Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 4 de 4
Filter
1.
J Can Health Libr Assoc ; 43(1): 12-27, 2022 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35950080

ABSTRACT

Introduction: Libraries have provided mediated search services for more than forty years without a practice standard to guide the execution of searches, training of searchers, or evaluation of search performance. A pan-Canadian group of librarians completed a study of the literature on mediated search practices from 2014-2017 as a first step in addressing this deficit. Methods: We used a three-phase, six-part content analysis process to examine and analyze published guidance on literature searching. Card sorting, Delphi methods, and an online questionnaire were then used to validate our findings and build a code of practice. Results: Our code of practice for mediated searching lists eighty-five search tasks arranged in performance order, within five progressive levels of search complexity. A glossary of 150 search terms supports the code of practice. Discussion: The research literature on mediated search methods is sparse and fragmented, lacking currency and a shared vocabulary. A code of practice for mediated searching will provide clarity in terminology, approach, and methods. This code of practice will provide a unified and convenient reference for training a new hire, upholding standards of search service delivery, or educating the next wave of health library professionals.

2.
Thromb Haemost ; 120(4): 702-713, 2020 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32289865

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Knowing the case fatality rates of recurrent venous thromboembolism (VTE) and major bleeding is important for weighing the relative risks and benefits of anticoagulation and deciding on the duration of anticoagulant therapy, but these rates are uncertain in patients with cancer-associated thrombosis. METHODS: We performed a systematic review and a meta-analysis to determine the incidence of recurrent VTE and major bleeding and their respective case fatality rates in patients with cancer-associated VTE. RESULTS: Our analysis included 29 studies (15 prospective cohort studies and 14 randomized controlled trials) from 1980 to January 2019. Data from 8,000 cancer patients with 4,786 patient-years of follow-up were summarized. Rates of recurrent VTE and fatal recurrent VTE were 23.7 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 20.1-27.8) and 1.9 (95% CI: 0.8-4.0) per 100 patient-years of follow-up, respectively, with a case fatality rate of 14.8% (95% CI: 6.6-30.1%). The rates of major bleeding and fatal major bleeding events were 13.1 (95% CI: 10.3-16.7) and 0.8 (95% CI: 0.3-2.1) per 100 patient-years of follow-up, respectively, with a case fatality rate of 8.9% (95% CI: 3.5-21.1%). While the estimates of case fatality vary by anticoagulation regimen and study design, the differences between them were not statistically significant. CONCLUSION: In cancer patients receiving anticoagulation, the case fatality rate of recurrent VTE is higher than the case fatality rate of major bleeding. These findings may help to inform decisions regarding the management of anticoagulation in patients with active cancer and VTE.


Subject(s)
Hemorrhage/epidemiology , Neoplasms/epidemiology , Venous Thromboembolism/epidemiology , Anticoagulants/therapeutic use , Clinical Trials as Topic , Hemorrhage/mortality , Humans , Incidence , Mortality , Neoplasms/mortality , Recurrence , Risk Assessment , Venous Thromboembolism/mortality
3.
Pain Physician ; 23(2): E163-E174, 2020 03.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32214293

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Acute pain management in patients on buprenorphine opioid agonist therapy (BOAT) can be challenging. It is unclear whether BOAT should be continued or interrupted for optimization of postoperative pain control. OBJECTIVES: To determine an evidence-based approach for pain management in patients on BOAT in the perioperative setting, particularly whether BOAT should be continued or interrupted with or without bridging to another mu opioid agonist and to identify benefits and harms of either perioperative strategy. STUDY DESIGN: Systematic literature review with qualitative data synthesis. SETTING: Hospital, perioperative. METHODS: The study protocol was registered on PROSPERO (Registration number 9030276355). Medline via OVID, EMBASE, CINAHL, and the Cochrane CENTRAL register of trials were searched for prospective or retrospective observational or controlled studies, case series, and case reports that described perioperative or acute pain care for patients on BOAT. References of narrative and systematic reviews addressing acute pain management in patients on BOAT and references of included articles were hand-searched to identify additional original articles for inclusion. The full text of publications were reviewed for final inclusion, and data were extracted using a standardized data extraction form. Results were summarized qualitatively. Primary outcomes were postoperative pain intensity and total opioid use and identification of benefits and harms of perioperative strategies. RESULTS: Eighteen publications presenting data on the perioperative management of patients on BOAT were identified: 10 case reports, 5 case series, and 3 retrospective cohort studies. Eleven articles reported continuation of BOAT, 2 concerned bridging BOAT, and 4 articles described stopping BOAT without planned bridging. In one retrospective cohort study, BOAT was continued in half and interrupted in half of patients. Patients on BOAT may have pain that is more difficult to treat than those who are not on OAT. There is no clear evidence that one particular strategy provides superior postoperative pain control, but interruption of BOAT may result in harm, including failure to return to baseline BOAT doses, continuing non-BOAT opioid use, or relapse of opioid use disorder. LIMITATIONS: There were a limited number of articles relevant to the study question consisting of case reports and retrospective observational studies. Some omitted relevant details. No prospective studies were found. CONCLUSIONS: There is no clear benefit to bridging or stopping BOAT but failure to restart it may pose concerns for relapse. We recommend continuing BOAT in the perioperative period when possible and incorporating an interdisciplinary approach with multimodal analgesia. KEY WORDS: Opioid use disorder, opiate substitution treatment, buprenorphine, buprenorphine-naloxone, buprenorphine opioid agonist therapy, postoperative pain, acute pain, multimodal analgesia.


Subject(s)
Analgesics, Opioid/administration & dosage , Buprenorphine/administration & dosage , Opiate Substitution Treatment/methods , Opioid-Related Disorders/drug therapy , Pain Management/methods , Pain, Postoperative/drug therapy , Drug Administration Schedule , Humans , Observational Studies as Topic/methods , Opiate Substitution Treatment/trends , Opioid-Related Disorders/epidemiology , Pain, Postoperative/epidemiology , Prospective Studies , Retrospective Studies
4.
Trib. méd. (Bogotá) ; 78(7): 19-21, oct. 1988. tab
Article in Spanish | LILACS | ID: lil-84365

ABSTRACT

Los pacientes con alteraciones tromboembolicas recidivantes o infrecuentes pueden tener anormalidades en el proceso de regulacion de la hemostasis, como consecuencia de deficiencias hereditarias o adquiridas de antitrombina III, proteina C o proteina S. En estos casos el medico requiere de suficientes conocimientos del proceso de coagulacion y suspicacia a fin de establecer el diagnostico. Mediante el tratamiento anticoagulante apropiado y oportuno se puede salvar la vida de estos pacientes


Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Female , Thromboembolism , Antithrombin III/physiology , Protein C/physiology , Thromboembolism/diagnosis
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...