Conceptualizing lifer versus destination patients for optimized care delivery.

BACKGROUND: Patients presenting to academic medical centers (AMC) typically receive primary care, specialty care, or both. Resources needed for each type of care vary, requiring different levels of care coordination. We propose a novel method to determine whether a patient primarily receives primary or specialty care to allow for optimization of care coordination. OBJECTIVES: We aimed to define the concepts of a Lifer Patient and Destination Patient and analyze the current state of care utilization in those groups to inform opportunities for improving care coordination. METHODS: Using AMC data for a 36-month study period (FY17-19), we evaluated the number of unique patients by residence zip code. Patients with at least one primary care visit and patients without a primary care visit were classified as Lifer and Destination patients, respectively. Cohen's effect sizes were used to evaluate differences in mean utilization of different care delivery settings. RESULTS: The AMC saw 35,909 Lifer patients and 744,037 Destination patients during the study period. Most patients were white, non-Hispanic females; however, the average age of a Lifer was seventy-two years whereas that of a Destination patient was thirty-eight. On average, a Lifer had three times more ambulatory care visits than a Destination patient. The proportion of Inpatient encounters is similar between the groups. Mean Inpatient length of stay (LOS) is similar between the groups, but Destination patients have more variance in LOS. The rate of admission from the emergency department (ED) for Destination patients is nearly double Lifers'. CONCLUSION: There were differences in ED, ambulatory care, and inpatient utilization between the Lifer and Destination patients. Furthermore, there were incongruities between rate of hospital admissions and LOS between two groups. The Lifer and Destination patient definitions allow for identification of opportunities to tailor care coordination to these unique groups and to allocate resources more efficiently.

Evaluating the pediatric mental health care continuum at an American health system.

Objective: To describe trends in the pediatric mental health care continuum and identify potential gaps in care coordination. Methods: We used electronic medical record data from October 2016 to September 2019 to characterize the prevalence of mental health issues in the pediatric population at a large American health system. This was a single institution case study. From the electronic medical record data, primary mental health discharge and readmission diagnoses were identified using International Classification of Diseases (ICD-9-CM, ICD-10-CM) codes. The electronic medical record was queried for mental health-specific diagnoses as defined by International Classification of Diseases classification, analysis of which was facilitated by the fact that only 176 mental health codes were billed for. Additionally, prevalence of care navigation encounters was assessed through electronic medical record query, as care navigation encounters are specifically coded. These encounter data was then segmented by care delivery setting. Results: Major depressive disorder and other mood disorders comprised 49.6% and 89.4% of diagnoses in the emergency department and inpatient settings respectively compared to 9.0% of ambulatory care diagnoses and were among top reasons for readmission. Additionally, only 1% of all ambulatory care encounters had a care navigation component, whereas 86% of care navigation encounters were for mental health-associated reasons. Conclusions: Major depressive disorder and other mood disorders were more common diagnoses in the emergency department and inpatient settings, which could signal gaps in care coordination. Bridging potential gaps in care coordination could reduce emergency department and inpatient utilization through increasing ambulatory care navigation resources, improving training, and restructuring financial incentives to facilitate ambulatory care diagnosis and management of major depressive disorder and mood disorders. Furthermore, health systems can use our descriptive analytic approach to serve as a reasonable measure of the current state of pediatric mental health care in their own patient population.

Risk of type 2 diabetes mellitus among adults aging with vision impairment: The role of the neighborhood environment.

BACKGROUND: Vision impairment (VI) affects approximately 1 in 28 Americans over the age of 40 and the prevalence increases sharply with age. However, experiencing vision loss with aging can be very different from aging with VI acquired earlier in life. People aging with VI may be at increased risk for diabetes due to environmental barriers in accessing health care, healthy food, and recreational resources that can facilitate positive health behaviors. OBJECTIVE: This study examined the relationship between neighborhood characteristics and incident type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) among a cohort of 22,719 adults aging with VI. METHODS: Data are from Optum® Clinformatics® DataMart, a private administrative claims database (2008-2017). Individuals 18 years of age and older at the time of their initial VI diagnosis were eligible for analysis. VI was determined using vision impairment, low vision, and blindness codes (ICD-9-CM, ICD-10-CM). Covariates included age, sex, and comorbidities. Cox models estimated adjusted hazard ratios (HRs) for incident T2DM. Stratified models examined differences in those aging with (age 18-64) and aging into (age 65+) vision impairment. RESULTS: Residence in neighborhoods with greater intersection density (HR = 1.26) and high-speed roads (HR = 1.22) were associated with increased risk of T2DM among older adults with VI. Living in neighborhoods with broadband internet access (HR = 0.67), optical stores (HR = 0.62), supermarkets (HR = 0.78), and gyms/fitness centers (HR = 0.63) was associated with reduced risk of T2DM for both younger and older adults with VI. CONCLUSIONS: Findings emphasize the importance of neighborhood context for mitigating the adverse consequences of vision loss for health.

Increased Intraoperative Faculty Entrustment and Resident Entrustability Does Not Compromise Patient Outcomes After General Surgery Procedures.

BACKGROUND: Intraoperative resident autonomy has been compromised secondary to expectations for increased supervision without defined parameters for safe progressive independence, diffusion of training experience, and more to learn with less time. Surgical residents who are insufficiently entrusted during training attain less autonomy, confidence, and even clinical competency, potentially affecting future patient outcomes. OBJECTIVE: To determine if OpTrust, an educational intervention for increasing intraoperative faculty entrustment and resident entrustability, negatively impacts patient outcomes after general surgery procedures. METHODS: Surgical faculty and residents received OpTrust training and instruction to promote intraoperative faculty entrustment and resident entrustability. A post-intervention OpTrust cohort was compared to historical and pre-intervention OpTrust cohorts. Multivariable logistic and negative binomial regression was used to evaluate the impact of the OpTrust intervention and time on patient outcomes. SETTING: Single tertiary academic center. PARTICIPANTS: General surgery faculty and residents. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Thirty-day postoperative outcomes, including mortality, any complication, reoperation, readmission, and length of stay. RESULTS: A total of 8890 surgical procedures were included. After risk adjustment, overall patient outcomes were similar. Multivariable regression estimating the effect of the OpTrust intervention and time revealed similar patient outcomes with no increased risk (P > 0.05) of mortality {odds ratio (OR), 2.23 [95% confidence interval (CI), 0.87-5.6]}, any complication [OR, 0.98 (95% CI, 0.76-1.3)], reoperation [OR, 0.65 (95% CI, 0.42-1.0)], readmission [OR, 0.82 (95% CI, 0.57-1.2)], and length of stay [OR, 0.99 (95% CI, 0.86-1.1)] compared to the historic and pre-intervention OpTrust cohorts. CONCLUSIONS: OpTrust, an educational intervention to increase faculty entrustment and resident entrustability, does not compromise postoperative patient outcomes. Integrating faculty and resident development to further enhance entrustment and entrustability through OpTrust may help facilitate increased resident autonomy within the safety net of surgical training without negatively impacting clinical outcomes.

Longitudinal Associations Between Vision Impairment and the Incidence of Neuropsychiatric, Musculoskeletal, and Cardiometabolic Chronic Diseases.

PURPOSE: To compare the incidence and hazard of neuropsychiatric, musculoskeletal, and cardiometabolic conditions among adults with and without vision impairment (VI). DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. METHODS: The sample comprised enrollees in a large private health insurance provider in the United States, including 24 657 adults aged ≥18 years with VI and age- and sex-matched controls. The exposure variable, VI, was based on low vision and blindness International Classification of Diseases, Ninth and Tenth Revision, Clinical Modification (ICD-9-CM and ICD-10-CM), diagnosis codes. Physician-diagnosed incident neuropsychiatric, musculoskeletal, and cardiometabolic diseases were identified using ICD codes. Separate Cox proportional hazards regression models were used to assess the association of VI with incidence of 30 chronic conditions, adjusting for Elixhauser Comorbidity Index. Analyses were stratified by age 18-64 years and ≥65 years. RESULTS: In individuals with VI aged 18-64 years (n=7478), the adjusted hazard of neuropsychiatric (HR 2.1, 95% CI 1.9, 2.4), musculoskeletal (HR 1.8, 95% CI 1.7, 2.0), and cardiometabolic (HR 1.8, 95% CI 1.7, 2.0) diseases was significantly greater than in matched controls (mean 5.5 years follow-up). Similar associations were seen between patients with VI aged ≥65 years (n=17 179) for neuropsychiatric (HR 2.4, 95% CI 2.1, 2.7), musculoskeletal (HR 1.8, 95% CI 1.6, 1.9), and cardiometabolic (HR 1.7, 95% CI 1.4, 2.0) diseases. VI was associated with a higher hazard of each of the 30 conditions we assessed, with similar results in both age cohorts. CONCLUSION: Across the life span, adults with VI had an approximately 2-fold greater adjusted hazard for common neuropsychiatric, musculoskeletal, and cardiometabolic disorders compared with matched controls without VI.

Adverse outcomes associated with inappropriate direct oral anticoagulant starter pack prescription among patients with atrial fibrillation: a retrospective claims-based study.

Direct oral anticoagulant (DOAC) starter packs are designed for unique treatment dosing for acute venous thromboembolism (VTE). Inappropriate use of 30-day DOAC starter packs in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) may increase the risk for bleeding events given higher dosing in the first 1-3 weeks of treatment. A retrospective analysis of medical and outpatient pharmacy claims data from 2015 to 2018 in Optum's De-identified Clinformatics® Data Mart was performed. Patients greater than 18 years of age with AF and a new prescription of apixaban or rivaroxaban were included. Patients with an acute VTE were excluded. The main outcome of interest was adverse events (emergency department [ED] visits, hospitalizations, and deaths within 90 days after prescription fill date) associated with inappropriate DOAC starter pack prescription. A total of 90,950 DOAC-treated patients with AF were identified. The mean age was 74.5 years (SD 10.0) and 42,717 (47.0%) were female. Inappropriate starter packs were used by 117 (0.1%) patients, who were younger than non-starter pack patients (71.3 years vs. 74.5 years). Patients who received an inappropriate DOAC prescription were more likely to identify as Black (12.0% vs. 8.8%). Rates of ED visits, hospitalizations, and deaths overall were numerically lower in patients with starter pack compared to non-starter pack DOAC prescriptions. In contrast, rates of ED visits and hospitalizations related to significant bleeding were numerically higher in patients with starter pack compared to non-starter pack DOAC prescriptions. Among patients with AF but no VTE, those who received an inappropriate DOAC starter pack had numerically higher rates of severe bleeding leading to ED visits and hospitalizations compared to those prescribed an appropriate non-starter pack DOAC anticoagulant.

Impact of a National Private Health Insurer's Prior Authorization Policy on Utilization of Vaginal Hysterectomy.

OBJECTIVES: On April 6, 2015, the largest private health insurer in the United States implemented a policy requiring prior authorization for all hysterectomies except those done as outpatient vaginal. The purpose of this policy was to increase utilization of vaginal hysterectomy; however, it is unknown whether this policy had its intended effect. We sought to analyze trends in hysterectomy routes before and after implementation of the prior authorization policy to see if utilization of vaginal hysterectomy increased. METHODS: This was a retrospective study using the Optum Clinformatics Data Mart national claims database of women enrolled in a single national private health insurer who underwent hysterectomy for any indication between January 1, 2010, and June 30, 2016. Per-quarter utilization of hysterectomy routes (abdominal, laparoscopic, vaginal, and laparoscopic-assisted vaginal) was compared between the prepolicy and postpolicy periods using interrupted time series analyses. RESULTS: Data for 305,139 hysterectomies were available-248,821 in the prepolicy period and 56,318 in the postperiod. Outpatient vaginal hysterectomy had the greatest increase in utilization of all routes and types; the average utilization per quarter in the prepolicy period was -0.61%, and this increased to 0.21% in the postpolicy period (P < 0.0001). Outpatient laparoscopic hysterectomy had the greatest decrease in utilization, with an average decrease of -1.50% per quarter. CONCLUSIONS: The prior authorization policy was associated with a short-term increase in utilization of vaginal hysterectomy.

Inappropriate Prescription of Direct Oral Anticoagulant Starter Packs.

BACKGROUND: The 30-day direct oral anticoagulant starter pack has simplified the treatment of acute venous thromboembolisms, but it is not appropriate for use in patients with other indications for anticoagulation. METHODS: A retrospective analysis of national outpatient pharmacy claims data between January 1, 2015 and December 31, 2018, was performed. Adult patients (ages >18 years) with continuous insurance enrollment at least 12 months prior to and 1 month following a direct oral anticoagulant starter pack prescription during the study period were included. The primary study outcome was the rate of inappropriate prescription of direct oral anticoagulant starter packs, defined as a prescription without a venous thromboembolism diagnosis within the prior 45 days or a prescription with a prior starter pack fill within the past 45 days. RESULTS: A total of 3711 direct oral anticoagulant starter pack prescription fills were identified, representing 3634 unique patients. The mean patient age was 62.8 years (standard deviation [SD] 15.1) and 1871 (50.4%) were females. There were 770 (20.7%) direct oral anticoagulant starter pack fills identified as potentially inappropriate. Patients prescribed inappropriate fills were likely to be older than patients with appropriate fills (64.7 years vs 62.4 years, P < 0.001). There was no significant difference in the race or geographic location between patients with inappropriate and appropriate prescriptions. CONCLUSIONS: A significant proportion of patients using direct oral anticoagulant starter packs did not have a diagnosis of acute venous thromboembolism, raising concerns about inappropriate prescribing and potential bleeding complications. Future studies are needed to identify factors associated with inappropriate direct oral anticoagulant starter pack prescription and evaluate efforts to reduce this practice.

Nation-Wide Use of Periprocedural Bridging Anticoagulation in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation.

The randomized, controlled BRIDGE trial established a lack of efficacy for use of bridging anticoagulation in warfarin-treated patients who underwent surgical procedures. A large nation-wide insurance claims database was used to perform a retrospective interrupted time series cohort study of adult patients with atrial fibrillation treated with warfarin who underwent surgical procedures. Patients were assessed for the use of low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) use as a periprocedural bridging anticoagulant between July 2015 and November 2017. The interrupted time series regression model was used to estimate the reduction in use of bridging LMWH following the publication of the BRIDGE trial in July 2015. The cohort consisted of 9,278 warfarin-treated patients with atrial fibrillation. Use of bridging LMWH declined by an estimated 6.7% (95% confidence interval [CI] 2.1% to 11.3%) to 13.0% following publication of the BRIDGE trial. The decline in bridging LMWH use was numerically larger for patients with a moderate- or high risk of stroke (8.9% decline, 95% CI 0.4% to 17.4%) than for patients at low risk for stroke (6.2% decline, 95% CI 0.7% to 11.5%). Significant predictors of bridging LMWH use include younger age and no co-morbid diabetes. In conclusion, this nation-wide, claims-based study identified a significant reduction in the use of bridging LMWH following the publication of the BRIDGE trial for warfarin-treated patients with AF.

Assessing Maternal and Fetal Risks Associated with Prolonged Induction of Labor.

OBJECTIVE: To assess whether prolonged induction of labor was associated with increased maternal or neonatal morbidity. STUDY DESIGN: We performed a retrospective cohort study of women undergoing induction of labor at a single institution. We included women with singletons ≥ 36 weeks with initial cervical dilation ≤4 cm. Prolonged induction of labor was defined as lasting > 36 hours from the time of initial method to delivery. A 2-to-1 propensity score-matched analysis was performed between women with and those without prolonged induction of labor. Maternal outcomes were cesarean delivery, chorioamnionitis, endometritis, postpartum hemorrhage, severe perineal laceration, and length of postpartum admission. Neonatal outcomes included Apgar scores, umbilical artery pH, and neonatal intensive care admission. RESULTS: Among 2,021 women, 407 (20.1%) had a prolonged induction. In unadjusted analyses, prolonged induction of labor was associated with increased cesarean delivery and chorioamnionitis. After 2-to-1 propensity score matching, there were 267 women with prolonged induction and 424 controls. Women with prolonged induction of labor had higher rates of cesarean delivery (35.6 vs. 16%, p < 0.001), chorioamnionitis (14.2 vs. 4.7%, p < 0.001), endometritis (6.4 vs. 1.9%, p = 0.002), and postpartum hemorrhage (18.8 vs. 11.9%, p = 0.008). There were no significant differences in neonatal outcomes. CONCLUSION: Overall length of induction impacts maternal outcome.

Definition development and prevalence of new persistent opioid use following hysterectomy.

BACKGROUND: Opioids used for postoperative pain control after surgery have been associated with an increased risk of chronic opioid use. Hysterectomy is the most common major gynecological procedure in the United States; however, we lack a data-driven definition of new persistent opioid use specific to hysterectomy. OBJECTIVE: The objectives of the study were as follows: (1) determine a data-driven definition of new persistent opioid use among opioid naïve women undergoing hysterectomy and (2) determine the prevalence of and risk factors for new persistent opioid use. STUDY DESIGN: We used data from Optum Clinformatics that include both medical and pharmacy data from a single national private health insurer. Hysterectomies performed from Jan. 1, 2011, to Dec. 31, 2014, were identified using current procedural terminology and International Classification of Diseases, ninth revision, codes. Inclusion criteria included the following: age ≤63 years at hysterectomy, no opioid fills for 8 months preceding (excluding the 30 days immediately prior), and no additional surgical procedures within 6 months after hysterectomy. The perioperative period was defined as 30 days prior to 14 days after hysterectomy. Number of opioid prescription fills, days supplied, and total oral morphine equivalents were analyzed to determine the distribution of opioid use in the perioperative and postoperative periods. We obtained demographics including age, race, educational level, and division of the country according to the US Census Bureau and used International Classification of Diseases, ninth revision, diagnosis codes to identify hysterectomy indications, surgical route, chronic pain disorders, depression/anxiety, and substance abuse. Bivariate analyses were used to compare persistent with nonpersistent opioid users. A hierarchical logistic regression model controlling for regional variation was used to determine factors associated with new persistent opioid use following hysterectomy. RESULTS: A total of 24,331 women were included in the analysis. New persistent opioid use was defined as follows: ≥2 opioid fills within 6 months of hysterectomy with ≥1 fill every 3 months and either total oral morphine equivalent ≥1150 or days supplied ≥39. Based on this definition, the prevalence of new persistent opioid use was 0.5% (n = 122). Median perioperative oral morphine equivalents prescribed to those who became new persistent users was 437.5 mg (interquartile range, 200-750) compared with 225 mg (interquartile range, 150-300) for nonpersistent users (P < .0001). Factors independently associated with new persistent opioid use included the following: increasing age (adjusted odds ratio, 1.04, 95% confidence interval, 1.01-1.06, P = .006), African-American race (reference: white, adjusted odds ratio, 1.61 95% confidence interval, 1.02-2.55, P = .04), gynecological malignancy (adjusted odds ratio, 7.61, 95% confidence interval, 3.35-17.27, P < .0001), abdominal route (adjusted odds ratio, 3.61, 95% confidence interval, 2.03-6.43, P < .0001), depression/anxiety (adjusted odds ratio, 2.62, 95% confidence interval, 1.71-4.02, P < .0001), and preoperative opioid fill (adjusted odds ratio, 2.76, 95% confidence interval, 1.87-4.07, P < .0001). The C-statistic for this model is 0.74. CONCLUSION: Based on our definition, the prevalence of new persistent opioid use among opioid-naïve women undergoing hysterectomy is low; however, 2 potentially modifiable risk factors are preoperative opioid prescription and abdominal route of surgery.