Acquired blood platelet disorder in patients with end-stage heart failure after implantation of a continuous centrifugal-flow left ventricular assist device: A prospective cohort study.

Background: Continuous-flow left ventricular assist devices (CF-LVADs) are an established therapy for advanced heart failure. Thrombosis and hemorrhage are common complications after CF-LVAD implantation, which may be explained by device-induced platelet activation. Few data on the effect of CF-LVAD implantation on platelets are available to date. Objectives: The aim of this study was to characterize the change in the platelet activation status after CF-LVAD. Methods: Platelet phenotype and reactivity were determined with flow cytometry in 32 adults with end-stage heart failure before and 4 to 6 weeks after CF-LVAD implantation. Sixteen adults with a biological aortic valve prosthesis (AVP) using the same antiplatelet regimen were included to discriminate between the effects of CF-LVAD and the antiplatelet regimen. Plasma markers for platelet activation were determined with enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. Results: Median (IQR) plasma levels of soluble P-selectin increased from 115.6 (79.1-142.7) ng/mL to 144.5 (100.4-197.5) ng/mL after CF-LVAD implantation (P < .001). Median (IQR) ß-thromboglobulin levels were 60.5 (37.8-81.5) ng/mL before implantation and remained high after LVAD implantation [60.0 (42.0-69.5) ng/mL]. The platelet P-selectin expression after stimulation with ADP (30 and 60 µM) or PAR1-activating peptide (12.5 and 25 µM) was reduced by 17% to 21%, and fibrinogen binding was reduced by 37% to 86%. Platelet responses to agonists were similar in patients with a CF-LVAD and patients with an AVP, except for fibrinogen binding in response to 12.5 µM PAR1-AP, which was lower in patients with a CF-LVAD (P < .001). Conclusions: Combined, these data provide evidence for systemic platelet activation and an acquired platelet disorder after CF-LVAD implantation. This might contribute to the risk of both hemorrhage and thrombosis associated with CF-LVADs.

Insights in the Prothrombotic Changes After Implantation of a Left Ventricular Assist Device in Patients With End-Stage Heart Failure: A Longitudinal Observational Study.

Thrombus formation is a common complication during left ventricular assist device (LVAD) therapy, despite anticoagulation with vitamin K antagonists (VKA) and a platelet inhibitor. Plasma levels of markers for primary and secondary hemostasis and contact activation were determined before LVAD implantation and 6 and 12 months thereafter in 37 adults with end-stage heart failure. Twelve patients received a HeartMate 3, 7 patients received a HeartWare, and 18 patients received a HeartMate II. At baseline, patients had elevated plasma levels of the platelet protein upon activation, ß-thromboglobulin, and active von Willebrand factor in thrombogenic state (VWFa), which remained high after LVAD implantation. Von Willebrand factor levels and VWF activity were elevated at baseline but normalized 12 months after LVAD implantation. High D -dimer plasma levels, at baseline, remained elevated after 12 months. This was associated with an increase in plasma thrombin-antithrombin-complex levels and plasma levels of contact activation marker-cleaved H-kininogen after LVAD implantation. Considering these results it could be concluded that LVAD patients show significant coagulation activation despite antithrombotic therapy, which could explain why patients are at high risk for LVAD-induced thrombosis. Continuous low-grade systemic platelet activation and contact activation may contribute to prothrombotic effects of LVAD.

Thrombotic Events in COVID-19 Are Associated With a Lower Use of Prophylactic Anticoagulation Before Hospitalization and Followed by Decreases in Platelet Reactivity.

Background: Coronavirus disease of 2019 (COVID-19) is associated with a prothrombotic state and a high incidence of thrombotic event(s) (TE). Objectives: To study platelet reactivity in hospitalized COVID-19 patients and determine a possible association with the clinical outcomes thrombosis and all-cause mortality. Methods: Seventy nine hospitalized COVID-19 patients were enrolled in this retrospective cohort study and provided blood samples in which platelet reactivity in response to stimulation with ADP and TRAP-6 was determined using flow cytometry. Clinical outcomes included thrombotic events, and all-cause mortality. Results: The incidence of TE in this study was 28% and all-cause mortality 16%. Patients that developed a TE were younger than patients that did not develop a TE [median age of 55 vs. 70 years; adjusted odds ratio (AOR) = 0.96 per 1 year of age, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.92-1.00; p = 0.041]. Furthermore, patients using preexisting thromboprophylaxis were less likely to develop a thrombotic complication than patients that were not (18 vs. 54%; AOR = 0.19, 95% CI 0.04-0.84; p = 0.029). Conversely, having asthma strongly increased the risk on TE development (AOR = 6.2, 95% CI 1.15-33.7; p = 0.034). No significant differences in baseline P-selectin expression or platelet reactivity were observed between the COVID-19 positive patients (n = 79) and COVID-19 negative hospitalized control patients (n = 21), nor between COVID-19 positive survivors or non-survivors. However, patients showed decreased platelet reactivity in response to TRAP-6 following TE development. Conclusion: We observed an association between the use of preexisting thromboprophylaxis and a decreased risk of TE during COVID-19. This suggests that these therapies are beneficial for coping with COVID-19 associated hypercoagulability. This highlights the importance of patient therapy adherence. We observed lowered platelet reactivity after the development of TE, which might be attributed to platelet desensitization during thromboinflammation.

Anti-ß2-glycoprotein I and anti-prothrombin antibodies cause lupus anticoagulant through different mechanisms of action.

BACKGROUND: The presence of lupus anticoagulant (LA) is an independent risk factor for thrombosis. This laboratory phenomenon is detected as a phospholipid-dependent prolongation of the clotting time and is caused by autoantibodies against beta2-glycoprotein I (ß2GPI) or prothrombin. How these autoantibodies cause LA is unclear. OBJECTIVE: To elucidate how anti-ß2GPI and anti-prothrombin antibodies cause the LA phenomenon. METHODS: The effects of monoclonal anti-ß2GPI and anti-prothrombin antibodies on coagulation were analyzed in plasma and with purified coagulation factors. RESULTS: Detection of LA caused by anti-ß2GPI or anti-prothrombin antibodies required the presence of the procofactor factor V (FV) in plasma. LA effect disappeared when FV was replaced by activated FV (FVa), both in a model system and in patient plasma, although differences between anti-ß2GPI and anti-prothrombin antibodies were observed. Further exploration of the effects of the antibodies on coagulation showed that the anti-ß2GPI antibody attenuated FV activation by activated faxtor X (FXa), whereas the anti-prothrombin antibody did not. Binding studies showed that ß2GPI--antibody complexes directly interacted with FV with high affinity. Anti-prothrombin complexes caused the LA phenomenon through competition for phospholipid binding sites with coagulation factors as reduced FXa binding to lipospheres was observed with flow cytometry in the presence of these antibodies. CONCLUSION: Anti-ß2GPI and anti-prothrombin antibodies cause LA through different mechanisms of action: While anti-ß2GPI antibodies interfere with FV activation by FXa through a direct interaction with FV, anti-prothrombin antibodies compete with FXa for phospholipid binding sites. These data provide leads for understanding the paradoxical association between thrombosis and a prolonged clotting time in the antiphospholipid syndrome.

Platelet function is disturbed by the angiogenesis inhibitors sunitinib and sorafenib, but unaffected by bevacizumab.

INTRODUCTION: At the clinical introduction of antiangiogenic agents as anticancer agents, no major toxicities were expected as merely just endothelial cells (ECs) in tumors would be affected. However, several (serious) toxicities became apparent, of which underlying mechanisms are largely unknown. We investigated to what extent sunitinib (multitargeted antiangiogenic tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI)), sorafenib (TKI) and bevacizumab [specific antibody against vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF)] may impair platelet function, which might explain treatment-related bleedings. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In vitro, the influence of sunitinib, sorafenib, and bevacizumab on platelet aggregation, P-selectin expression and fibrinogen binding, platelet-EC interaction, and tyrosine phosphorylation of c-Src was studied by optical aggregation, flow cytometry, real-time perfusion, and western blotting. Ex vivo, platelet aggregation was analyzed in 25 patients upon sunitinib or bevacizumab treatment. Concentrations of sunitinib, VEGF, and platelet and EC activation markers were measured by LC-MS/MS and ELISA. RESULTS: In vitro, sunitinib and sorafenib significantly inhibited platelet aggregation (20 µM sunitinib: 71.3%, p < 0.001; 25 µM sorafenib: 55.8%, p = 0.042). Sorafenib and sunitinib significantly inhibited P-selectin expression on platelets. Exposure to both TKIs resulted in a reduced tyrosine phosphorylation of c-Src. Ex vivo, within 24 h sunitinib impaired platelet aggregation (83.0%, p = 0.001, N = 8). Plasma concentrations of sunitinib, VEGF, and platelet/EC activation markers were not correlated with disturbed aggregation. In contrast, bevacizumab only significantly impaired platelet aggregation in vitro at high concentrations, but not ex vivo. CONCLUSION: Sunitinib significantly inhibits platelet aggregation in patients already after 24 h of first administration, whereas bevacizumab had no effect on aggregation. These findings may explain the clinically observed bleedings during treatment with antiangiogenic TKIs.