Analysis of the reliability of KEOPS version 2 for the measurement of coronal and sagittal parameters in spinal deformity.

BACKGROUND: The purpose of the study is to evaluate the updated version of this software in patients with various spinal deformity. METHODS: Sixty patients were included in this study and were divided into three categories: 20 patients with AIS, 20 patients with ASD, and 20 patients having undergone corrective surgery for spinal deformity. The measurements were performed by two senior and two junior orthopedic surgery residents, and were done at two points in time separated by a 3-week interval with the cases being randomized every time to reduce the risk of memory bias. Measured parameters included coronal, sagittal, global alignment parameters, and pelvic parameters. RESULTS: When assessing the inter- and intra-observer reliability across all the groups of patients, none of the coefficients was smaller than 0.8 with a very high level of agreement. The standard error ranged from 0.7° to 1.5° demonstrating a high level of accuracy. Fairly similar results were seen when the groups were divided into the three categories except for the post-operative groups where a strong and not perfect level of agreement was reported. CONCLUSION: This is the first study to assess the reproducibility of the new version of KEOPS, showing a very high agreement in all measurements. In the post-operative group, although it showed a strong agreement, the lower performance can be explained by the presence of surgical material making it harder to identify the anatomical landmarks accurately. Nevertheless, we can recommend the usage of this software in a clinical setting.

Dual Versus Single Attending Surgeon Performance of Spinal Deformity Surgery? A Meta-Analysis.

BACKGROUND: The inclusion of 2 surgeons in spinal deformity surgery is considered beneficial by some. In fact, select studies indicate advantages such as reduced operation time and blood loss. Another observed decreased patient morbidity with a dual-surgeon approach, attributed to shorter operative times and reduced intraoperative blood losses. Therefore, this meta-analysis will assess the benefits of a having 2 surgeons compared to 1 surgeon during spine surgeries. METHODS: PubMed, Cochrane, and Google Scholar (page 1-20) were searched till January 2024. The clinical outcomes evaluated were the incidence of adverse events, the rate of transfusion, reoperation, and surgery-related parameters such as operative room time, length of stay (LOS), and estimated blood loss. RESULTS: Thirteen studies were included. A greater rate of complications was seen in patients operated upon by 1 surgeon (odds ratio = 0.50; 95% confidence intervals [CI]: 0.25-0.99, P = 0.05). Furthermore, operative room time (mean differences = -82.73; 95% CI: -111.42 to -54.03, P < 0.001) and LOS (mean differences = -0.91; 95% CI: -1.12 to -0.71, P < 0.001) were reduced in the dual surgeon scenario. No statistically significant difference was shown in the remaining analyzed outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: The presence of 2 surgeons in the odds ratiowas shown to reduce complications, operative room time, and LOS. More cost-effectiveness studies are needed in order to substantiate the financial advantages associated with the dual-surgeon approach.

The Efficacy of Bone Wax in Total Joint Arthroplasty: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Objectives: This meta-analysis was conducted to study the hemostatic efficacy of bone wax in total joint arthroplasty (TJA) defined in this manuscript as total knee arthroplasty and total hip arthroplasty. Methods: PubMed, Embase, Google Scholar (page 1-20), and Scopus were searched updated to November 2023. Only comparative studies were included. The clinical outcomes evaluated were the transfusion rate, total blood loss, and the loss of hemoglobin on day 1, 3, and 5 post-operatively. Results: Only 3 studies met the inclusion criteria and were included in this meta-analysis. Bone wax was associated with a reduced transfusion rate (p=0.01), reduced total blood loss (p=0.001), and a decrease in hemoglobin loss on day 1 (p<0.00001), day 3 (p<0.0001), and day 5 (p<0.00001) after the surgery. Conclusion: Bone wax reduced the rate of transfusion, total blood loss, and hemoglobin loss after the surgery. This may induce a reduction the cost of correcting post-operative anemia as well as decrease hospital stay and improving functional outcomes in patients undergoing TJA. Better-conducted randomized controlled studies and cost-effectivity studies could strengthen these findings.

Pulsed lavage in joint arthroplasty: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Knee and hip osteoarthritis affects millions of people around the world and is expected to rise even more in frequency as the population ages. Joint arthroplasty is the surgical management of choice in these articulations. Heterotopic ossification and radiolucent lines formation are two frequent problems faced in hip and knee replacements respectively. Some studies show that the usage of pulsed lavage may prevent their formation. AIM: To compare pulsed lavage to standard lavage in joint arthroplasty. METHODS: PubMed, Cochrane, and Google Scholar (page 1-20) were searched till December 2023. Only comparative studies were included. The clinical outcomes evaluated were the heterotopic ossification formation in hip replacements, radiolucent lines formation, and functional knee scores in knee replacements. RESULTS: Four studies met the inclusion criteria and were included in this meta-analysis. Pulsed lavage was shown to reduce the formation of radiolucent lines (P = 0.001). However, no difference was seen in the remaining outcomes. CONCLUSION: Pulsed lavage reduced the formation of radiolucent lines in knee replacements. No difference was seen in the remaining outcomes. Furthermore, the clinical significance of these radiolucent lines is poorly understood. Better conducted randomized controlled studies and cost-effectivity studies are needed to reinforce these findings.

Implant density in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: a meta-analysis of clinical and radiological outcomes.

BACKGROUND: Adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) affects 1-3% of adolescents, and treatment approaches, including the density of constructs in surgical fusion, vary among orthopedic surgeons. Studies have sought to establish whether high-density or low-density constructs offer superior clinical and radiological outcomes, yet conclusive results are lacking. This meta-analysis aims to provide a definitive answer to the controversial and ambiguous question surrounding the efficacy of different pedicle screw densities in treating AIS. METHODS: PubMed, Cochrane, and Google Scholar (page 1-20) were searched till December 2023. The studied outcomes were Major Cobb angle, major curve correction, lumbar curve, kyphosis (T5-T12), lumbar lordosis, coronal balance, LIV Tilt angle, TAV translation, LAV translation, apical trunk rotation, trunk shift, SRS-22, operative time, blood loss, complications and cost. RESULTS: Twenty-four studies (total of 1985 patients, 1045 in LD group and 940 in HD group) were included in this meta-analysis. A statistically significant better improvement in ATR (p = 0.02) and LIV tilt angle (p = 0.02) was seen in the high-density group. On the other hand, longer operative time (p = 0.002), blood loss (p = 0.0004) and costs (p = 0.02) were seen in the high-density group. No difference was seen in the remaining radiographic and clinical outcomes between both surgeries. CONCLUSION: Both low-density (LD) and high-density (HD) screw constructs show comparable and satisfactory radiographic and QOL for AIS patients. Furthermore, HD constructs had increased costs, operative time, and blood loss associated. However, a definitive conclusion cannot be made and more studies taking into account multiple additional variables are necessary to do so.

Hybrid vs all pedicle screws constructs in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: a metaanalysis of clinical and radiological outcomes.

BACKGROUND: Adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) affects around 1 to 3% of young individuals, leading to spinal deformities typically exceeding a Cobb angle of 10 degrees without congenital or neuromuscular causes. Advances in treatment now include various surgical techniques such as posterior fusion utilizing all-pedicle screw constructs or hybrid constructs. METHODS: PubMed, Cochrane, and Google Scholar (pages 1-20) were searched up until February 2024. Comparative studies in which the cohort was separated into two groups (HC and PSC) were included. Data consisting of, surgery-related outcomes, sagittal radiographic outcomes, coronal radiographic outcomes, and patient-reported outcomes, was extracted and compared. RESULTS: Twenty-eight studies including 3435 patients were included. Higher rates of complications (Odds-Ratio = 1.99, p < 0.00001) and reoperations (Odds-Ratio = 2.82, p < 0.00001) were seen in the hybrid group. Better radiographic coronal correction was seen in the PSC group in both the major curve (Mean Difference = 5.97, p < 0.00001) and the secondary curve (Mean Difference = - 10.73, p < 0.0001). However, restoration of sagittal alignment was better in the HC group when assessing thoracic kyphosis (Mean Difference = 2.97, p = 0.02) and lumbar lordosis (Mean Difference = 3.17, p = 0.005). CONCLUSION: While all-pedicle screw constructs demonstrated greater stability in AIS compared to hybrid constructs, resulting in reduced rates of reoperations and complications, as well as improved correction of major and secondary curves, they were unable to fully restore optimal sagittal alignment.

Intensive Care Unit Admission After Spine Surgery: A Narrative Review.

INTRODUCTION: Intensive care unit (ICU) admissions constitute a substantial financial challenge for health care systems and patients and are linked to various potentially life-altering complications. A wide range of patient-related, surgical, and medical factors are associated with an increased risk of ICU admission following spine surgery. DISCUSSION: The most notable examples include lung, heart, and kidney disease, as well as estimated blood loss and length of surgery. Various scores that include the most significant patient- and procedure-related factors have been described to assess the risk associated with surgery for individual patients. To date, the fusion risk score and the American Society of Anesthesiologists score have been the most useful in predicting postoperative complications and admission to the ICU. However, other risk factors have also been implicated in ICU admission and length of stay. The current scores must further adapt by using the available evidence to fulfill their intended purpose. Moreover, a handful of measures have shown efficacy in decreasing ICU admission and length of stay, with their benefits still to be demonstrated by future research. CONCLUSION: This review underscores the risk factors predictive of ICU admission following spine surgery and will help surgeons and clinicians in patient stratification. However, future studies are needed to validate the role of protective measures in preventing ICU admissions and the significance of certain risk factors.

Unilateral Versus Bilateral Cages in Lumbar Interbody Fusions: A Meta-Analysis of Clinical and Radiographic Outcomes.

BACKGROUND: Bilateral cages are often used for interbody fusion. However, this procedure may not be possible in some cases making unilateral cages a reasonable alternative. The literature remains divided on the clinical and radiological distinctions when comparing unilateral to bilateral cages in lumbar interbody fusion. Thus, this meta-analysis will analyze the clinical and radiographic outcomes between these 2 groups. METHODS: PubMed, Cochrane, and Google Scholar (page 1-20) were searched till January 2024. The clinical outcomes evaluated were the incidence of adverse events, surgery-related parameters, and patient reported outcomes. RESULTS: Lower rates of pseudoarthrosis, subsidence, were reported in the bilateral cages group (P = 0.01, P = 0.001, respectively) whereas shorter operative time (OR time), and lower estimated blood loss were seen in unilateral cage group (P < 0.001, and P = 0.003). There was no statistically significant difference in the remaining analyzed outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: Unilateral cages were shown to be superior due to their reduced OR time and estimated blood loss. As for the higher rate of pseudoarthrosis, this outcome may not be related to the cage numbers and it did not affect clinical outcomes. Nevertheless, one must consider other factors such as radiographic sagittal parameters before making a surgical decision.

Will ChatGPT be Able to Replace a Spine Surgeon in the Clinical Setting?

OBJECTIVE: This study evaluates ChatGPT's performance in diagnosing and managing spinal pathologies. METHODS: Patients underwent evaluation by two spine surgeons (and the case was discussed and a consensus was reached) and ChatGPT. Patient data, including demographics, symptoms, and available imaging reports, were collected using a standardized form. This information was then processed by ChatGPT for diagnosis and management recommendations. The study assessed ChatGPT's diagnostic and management accuracy through descriptive statistics, comparing its performance to that of experienced spine specialists. RESULTS: A total of 97 patients with various spinal pathologies participated in the study, with a gender distribution of 40 males and 57 females. ChatGPT achieved a 70% diagnostic accuracy rate and provided suitable management recommendations for 95% of patients. However, it struggled with certain pathologies, misdiagnosing 100% of vertebral trauma and facet joint syndrome, 40% of spondylolisthesis, stenosis, and scoliosis, and 22% of disc-related pathologies. Furthermore, ChatGPT's management recommendations were poor in 53% of cases, often failing to suggest the most appropriate treatment options and occasionally providing incomplete advice. CONCLUSIONS: While helpful in the medical field, ChatGPT falls short in providing reliable management recommendations, with a 30% misdiagnosis rate and 53% mismanagement rate in our study. Its limitations, including reliance on outdated data and the inability to interactively gather patient information, must be acknowledged. Surgeons should use ChatGPT cautiously as a supplementary tool rather than a substitute for their clinical expertise, as the complexities of healthcare demand human judgment and interaction.

Approaches in Anterior Column Support in Adult Spinal Deformity Surgery: A Meta-Analysis of Clinical and Radiologic Outcomes.

OBJECTIVE: This meta-analysis was conducted to compare anterior lumbar interbody fusion (ALIF) with transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) in terms of postoperative complications, improvement in radiographic parameters, and patient-reported outcomes. METHODS: PubMed, Cochrane, and Google Scholar (pages 1-20) databases were searched up to June 2023. The studied outcomes were the rate of rod failures, rod failures requiring revision surgery, all complications, all revision surgeries, the change in pelvic tilt, sacral slope, Cobb angle, lumbar lordosis (LL), sagittal vertical axis, the postoperative pelvic incidence-LL, and LL, and the improvement in back pain and Oswestry Disability Index (ODI). RESULTS: Six studies were included in this meta-analysis. ALIF showed higher postoperative lordosis (P = 0.003) and better improvement in ODI (P = 0.0001). No difference was seen in the remaining outcomes between ALIF and TLIF. CONCLUSIONS: Although ALIF had better improvement in ODI, the mean difference was 6.5 points, which is below the minimal clinically important difference, stripping this result of any clinical value. Furthermore, even though ALIF had better postoperative lordosis, the change in LL postoperatively was not different between ALIF and TLIF. With no difference in complications, sagittal and coronal alignment, and patient-reported outcomes, TLIF was shown in this study to be favored instead of ALIF in adult spinal deformity surgery to avoid all the double approach-related comorbidity.

Tyrosine kinase inhibitors in osteosarcoma: Adapting treatment strategiesa.

Osteosarcoma (OS) is an aggressive primary bone malignancy that metastasizes rapidly. The standard of care has changed little over the previous four decades, and survival rates have plateaued. In this context, tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) emerge as potential treatments. A literature search was conducted to collect data related to receptor tyrosine kinase genetic alterations and expression in OS specimens. Gene amplification and protein expression of these receptors were linked to prognosis and tumor behavior. Relevant TKIs were evaluated as monotherapies and as parts of combination therapies. Certain TKIs, such as apatinib, regorafenib, and cabozantinib, present a potential therapeutic avenue for OS patients, especially when combined with chemotherapy. Producing long-lasting responses and enhancing quality of life remain key goals in OS treatment. To this effect, optimizing the use of TKIs by identifying biomarkers predictive of response and assessing promising TKIs in larger-scale trials to validate the efficacy and safety outcomes relative to these drugs reported in phase II clinical trials. To this effect, it is necessary to identify biomarkers predictive of response to TKIs in larger-scale trials and to validate the efficacy and safety of these drugs reported in phase II clinical trials.

Management of Bennett's fracture: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Background: First described in 1882, Bennett's fracture is an intra-articular fracture of the first metacarpal associated with a dislocation of the carpometacarpal joint. Usually, open reduction internal fixation is used to manage such fractures. However, closed reduction has shown good outcomes recently. This meta-analysis compares closed reduction to open reduction internal fixation in the management of Bennett's fracture. Methods: PubMed, Cochrane, and Google Scholar (pages 1-20) were searched until August 2023. The clinical outcomes consisted of post-traumatic arthritis, grip and pinch strengths, range of motion, functional scores, and mean adduction deformity. Results: Six retrospective studies were included in this meta-analysis. Our results show higher grip and pinch strengths, better extension and flexion of the thumb, and lower mean adduction deformity in the open reduction internal fixation group. Conclusion: Higher grip and pinch strengths, better extension and flexion of the carpometacarpal joint, and a smaller mean adduction deformity of the thumb in the open reduction internal fixation group. No differences were seen in the remaining outcomes. However, a higher rate of complications is associated with open reduction internal fixation. Nevertheless, more randomized controlled studies are needed to confirm such results. Level of evidence: III.

Management of Displaced Metacarpal Shaft Fractures: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Background: Affecting mainly the working population, metacarpal shaft fractures account for up to 31% of hand fractures. To manage this entity, conservative management can be equal to operative management. However, surgeons tend to favor operative management in order to reduce the rate of complications, such as shortening and malunion. This meta-analysis was conducted to compare conservative to operative management of displaced metacarpal shaft fractures. Methods: PubMed, Cochrane, and Google Scholar (pages 1-20) were searched until August 2023. The clinical outcomes consisted of postoperative shortening, Disabilities of Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (DASH) score, and mean grip strength. Results: Only three studies were included in this meta-analysis. Operative management was shown to reduce postoperative shortening (p<0.00001). However, conservative management had a better postoperative DASH score (p=0.001). Conclusion: Better DASH scores were seen in the conservative group, but there was a higher postoperative shortening. However, studies have shown that the shortening has no effect on the functional outcome. Nevertheless, more randomized controlled studies and cost-effectiveness studies are needed to confirm these findings.

Epidemiology of bone tumors in Lebanon: a retrospective study from 2000 to 2022 at a tertiary center.

Aim: Bone tumors are rare and have an uneven geographic distribution. Methods: 730 patients diagnosed with bone tumors were included in this retrospective analysis. Results: With a 64% rate of malignancy, the most common tumors were metastasis (40%) mostly in the axial skeleton, Osteosarcoma (9%) mostly in the femur, Osteochondroma (8%) mostly in the femur, giant cell tumors (7%) mostly in the knee, and Ewing's sarcoma (6%) mostly in the axial skeleton. Conclusion: Even though a some of the tumors have a predilection for certain localizations in the human body, they may differ in the middle-eastern population. One must also pay attention to the higher rates of malignancies as compared with other cohorts.

With significant morbidity and mortality, bone tumors incidence is low and varies geographically. In our Lebanese population, Seven-hundred-thirty patients with bone tumors were identified with a 64% rate of malignancy with osteosarcoma being the most common primary bone cancer and metastasis being the overall most prevalent bone malignancy. This higher rate of malignancy compared with other populations should be taken into consideration when evaluating Lebanese or Middle eastern patients.

Exceptional Spinal Mobility Caused by Charcot Disease: Case Description with Several Years of Follow-Up.

A spinal cord injury is now the most common cause of Charcot Spinal Arthropathy (CSA). Paraplegia, loss of pain sensation, laminectomies, and spinal fusions involving more than 5 levels are all risk factors for developing this condition. Low back pain and spinal abnormalities are common symptoms. Circumferential arthrodesis is the chosen treatment. Implant failure and new-onset CSA, which necessitates re-instrumentation, are some of the risks associated with this treatment. This is the case of a patient with a post-traumatic spinal cord injury presenting with spinal Charcot disease with a very long follow-up. We report a unique complication with the replacement of the discal space and portions of the vertebral bodies by fibrotic tissue with an extraordinary spinal movement in the coronal and sagittal planes. Recurrent Charcot disease at the same level or at a caudal level is a devastating complication in spinal surgery. Since this disease naturally exposes the patient to iterative surgeries, it would be wise to limit the extent of the arthrodesis to an optimal number of levels sufficient to ensure perfect stability of the construct and not to be very extensive from the first surge. The risk would increase the fused levels which limit the availability of mobile buffer levels and increase the stress on the remaining levels. Regular follow-ups to the patient should be done to detect recurrence at the same site or distal to the instrumentation.

Transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion using banana-shaped and straight cages: meta-analysis of clinical and radiological outcomes.

PURPOSE: Transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) surgery rate increased over the last decade. There is no consensus about the better shape of cage to use in TLIF. This meta-analysis was conducted to compare the shape focusing on bony union, lordosis restoration as well as perioperative complications. METHODS: PubMed, Cochrane, and Google Scholar (page 1-20) were searched till September 2022. The clinical outcomes consisted of the bony union, segmental and lumbar lordosis restoration, quality of life, and operation-related outcomes. RESULTS: Only 5 studies were included in this meta-analysis. Straight-shaped cages tended to have a lower subsidence rate compared to banana-shaped cages (p = 0.10), had a better restoration of segmental lordosis (p < 0.0001), better disc height restoration (p = 0.01), as well as a higher Oswestry Disability Index decrease (p = 0.0002). CONCLUSION: Straight-shaped cages had a better restoration of lumbar lordosis, disc height, and a lower subsidence rate when compared to banana-shaped cages. This may be explained by the absence of the optimal placement of the curved cages, which is at the most anterior part of the disc space. Better conducted randomized controlled trial could strengthen these findings.