on an original placebo technique, performed to evaluate the efficacy of percutaneous tibial nerve stimulation in female patients with detrusor overactivity incontinence. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 35 female patients presenting with detrusor overactivity incontinence that did not respond to antimuscarinic therapy were randomly assigned to percutaneous tibial nerve stimulation or to a control group. The percutaneous tibial nerve stimulation group (18 patients) was treated with 12 percutaneous tibial nerve stimulation sessions. The control group (17 patients) received an original placebo treatment using a 34 gauge needle placed in the medial part of the gastrocnemius muscle. The sessions lasted for 30 minutes and were performed 3 times weekly as percutaneous tibial nerve stimulation sessions. All patients were evaluated with bladder diaries as well as quality of life scores before and after treatment. Patients showing a reduction in urge incontinence episodes greater than 50% were considered responders. RESULTS: Some patients (1 in the percutaneous tibial nerve stimulation group and 2 in the placebo group) did not complete the study for reasons not related to the technique. Of 17 patients in the percutaneous tibial nerve stimulation group 12 (71%) and of 15 in placebo group 0 were considered responders according to the previously reported definition (p <0.001). Improvement in the number of incontinence episodes, number of voids, voided volume and incontinence quality of life score were statistically significant in the percutaneous tibial nerve stimulation group but not in the placebo group. CONCLUSIONS: Percutaneous tibial nerve stimulation can be considered an effective treatment for detrusor overactivity incontinence with 71% of patients considered responders, while none of those treated with placebo was considered a responder. The relevance of a placebo effect seems to be negligible in this patient population.

Effects of inhibitory rTMS on bladder function in Parkinson's disease patients.

Patients affected by Parkinson's disease (PD) may present with lower urinary tract (LUT) dysfunction characterized by involuntary detrusor overactivity. We evaluated possible impact of a 2-week course of low frequency 1 Hz repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) on LUT behavior in eight advanced PD patients complaining of urinary disturbances. We tested the effects of rTMS measuring urodynamic examination and the International Prostate Symptoms Score (IPSS) questionnaire, used for evaluation of subjective LUTS. rTMS was able to improve temporarily LUT behavior in PD patients, increasing bladder capacity and the first sensation of filling phase. Moreover, a reduction of IPSS score was noticed, due to an improvement on filling phase symptoms. The beneficial effects assessed with the IPSS lasted for up to 2 weeks after the end of the stimulation. rTMS seems to be an effective, noninvasive alternative treatment for PD patients with urinary disturbances.

Percutaneous tibial nerve stimulation produces effects on brain activity: study on the modifications of the long latency somatosensory evoked potentials.

OBJECTIVE: Long-latency somatosensory evoked potentials (LL-SEP) provide information on the function of somatosensory cortical structures. Percutaneous tibial nerve stimulation (PTNS) is indicated in the treatment of lower urinary tract dysfunction. Aim of this study was to evaluate LL-SEP in patients with overactive bladder syndrome (OAB) treated by means of PTNS. METHODS: Sixteen female patients with a diagnosis of pharmacoresistant OAB underwent PTNS while eight female patients with the same diagnosis underwent sham stimulation. LL-SEP were performed at baseline and at the end of PTNS or sham stimulation. Peak latency and peak to peak amplitude of P80, P100, and P200 waves were measured. RESULTS: Mean latency of P80, P100, and P200 and mean amplitude of P200 did not show any significant change after both stimulation. Mean amplitude of P80 and P100 waves increased significantly after PTNS while it did not vary after sham stimulation. CONCLUSION: The P80 and P100 amplitude increase might reflect long-term modifications in synaptic efficiency through the somatosensory pathway. The plastic reorganization of cortical network triggered by peripheral neuromodulation can be hypothesized as a mechanism of action of PTNS. Further studies are needed to correlate LL-SEP modifications after PTNS with the success of the treatment.